TSTP Solution File: GEO612+1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : GEO612+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 06:21:09 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 31.94s 32.10s
% Output : Refutation 31.94s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : GEO612+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.5.0.
% 0.13/0.12 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.13/0.33 % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.33 % DateTime : Fri Jun 17 18:34:23 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.36 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.20/0.36 The process was started by sandbox2 on n010.cluster.edu,
% 0.20/0.36 Fri Jun 17 18:34:23 2022
% 0.20/0.36 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 26193.
% 0.20/0.36
% 0.20/0.36 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.20/0.36 set(auto).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.20/0.36 clear(print_given).
% 0.20/0.36
% 0.20/0.36 formula_list(usable).
% 0.20/0.36
% 0.20/0.36 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=5.
% 0.20/0.36
% 0.20/0.36 This ia a non-Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 0.20/0.36 Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.20/0.36 unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.20/0.36 clauses in usable.
% 0.20/0.36
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.20/0.36
% 0.20/0.36 ------------> process usable:
% 0.20/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 72 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -eqangle(A,B,C,D,C,D,A,B)|perp(A,B,C,D)|para(A,B,C,D).
% 0.20/0.36
% 0.20/0.36 ------------> process sos:
% 0.20/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 168 during input processing: 0 [copy,168,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.20/0.36 168 back subsumes 146.
% 0.20/0.36 168 back subsumes 145.
% 0.20/0.36 168 back subsumes 144.
% 0.20/0.36 168 back subsumes 143.
% 0.20/0.36
% 0.20/0.36 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.20/0.43
% 0.20/0.43
% 0.20/0.43 Failed to model usable list: disabling FINDER
% 0.20/0.43
% 0.20/0.43
% 0.20/0.43
% 0.20/0.43 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.20/0.43
% 0.20/0.43 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.20/0.43 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.20/0.43 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.20/0.43 number of clauses in intial UL: 154
% 0.20/0.43 number of clauses initially in problem: 164
% 0.20/0.43 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 93
% 0.20/0.43 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 87
% 0.20/0.43 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.20/0.43 absolute distinct symbol count: 41
% 0.20/0.43 distinct predicate count: 12
% 0.20/0.43 distinct function count: 20
% 0.20/0.43 distinct constant count: 9
% 0.20/0.43
% 0.20/0.43 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.20/0.43
% 0.20/0.43
% 0.20/0.43
% 0.20/0.43 =========== start of search ===========
% 7.71/7.90
% 7.71/7.90
% 7.71/7.90 Changing weight limit from 60 to 57.
% 7.71/7.90
% 7.71/7.90 Resetting weight limit to 57 after 250 givens.
% 7.71/7.90
% 8.18/8.35
% 8.18/8.35
% 8.18/8.35 Changing weight limit from 57 to 56.
% 8.18/8.35
% 8.18/8.35 Resetting weight limit to 56 after 255 givens.
% 8.18/8.35
% 10.63/10.81
% 10.63/10.81
% 10.63/10.81 Changing weight limit from 56 to 55.
% 10.63/10.81
% 10.63/10.81 Resetting weight limit to 55 after 270 givens.
% 10.63/10.81
% 13.25/13.47
% 13.25/13.47
% 13.25/13.47 Changing weight limit from 55 to 54.
% 13.25/13.47
% 13.25/13.47 Modelling stopped after 300 given clauses and 0.00 seconds
% 13.25/13.47
% 13.25/13.47
% 13.25/13.47 Resetting weight limit to 54 after 305 givens.
% 13.25/13.47
% 14.29/14.48
% 14.29/14.48
% 14.29/14.48 Changing weight limit from 54 to 52.
% 14.29/14.48
% 14.29/14.48 Resetting weight limit to 52 after 325 givens.
% 14.29/14.48
% 15.56/15.74
% 15.56/15.74
% 15.56/15.74 Changing weight limit from 52 to 51.
% 15.56/15.74
% 15.56/15.74 Resetting weight limit to 51 after 340 givens.
% 15.56/15.74
% 19.51/19.74
% 19.51/19.74
% 19.51/19.74 Changing weight limit from 51 to 50.
% 19.51/19.74
% 19.51/19.74 Resetting weight limit to 50 after 400 givens.
% 19.51/19.74
% 23.07/23.30
% 23.07/23.30
% 23.07/23.30 Changing weight limit from 50 to 49.
% 23.07/23.30
% 23.07/23.30 Resetting weight limit to 49 after 440 givens.
