TSTP Solution File: GEO585+1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : GEO585+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 06:21:01 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 23.41s 23.61s
% Output : Refutation 23.41s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : GEO585+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.5.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Fri Jun 17 21:37:21 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.37 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.12/0.37 The process was started by sandbox2 on n016.cluster.edu,
% 0.12/0.37 Fri Jun 17 21:37:21 2022
% 0.12/0.37 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 17839.
% 0.12/0.37
% 0.12/0.37 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.12/0.37 set(auto).
% 0.12/0.37 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.12/0.37 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.12/0.37 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.12/0.37 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.12/0.37 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.12/0.37 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.12/0.37 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.12/0.37 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.12/0.37 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.12/0.37 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.12/0.37 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.12/0.37 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.12/0.37 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.12/0.37 clear(print_given).
% 0.12/0.37
% 0.12/0.37 formula_list(usable).
% 0.12/0.37
% 0.12/0.37 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=5.
% 0.12/0.37
% 0.12/0.37 This ia a non-Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 0.12/0.37 Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.12/0.37 unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.12/0.37 clauses in usable.
% 0.12/0.37
% 0.12/0.37 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.12/0.37 dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.12/0.37 dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.12/0.37 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.12/0.37 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.12/0.37 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.12/0.37 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.12/0.37 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.12/0.37 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.12/0.37 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.12/0.37 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.12/0.37 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.12/0.37 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.12/0.37 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.12/0.37 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.12/0.37
% 0.12/0.37 ------------> process usable:
% 0.12/0.37 Following clause subsumed by 72 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -eqangle(A,B,C,D,C,D,A,B)|perp(A,B,C,D)|para(A,B,C,D).
% 0.12/0.37
% 0.12/0.37 ------------> process sos:
% 0.12/0.37 Following clause subsumed by 167 during input processing: 0 [copy,167,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.12/0.37 167 back subsumes 146.
% 0.12/0.37 167 back subsumes 145.
% 0.12/0.37 167 back subsumes 144.
% 0.12/0.37 167 back subsumes 143.
% 0.12/0.37
% 0.12/0.37 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.19/0.44
% 0.19/0.44
% 0.19/0.44 Failed to model usable list: disabling FINDER
% 0.19/0.44
% 0.19/0.44
% 0.19/0.44
% 0.19/0.44 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.19/0.44
% 0.19/0.44 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.19/0.44 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.19/0.44 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.19/0.44 number of clauses in intial UL: 154
% 0.19/0.44 number of clauses initially in problem: 163
% 0.19/0.44 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 94
% 0.19/0.44 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 90
% 0.19/0.44 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.19/0.44 absolute distinct symbol count: 40
% 0.19/0.44 distinct predicate count: 12
% 0.19/0.44 distinct function count: 20
% 0.19/0.44 distinct constant count: 8
% 0.19/0.44
% 0.19/0.44 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.19/0.44
% 0.19/0.44
% 0.19/0.44
% 0.19/0.44 =========== start of search ===========
% 6.24/6.45
% 6.24/6.45
% 6.24/6.45 Changing weight limit from 60 to 57.
% 6.24/6.45
% 6.24/6.45 Resetting weight limit to 57 after 190 givens.
% 6.24/6.45
% 7.41/7.62
% 7.41/7.62
% 7.41/7.62 Changing weight limit from 57 to 56.
% 7.41/7.62
% 7.41/7.62 Resetting weight limit to 56 after 195 givens.
% 7.41/7.62
% 10.03/10.26
% 10.03/10.26
% 10.03/10.26 Changing weight limit from 56 to 55.
% 10.03/10.26
% 10.03/10.26 Resetting weight limit to 55 after 215 givens.
% 10.03/10.26
% 11.31/11.53
% 11.31/11.53
% 11.31/11.53 Changing weight limit from 55 to 52.
% 11.31/11.53
% 11.31/11.53 Resetting weight limit to 52 after 230 givens.
% 11.31/11.53
% 13.33/13.50
% 13.33/13.50
% 13.33/13.50 Changing weight limit from 52 to 51.
% 13.33/13.50
% 13.33/13.50 Resetting weight limit to 51 after 260 givens.
% 13.33/13.50
% 17.14/17.34
% 17.14/17.34
% 17.14/17.34 Changing weight limit from 51 to 50.
% 17.14/17.34
% 17.14/17.34 Modelling stopped after 300 given clauses and 0.00 seconds
% 17.14/17.34
% 17.14/17.34
% 17.14/17.34 Resetting weight limit to 50 after 320 givens.
