TSTP Solution File: GEO601+1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : GEO601+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 06:21:05 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 21.85s 22.06s
% Output : Refutation 21.85s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.11 % Problem : GEO601+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.5.0.
% 0.04/0.12 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Fri Jun 17 16:00:02 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.36 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.18/0.36 The process was started by sandbox on n022.cluster.edu,
% 0.18/0.36 Fri Jun 17 16:00:02 2022
% 0.18/0.36 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 12668.
% 0.18/0.36
% 0.18/0.36 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.18/0.36 set(auto).
% 0.18/0.36 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.18/0.36 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.18/0.36 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.18/0.36 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.18/0.36 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.18/0.36 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.18/0.36 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.18/0.36 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.18/0.36 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.18/0.36 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.18/0.36 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.18/0.36 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.18/0.36 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.18/0.36 clear(print_given).
% 0.18/0.36
% 0.18/0.36 formula_list(usable).
% 0.18/0.36
% 0.18/0.36 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=5.
% 0.18/0.36
% 0.18/0.36 This ia a non-Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 0.18/0.36 Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.18/0.36 unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.18/0.36 clauses in usable.
% 0.18/0.36
% 0.18/0.36 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.18/0.36 dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.18/0.36 dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.18/0.36 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.18/0.36 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.18/0.36 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.18/0.36 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.18/0.36 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.18/0.36 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.18/0.36 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.18/0.36 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.18/0.36 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.18/0.36 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.18/0.36 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.18/0.36 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.18/0.36
% 0.18/0.36 ------------> process usable:
% 0.18/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 72 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -eqangle(A,B,C,D,C,D,A,B)|perp(A,B,C,D)|para(A,B,C,D).
% 0.18/0.36
% 0.18/0.36 ------------> process sos:
% 0.18/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 163 during input processing: 0 [copy,163,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.18/0.36 163 back subsumes 146.
% 0.18/0.36 163 back subsumes 145.
% 0.18/0.36 163 back subsumes 144.
% 0.18/0.36 163 back subsumes 143.
% 0.18/0.36
% 0.18/0.36 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.18/0.42
% 0.18/0.42
% 0.18/0.42 Failed to model usable list: disabling FINDER
% 0.18/0.42
% 0.18/0.42
% 0.18/0.42
% 0.18/0.42 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.18/0.42
% 0.18/0.42 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.18/0.42 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.18/0.42 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.18/0.42 number of clauses in intial UL: 154
% 0.18/0.42 number of clauses initially in problem: 159
% 0.18/0.42 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 96
% 0.18/0.42 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 92
% 0.18/0.42 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.18/0.42 absolute distinct symbol count: 39
% 0.18/0.42 distinct predicate count: 12
% 0.18/0.42 distinct function count: 20
% 0.18/0.42 distinct constant count: 7
% 0.18/0.42
% 0.18/0.42 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.18/0.42
% 0.18/0.42
% 0.18/0.42
% 0.18/0.42 =========== start of search ===========
% 5.34/5.56
% 5.34/5.56
% 5.34/5.56 Changing weight limit from 60 to 58.
% 5.34/5.56
% 5.34/5.56 Resetting weight limit to 58 after 215 givens.
% 5.34/5.56
% 5.86/6.03
% 5.86/6.03
% 5.86/6.03 Changing weight limit from 58 to 56.
% 5.86/6.03
% 5.86/6.03 Resetting weight limit to 56 after 220 givens.
% 5.86/6.03
% 7.06/7.24
% 7.06/7.24
% 7.06/7.24 Changing weight limit from 56 to 55.
% 7.06/7.24
% 7.06/7.24 Resetting weight limit to 55 after 230 givens.
% 7.06/7.24
% 9.90/10.10
% 9.90/10.10
% 9.90/10.10 Changing weight limit from 55 to 54.
% 9.90/10.10
% 9.90/10.10 Resetting weight limit to 54 after 260 givens.
