TSTP Solution File: GEO620+1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : GEO620+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 06:21:11 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 18.45s 18.64s
% Output : Refutation 18.45s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : GEO620+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.5.0.
% 0.11/0.12 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Fri Jun 17 15:45:30 EDT 2022
% 0.18/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.36 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.18/0.36 The process was started by sandbox on n021.cluster.edu,
% 0.18/0.36 Fri Jun 17 15:45:30 2022
% 0.18/0.36 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 23643.
% 0.18/0.36
% 0.18/0.36 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.18/0.36 set(auto).
% 0.18/0.36 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.18/0.36 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.18/0.36 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.18/0.36 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.18/0.36 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.18/0.36 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.18/0.36 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.18/0.36 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.18/0.36 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.18/0.36 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.18/0.36 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.18/0.36 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.18/0.36 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.18/0.36 clear(print_given).
% 0.18/0.36
% 0.18/0.36 formula_list(usable).
% 0.18/0.36
% 0.18/0.36 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=5.
% 0.18/0.36
% 0.18/0.36 This ia a non-Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 0.18/0.36 Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.18/0.36 unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.18/0.36 clauses in usable.
% 0.18/0.36
% 0.18/0.36 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.18/0.36 dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.18/0.36 dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.18/0.36 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.18/0.36 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.18/0.36 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.18/0.36 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.18/0.36 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.18/0.36 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.18/0.36 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.18/0.36 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.18/0.36 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.18/0.36 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.18/0.36 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.18/0.36 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.18/0.36
% 0.18/0.36 ------------> process usable:
% 0.18/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 72 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -eqangle(A,B,C,D,C,D,A,B)|perp(A,B,C,D)|para(A,B,C,D).
% 0.18/0.36
% 0.18/0.36 ------------> process sos:
% 0.18/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 169 during input processing: 0 [copy,169,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.18/0.36 169 back subsumes 146.
% 0.18/0.36 169 back subsumes 145.
% 0.18/0.36 169 back subsumes 144.
% 0.18/0.36 169 back subsumes 143.
% 0.18/0.36
% 0.18/0.36 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.18/0.43
% 0.18/0.43
% 0.18/0.43 Failed to model usable list: disabling FINDER
% 0.18/0.43
% 0.18/0.43
% 0.18/0.43
% 0.18/0.43 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.18/0.43
% 0.18/0.43 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.18/0.43 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.18/0.43 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.18/0.43 number of clauses in intial UL: 154
% 0.18/0.43 number of clauses initially in problem: 165
% 0.18/0.43 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 93
% 0.18/0.43 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 87
% 0.18/0.43 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.18/0.43 absolute distinct symbol count: 40
% 0.18/0.43 distinct predicate count: 12
% 0.18/0.43 distinct function count: 20
% 0.18/0.43 distinct constant count: 8
% 0.18/0.43
% 0.18/0.43 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.18/0.43
% 0.18/0.43
% 0.18/0.43
% 0.18/0.43 =========== start of search ===========
% 11.42/11.63
% 11.42/11.63
% 11.42/11.63 Changing weight limit from 60 to 59.
% 11.42/11.63
% 11.42/11.63 Resetting weight limit to 59 after 245 givens.
% 11.42/11.63
% 13.11/13.39
% 13.11/13.39
% 13.11/13.39 Changing weight limit from 59 to 58.
% 13.11/13.39
% 13.11/13.39 Resetting weight limit to 58 after 255 givens.
% 13.11/13.39
% 13.41/13.63
% 13.41/13.63
% 13.41/13.63 Changing weight limit from 58 to 55.
% 13.41/13.63
% 13.41/13.63 Resetting weight limit to 55 after 260 givens.
% 13.41/13.63
% 18.45/18.64
% 18.45/18.64 -- HEY sandbox, WE HAVE A PROOF!! --
% 18.45/18.64
% 18.45/18.64 Modelling stopped after 300 given clauses and 0.00 seconds
% 18.45/18.64
% 18.45/18.64
% 18.45/18.64 ----> UNIT CONFLICT at 18.25 sec ----> 7271 [binary,7270.1,113.1] {-} $F.
% 18.45/18.64
% 18.45/18.64 Length of proof is 16. Level of proof is 8.
% 18.45/18.64
% 18.45/18.64 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 18.45/18.64 % SZS status Theorem
% 18.45/18.64 % SZS output start Refutation
% 18.45/18.64
% 18.45/18.64 1 [] {+} -coll(A,B,C)|coll(A,C,B).
% 18.45/18.64 2 [] {+} -coll(A,B,C)|coll(B,A,C).
% 18.45/18.64 3 [] {+} -coll(A,B,C)| -coll(A,B,D)|coll(C,D,A).
% 18.45/18.64 113 [] {+} -coll($c4,$c1,$c2).
% 18.45/18.64 114 [factor,3.1.2] {+} -coll(A,B,C)|coll(C,C,A).
% 18.45/18.64 163 [] {-} coll($c4,$c8,$c5).
% 18.45/18.64 166 [] {-} coll($c2,$c8,$c3).
% 18.45/18.64 168 [] {-} coll($c1,$c7,$c5).
% 18.45/18.64 207 [hyper,163,2] {-} coll($c8,$c4,$c5).
% 18.45/18.64 208 [hyper,163,1] {-} coll($c4,$c5,$c8).
% 18.45/18.64 223 [hyper,166,1] {-} coll($c2,$c3,$c8).
% 18.45/18.64 236 [hyper,168,114] {-} coll($c5,$c5,$c1).
% 18.45/18.64 301 [hyper,207,114] {-} coll($c5,$c5,$c8).
% 18.45/18.64 315 [hyper,208,114] {-} coll($c8,$c8,$c4).
% 18.45/18.64 393 [hyper,223,114] {-} coll($c8,$c8,$c2).
% 18.45/18.64 497 [hyper,301,3,236] {-} coll($c1,$c8,$c5).
% 18.45/18.64 649 [hyper,393,3,315] {-} coll($c2,$c4,$c8).
% 18.45/18.64 964 [hyper,497,1] {-} coll($c1,$c5,$c8).
% 18.45/18.64 1551 [hyper,649,1] {-} coll($c2,$c8,$c4).
% 18.45/18.64 2609 [hyper,964,114] {-} coll($c8,$c8,$c1).
% 18.45/18.64 4202 [hyper,2609,3,393] {-} coll($c2,$c1,$c8).
% 18.45/18.64 6022 [hyper,4202,1] {-} coll($c2,$c8,$c1).
% 18.45/18.64 7270 [hyper,6022,3,1551] {-} coll($c4,$c1,$c2).
% 18.45/18.64 7271 [binary,7270.1,113.1] {-} $F.
% 18.45/18.64
% 18.45/18.64 % SZS output end Refutation
% 18.45/18.64 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 18.45/18.64
% 18.45/18.64
% 18.45/18.64 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 18.45/18.64
% 18.45/18.64
% 18.45/18.64 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 18.45/18.64
% 18.45/18.64 ============ end of search ============
% 18.45/18.64
% 18.45/18.64 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 18.45/18.64
% 18.45/18.64 Process 23643 finished Fri Jun 17 15:45:49 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------