TSTP Solution File: GEO641+1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : GEO641+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 06:21:17 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 23.52s 23.70s
% Output : Refutation 23.52s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : GEO641+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.5.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 01:49:13 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.37 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.12/0.37 The process was started by sandbox2 on n007.cluster.edu,
% 0.12/0.37 Sat Jun 18 01:49:13 2022
% 0.12/0.37 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 32262.
% 0.12/0.37
% 0.12/0.37 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.12/0.37 set(auto).
% 0.12/0.37 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.12/0.37 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.12/0.37 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.12/0.37 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.12/0.37 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.12/0.37 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.12/0.37 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.12/0.37 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.12/0.37 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.12/0.37 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.12/0.37 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.12/0.37 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.12/0.37 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.12/0.37 clear(print_given).
% 0.12/0.37
% 0.12/0.37 formula_list(usable).
% 0.12/0.37
% 0.12/0.37 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=5.
% 0.12/0.37
% 0.12/0.37 This ia a non-Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 0.12/0.37 Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.12/0.37 unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.12/0.37 clauses in usable.
% 0.12/0.37
% 0.12/0.37 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.12/0.37 dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.12/0.37 dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.12/0.37 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.12/0.37 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.12/0.37 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.12/0.37 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.12/0.37 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.12/0.37 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.12/0.37 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.12/0.37 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.12/0.37 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.12/0.37 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.12/0.37 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.12/0.37 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.12/0.37
% 0.12/0.37 ------------> process usable:
% 0.12/0.37 Following clause subsumed by 72 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -eqangle(A,B,C,D,C,D,A,B)|perp(A,B,C,D)|para(A,B,C,D).
% 0.12/0.37
% 0.12/0.37 ------------> process sos:
% 0.12/0.37 Following clause subsumed by 167 during input processing: 0 [copy,167,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.12/0.37 167 back subsumes 146.
% 0.12/0.37 167 back subsumes 145.
% 0.12/0.37 167 back subsumes 144.
% 0.12/0.37 167 back subsumes 143.
% 0.12/0.37
% 0.12/0.37 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.19/0.43
% 0.19/0.43
% 0.19/0.43 Failed to model usable list: disabling FINDER
% 0.19/0.43
% 0.19/0.43
% 0.19/0.43
% 0.19/0.43 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.19/0.43
% 0.19/0.43 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.19/0.43 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.19/0.43 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.19/0.43 number of clauses in intial UL: 154
% 0.19/0.43 number of clauses initially in problem: 163
% 0.19/0.43 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 94
% 0.19/0.43 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 90
% 0.19/0.43 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.19/0.43 absolute distinct symbol count: 40
% 0.19/0.43 distinct predicate count: 12
% 0.19/0.43 distinct function count: 20
% 0.19/0.43 distinct constant count: 8
% 0.19/0.43
% 0.19/0.43 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.19/0.43
% 0.19/0.43
% 0.19/0.43
% 0.19/0.43 =========== start of search ===========
% 6.33/6.51
% 6.33/6.51
% 6.33/6.51 Changing weight limit from 60 to 57.
% 6.33/6.51
% 6.33/6.51 Resetting weight limit to 57 after 190 givens.
% 6.33/6.51
% 7.56/7.73
% 7.56/7.73
% 7.56/7.73 Changing weight limit from 57 to 56.
% 7.56/7.73
% 7.56/7.73 Resetting weight limit to 56 after 195 givens.
% 7.56/7.73
% 10.34/10.52
% 10.34/10.52
% 10.34/10.52 Changing weight limit from 56 to 55.
% 10.34/10.52
% 10.34/10.52 Resetting weight limit to 55 after 215 givens.
% 10.34/10.52
% 11.66/11.83
% 11.66/11.83
% 11.66/11.83 Changing weight limit from 55 to 52.
% 11.66/11.83
% 11.66/11.83 Resetting weight limit to 52 after 230 givens.
% 11.66/11.83
% 13.64/13.86
% 13.64/13.86
% 13.64/13.86 Changing weight limit from 52 to 51.
% 13.64/13.86
% 13.64/13.86 Resetting weight limit to 51 after 260 givens.
% 13.64/13.86
% 17.44/17.65
% 17.44/17.65
% 17.44/17.65 Changing weight limit from 51 to 50.