% 9.90/10.10
% 10.80/11.03
% 10.80/11.03
% 10.80/11.03 Changing weight limit from 54 to 51.
% 10.80/11.03
% 10.80/11.03 Resetting weight limit to 51 after 270 givens.
% 10.80/11.03
% 12.15/12.33
% 12.15/12.33
% 12.15/12.33 Changing weight limit from 51 to 50.
% 12.15/12.33
% 12.15/12.33 Resetting weight limit to 50 after 285 givens.
% 12.15/12.33
% 14.42/14.60
% 14.42/14.60
% 14.42/14.60 Changing weight limit from 50 to 49.
% 14.42/14.60
% 14.42/14.60 Modelling stopped after 300 given clauses and 0.00 seconds
% 14.42/14.60
% 14.42/14.60
% 14.42/14.60 Resetting weight limit to 49 after 310 givens.
% 14.42/14.60
% 15.53/15.72
% 15.53/15.72
% 15.53/15.72 Changing weight limit from 49 to 46.
% 15.53/15.72
% 15.53/15.72 Resetting weight limit to 46 after 325 givens.
% 15.53/15.72
% 15.74/15.98
% 15.74/15.98
% 15.74/15.98 Changing weight limit from 46 to 45.
% 15.74/15.98
% 15.74/15.98 Resetting weight limit to 45 after 330 givens.
% 15.74/15.98
% 16.15/16.38
% 16.15/16.38
% 16.15/16.38 Changing weight limit from 45 to 44.
% 16.15/16.38
% 16.15/16.38 Resetting weight limit to 44 after 340 givens.
% 16.15/16.38
% 16.36/16.59
% 16.36/16.59
% 16.36/16.59 Changing weight limit from 44 to 35.
% 16.36/16.59
% 16.36/16.59 Resetting weight limit to 35 after 345 givens.
% 16.36/16.59
% 16.80/17.01
% 16.80/17.01
% 16.80/17.01 Changing weight limit from 35 to 34.
% 16.80/17.01
% 16.80/17.01 Resetting weight limit to 34 after 355 givens.
% 16.80/17.01
% 17.27/17.51
% 17.27/17.51
% 17.27/17.51 Changing weight limit from 34 to 31.
% 17.27/17.51
% 17.27/17.51 Resetting weight limit to 31 after 365 givens.
% 17.27/17.51
% 17.78/17.98
% 17.78/17.98
% 17.78/17.98 Changing weight limit from 31 to 30.
% 17.78/17.98
% 17.78/17.98 Resetting weight limit to 30 after 375 givens.
% 17.78/17.98
% 21.04/21.25
% 21.04/21.25
% 21.04/21.25 Changing weight limit from 30 to 29.
% 21.04/21.25
% 21.04/21.25 Resetting weight limit to 29 after 485 givens.
% 21.04/21.25
% 21.66/21.90
% 21.66/21.90
% 21.66/21.90 Changing weight limit from 29 to 13.
% 21.66/21.90
% 21.66/21.90 Resetting weight limit to 13 after 520 givens.
% 21.66/21.90
% 21.74/21.97
% 21.74/21.97
% 21.74/21.97 Changing weight limit from 13 to 10.
% 21.74/21.97
% 21.74/21.97 Resetting weight limit to 10 after 585 givens.
% 21.74/21.97
% 21.85/22.06
% 21.85/22.06 -- HEY sandbox, WE HAVE A PROOF!! --
% 21.85/22.06
% 21.85/22.06 ----> UNIT CONFLICT at 21.68 sec ----> 14941 [binary,14940.1,113.1] {-} $F.
% 21.85/22.06
% 21.85/22.06 Length of proof is 46. Level of proof is 22.
% 21.85/22.06
% 21.85/22.06 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 21.85/22.06 % SZS status Theorem
% 21.85/22.06 % SZS output start Refutation
% 21.85/22.06
% 21.85/22.06 1 [] {+} -coll(A,B,C)|coll(A,C,B).
