TSTP Solution File: GRP001+6 by SPASS---3.9

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : GRP001+6 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 11:44:40 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 2.68s 2.93s
% Output   : Refutation 2.68s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   26 (  14 unt;   0 nHn;  26 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   47 (   0 equ;  22 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   12 (  12 usr;  10 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    0 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(1,axiom,
    product(skc5,skc6,skc7),
    file('GRP001+6.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(2,axiom,
    product(u,skc4,u),
    file('GRP001+6.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(3,axiom,
    product(skc4,u,u),
    file('GRP001+6.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(4,axiom,
    product(u,u,skc4),
    file('GRP001+6.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(5,axiom,
    product(u,inverse(u),skc4),
    file('GRP001+6.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(6,axiom,
    product(inverse(u),u,skc4),
    file('GRP001+6.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(7,axiom,
    ~ product(skc6,skc5,skc7),
    file('GRP001+6.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(8,axiom,
    product(u,v,skf1(v,u)),
    file('GRP001+6.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(9,axiom,
    ( ~ product(u,v,w)
    | ~ product(x,w,y)
    | ~ product(x,u,z)
    | product(z,v,y) ),
    file('GRP001+6.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(10,axiom,
    ( ~ product(u,v,w)
    | ~ product(x,v,y)
    | ~ product(z,x,u)
    | product(z,y,w) ),
    file('GRP001+6.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(12,plain,
    ( ~ product(u,v,w)
    | ~ product(x,u,skc4)
    | product(x,w,v) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[3,10]),
    [iquote('0:Res:3.0,10.0')] ).

cnf(18,plain,
    ( ~ product(u,skc7,v)
    | ~ product(u,skc5,w)
    | product(w,skc6,v) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[1,9]),
    [iquote('0:Res:1.0,9.0')] ).

cnf(21,plain,
    ( ~ product(u,skc4,v)
    | ~ product(u,w,x)
    | product(x,w,v) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[4,9]),
    [iquote('0:Res:4.0,9.0')] ).

cnf(22,plain,
    ( ~ product(u,skc4,v)
    | ~ product(u,inverse(w),x)
    | product(x,w,v) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[6,9]),
    [iquote('0:Res:6.0,9.0')] ).

cnf(24,plain,
    ( ~ product(u,skf1(v,w),x)
    | ~ product(u,w,y)
    | product(y,v,x) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[8,9]),
    [iquote('0:Res:8.0,9.0')] ).

cnf(35,plain,
    ( ~ product(skc7,skc5,u)
    | product(u,skc6,skc4) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[4,18]),
    [iquote('0:Res:4.0,18.0')] ).

cnf(43,plain,
    product(skf1(skc5,skc7),skc6,skc4),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[8,35]),
    [iquote('0:Res:8.0,35.0')] ).

cnf(52,plain,
    ( ~ product(u,v,skc4)
    | product(u,skc4,v) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[4,12]),
    [iquote('0:Res:4.0,12.0')] ).

cnf(118,plain,
    product(skf1(skc5,skc7),skc4,skc6),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[43,52]),
    [iquote('0:Res:43.0,52.0')] ).

cnf(197,plain,
    ( ~ product(u,v,w)
    | product(w,v,u) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[2,21]),
    [iquote('0:Res:2.0,21.0')] ).

cnf(294,plain,
    ( ~ product(u,skc4,v)
    | product(skc4,u,v) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[5,22]),
    [iquote('0:Res:5.0,22.1')] ).

cnf(672,plain,
    product(skc4,skf1(skc5,skc7),skc6),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[118,294]),
    [iquote('0:Res:118.0,294.0')] ).

cnf(730,plain,
    ( ~ product(skc4,skc7,u)
    | product(u,skc5,skc6) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[672,24]),
    [iquote('0:Res:672.0,24.0')] ).

cnf(5759,plain,
    product(skc7,skc5,skc6),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[3,730]),
    [iquote('0:Res:3.0,730.0')] ).

cnf(5788,plain,
    product(skc6,skc5,skc7),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[5759,197]),
    [iquote('0:Res:5759.0,197.0')] ).

cnf(5797,plain,
    $false,
    inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[5788,7]),
    [iquote('0:MRR:5788.0,7.0')] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : GRP001+6 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.12/0.13  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Mon Jun 13 14:45:33 EDT 2022
% 0.19/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 2.68/2.93  
% 2.68/2.93  SPASS V 3.9 
% 2.68/2.93  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 2.68/2.93  % SZS status Theorem
% 2.68/2.93  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 2.68/2.93  SPASS derived 5786 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 3694 clauses.
% 2.68/2.93  SPASS allocated 88558 KBytes.
% 2.68/2.93  SPASS spent	0:00:02.55 on the problem.
% 2.68/2.93  		0:00:00.03 for the input.
% 2.68/2.93  		0:00:00.03 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 2.68/2.93  		0:00:00.04 for inferences.
% 2.68/2.93  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 2.68/2.93  		0:00:02.41 for the reduction.
% 2.68/2.93  
% 2.68/2.93  
% 2.68/2.93  Here is a proof with depth 8, length 26 :
% 2.68/2.93  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 2.68/2.93  Formulae used in the proof : commutativity
% 2.68/2.93  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------