% 17.44/17.65
% 17.44/17.65 Modelling stopped after 300 given clauses and 0.00 seconds
% 17.44/17.65
% 17.44/17.65
% 17.44/17.65 Resetting weight limit to 50 after 320 givens.
% 17.44/17.65
% 18.81/19.00
% 18.81/19.00
% 18.81/19.00 Changing weight limit from 50 to 47.
% 18.81/19.00
% 18.81/19.00 Resetting weight limit to 47 after 325 givens.
% 18.81/19.00
% 19.65/19.84
% 19.65/19.84
% 19.65/19.84 Changing weight limit from 47 to 46.
% 19.65/19.84
% 19.65/19.84 Resetting weight limit to 46 after 330 givens.
% 19.65/19.84
% 20.32/20.51
% 20.32/20.51
% 20.32/20.51 Changing weight limit from 46 to 31.
% 20.32/20.51
% 20.32/20.51 Resetting weight limit to 31 after 335 givens.
% 20.32/20.51
% 21.15/21.36
% 21.15/21.36
% 21.15/21.36 Changing weight limit from 31 to 30.
% 21.15/21.36
% 21.15/21.36 Resetting weight limit to 30 after 345 givens.
% 21.15/21.36
% 22.80/22.99
% 22.80/22.99
% 22.80/22.99 Changing weight limit from 30 to 29.
% 22.80/22.99
% 22.80/22.99 Resetting weight limit to 29 after 380 givens.
% 22.80/22.99
% 23.26/23.50
% 23.26/23.50
% 23.26/23.50 Changing weight limit from 29 to 18.
% 23.26/23.50
% 23.26/23.50 Resetting weight limit to 18 after 435 givens.
% 23.26/23.50
% 23.33/23.51
% 23.33/23.51
% 23.33/23.51 Changing weight limit from 18 to 14.
% 23.33/23.51
% 23.33/23.51 Resetting weight limit to 14 after 445 givens.
% 23.33/23.51
% 23.33/23.53
% 23.33/23.53
% 23.33/23.53 Changing weight limit from 14 to 13.
% 23.33/23.53
% 23.33/23.53 Resetting weight limit to 13 after 460 givens.
% 23.33/23.53
% 23.33/23.54
% 23.33/23.54
% 23.33/23.54 Changing weight limit from 13 to 10.
% 23.33/23.54
% 23.33/23.54 Resetting weight limit to 10 after 465 givens.
% 23.33/23.54
% 23.52/23.70
% 23.52/23.70 -- HEY sandbox2, WE HAVE A PROOF!! --
% 23.52/23.70
% 23.52/23.70 ----> UNIT CONFLICT at 23.31 sec ----> 17183 [binary,17182.1,113.1] {-} $F.
% 23.52/23.70
% 23.52/23.70 Length of proof is 64. Level of proof is 14.
% 23.52/23.70
% 23.52/23.70 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 23.52/23.70 % SZS status Theorem
% 23.52/23.70 % SZS output start Refutation
% 23.52/23.70
% 23.52/23.70 1 [] {+} -coll(A,B,C)|coll(A,C,B).
% 23.52/23.70 3 [] {+} -coll(A,B,C)| -coll(A,B,D)|coll(C,D,A).
% 23.52/23.70 7 [] {+} -perp(A,B,C,D)|perp(A,B,D,C).
% 23.52/23.70 8 [] {+} -perp(A,B,C,D)|perp(C,D,A,B).
% 23.52/23.70 9 [] {+} -perp(A,B,C,D)| -perp(C,D,E,F)|para(A,B,E,F).
% 23.52/23.70 14 [] {+} -cyclic(A,B,C,D)|cyclic(A,B,D,C).
% 23.52/23.70 15 [] {+} -cyclic(A,B,C,D)|cyclic(A,C,B,D).
% 23.52/23.70 40 [] {+} -para(A,B,C,D)|eqangle(A,B,E,F,C,D,E,F).
% 23.52/23.70 43 [] {+} -eqangle(A,B,A,C,D,B,D,C)| -coll(A,D,C)|cyclic(B,C,A,D).
% 23.52/23.70 44 [] {+} -cyclic(A,B,C,D)| -cyclic(A,B,C,E)| -cyclic(A,B,C,F)| -eqangle(C,A,C,B,F,D,F,E)|cong(A,B,D,E).
% 23.52/23.70 46 [] {+} -midp(A,B,C)| -para(A,D,C,E)| -coll(D,B,E)|midp(D,B,E).