% 21.85/22.06 2 [] {+} -coll(A,B,C)|coll(B,A,C).
% 21.85/22.06 3 [] {+} -coll(A,B,C)| -coll(A,B,D)|coll(C,D,A).
% 21.85/22.06 8 [] {+} -perp(A,B,C,D)|perp(C,D,A,B).
% 21.85/22.06 9 [] {+} -perp(A,B,C,D)| -perp(C,D,E,F)|para(A,B,E,F).
% 21.85/22.06 14 [] {+} -cyclic(A,B,C,D)|cyclic(A,B,D,C).
% 21.85/22.06 15 [] {+} -cyclic(A,B,C,D)|cyclic(A,C,B,D).
% 21.85/22.06 17 [] {+} -cyclic(A,B,C,D)| -cyclic(A,B,C,E)|cyclic(B,C,D,E).
% 21.85/22.06 40 [] {+} -para(A,B,C,D)|eqangle(A,B,E,F,C,D,E,F).
% 21.85/22.06 43 [] {+} -eqangle(A,B,A,C,D,B,D,C)| -coll(A,D,C)|cyclic(B,C,A,D).
% 21.85/22.06 54 [] {+} -circle(A,B,C,D)| -coll(A,B,D)|perp(B,C,C,D).
% 21.85/22.06 67 [] {+} -para(A,B,A,C)|coll(A,B,C).
% 21.85/22.06 99 [] {+} -circle(A,B,C,D)|perp($f12(B,C,D,A),B,B,A).
% 21.85/22.06 113 [] {+} -cyclic($c7,$c2,$c1,$c3).
% 21.85/22.06 114 [factor,3.1.2] {+} -coll(A,B,C)|coll(C,C,A).
% 21.85/22.06 159 [] {-} coll($c4,$c6,$c5).
% 21.85/22.06 160 [] {-} circle($c3,$c7,$c4,$c5).
% 21.85/22.06 161 [] {-} circle($c2,$c7,$c4,$c6).
% 21.85/22.06 162 [] {-} circle($c1,$c6,$c7,$c5).
% 21.85/22.06 165 [hyper,159,2] {-} coll($c6,$c4,$c5).
% 21.85/22.06 193 [hyper,165,114] {-} coll($c5,$c5,$c6).
% 21.85/22.06 221 [hyper,160,99] {-} perp($f12($c7,$c4,$c5,$c3),$c7,$c7,$c3).
% 21.85/22.06 265 [hyper,193,114] {-} coll($c6,$c6,$c5).
% 21.85/22.06 293 [hyper,161,99] {-} perp($f12($c7,$c4,$c6,$c2),$c7,$c7,$c2).
% 21.85/22.06 364 [hyper,162,99] {-} perp($f12($c6,$c7,$c5,$c1),$c6,$c6,$c1).
% 21.85/22.06 743 [hyper,221,8] {-} perp($c7,$c3,$f12($c7,$c4,$c5,$c3),$c7).
% 21.85/22.06 835 [hyper,293,8] {-} perp($c7,$c2,$f12($c7,$c4,$c6,$c2),$c7).
% 21.85/22.06 869 [hyper,364,8] {-} perp($c6,$c1,$f12($c6,$c7,$c5,$c1),$c6).
% 21.85/22.06 904 [hyper,743,9,221] {-} para($c7,$c3,$c7,$c3).
% 21.85/22.06 938 [hyper,904,67] {-} coll($c7,$c3,$c3).
% 21.85/22.06 939 [hyper,904,40] {-} eqangle($c7,$c3,A,B,$c7,$c3,A,B).
% 21.85/22.06 1005 [hyper,938,114] {-} coll($c3,$c3,$c7).
% 21.85/22.06 1019 [hyper,1005,114] {-} coll($c7,$c7,$c3).
% 21.85/22.06 1387 [hyper,835,9,293] {-} para($c7,$c2,$c7,$c2).
