TSTP Solution File: GEO627+1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : GEO627+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 06:21:13 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 39.54s 39.77s
% Output : Refutation 39.54s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : GEO627+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.5.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Fri Jun 17 15:38:12 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.36 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.18/0.36 The process was started by sandbox on n003.cluster.edu,
% 0.18/0.36 Fri Jun 17 15:38:12 2022
% 0.18/0.36 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 5319.
% 0.18/0.36
% 0.18/0.36 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.18/0.36 set(auto).
% 0.18/0.36 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.18/0.36 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.18/0.36 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.18/0.36 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.18/0.36 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.18/0.36 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.18/0.36 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.18/0.36 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.18/0.36 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.18/0.36 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.18/0.36 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.18/0.36 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.18/0.36 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.18/0.36 clear(print_given).
% 0.18/0.36
% 0.18/0.36 formula_list(usable).
% 0.18/0.36
% 0.18/0.36 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=5.
% 0.18/0.36
% 0.18/0.36 This ia a non-Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 0.18/0.36 Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.18/0.36 unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.18/0.36 clauses in usable.
% 0.18/0.36
% 0.18/0.36 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.18/0.36 dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.18/0.36 dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.18/0.36 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.18/0.36 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.18/0.36 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.18/0.36 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.18/0.36 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.18/0.36 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.18/0.36 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.18/0.36 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.18/0.36 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.18/0.36 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.18/0.36 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.18/0.36 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.18/0.36
% 0.18/0.36 ------------> process usable:
% 0.18/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 72 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -eqangle(A,B,C,D,C,D,A,B)|perp(A,B,C,D)|para(A,B,C,D).
% 0.18/0.36
% 0.18/0.36 ------------> process sos:
% 0.18/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 172 during input processing: 0 [copy,172,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.18/0.36 172 back subsumes 146.
% 0.18/0.36 172 back subsumes 145.
% 0.18/0.36 172 back subsumes 144.
% 0.18/0.36 172 back subsumes 143.
% 0.18/0.36
% 0.18/0.36 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.18/0.43
% 0.18/0.43
% 0.18/0.43 Failed to model usable list: disabling FINDER
% 0.18/0.43
% 0.18/0.43
% 0.18/0.43
% 0.18/0.43 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.18/0.43
% 0.18/0.43 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.18/0.43 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.18/0.43 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.18/0.43 number of clauses in intial UL: 154
% 0.18/0.43 number of clauses initially in problem: 168
% 0.18/0.43 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 91
% 0.18/0.43 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 80
% 0.18/0.43 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.18/0.43 absolute distinct symbol count: 45
% 0.18/0.43 distinct predicate count: 12
% 0.18/0.43 distinct function count: 20
% 0.18/0.43 distinct constant count: 13
% 0.18/0.43
% 0.18/0.43 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.18/0.43
% 0.18/0.43
% 0.18/0.43
% 0.18/0.43 =========== start of search ===========
% 6.78/6.98
% 6.78/6.98
% 6.78/6.98 Changing weight limit from 60 to 57.
% 6.78/6.98
% 6.78/6.98 Resetting weight limit to 57 after 255 givens.
% 6.78/6.98
% 7.55/7.73
% 7.55/7.73
% 7.55/7.73 Changing weight limit from 57 to 56.
% 7.55/7.73
% 7.55/7.73 Resetting weight limit to 56 after 260 givens.
% 7.55/7.73
% 9.96/10.15
% 9.96/10.15
% 9.96/10.15 Changing weight limit from 56 to 55.
% 9.96/10.15
% 9.96/10.15 Resetting weight limit to 55 after 275 givens.
% 9.96/10.15
% 12.52/12.72
% 12.52/12.72
% 12.52/12.72 Changing weight limit from 55 to 54.
% 12.52/12.72
% 12.52/12.72 Modelling stopped after 300 given clauses and 0.00 seconds
% 12.52/12.72
% 12.52/12.72
% 12.52/12.72 Resetting weight limit to 54 after 305 givens.
% 12.52/12.72
% 13.51/13.71
% 13.51/13.71
% 13.51/13.71 Changing weight limit from 54 to 52.