% 23.52/23.70 64 [] {+} -midp(A,B,C)| -midp(A,D,E)|para(B,D,C,E).
% 23.52/23.70 65 [] {+} -midp(A,B,C)| -para(B,D,C,E)| -para(B,E,C,D)|midp(A,D,E).
% 23.52/23.70 67 [] {+} -para(A,B,A,C)|coll(A,B,C).
% 23.52/23.70 68 [] {+} -cong(A,B,A,C)| -coll(A,B,C)|midp(A,B,C).
% 23.52/23.70 113 [] {+} -para($c3,$c2,$c7,$c6).
% 23.52/23.70 114 [factor,3.1.2] {+} -coll(A,B,C)|coll(C,C,A).
% 23.52/23.70 123 [factor,44.2.3] {+} -cyclic(A,B,C,D)| -cyclic(A,B,C,E)| -eqangle(C,A,C,B,E,D,E,E)|cong(A,B,D,E).
% 23.52/23.70 129 [factor,65.2.3] {+} -midp(A,B,C)| -para(B,D,C,D)|midp(A,D,D).
% 23.52/23.70 161 [] {-} perp($c8,$c7,$c4,$c3).
% 23.52/23.70 162 [] {-} perp($c8,$c4,$c7,$c3).
% 23.52/23.70 163 [] {-} perp($c7,$c4,$c8,$c3).
% 23.52/23.70 164 [] {-} perp($c8,$c6,$c4,$c2).
% 23.52/23.70 165 [] {-} perp($c8,$c4,$c6,$c2).
% 23.52/23.70 166 [] {-} perp($c6,$c4,$c8,$c2).
% 23.52/23.70 202 [hyper,161,8] {-} perp($c4,$c3,$c8,$c7).
% 23.52/23.70 220 [hyper,162,8] {-} perp($c7,$c3,$c8,$c4).
% 23.52/23.70 221 [hyper,162,7] {-} perp($c8,$c4,$c3,$c7).
% 23.52/23.70 246 [hyper,163,8] {-} perp($c8,$c3,$c7,$c4).
% 23.52/23.70 264 [hyper,164,8] {-} perp($c4,$c2,$c8,$c6).
% 23.52/23.70 283 [hyper,165,7] {-} perp($c8,$c4,$c2,$c6).
% 23.52/23.70 308 [hyper,166,8] {-} perp($c8,$c2,$c6,$c4).
% 23.52/23.70 326 [hyper,202,9,161] {-} para($c8,$c7,$c8,$c7).
% 23.52/23.70 327 [hyper,202,9,161] {-} para($c4,$c3,$c4,$c3).
% 23.52/23.70 397 [hyper,220,9,162] {-} para($c8,$c4,$c8,$c4).
% 23.52/23.70 417 [hyper,221,9,220] {-} para($c7,$c3,$c3,$c7).
% 23.52/23.70 444 [hyper,246,9,163] {-} para($c8,$c3,$c8,$c3).
% 23.52/23.70 580 [hyper,264,9,164] {-} para($c8,$c6,$c8,$c6).
% 23.52/23.70 581 [hyper,264,9,164] {-} para($c4,$c2,$c4,$c2).
% 23.52/23.70 738 [hyper,283,9,220] {-} para($c7,$c3,$c2,$c6).
% 23.52/23.70 765 [hyper,308,9,166] {-} para($c8,$c2,$c8,$c2).
% 23.52/23.70 801 [hyper,326,67] {-} coll($c8,$c7,$c7).
% 23.52/23.70 802 [hyper,326,40] {-} eqangle($c8,$c7,A,B,$c8,$c7,A,B).
% 23.52/23.70 920 [hyper,801,114] {-} coll($c7,$c7,$c8).
% 23.52/23.70 934 [hyper,920,114] {-} coll($c8,$c8,$c7).
% 23.52/23.70 960 [hyper,934,1] {-} coll($c8,$c7,$c8).
% 23.52/23.70 1085 [hyper,960,114] {-} coll($c8,$c8,$c8).
% 23.52/23.70 1086 [hyper,960,3,801] {-} coll($c7,$c8,$c8).
% 23.52/23.70 1213 [hyper,327,67] {-} coll($c4,$c3,$c3).
% 23.52/23.70 1231 [hyper,1213,114] {-} coll($c3,$c3,$c4).
% 23.52/23.70 1245 [hyper,1231,114] {-} coll($c4,$c4,$c3).