% 21.85/22.06 1421 [hyper,1387,67] {-} coll($c7,$c2,$c2).
% 21.85/22.06 1440 [hyper,1421,114] {-} coll($c2,$c2,$c7).
% 21.85/22.06 1455 [hyper,1440,114] {-} coll($c7,$c7,$c2).
% 21.85/22.06 2223 [hyper,869,9,364] {-} para($c6,$c1,$c6,$c1).
% 21.85/22.06 2257 [hyper,2223,67] {-} coll($c6,$c1,$c1).
% 21.85/22.06 2276 [hyper,2257,114] {-} coll($c1,$c1,$c6).
% 21.85/22.06 2356 [hyper,2276,114] {-} coll($c6,$c6,$c1).
% 21.85/22.06 2394 [hyper,2356,3,265] {-} coll($c1,$c5,$c6).
% 21.85/22.06 2598 [hyper,2394,1] {-} coll($c1,$c6,$c5).
% 21.85/22.06 2723 [hyper,2598,54,162] {-} perp($c6,$c7,$c7,$c5).
% 21.85/22.06 3397 [hyper,2723,8] {-} perp($c7,$c5,$c6,$c7).
% 21.85/22.06 3470 [hyper,3397,9,2723] {-} para($c6,$c7,$c6,$c7).
% 21.85/22.06 3612 [hyper,3470,67] {-} coll($c6,$c7,$c7).
% 21.85/22.06 3631 [hyper,3612,114] {-} coll($c7,$c7,$c6).
% 21.85/22.06 3700 [hyper,3631,114] {-} coll($c6,$c6,$c7).
% 21.85/22.06 3733 [hyper,3700,3,2356] {-} coll($c1,$c7,$c6).
% 21.85/22.06 3891 [hyper,3733,1] {-} coll($c1,$c6,$c7).
% 21.85/22.06 4305 [hyper,3891,114] {-} coll($c7,$c7,$c1).
% 21.85/22.06 12936 [hyper,939,43,4305] {-} cyclic($c3,$c1,$c7,$c7).
% 21.85/22.06 12938 [hyper,939,43,1455] {-} cyclic($c3,$c2,$c7,$c7).
% 21.85/22.06 12940 [hyper,939,43,1019] {-} cyclic($c3,$c3,$c7,$c7).
% 21.85/22.06 12951 [hyper,12936,15] {-} cyclic($c3,$c7,$c1,$c7).
% 21.85/22.06 12960 [hyper,12938,15] {-} cyclic($c3,$c7,$c2,$c7).
% 21.85/22.06 12963 [hyper,12940,15] {-} cyclic($c3,$c7,$c3,$c7).
% 21.85/22.06 12984 [hyper,12951,14] {-} cyclic($c3,$c7,$c7,$c1).
% 21.85/22.06 13000 [hyper,12960,14] {-} cyclic($c3,$c7,$c7,$c2).
% 21.85/22.06 13019 [hyper,12963,14] {-} cyclic($c3,$c7,$c7,$c3).
% 21.85/22.06 13123 [hyper,13000,17,12984] {-} cyclic($c7,$c7,$c2,$c1).
% 21.85/22.06 13135 [hyper,13019,17,13000] {-} cyclic($c7,$c7,$c2,$c3).
% 21.85/22.06 14940 [hyper,13135,17,13123] {-} cyclic($c7,$c2,$c1,$c3).
% 21.85/22.06 14941 [binary,14940.1,113.1] {-} $F.
% 21.85/22.06
% 21.85/22.06 % SZS output end Refutation
% 21.85/22.06 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 21.85/22.06
% 21.85/22.06
% 21.85/22.06 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 21.85/22.06
% 21.85/22.06
% 21.85/22.06 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 21.85/22.06
% 21.85/22.06 ============ end of search ============
% 21.85/22.06
% 21.85/22.06 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 21.85/22.06
% 21.85/22.06 Process 12668 finished Fri Jun 17 16:00:24 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------