TSTP Solution File: GEO603+1 by SOS---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : GEO603+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 06:21:06 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 30.74s 30.91s
% Output   : Refutation 30.74s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : GEO603+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.5.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 05:19:09 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.14/0.38  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.14/0.38  The process was started by sandbox2 on n026.cluster.edu,
% 0.14/0.38  Sat Jun 18 05:19:09 2022
% 0.14/0.38  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 22002.
% 0.14/0.38  
% 0.14/0.38  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.14/0.38  set(auto).
% 0.14/0.38     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.14/0.38     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.14/0.38     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.14/0.38     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.14/0.38     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.14/0.38     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.14/0.38     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.14/0.38     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.14/0.38     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.14/0.38     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.14/0.38     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.14/0.38     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.14/0.38     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.14/0.38  clear(print_given).
% 0.14/0.38  
% 0.14/0.38  formula_list(usable).
% 0.14/0.38  
% 0.14/0.38  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=5.
% 0.14/0.38  
% 0.14/0.38  This ia a non-Horn set with equality.  The strategy will be
% 0.14/0.38  Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.14/0.38  unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.14/0.38  clauses in usable.
% 0.14/0.38  
% 0.14/0.38     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.14/0.38     dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.14/0.38     dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.14/0.38     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.14/0.38     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.14/0.38     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.14/0.38     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.14/0.38     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.14/0.38     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.14/0.38     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.14/0.38     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.14/0.38     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.14/0.38     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.14/0.38     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.14/0.38     dependent: set(factor).
% 0.14/0.38  
% 0.14/0.38  ------------> process usable:
% 0.14/0.38    Following clause subsumed by 72 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -eqangle(A,B,C,D,C,D,A,B)|perp(A,B,C,D)|para(A,B,C,D).
% 0.14/0.38  
% 0.14/0.38  ------------> process sos:
% 0.14/0.38    Following clause subsumed by 164 during input processing: 0 [copy,164,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.14/0.38  164 back subsumes 146.
% 0.14/0.38  164 back subsumes 145.
% 0.14/0.38  164 back subsumes 144.
% 0.14/0.38  164 back subsumes 143.
% 0.14/0.38  
% 0.14/0.38  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.21/0.45  
% 0.21/0.45  
% 0.21/0.45  Failed to model usable list: disabling FINDER
% 0.21/0.45  
% 0.21/0.45  
% 0.21/0.45  
% 0.21/0.45  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.21/0.45  
% 0.21/0.45  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.21/0.45  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.21/0.45  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.21/0.45  number of clauses in intial UL: 154
% 0.21/0.45  number of clauses initially in problem: 160
% 0.21/0.45  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 96
% 0.21/0.45  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 89
% 0.21/0.45  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.21/0.45  absolute distinct symbol count: 39
% 0.21/0.45     distinct predicate count: 12
% 0.21/0.45     distinct function count: 20
% 0.21/0.45     distinct constant count: 7
% 0.21/0.45  
% 0.21/0.45  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.21/0.45  
% 0.21/0.45  
% 0.21/0.45  
% 0.21/0.45  =========== start of search ===========
% 6.50/6.68  
% 6.50/6.68  
% 6.50/6.68  Changing weight limit from 60 to 56.
% 6.50/6.68  
% 6.50/6.68  Resetting weight limit to 56 after 200 givens.
% 6.50/6.68  
% 9.07/9.29  
% 9.07/9.29  
% 9.07/9.29  Changing weight limit from 56 to 55.
% 9.07/9.29  
% 9.07/9.29  Resetting weight limit to 55 after 215 givens.
% 9.07/9.29  
% 11.11/11.33  
% 11.11/11.33  
% 11.11/11.33  Changing weight limit from 55 to 54.
% 11.11/11.33  
% 11.11/11.33  Resetting weight limit to 54 after 230 givens.
% 11.11/11.33  
% 11.70/11.87  
% 11.70/11.87  
% 11.70/11.87  Changing weight limit from 54 to 52.
% 11.70/11.87  
% 11.70/11.87  Resetting weight limit to 52 after 235 givens.