% 17.14/17.34
% 18.55/18.72
% 18.55/18.72
% 18.55/18.72 Changing weight limit from 50 to 47.
% 18.55/18.72
% 18.55/18.72 Resetting weight limit to 47 after 325 givens.
% 18.55/18.72
% 19.41/19.60
% 19.41/19.60
% 19.41/19.60 Changing weight limit from 47 to 46.
% 19.41/19.60
% 19.41/19.60 Resetting weight limit to 46 after 330 givens.
% 19.41/19.60
% 20.06/20.29
% 20.06/20.29
% 20.06/20.29 Changing weight limit from 46 to 31.
% 20.06/20.29
% 20.06/20.29 Resetting weight limit to 31 after 335 givens.
% 20.06/20.29
% 20.95/21.18
% 20.95/21.18
% 20.95/21.18 Changing weight limit from 31 to 30.
% 20.95/21.18
% 20.95/21.18 Resetting weight limit to 30 after 345 givens.
% 20.95/21.18
% 22.70/22.89
% 22.70/22.89
% 22.70/22.89 Changing weight limit from 30 to 29.
% 22.70/22.89
% 22.70/22.89 Resetting weight limit to 29 after 380 givens.
% 22.70/22.89
% 23.16/23.42
% 23.16/23.42
% 23.16/23.42 Changing weight limit from 29 to 18.
% 23.16/23.42
% 23.16/23.42 Resetting weight limit to 18 after 435 givens.
% 23.16/23.42
% 23.25/23.43
% 23.25/23.43
% 23.25/23.43 Changing weight limit from 18 to 14.
% 23.25/23.43
% 23.25/23.43 Resetting weight limit to 14 after 445 givens.
% 23.25/23.43
% 23.25/23.46
% 23.25/23.46
% 23.25/23.46 Changing weight limit from 14 to 13.
% 23.25/23.46
% 23.25/23.46 Resetting weight limit to 13 after 460 givens.
% 23.25/23.46
% 23.25/23.46
% 23.25/23.46
% 23.25/23.46 Changing weight limit from 13 to 10.
% 23.25/23.46
% 23.25/23.46 Resetting weight limit to 10 after 465 givens.
% 23.25/23.46
% 23.41/23.61
% 23.41/23.61 -- HEY sandbox2, WE HAVE A PROOF!! --
% 23.41/23.61
% 23.41/23.61 ----> UNIT CONFLICT at 23.20 sec ----> 16615 [binary,16614.1,113.1] {-} $F.
% 23.41/23.61
% 23.41/23.61 Length of proof is 36. Level of proof is 13.
% 23.41/23.61
% 23.41/23.61 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 23.41/23.61 % SZS status Theorem
% 23.41/23.61 % SZS output start Refutation
% 23.41/23.61
% 23.41/23.61 1 [] {+} -coll(A,B,C)|coll(A,C,B).
% 23.41/23.61 3 [] {+} -coll(A,B,C)| -coll(A,B,D)|coll(C,D,A).
% 23.41/23.61 8 [] {+} -perp(A,B,C,D)|perp(C,D,A,B).
% 23.41/23.61 9 [] {+} -perp(A,B,C,D)| -perp(C,D,E,F)|para(A,B,E,F).
% 23.41/23.61 14 [] {+} -cyclic(A,B,C,D)|cyclic(A,B,D,C).
% 23.41/23.61 15 [] {+} -cyclic(A,B,C,D)|cyclic(A,C,B,D).
% 23.41/23.61 17 [] {+} -cyclic(A,B,C,D)| -cyclic(A,B,C,E)|cyclic(B,C,D,E).
% 23.41/23.61 40 [] {+} -para(A,B,C,D)|eqangle(A,B,E,F,C,D,E,F).
% 23.41/23.61 43 [] {+} -eqangle(A,B,A,C,D,B,D,C)| -coll(A,D,C)|cyclic(B,C,A,D).
% 23.41/23.61 67 [] {+} -para(A,B,A,C)|coll(A,B,C).
% 23.41/23.61 113 [] {+} -cyclic($c8,$c3,$c4,$c2).
% 23.41/23.61 114 [factor,3.1.2] {+} -coll(A,B,C)|coll(C,C,A).
% 23.41/23.61 161 [] {-} perp($c8,$c7,$c4,$c3).
% 23.41/23.61 162 [] {-} perp($c8,$c4,$c7,$c3).
% 23.41/23.61 164 [] {-} perp($c8,$c6,$c4,$c2).
