TSTP Solution File: GEO578+1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : GEO578+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 06:20:59 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 18.47s 18.67s
% Output : Refutation 18.47s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13 % Problem : GEO578+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.5.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Fri Jun 17 16:52:07 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.38 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.13/0.38 The process was started by sandbox2 on n011.cluster.edu,
% 0.13/0.38 Fri Jun 17 16:52:07 2022
% 0.13/0.38 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 26347.
% 0.13/0.38
% 0.13/0.38 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.13/0.38 set(auto).
% 0.13/0.38 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.13/0.38 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.13/0.38 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.13/0.38 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.13/0.38 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.13/0.38 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.13/0.38 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.13/0.38 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.13/0.38 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.13/0.38 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.13/0.38 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.13/0.38 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.13/0.38 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.13/0.38 clear(print_given).
% 0.13/0.38
% 0.13/0.38 formula_list(usable).
% 0.13/0.38
% 0.13/0.38 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=5.
% 0.13/0.38
% 0.13/0.38 This ia a non-Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 0.13/0.38 Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.13/0.38 unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.13/0.38 clauses in usable.
% 0.13/0.38
% 0.13/0.38 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.13/0.38 dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.13/0.38 dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.13/0.38 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.13/0.38 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.13/0.38 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.13/0.38 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.13/0.38 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.13/0.38 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.13/0.38 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.13/0.38 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.13/0.38 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.13/0.38 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.13/0.38 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.13/0.38 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.13/0.38
% 0.13/0.38 ------------> process usable:
% 0.13/0.38 Following clause subsumed by 72 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -eqangle(A,B,C,D,C,D,A,B)|perp(A,B,C,D)|para(A,B,C,D).
% 0.13/0.38
% 0.13/0.38 ------------> process sos:
% 0.13/0.38 Following clause subsumed by 164 during input processing: 0 [copy,164,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.13/0.38 164 back subsumes 146.
% 0.13/0.38 164 back subsumes 145.
% 0.13/0.38 164 back subsumes 144.
% 0.13/0.38 164 back subsumes 143.
% 0.13/0.38
% 0.13/0.38 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.20/0.45
% 0.20/0.45
% 0.20/0.45 Failed to model usable list: disabling FINDER
% 0.20/0.45
% 0.20/0.45
% 0.20/0.45
% 0.20/0.45 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.20/0.45
% 0.20/0.45 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.20/0.45 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.20/0.45 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.20/0.45 number of clauses in intial UL: 154
% 0.20/0.45 number of clauses initially in problem: 160
% 0.20/0.45 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 96
% 0.20/0.45 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 94
% 0.20/0.45 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.20/0.45 absolute distinct symbol count: 37
% 0.20/0.45 distinct predicate count: 12
% 0.20/0.45 distinct function count: 20
% 0.20/0.45 distinct constant count: 5
% 0.20/0.45
% 0.20/0.45 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.20/0.45
% 0.20/0.45
% 0.20/0.45
% 0.20/0.45 =========== start of search ===========
% 9.82/10.03
% 9.82/10.03
% 9.82/10.03 Changing weight limit from 60 to 55.
% 9.82/10.03
% 9.82/10.03 Resetting weight limit to 55 after 185 givens.
% 9.82/10.03
% 13.22/13.41
% 13.22/13.41
% 13.22/13.41 Changing weight limit from 55 to 54.
% 13.22/13.41
% 13.22/13.41 Resetting weight limit to 54 after 200 givens.
% 13.22/13.41
% 14.93/15.11
% 14.93/15.11
% 14.93/15.11 Changing weight limit from 54 to 50.
% 14.93/15.11
% 14.93/15.11 Resetting weight limit to 50 after 210 givens.
% 14.93/15.11
% 15.72/15.90
% 15.72/15.90
% 15.72/15.90 Changing weight limit from 50 to 49.
% 15.72/15.90
% 15.72/15.90 Resetting weight limit to 49 after 215 givens.
% 15.72/15.90
% 16.35/16.59
% 16.35/16.59
% 16.35/16.59 Changing weight limit from 49 to 34.
% 16.35/16.59
% 16.35/16.59 Resetting weight limit to 34 after 220 givens.
