TSTP Solution File: GRA010+1 by SPASS---3.9

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : GRA010+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 07:22:09 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.19s 0.49s
% Output   : Refutation 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   17 (   7 unt;   6 nHn;  17 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   34 (   0 equ;  14 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   5 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   13 (  13 usr;   9 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    0 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(2,axiom,
    path(skc4,skc5,skc3),
    file('GRA010+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(15,axiom,
    ~ equal(number_of_in(triangles,skc3),number_of_in(sequential_pairs,skc3)),
    file('GRA010+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(43,axiom,
    ( ~ path(u,v,w)
    | on_path(skf13(w),w)
    | equal(number_of_in(triangles,w),number_of_in(sequential_pairs,w)) ),
    file('GRA010+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(44,axiom,
    ( ~ path(u,v,w)
    | on_path(skf11(w),w)
    | equal(number_of_in(triangles,w),number_of_in(sequential_pairs,w)) ),
    file('GRA010+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(45,axiom,
    ( ~ path(u,v,w)
    | sequential(skf13(w),skf11(w))
    | equal(number_of_in(triangles,w),number_of_in(sequential_pairs,w)) ),
    file('GRA010+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(47,axiom,
    ( ~ sequential(u,v)
    | ~ on_path(v,skc3)
    | ~ on_path(u,skc3)
    | triangle(u,v,skf9(v,u)) ),
    file('GRA010+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(50,axiom,
    ( ~ path(u,v,w)
    | ~ triangle(skf13(w),skf11(w),x)
    | equal(number_of_in(triangles,w),number_of_in(sequential_pairs,w)) ),
    file('GRA010+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(79,plain,
    ( sequential(skf13(skc3),skf11(skc3))
    | equal(number_of_in(triangles,skc3),number_of_in(sequential_pairs,skc3)) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[2,45]),
    [iquote('0:Res:2.0,45.0')] ).

cnf(80,plain,
    ( on_path(skf13(skc3),skc3)
    | equal(number_of_in(triangles,skc3),number_of_in(sequential_pairs,skc3)) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[2,43]),
    [iquote('0:Res:2.0,43.0')] ).

cnf(81,plain,
    ( on_path(skf11(skc3),skc3)
    | equal(number_of_in(triangles,skc3),number_of_in(sequential_pairs,skc3)) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[2,44]),
    [iquote('0:Res:2.0,44.0')] ).

cnf(98,plain,
    ( ~ triangle(skf13(skc3),skf11(skc3),u)
    | equal(number_of_in(triangles,skc3),number_of_in(sequential_pairs,skc3)) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[2,50]),
    [iquote('0:Res:2.0,50.1')] ).

cnf(120,plain,
    on_path(skf13(skc3),skc3),
    inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[80,15]),
    [iquote('0:MRR:80.1,15.0')] ).

cnf(121,plain,
    on_path(skf11(skc3),skc3),
    inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[81,15]),
    [iquote('0:MRR:81.1,15.0')] ).

cnf(122,plain,
    sequential(skf13(skc3),skf11(skc3)),
    inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[79,15]),
    [iquote('0:MRR:79.1,15.0')] ).

cnf(123,plain,
    ~ triangle(skf13(skc3),skf11(skc3),u),
    inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[98,15]),
    [iquote('0:MRR:98.1,15.0')] ).

cnf(133,plain,
    ( ~ on_path(skf13(skc3),skc3)
    | ~ sequential(skf13(skc3),skf11(skc3))
    | ~ on_path(skf11(skc3),skc3) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[47,123]),
    [iquote('0:Res:47.3,123.0')] ).

cnf(134,plain,
    $false,
    inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[133,120,122,121]),
    [iquote('0:MRR:133.0,133.1,133.2,120.0,122.0,121.0')] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.12  % Problem  : GRA010+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.2.0.
% 0.04/0.13  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Mon May 30 23:17:55 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.49  
% 0.19/0.49  SPASS V 3.9 
% 0.19/0.49  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.19/0.49  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.19/0.49  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 0.19/0.49  SPASS derived 35 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 101 clauses.
% 0.19/0.49  SPASS allocated 98294 KBytes.
% 0.19/0.49  SPASS spent	0:00:00.14 on the problem.
% 0.19/0.49  		0:00:00.04 for the input.
% 0.19/0.49  		0:00:00.08 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.19/0.49  		0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.19/0.49  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.19/0.49  		0:00:00.00 for the reduction.
% 0.19/0.49  
% 0.19/0.49  
% 0.19/0.49  Here is a proof with depth 2, length 17 :
% 0.19/0.49  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.49  Formulae used in the proof : complete_means_sequential_pairs_and_triangles sequential_pairs_and_triangles
% 0.19/0.49  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------