% 11.70/11.87  
% 13.20/13.38  
% 13.20/13.38  
% 13.20/13.38  Changing weight limit from 52 to 51.
% 13.20/13.38  
% 13.20/13.38  Resetting weight limit to 51 after 245 givens.
% 13.20/13.38  
% 16.53/16.72  
% 16.53/16.72  
% 16.53/16.72  Changing weight limit from 51 to 50.
% 16.53/16.72  
% 16.53/16.72  Resetting weight limit to 50 after 270 givens.
% 16.53/16.72  
% 18.97/19.18  
% 18.97/19.18  
% 18.97/19.18  Changing weight limit from 50 to 49.
% 18.97/19.18  
% 18.97/19.18  Modelling stopped after 300 given clauses and 0.00 seconds
% 18.97/19.18  
% 18.97/19.18  
% 18.97/19.18  Resetting weight limit to 49 after 300 givens.
% 18.97/19.18  
% 19.63/19.80  
% 19.63/19.80  
% 19.63/19.80  Changing weight limit from 49 to 46.
% 19.63/19.80  
% 19.63/19.80  Resetting weight limit to 46 after 305 givens.
% 19.63/19.80  
% 20.23/20.45  
% 20.23/20.45  
% 20.23/20.45  Changing weight limit from 46 to 45.
% 20.23/20.45  
% 20.23/20.45  Resetting weight limit to 45 after 310 givens.
% 20.23/20.45  
% 20.72/20.91  
% 20.72/20.91  
% 20.72/20.91  Changing weight limit from 45 to 34.
% 20.72/20.91  
% 20.72/20.91  Resetting weight limit to 34 after 315 givens.
% 20.72/20.91  
% 20.84/21.04  
% 20.84/21.04  
% 20.84/21.04  Changing weight limit from 34 to 31.
% 20.84/21.04  
% 20.84/21.04  Resetting weight limit to 31 after 320 givens.
% 20.84/21.04  
% 21.16/21.35  
% 21.16/21.35  
% 21.16/21.35  Changing weight limit from 31 to 30.
% 21.16/21.35  
% 21.16/21.35  Resetting weight limit to 30 after 325 givens.
% 21.16/21.35  
% 22.52/22.72  
% 22.52/22.72  
% 22.52/22.72  Changing weight limit from 30 to 29.
% 22.52/22.72  
% 22.52/22.72  Resetting weight limit to 29 after 515 givens.
% 22.52/22.72  
% 23.08/23.27  
% 23.08/23.27  
% 23.08/23.27  Changing weight limit from 29 to 26.
% 23.08/23.27  
% 23.08/23.27  Resetting weight limit to 26 after 640 givens.
% 23.08/23.27  
% 23.08/23.30  
% 23.08/23.30  
% 23.08/23.30  Changing weight limit from 26 to 22.
% 23.08/23.30  
% 23.08/23.30  Resetting weight limit to 22 after 655 givens.
% 23.08/23.30  
% 23.13/23.31  
% 23.13/23.31  
% 23.13/23.31  Changing weight limit from 22 to 18.
% 23.13/23.31  
% 23.13/23.31  Resetting weight limit to 18 after 660 givens.
% 23.13/23.31  
% 23.40/23.58  
% 23.40/23.58  
% 23.40/23.58  Changing weight limit from 18 to 17.
% 23.40/23.58  
% 23.40/23.58  Resetting weight limit to 17 after 830 givens.
% 23.40/23.58  
% 23.44/23.62  
% 23.44/23.62  
% 23.44/23.62  Changing weight limit from 17 to 16.
% 23.44/23.62  
% 23.44/23.62  Resetting weight limit to 16 after 855 givens.
% 23.44/23.62  
% 23.63/23.83  
% 23.63/23.83  
% 23.63/23.83  Changing weight limit from 16 to 14.
% 23.63/23.83  
% 23.63/23.83  Resetting weight limit to 14 after 1015 givens.
% 23.63/23.83  
% 24.55/24.77  
% 24.55/24.77  
% 24.55/24.77  Changing weight limit from 14 to 12.