% 23.41/23.61 202 [hyper,161,8] {-} perp($c4,$c3,$c8,$c7).
% 23.41/23.61 220 [hyper,162,8] {-} perp($c7,$c3,$c8,$c4).
% 23.41/23.61 264 [hyper,164,8] {-} perp($c4,$c2,$c8,$c6).
% 23.41/23.61 326 [hyper,202,9,161] {-} para($c8,$c7,$c8,$c7).
% 23.41/23.61 327 [hyper,202,9,161] {-} para($c4,$c3,$c4,$c3).
% 23.41/23.61 397 [hyper,220,9,162] {-} para($c8,$c4,$c8,$c4).
% 23.41/23.61 581 [hyper,264,9,164] {-} para($c4,$c2,$c4,$c2).
% 23.41/23.61 802 [hyper,326,40] {-} eqangle($c8,$c7,A,B,$c8,$c7,A,B).
% 23.41/23.61 1213 [hyper,327,67] {-} coll($c4,$c3,$c3).
% 23.41/23.61 1231 [hyper,1213,114] {-} coll($c3,$c3,$c4).
% 23.41/23.61 1245 [hyper,1231,114] {-} coll($c4,$c4,$c3).
% 23.41/23.61 1655 [hyper,397,67] {-} coll($c8,$c4,$c4).
% 23.41/23.61 1674 [hyper,1655,114] {-} coll($c4,$c4,$c8).
% 23.41/23.61 1689 [hyper,1674,114] {-} coll($c8,$c8,$c4).
% 23.41/23.61 1690 [hyper,1674,3,1245] {-} coll($c3,$c8,$c4).
% 23.41/23.61 1798 [hyper,1690,1] {-} coll($c3,$c4,$c8).
% 23.41/23.61 1941 [hyper,1798,114] {-} coll($c8,$c8,$c3).
% 23.41/23.61 5773 [hyper,581,67] {-} coll($c4,$c2,$c2).
% 23.41/23.61 5791 [hyper,5773,114] {-} coll($c2,$c2,$c4).
% 23.41/23.61 5806 [hyper,5791,114] {-} coll($c4,$c4,$c2).
% 23.41/23.61 5917 [hyper,5806,3,1674] {-} coll($c2,$c8,$c4).
% 23.41/23.61 6128 [hyper,5917,1] {-} coll($c2,$c4,$c8).
% 23.41/23.61 6343 [hyper,6128,114] {-} coll($c8,$c8,$c2).
% 23.41/23.61 12912 [hyper,802,43,6343] {-} cyclic($c7,$c2,$c8,$c8).
% 23.41/23.61 12914 [hyper,802,43,1941] {-} cyclic($c7,$c3,$c8,$c8).
% 23.41/23.61 12915 [hyper,802,43,1689] {-} cyclic($c7,$c4,$c8,$c8).
% 23.41/23.61 14279 [hyper,12912,15] {-} cyclic($c7,$c8,$c2,$c8).
% 23.41/23.61 14288 [hyper,12914,15] {-} cyclic($c7,$c8,$c3,$c8).
% 23.41/23.61 14291 [hyper,12915,15] {-} cyclic($c7,$c8,$c4,$c8).
% 23.41/23.61 14702 [hyper,14279,14] {-} cyclic($c7,$c8,$c8,$c2).
% 23.41/23.61 14729 [hyper,14288,14] {-} cyclic($c7,$c8,$c8,$c3).
% 23.41/23.61 14737 [hyper,14291,14] {-} cyclic($c7,$c8,$c8,$c4).
% 23.41/23.61 15626 [hyper,14729,17,14702] {-} cyclic($c8,$c8,$c3,$c2).
% 23.41/23.61 15652 [hyper,14737,17,14729] {-} cyclic($c8,$c8,$c3,$c4).
% 23.41/23.61 16614 [hyper,15652,17,15626] {-} cyclic($c8,$c3,$c4,$c2).
% 23.41/23.61 16615 [binary,16614.1,113.1] {-} $F.
% 23.41/23.61
% 23.41/23.61 % SZS output end Refutation
% 23.41/23.61 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 23.41/23.61
% 23.41/23.61
% 23.41/23.61 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 23.41/23.61
% 23.41/23.61
% 23.41/23.61 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 23.41/23.61
% 23.41/23.61 ============ end of search ============
% 23.41/23.61
% 23.41/23.61 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 23.41/23.61
% 23.41/23.61 Process 17839 finished Fri Jun 17 21:37:44 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------