TSTP Solution File: GEO579+1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : GEO579+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 06:20:59 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 15.86s 16.06s
% Output : Refutation 15.86s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.05/0.10 % Problem : GEO579+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.5.0.
% 0.05/0.11 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.10/0.31 % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.31 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.31 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.31 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.31 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.31 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.31 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.10/0.31 % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 05:50:16 EDT 2022
% 0.10/0.31 % CPUTime :
% 0.15/0.33 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.15/0.33 The process was started by sandbox on n032.cluster.edu,
% 0.15/0.33 Sat Jun 18 05:50:16 2022
% 0.15/0.33 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 20472.
% 0.15/0.33
% 0.15/0.33 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.15/0.33 set(auto).
% 0.15/0.33 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.15/0.33 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.15/0.33 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.15/0.33 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.15/0.33 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.15/0.33 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.15/0.33 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.15/0.33 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.15/0.33 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.15/0.33 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.15/0.33 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.15/0.33 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.15/0.33 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.15/0.33 clear(print_given).
% 0.15/0.33
% 0.15/0.33 formula_list(usable).
% 0.15/0.33
% 0.15/0.33 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=5.
% 0.15/0.33
% 0.15/0.33 This ia a non-Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 0.15/0.33 Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.15/0.33 unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.15/0.33 clauses in usable.
% 0.15/0.33
% 0.15/0.33 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.15/0.33 dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.15/0.33 dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.15/0.33 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.15/0.33 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.15/0.33 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.15/0.33 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.15/0.33 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.15/0.33 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.15/0.33 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.15/0.33 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.15/0.33 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.15/0.33 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.15/0.33 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.15/0.33 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.15/0.33
% 0.15/0.33 ------------> process usable:
% 0.15/0.33 Following clause subsumed by 72 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -eqangle(A,B,C,D,C,D,A,B)|perp(A,B,C,D)|para(A,B,C,D).
% 0.15/0.33
% 0.15/0.33 ------------> process sos:
% 0.15/0.33 Following clause subsumed by 168 during input processing: 0 [copy,168,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.15/0.33 168 back subsumes 146.
% 0.15/0.33 168 back subsumes 145.
% 0.15/0.33 168 back subsumes 144.
% 0.15/0.33 168 back subsumes 143.
% 0.15/0.33
% 0.15/0.33 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.15/0.37
% 0.15/0.37
% 0.15/0.37 Failed to model usable list: disabling FINDER
% 0.15/0.37
% 0.15/0.37
% 0.15/0.37
% 0.15/0.37 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.15/0.37
% 0.15/0.37 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.15/0.37 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.15/0.37 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.15/0.37 number of clauses in intial UL: 154
% 0.15/0.37 number of clauses initially in problem: 164
% 0.15/0.37 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 93
% 0.15/0.37 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 89
% 0.15/0.37 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.15/0.37 absolute distinct symbol count: 39
% 0.15/0.37 distinct predicate count: 12
% 0.15/0.37 distinct function count: 20
% 0.15/0.37 distinct constant count: 7
% 0.15/0.37
% 0.15/0.37 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.15/0.37
% 0.15/0.37
% 0.15/0.37
% 0.15/0.37 =========== start of search ===========
% 14.48/14.73
% 14.48/14.73
% 14.48/14.73 Changing weight limit from 60 to 59.
% 14.48/14.73
% 14.48/14.73 Resetting weight limit to 59 after 245 givens.
% 14.48/14.73
% 15.86/16.06
% 15.86/16.06 -- HEY sandbox, WE HAVE A PROOF!! --
% 15.86/16.06
% 15.86/16.06 ----> UNIT CONFLICT at 15.70 sec ----> 6200 [binary,6199.1,113.1] {-} $F.
% 15.86/16.06
% 15.86/16.06 Length of proof is 18. Level of proof is 7.
% 15.86/16.06
% 15.86/16.06 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 15.86/16.06 % SZS status Theorem
% 15.86/16.06 % SZS output start Refutation
% 15.86/16.06
% 15.86/16.06 1 [] {+} -coll(A,B,C)|coll(A,C,B).
% 15.86/16.06 2 [] {+} -coll(A,B,C)|coll(B,A,C).
% 15.86/16.06 3 [] {+} -coll(A,B,C)| -coll(A,B,D)|coll(C,D,A).
% 15.86/16.06 113 [] {+} -coll($c1,$c3,$c2).
% 15.86/16.06 114 [factor,3.1.2] {+} -coll(A,B,C)|coll(C,C,A).
% 15.86/16.06 163 [] {-} coll($c3,$c7,$c5).
% 15.86/16.06 165 [] {-} coll($c2,$c6,$c5).
% 15.86/16.06 167 [] {-} coll($c1,$c7,$c4).
% 15.86/16.06 205 [hyper,163,114] {-} coll($c5,$c5,$c3).
% 15.86/16.06 206 [hyper,163,2] {-} coll($c7,$c3,$c5).
% 15.86/16.06 207 [hyper,163,1] {-} coll($c3,$c5,$c7).
% 15.86/16.06 220 [hyper,165,114] {-} coll($c5,$c5,$c2).
% 15.86/16.06 237 [hyper,167,1] {-} coll($c1,$c4,$c7).
% 15.86/16.06 300 [hyper,206,114] {-} coll($c5,$c5,$c7).
% 15.86/16.06 314 [hyper,207,114] {-} coll($c7,$c7,$c3).
% 15.86/16.06 330 [hyper,220,3,205] {-} coll($c2,$c3,$c5).
% 15.86/16.06 454 [hyper,237,114] {-} coll($c7,$c7,$c1).
% 15.86/16.06 496 [hyper,300,3,220] {-} coll($c2,$c7,$c5).
% 15.86/16.06 613 [hyper,330,1] {-} coll($c2,$c5,$c3).
% 15.86/16.06 823 [hyper,454,3,314] {-} coll($c3,$c1,$c7).
% 15.86/16.06 975 [hyper,496,1] {-} coll($c2,$c5,$c7).
% 15.86/16.06 2214 [hyper,823,1] {-} coll($c3,$c7,$c1).
% 15.86/16.06 2721 [hyper,975,3,613] {-} coll($c3,$c7,$c2).
% 15.86/16.06 4253 [hyper,2721,3,2214] {-} coll($c1,$c2,$c3).
% 15.86/16.06 6199 [hyper,4253,1] {-} coll($c1,$c3,$c2).
% 15.86/16.06 6200 [binary,6199.1,113.1] {-} $F.
% 15.86/16.06
% 15.86/16.06 % SZS output end Refutation
% 15.86/16.06 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 15.86/16.06
% 15.86/16.06
% 15.86/16.06 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 15.86/16.06
% 15.86/16.06
% 15.86/16.06 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 15.86/16.06
% 15.86/16.06 ============ end of search ============
% 15.86/16.06
% 15.86/16.06 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 15.86/16.06
% 15.86/16.06 Process 20472 finished Sat Jun 18 05:50:32 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------