% 13.51/13.71
% 13.51/13.71 Resetting weight limit to 52 after 320 givens.
% 13.51/13.71
% 14.69/14.91
% 14.69/14.91
% 14.69/14.91 Changing weight limit from 52 to 51.
% 14.69/14.91
% 14.69/14.91 Resetting weight limit to 51 after 335 givens.
% 14.69/14.91
% 18.52/18.72
% 18.52/18.72
% 18.52/18.72 Changing weight limit from 51 to 50.
% 18.52/18.72
% 18.52/18.72 Resetting weight limit to 50 after 395 givens.
% 18.52/18.72
% 21.97/22.17
% 21.97/22.17
% 21.97/22.17 Changing weight limit from 50 to 49.
% 21.97/22.17
% 21.97/22.17 Resetting weight limit to 49 after 450 givens.
% 21.97/22.17
% 23.11/23.35
% 23.11/23.35
% 23.11/23.35 Changing weight limit from 49 to 47.
% 23.11/23.35
% 23.11/23.35 Resetting weight limit to 47 after 470 givens.
% 23.11/23.35
% 23.58/23.83
% 23.58/23.83
% 23.58/23.83 Changing weight limit from 47 to 46.
% 23.58/23.83
% 23.58/23.83 Resetting weight limit to 46 after 475 givens.
% 23.58/23.83
% 24.25/24.45
% 24.25/24.45
% 24.25/24.45 Changing weight limit from 46 to 45.
% 24.25/24.45
% 24.25/24.45 Resetting weight limit to 45 after 480 givens.
% 24.25/24.45
% 24.65/24.85
% 24.65/24.85
% 24.65/24.85 Changing weight limit from 45 to 44.
% 24.65/24.85
% 24.65/24.85 Resetting weight limit to 44 after 485 givens.
% 24.65/24.85
% 24.95/25.15
% 24.95/25.15
% 24.95/25.15 Changing weight limit from 44 to 34.
% 24.95/25.15
% 24.95/25.15 Resetting weight limit to 34 after 490 givens.
% 24.95/25.15
% 24.99/25.21
% 24.99/25.21
% 24.99/25.21 Changing weight limit from 34 to 31.
% 24.99/25.21
% 24.99/25.21 Resetting weight limit to 31 after 495 givens.
% 24.99/25.21
% 25.47/25.71
% 25.47/25.71
% 25.47/25.71 Changing weight limit from 31 to 30.
% 25.47/25.71
% 25.47/25.71 Resetting weight limit to 30 after 510 givens.
% 25.47/25.71
% 33.80/34.01
% 33.80/34.01
% 33.80/34.01 Changing weight limit from 30 to 29.
% 33.80/34.01
% 33.80/34.01 Resetting weight limit to 29 after 820 givens.
% 33.80/34.01
% 36.24/36.45
% 36.24/36.45
% 36.24/36.45 Changing weight limit from 29 to 10.
% 36.24/36.45
% 36.24/36.45 Resetting weight limit to 10 after 1315 givens.
% 36.24/36.45
% 38.43/38.65
% 38.43/38.65
% 38.43/38.65 Changing weight limit from 10 to 9.
% 38.43/38.65
% 38.43/38.65 Resetting weight limit to 9 after 2325 givens.
% 38.43/38.65
% 39.39/39.61
% 39.39/39.61
% 39.39/39.61 Changing weight limit from 9 to 5.
% 39.39/39.61
% 39.39/39.61 Resetting weight limit to 5 after 2995 givens.
% 39.39/39.61
% 39.54/39.77
% 39.54/39.77 -- HEY sandbox, WE HAVE A PROOF!! --
% 39.54/39.77
% 39.54/39.77 ----> UNIT CONFLICT at 39.30 sec ----> 70044 [binary,70043.1,113.1] {-} $F.
% 39.54/39.77
% 39.54/39.77 Length of proof is 54. Level of proof is 17.
% 39.54/39.77
% 39.54/39.77 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 39.54/39.77 % SZS status Theorem
% 39.54/39.77 % SZS output start Refutation
% 39.54/39.77
% 39.54/39.77 1 [] {+} -coll(A,B,C)|coll(A,C,B).