% 24.55/24.77  
% 24.55/24.77  Resetting weight limit to 12 after 1570 givens.
% 24.55/24.77  
% 24.60/24.81  
% 24.60/24.81  
% 24.60/24.81  Changing weight limit from 12 to 11.
% 24.60/24.81  
% 24.60/24.81  Resetting weight limit to 11 after 1575 givens.
% 24.60/24.81  
% 24.70/24.88  
% 24.70/24.88  
% 24.70/24.88  Changing weight limit from 11 to 10.
% 24.70/24.88  
% 24.70/24.88  Resetting weight limit to 10 after 1585 givens.
% 24.70/24.88  
% 26.37/26.59  
% 26.37/26.59  
% 26.37/26.59  Changing weight limit from 10 to 9.
% 26.37/26.59  
% 26.37/26.59  Resetting weight limit to 9 after 2025 givens.
% 26.37/26.59  
% 30.74/30.91  
% 30.74/30.91  -- HEY sandbox2, WE HAVE A PROOF!! -- 
% 30.74/30.91  
% 30.74/30.91  ----> UNIT CONFLICT at  30.26 sec ----> 59804 [binary,59803.1,113.1] {-} $F.
% 30.74/30.91  
% 30.74/30.91  Length of proof is 9.  Level of proof is 8.
% 30.74/30.91  
% 30.74/30.91  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 30.74/30.91  % SZS status Theorem
% 30.74/30.91  % SZS output start Refutation
% 30.74/30.91  
% 30.74/30.91  3 [] {+} -coll(A,B,C)| -coll(A,B,D)|coll(C,D,A).
% 30.74/30.91  5 [] {+} -para(A,B,C,D)|para(C,D,A,B).
% 30.74/30.91  6 [] {+} -para(A,B,C,D)| -para(C,D,E,F)|para(A,B,E,F).
% 30.74/30.91  19 [] {+} -eqangle(A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H)|eqangle(C,D,A,B,G,H,E,F).
% 30.74/30.91  39 [] {+} -eqangle(A,B,C,D,E,F,C,D)|para(A,B,E,F).
% 30.74/30.91  40 [] {+} -para(A,B,C,D)|eqangle(A,B,E,F,C,D,E,F).
% 30.74/30.91  67 [] {+} -para(A,B,A,C)|coll(A,B,C).
% 30.74/30.91  113 [] {+} -coll($c7,$c1,$c4).
% 30.74/30.91  114 [factor,3.1.2] {+} -coll(A,B,C)|coll(C,C,A).
% 30.74/30.91  161 [] {-} para($c6,$c5,$c2,$c3).
% 30.74/30.91  227 [hyper,161,5] {-} para($c2,$c3,$c6,$c5).
% 30.74/30.91  3686 [hyper,227,6,161] {-} para($c6,$c5,$c6,$c5).
% 30.74/30.91  3890 [hyper,3686,40] {-} eqangle($c6,$c5,A,B,$c6,$c5,A,B).
% 30.74/30.91  17597 [hyper,3890,19] {-} eqangle(A,B,$c6,$c5,A,B,$c6,$c5).
% 30.74/30.91  38154 [hyper,17597,39] {-} para(A,B,A,B).
% 30.74/30.91  54425 [hyper,38154,67] {-} coll(A,B,B).
% 30.74/30.91  56006 [hyper,54425,114] {-} coll(A,A,B).
% 30.74/30.91  59803 [hyper,56006,3,56006] {-} coll(A,B,C).
% 30.74/30.91  59804 [binary,59803.1,113.1] {-} $F.
% 30.74/30.91  
% 30.74/30.91  % SZS output end Refutation
% 30.74/30.91  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 30.74/30.91  
% 30.74/30.91  
% 30.74/30.91  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 30.74/30.91  
% 30.74/30.91  
% 30.74/30.91  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 30.74/30.91  
% 30.74/30.91  ============ end of search ============
% 30.74/30.91  
% 30.74/30.91  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 30.74/30.91  
% 30.74/30.91  Process 22002 finished Sat Jun 18 05:19:40 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------