% 23.07/23.30
% 25.04/25.23
% 25.04/25.23
% 25.04/25.23 Changing weight limit from 49 to 45.
% 25.04/25.23
% 25.04/25.23 Resetting weight limit to 45 after 445 givens.
% 25.04/25.23
% 25.77/26.03
% 25.77/26.03
% 25.77/26.03 Changing weight limit from 45 to 31.
% 25.77/26.03
% 25.77/26.03 Resetting weight limit to 31 after 450 givens.
% 25.77/26.03
% 25.95/26.17
% 25.95/26.17
% 25.95/26.17 Changing weight limit from 31 to 30.
% 25.95/26.17
% 25.95/26.17 Resetting weight limit to 30 after 455 givens.
% 25.95/26.17
% 29.03/29.24
% 29.03/29.24
% 29.03/29.24 Changing weight limit from 30 to 29.
% 29.03/29.24
% 29.03/29.24 Resetting weight limit to 29 after 525 givens.
% 29.03/29.24
% 30.18/30.40
% 30.18/30.40
% 30.18/30.40 Changing weight limit from 29 to 18.
% 30.18/30.40
% 30.18/30.40 Resetting weight limit to 18 after 720 givens.
% 30.18/30.40
% 30.18/30.43
% 30.18/30.43
% 30.18/30.43 Changing weight limit from 18 to 10.
% 30.18/30.43
% 30.18/30.43 Resetting weight limit to 10 after 725 givens.
% 30.18/30.43
% 31.89/32.08
% 31.89/32.08
% 31.89/32.08 Changing weight limit from 10 to 9.
% 31.89/32.08
% 31.89/32.08 Resetting weight limit to 9 after 1800 givens.
% 31.89/32.08
% 31.94/32.10
% 31.94/32.10 -- HEY sandbox2, WE HAVE A PROOF!! --
% 31.94/32.10
% 31.94/32.10 ----> UNIT CONFLICT at 31.68 sec ----> 31068 [binary,31067.1,113.1] {-} $F.
% 31.94/32.10
% 31.94/32.10 Length of proof is 39. Level of proof is 11.
% 31.94/32.10
% 31.94/32.10 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 31.94/32.10 % SZS status Theorem
% 31.94/32.10 % SZS output start Refutation
% 31.94/32.10
% 31.94/32.10 1 [] {+} -coll(A,B,C)|coll(A,C,B).
% 31.94/32.10 2 [] {+} -coll(A,B,C)|coll(B,A,C).
% 31.94/32.10 3 [] {+} -coll(A,B,C)| -coll(A,B,D)|coll(C,D,A).
% 31.94/32.10 8 [] {+} -perp(A,B,C,D)|perp(C,D,A,B).
% 31.94/32.10 9 [] {+} -perp(A,B,C,D)| -perp(C,D,E,F)|para(A,B,E,F).
% 31.94/32.10 14 [] {+} -cyclic(A,B,C,D)|cyclic(A,B,D,C).
% 31.94/32.10 15 [] {+} -cyclic(A,B,C,D)|cyclic(A,C,B,D).
% 31.94/32.10 17 [] {+} -cyclic(A,B,C,D)| -cyclic(A,B,C,E)|cyclic(B,C,D,E).
% 31.94/32.10 40 [] {+} -para(A,B,C,D)|eqangle(A,B,E,F,C,D,E,F).
% 31.94/32.10 43 [] {+} -eqangle(A,B,A,C,D,B,D,C)| -coll(A,D,C)|cyclic(B,C,A,D).
% 31.94/32.10 113 [] {+} -cyclic($c9,$c3,$c2,$c8).
% 31.94/32.10 114 [factor,3.1.2] {+} -coll(A,B,C)|coll(C,C,A).
% 31.94/32.10 160 [] {-} perp($c5,$c7,$c9,$c8).
% 31.94/32.10 161 [] {-} coll($c5,$c9,$c8).
% 31.94/32.10 165 [] {-} coll($c3,$c9,$c7).
% 31.94/32.10 167 [] {-} coll($c2,$c8,$c7).
% 31.94/32.10 186 [hyper,161,114] {-} coll($c8,$c8,$c5).
% 31.94/32.10 187 [hyper,161,2] {-} coll($c9,$c5,$c8).
% 31.94/32.10 188 [hyper,161,1] {-} coll($c5,$c8,$c9).
% 31.94/32.10 218 [hyper,165,1] {-} coll($c3,$c7,$c9).