% 23.52/23.70 1655 [hyper,397,67] {-} coll($c8,$c4,$c4).
% 23.52/23.70 1674 [hyper,1655,114] {-} coll($c4,$c4,$c8).
% 23.52/23.70 1689 [hyper,1674,114] {-} coll($c8,$c8,$c4).
% 23.52/23.70 1690 [hyper,1674,3,1245] {-} coll($c3,$c8,$c4).
% 23.52/23.70 1798 [hyper,1690,1] {-} coll($c3,$c4,$c8).
% 23.52/23.70 1941 [hyper,1798,114] {-} coll($c8,$c8,$c3).
% 23.52/23.70 2088 [hyper,1941,3,934] {-} coll($c7,$c3,$c8).
% 23.52/23.70 2496 [hyper,2088,1] {-} coll($c7,$c8,$c3).
% 23.52/23.70 2588 [hyper,2496,114] {-} coll($c3,$c3,$c7).
% 23.52/23.70 3706 [hyper,580,67] {-} coll($c8,$c6,$c6).
% 23.52/23.70 3805 [hyper,3706,114] {-} coll($c6,$c6,$c8).
% 23.52/23.70 3820 [hyper,3805,114] {-} coll($c8,$c8,$c6).
% 23.52/23.70 3850 [hyper,3820,3,1941] {-} coll($c3,$c6,$c8).
% 23.52/23.70 3855 [hyper,3820,3,1689] {-} coll($c6,$c4,$c8).
% 23.52/23.70 3962 [hyper,3850,1] {-} coll($c3,$c8,$c6).
% 23.52/23.70 4106 [hyper,3855,1] {-} coll($c6,$c8,$c4).
% 23.52/23.70 4220 [hyper,3962,3,1690] {-} coll($c6,$c4,$c3).
% 23.52/23.70 4386 [hyper,4106,114] {-} coll($c4,$c4,$c6).
% 23.52/23.70 5773 [hyper,581,67] {-} coll($c4,$c2,$c2).
% 23.52/23.70 5791 [hyper,5773,114] {-} coll($c2,$c2,$c4).
% 23.52/23.70 5806 [hyper,5791,114] {-} coll($c4,$c4,$c2).
% 23.52/23.70 5910 [hyper,5806,3,4386] {-} coll($c6,$c2,$c4).
% 23.52/23.70 5944 [hyper,5910,1] {-} coll($c6,$c4,$c2).
% 23.52/23.70 6179 [hyper,5944,3,4220] {-} coll($c3,$c2,$c6).
% 23.52/23.70 12916 [hyper,802,43,1085] {-} cyclic($c7,$c8,$c8,$c8).
% 23.52/23.70 12917 [hyper,802,43,934] {-} cyclic($c7,$c7,$c8,$c8).
% 23.52/23.70 14307 [hyper,12917,15] {-} cyclic($c7,$c8,$c7,$c8).
% 23.52/23.70 14742 [hyper,14307,14] {-} cyclic($c7,$c8,$c8,$c7).
% 23.52/23.70 15669 [hyper,14742,123,12916,802] {-} cong($c7,$c8,$c7,$c8).
% 23.52/23.70 16752 [hyper,15669,68,1086] {-} midp($c7,$c8,$c8).
% 23.52/23.70 16758 [hyper,16752,129,765] {-} midp($c7,$c2,$c2).
% 23.52/23.70 16760 [hyper,16752,129,444] {-} midp($c7,$c3,$c3).
% 23.52/23.70 16786 [hyper,16758,46,738,6179] {-} midp($c3,$c2,$c6).
% 23.52/23.70 16846 [hyper,16760,46,417,2588] {-} midp($c3,$c3,$c7).
% 23.52/23.70 17182 [hyper,16846,64,16786] {-} para($c3,$c2,$c7,$c6).
% 23.52/23.70 17183 [binary,17182.1,113.1] {-} $F.
% 23.52/23.70
% 23.52/23.70 % SZS output end Refutation
% 23.52/23.70 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 23.52/23.70
% 23.52/23.70
% 23.52/23.70 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 23.52/23.70
% 23.52/23.70
% 23.52/23.70 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 23.52/23.70
% 23.52/23.70 ============ end of search ============
% 23.52/23.70
% 23.52/23.70 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 23.52/23.70
% 23.52/23.70 Process 32262 finished Sat Jun 18 01:49:36 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------