% 16.35/16.59
% 16.73/16.96
% 16.73/16.96
% 16.73/16.96 Changing weight limit from 34 to 31.
% 16.73/16.96
% 16.73/16.96 Resetting weight limit to 31 after 225 givens.
% 16.73/16.96
% 16.92/17.18
% 16.92/17.18
% 16.92/17.18 Changing weight limit from 31 to 30.
% 16.92/17.18
% 16.92/17.18 Resetting weight limit to 30 after 230 givens.
% 16.92/17.18
% 17.72/17.97
% 17.72/17.97
% 17.72/17.97 Changing weight limit from 30 to 29.
% 17.72/17.97
% 17.72/17.97 Resetting weight limit to 29 after 260 givens.
% 17.72/17.97
% 18.23/18.46
% 18.23/18.46
% 18.23/18.46 Changing weight limit from 29 to 11.
% 18.23/18.46
% 18.23/18.46 Modelling stopped after 300 given clauses and 0.00 seconds
% 18.23/18.46
% 18.23/18.46
% 18.23/18.46 Resetting weight limit to 11 after 350 givens.
% 18.23/18.46
% 18.30/18.50
% 18.30/18.50
% 18.30/18.50 Changing weight limit from 11 to 10.
% 18.30/18.50
% 18.30/18.50 Resetting weight limit to 10 after 360 givens.
% 18.30/18.50
% 18.47/18.67
% 18.47/18.67 -- HEY sandbox2, WE HAVE A PROOF!! --
% 18.47/18.67
% 18.47/18.67 ----> UNIT CONFLICT at 18.25 sec ----> 14986 [binary,14985.1,113.1] {-} $F.
% 18.47/18.67
% 18.47/18.67 Length of proof is 65. Level of proof is 15.
% 18.47/18.67
% 18.47/18.67 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 18.47/18.67 % SZS status Theorem
% 18.47/18.67 % SZS output start Refutation
% 18.47/18.67
% 18.47/18.67 1 [] {+} -coll(A,B,C)|coll(A,C,B).
% 18.47/18.67 2 [] {+} -coll(A,B,C)|coll(B,A,C).
% 18.47/18.67 3 [] {+} -coll(A,B,C)| -coll(A,B,D)|coll(C,D,A).
% 18.47/18.67 4 [] {+} -para(A,B,C,D)|para(A,B,D,C).
% 18.47/18.67 5 [] {+} -para(A,B,C,D)|para(C,D,A,B).
% 18.47/18.67 6 [] {+} -para(A,B,C,D)| -para(C,D,E,F)|para(A,B,E,F).
% 18.47/18.67 14 [] {+} -cyclic(A,B,C,D)|cyclic(A,B,D,C).
% 18.47/18.67 15 [] {+} -cyclic(A,B,C,D)|cyclic(A,C,B,D).
% 18.47/18.67 19 [] {+} -eqangle(A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H)|eqangle(C,D,A,B,G,H,E,F).
% 18.47/18.67 21 [] {+} -eqangle(A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H)|eqangle(A,B,E,F,C,D,G,H).
% 18.47/18.67 39 [] {+} -eqangle(A,B,C,D,E,F,C,D)|para(A,B,E,F).
% 18.47/18.67 40 [] {+} -para(A,B,C,D)|eqangle(A,B,E,F,C,D,E,F).
% 18.47/18.67 43 [] {+} -eqangle(A,B,A,C,D,B,D,C)| -coll(A,D,C)|cyclic(B,C,A,D).
% 18.47/18.67 44 [] {+} -cyclic(A,B,C,D)| -cyclic(A,B,C,E)| -cyclic(A,B,C,F)| -eqangle(C,A,C,B,F,D,F,E)|cong(A,B,D,E).
% 18.47/18.67 46 [] {+} -midp(A,B,C)| -para(A,D,C,E)| -coll(D,B,E)|midp(D,B,E).
% 18.47/18.67 65 [] {+} -midp(A,B,C)| -para(B,D,C,E)| -para(B,E,C,D)|midp(A,D,E).
% 18.47/18.67 67 [] {+} -para(A,B,A,C)|coll(A,B,C).