% 39.54/39.77 2 [] {+} -coll(A,B,C)|coll(B,A,C).
% 39.54/39.77 3 [] {+} -coll(A,B,C)| -coll(A,B,D)|coll(C,D,A).
% 39.54/39.77 8 [] {+} -perp(A,B,C,D)|perp(C,D,A,B).
% 39.54/39.77 9 [] {+} -perp(A,B,C,D)| -perp(C,D,E,F)|para(A,B,E,F).
% 39.54/39.77 14 [] {+} -cyclic(A,B,C,D)|cyclic(A,B,D,C).
% 39.54/39.77 15 [] {+} -cyclic(A,B,C,D)|cyclic(A,C,B,D).
% 39.54/39.77 17 [] {+} -cyclic(A,B,C,D)| -cyclic(A,B,C,E)|cyclic(B,C,D,E).
% 39.54/39.77 40 [] {+} -para(A,B,C,D)|eqangle(A,B,E,F,C,D,E,F).
% 39.54/39.77 43 [] {+} -eqangle(A,B,A,C,D,B,D,C)| -coll(A,D,C)|cyclic(B,C,A,D).
% 39.54/39.77 67 [] {+} -para(A,B,A,C)|coll(A,B,C).
% 39.54/39.77 113 [] {+} -cyclic($c13,$c9,$c6,$c3).
% 39.54/39.77 114 [factor,3.1.2] {+} -coll(A,B,C)|coll(C,C,A).
% 39.54/39.77 161 [] {-} perp($c8,$c9,$c13,$c11).
% 39.54/39.77 162 [] {-} coll($c8,$c13,$c11).
% 39.54/39.77 166 [] {-} perp($c5,$c6,$c13,$c12).
% 39.54/39.77 167 [] {-} coll($c5,$c13,$c12).
% 39.54/39.77 170 [] {-} perp($c8,$c7,$c6,$c3).
% 39.54/39.77 191 [hyper,162,2] {-} coll($c13,$c8,$c11).
% 39.54/39.77 192 [hyper,162,1] {-} coll($c8,$c11,$c13).
% 39.54/39.77 222 [hyper,167,1] {-} coll($c5,$c12,$c13).
% 39.54/39.77 282 [hyper,191,1] {-} coll($c13,$c11,$c8).
% 39.54/39.77 295 [hyper,192,114] {-} coll($c13,$c13,$c8).
% 39.54/39.77 309 [hyper,161,8] {-} perp($c13,$c11,$c8,$c9).
% 39.54/39.77 416 [hyper,222,114] {-} coll($c13,$c13,$c5).
% 39.54/39.77 531 [hyper,166,8] {-} perp($c13,$c12,$c5,$c6).
% 39.54/39.77 549 [hyper,282,114] {-} coll($c8,$c8,$c13).
% 39.54/39.77 677 [hyper,170,8] {-} perp($c6,$c3,$c8,$c7).
% 39.54/39.77 794 [hyper,416,3,295] {-} coll($c8,$c5,$c13).
% 39.54/39.77 2051 [hyper,794,1] {-} coll($c8,$c13,$c5).
% 39.54/39.77 3579 [hyper,2051,114] {-} coll($c5,$c5,$c8).
% 39.54/39.77 7648 [hyper,309,9,161] {-} para($c8,$c9,$c8,$c9).
% 39.54/39.77 7723 [hyper,531,9,166] {-} para($c5,$c6,$c5,$c6).
% 39.54/39.77 7796 [hyper,677,9,170] {-} para($c6,$c3,$c6,$c3).
% 39.54/39.77 7887 [hyper,7648,67] {-} coll($c8,$c9,$c9).
% 39.54/39.77 7888 [hyper,7648,40] {-} eqangle($c8,$c9,A,B,$c8,$c9,A,B).
% 39.54/39.77 7906 [hyper,7887,114] {-} coll($c9,$c9,$c8).
% 39.54/39.77 7921 [hyper,7906,114] {-} coll($c8,$c8,$c9).
% 39.54/39.77 11014 [hyper,7723,67] {-} coll($c5,$c6,$c6).
% 39.54/39.77 11025 [hyper,11014,114] {-} coll($c6,$c6,$c5).