% 31.94/32.10 231 [hyper,160,8] {-} perp($c9,$c8,$c5,$c7).
% 31.94/32.10 251 [hyper,167,1] {-} coll($c2,$c7,$c8).
% 31.94/32.10 264 [hyper,186,114] {-} coll($c5,$c5,$c8).
% 31.94/32.10 279 [hyper,187,1] {-} coll($c9,$c8,$c5).
% 31.94/32.10 292 [hyper,188,114] {-} coll($c9,$c9,$c5).
% 31.94/32.10 411 [hyper,218,114] {-} coll($c9,$c9,$c3).
% 31.94/32.10 473 [hyper,251,114] {-} coll($c8,$c8,$c2).
% 31.94/32.10 564 [hyper,279,114] {-} coll($c5,$c5,$c9).
% 31.94/32.10 1051 [hyper,411,3,292] {-} coll($c3,$c5,$c9).
% 31.94/32.10 1347 [hyper,473,3,186] {-} coll($c2,$c5,$c8).
% 31.94/32.10 2480 [hyper,1051,1] {-} coll($c3,$c9,$c5).
% 31.94/32.10 3035 [hyper,1347,1] {-} coll($c2,$c8,$c5).
% 31.94/32.10 4409 [hyper,2480,114] {-} coll($c5,$c5,$c3).
% 31.94/32.10 5184 [hyper,3035,114] {-} coll($c5,$c5,$c2).
% 31.94/32.10 6268 [hyper,231,9,160] {-} para($c5,$c7,$c5,$c7).
% 31.94/32.10 7828 [hyper,6268,40] {-} eqangle($c5,$c7,A,B,$c5,$c7,A,B).
% 31.94/32.10 18697 [hyper,7828,43,5184] {-} cyclic($c7,$c2,$c5,$c5).
% 31.94/32.10 18698 [hyper,7828,43,4409] {-} cyclic($c7,$c3,$c5,$c5).
% 31.94/32.10 18700 [hyper,7828,43,564] {-} cyclic($c7,$c9,$c5,$c5).
% 31.94/32.10 18702 [hyper,7828,43,264] {-} cyclic($c7,$c8,$c5,$c5).
% 31.94/32.10 18711 [hyper,18697,15] {-} cyclic($c7,$c5,$c2,$c5).
% 31.94/32.10 18714 [hyper,18698,15] {-} cyclic($c7,$c5,$c3,$c5).
% 31.94/32.10 18722 [hyper,18700,15] {-} cyclic($c7,$c5,$c9,$c5).
% 31.94/32.10 18726 [hyper,18702,15] {-} cyclic($c7,$c5,$c8,$c5).
% 31.94/32.10 18747 [hyper,18711,14] {-} cyclic($c7,$c5,$c5,$c2).
% 31.94/32.10 18756 [hyper,18714,14] {-} cyclic($c7,$c5,$c5,$c3).
% 31.94/32.10 18767 [hyper,18722,14] {-} cyclic($c7,$c5,$c5,$c9).
% 31.94/32.10 18779 [hyper,18726,14] {-} cyclic($c7,$c5,$c5,$c8).
% 31.94/32.10 18852 [hyper,18767,17,18756] {-} cyclic($c5,$c5,$c9,$c3).
% 31.94/32.10 18853 [hyper,18767,17,18747] {-} cyclic($c5,$c5,$c9,$c2).
% 31.94/32.10 18883 [hyper,18779,17,18767] {-} cyclic($c5,$c5,$c9,$c8).
% 31.94/32.10 19082 [hyper,18853,17,18852] {-} cyclic($c5,$c9,$c3,$c2).
% 31.94/32.10 20044 [hyper,18883,17,18852] {-} cyclic($c5,$c9,$c3,$c8).
% 31.94/32.10 31067 [hyper,20044,17,19082] {-} cyclic($c9,$c3,$c2,$c8).
% 31.94/32.10 31068 [binary,31067.1,113.1] {-} $F.
% 31.94/32.10
% 31.94/32.10 % SZS output end Refutation
% 31.94/32.10 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 31.94/32.10
% 31.94/32.10
% 31.94/32.10 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 31.94/32.10
% 31.94/32.10
% 31.94/32.10 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 31.94/32.10
% 31.94/32.10 ============ end of search ============
% 31.94/32.10
% 31.94/32.10 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 31.94/32.10
% 31.94/32.10 Process 26193 finished Fri Jun 17 18:34:55 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------