% 18.47/18.67 68 [] {+} -cong(A,B,A,C)| -coll(A,B,C)|midp(A,B,C).
% 18.47/18.67 69 [] {+} -midp(A,B,C)|cong(A,B,A,C).
% 18.47/18.67 73 [] {+} -eqangle(A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H)| -para(E,F,G,H)|para(A,B,C,D).
% 18.47/18.67 113 [] {+} -cong($c1,$c2,$c1,$c5).
% 18.47/18.67 114 [factor,3.1.2] {+} -coll(A,B,C)|coll(C,C,A).
% 18.47/18.67 123 [factor,44.2.3] {+} -cyclic(A,B,C,D)| -cyclic(A,B,C,E)| -eqangle(C,A,C,B,E,D,E,E)|cong(A,B,D,E).
% 18.47/18.67 129 [factor,65.2.3] {+} -midp(A,B,C)| -para(B,D,C,D)|midp(A,D,D).
% 18.47/18.67 159 [] {-} eqangle($c2,$c5,$c5,$c4,$c2,$c5,$c5,$c3).
% 18.47/18.67 160 [] {-} eqangle($c2,$c4,$c4,$c3,$c2,$c4,$c4,$c5).
% 18.47/18.67 162 [] {-} para($c5,$c4,$c1,$c2).
% 18.47/18.67 163 [] {-} coll($c1,$c5,$c3).
% 18.47/18.67 165 [hyper,159,21] {-} eqangle($c2,$c5,$c2,$c5,$c5,$c4,$c5,$c3).
% 18.47/18.67 167 [hyper,159,19] {-} eqangle($c5,$c4,$c2,$c5,$c5,$c3,$c2,$c5).
% 18.47/18.67 201 [hyper,163,114] {-} coll($c3,$c3,$c1).
% 18.47/18.67 202 [hyper,163,2] {-} coll($c5,$c1,$c3).
% 18.47/18.67 203 [hyper,163,1] {-} coll($c1,$c3,$c5).
% 18.47/18.67 216 [hyper,201,114] {-} coll($c1,$c1,$c3).
% 18.47/18.67 230 [hyper,202,114] {-} coll($c3,$c3,$c5).
% 18.47/18.67 231 [hyper,202,1] {-} coll($c5,$c3,$c1).
% 18.47/18.67 244 [hyper,160,21] {-} eqangle($c2,$c4,$c2,$c4,$c4,$c3,$c4,$c5).
% 18.47/18.67 246 [hyper,160,19] {-} eqangle($c4,$c3,$c2,$c4,$c4,$c5,$c2,$c4).
% 18.47/18.67 280 [hyper,203,114] {-} coll($c5,$c5,$c1).
% 18.47/18.67 294 [hyper,216,1] {-} coll($c1,$c3,$c1).
% 18.47/18.67 321 [hyper,230,114] {-} coll($c5,$c5,$c3).
% 18.47/18.67 371 [hyper,231,114] {-} coll($c1,$c1,$c5).
% 18.47/18.67 385 [hyper,280,1] {-} coll($c5,$c1,$c5).
% 18.47/18.67 412 [hyper,294,3,203] {-} coll($c5,$c1,$c1).
% 18.47/18.67 428 [hyper,162,5] {-} para($c1,$c2,$c5,$c4).
% 18.47/18.67 429 [hyper,162,4] {-} para($c5,$c4,$c2,$c1).
% 18.47/18.67 470 [hyper,321,1] {-} coll($c5,$c3,$c5).
% 18.47/18.67 554 [hyper,385,114] {-} coll($c5,$c5,$c5).
% 18.47/18.67 665 [hyper,167,39] {-} para($c5,$c4,$c5,$c3).
% 18.47/18.67 783 [hyper,428,6,162] {-} para($c5,$c4,$c5,$c4).
% 18.47/18.67 784 [hyper,428,6,162] {-} para($c1,$c2,$c1,$c2).
% 18.47/18.67 804 [hyper,429,5] {-} para($c2,$c1,$c5,$c4).
% 18.47/18.67 821 [hyper,665,73,165] {-} para($c2,$c5,$c2,$c5).