% 39.54/39.77 11040 [hyper,11025,114] {-} coll($c5,$c5,$c6).
% 39.54/39.77 11073 [hyper,11040,3,3579] {-} coll($c8,$c6,$c5).
% 39.54/39.77 11081 [hyper,11040,3,3579] {-} coll($c6,$c8,$c5).
% 39.54/39.77 11149 [hyper,11073,1] {-} coll($c8,$c5,$c6).
% 39.54/39.77 11252 [hyper,11081,1] {-} coll($c6,$c5,$c8).
% 39.54/39.77 11420 [hyper,11149,114] {-} coll($c6,$c6,$c8).
% 39.54/39.77 11603 [hyper,11252,114] {-} coll($c8,$c8,$c6).
% 39.54/39.77 14664 [hyper,7796,67] {-} coll($c6,$c3,$c3).
% 39.54/39.77 14666 [hyper,14664,114] {-} coll($c3,$c3,$c6).
% 39.54/39.77 14675 [hyper,14666,114] {-} coll($c6,$c6,$c3).
% 39.54/39.77 14705 [hyper,14675,3,11420] {-} coll($c3,$c8,$c6).
% 39.54/39.77 14806 [hyper,14705,1] {-} coll($c3,$c6,$c8).
% 39.54/39.77 15191 [hyper,14806,114] {-} coll($c8,$c8,$c3).
% 39.54/39.77 21967 [hyper,7888,43,15191] {-} cyclic($c9,$c3,$c8,$c8).
% 39.54/39.77 21968 [hyper,7888,43,11603] {-} cyclic($c9,$c6,$c8,$c8).
% 39.54/39.77 21969 [hyper,7888,43,7921] {-} cyclic($c9,$c9,$c8,$c8).
% 39.54/39.77 21975 [hyper,7888,43,549] {-} cyclic($c9,$c13,$c8,$c8).
% 39.54/39.77 30531 [hyper,21967,15] {-} cyclic($c9,$c8,$c3,$c8).
% 39.54/39.77 30534 [hyper,21968,15] {-} cyclic($c9,$c8,$c6,$c8).
% 39.54/39.77 30535 [hyper,21969,15] {-} cyclic($c9,$c8,$c9,$c8).
% 39.54/39.77 30558 [hyper,21975,15] {-} cyclic($c9,$c8,$c13,$c8).
% 39.54/39.77 31077 [hyper,30531,14] {-} cyclic($c9,$c8,$c8,$c3).
% 39.54/39.77 31107 [hyper,30534,14] {-} cyclic($c9,$c8,$c8,$c6).
% 39.54/39.77 31110 [hyper,30535,14] {-} cyclic($c9,$c8,$c8,$c9).
% 39.54/39.77 31259 [hyper,30558,14] {-} cyclic($c9,$c8,$c8,$c13).
% 39.54/39.77 32766 [hyper,31259,17,31110] {-} cyclic($c8,$c8,$c13,$c9).
% 39.54/39.77 32767 [hyper,31259,17,31107] {-} cyclic($c8,$c8,$c13,$c6).
% 39.54/39.77 32768 [hyper,31259,17,31077] {-} cyclic($c8,$c8,$c13,$c3).
% 39.54/39.77 38637 [hyper,32767,17,32766] {-} cyclic($c8,$c13,$c9,$c6).
% 39.54/39.77 38654 [hyper,32768,17,32766] {-} cyclic($c8,$c13,$c9,$c3).
% 39.54/39.77 70043 [hyper,38654,17,38637] {-} cyclic($c13,$c9,$c6,$c3).
% 39.54/39.77 70044 [binary,70043.1,113.1] {-} $F.
% 39.54/39.77
% 39.54/39.77 % SZS output end Refutation
% 39.54/39.77 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 39.54/39.77
% 39.54/39.77
% 39.54/39.77 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 39.54/39.77
% 39.54/39.77
% 39.54/39.77 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 39.54/39.77
% 39.54/39.77 ============ end of search ============
% 39.54/39.77
% 39.54/39.77 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 39.54/39.77
% 39.54/39.77 Process 5319 finished Fri Jun 17 15:38:52 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------