% 18.47/18.67 822 [hyper,665,67] {-} coll($c5,$c4,$c3).
% 18.47/18.67 844 [hyper,822,2] {-} coll($c4,$c5,$c3).
% 18.47/18.67 845 [hyper,822,1] {-} coll($c5,$c3,$c4).
% 18.47/18.67 953 [hyper,844,1] {-} coll($c4,$c3,$c5).
% 18.47/18.67 970 [hyper,845,3,470] {-} coll($c4,$c5,$c5).
% 18.47/18.67 971 [hyper,845,3,231] {-} coll($c4,$c1,$c5).
% 18.47/18.67 1002 [hyper,953,114] {-} coll($c5,$c5,$c4).
% 18.47/18.67 1340 [hyper,971,1] {-} coll($c4,$c5,$c1).
% 18.47/18.67 1779 [hyper,1340,114] {-} coll($c1,$c1,$c4).
% 18.47/18.67 2627 [hyper,783,40] {-} eqangle($c5,$c4,A,B,$c5,$c4,A,B).
% 18.47/18.67 2645 [hyper,784,67] {-} coll($c1,$c2,$c2).
% 18.47/18.67 2663 [hyper,2645,114] {-} coll($c2,$c2,$c1).
% 18.47/18.67 2678 [hyper,2663,114] {-} coll($c1,$c1,$c2).
% 18.47/18.67 2782 [hyper,2678,3,1779] {-} coll($c4,$c2,$c1).
% 18.47/18.67 2784 [hyper,2678,3,371] {-} coll($c5,$c2,$c1).
% 18.47/18.67 2814 [hyper,2782,1] {-} coll($c4,$c1,$c2).
% 18.47/18.67 2973 [hyper,2784,1] {-} coll($c5,$c1,$c2).
% 18.47/18.67 3113 [hyper,2814,114] {-} coll($c2,$c2,$c4).
% 18.47/18.67 3260 [hyper,2973,3,412] {-} coll($c1,$c2,$c5).
% 18.47/18.67 5105 [hyper,804,4] {-} para($c2,$c1,$c4,$c5).
% 18.47/18.67 5178 [hyper,821,4] {-} para($c2,$c5,$c5,$c2).
% 18.47/18.67 6037 [hyper,5178,5] {-} para($c5,$c2,$c2,$c5).
% 18.47/18.67 6980 [hyper,6037,6,5178] {-} para($c5,$c2,$c5,$c2).
% 18.47/18.67 7600 [hyper,246,39] {-} para($c4,$c3,$c4,$c5).
% 18.47/18.67 7684 [hyper,7600,73,244] {-} para($c2,$c4,$c2,$c4).
% 18.47/18.67 7769 [hyper,7684,4] {-} para($c2,$c4,$c4,$c2).
% 18.47/18.67 8281 [hyper,7769,5] {-} para($c4,$c2,$c2,$c4).
% 18.47/18.67 10155 [hyper,2627,43,1002] {-} cyclic($c4,$c4,$c5,$c5).
% 18.47/18.67 10156 [hyper,2627,43,554] {-} cyclic($c4,$c5,$c5,$c5).
% 18.47/18.67 10164 [hyper,10155,15] {-} cyclic($c4,$c5,$c4,$c5).
% 18.47/18.67 10180 [hyper,10164,14] {-} cyclic($c4,$c5,$c5,$c4).
% 18.47/18.67 10207 [hyper,10180,123,10156,2627] {-} cong($c4,$c5,$c4,$c5).
% 18.47/18.67 10265 [hyper,10207,68,970] {-} midp($c4,$c5,$c5).
% 18.47/18.67 10276 [hyper,10265,129,6980] {-} midp($c4,$c2,$c2).
% 18.47/18.67 10325 [hyper,10276,46,8281,3113] {-} midp($c2,$c2,$c4).
% 18.47/18.67 11255 [hyper,10325,46,5105,3260] {-} midp($c1,$c2,$c5).
% 18.47/18.67 14985 [hyper,11255,69] {-} cong($c1,$c2,$c1,$c5).
% 18.47/18.67 14986 [binary,14985.1,113.1] {-} $F.
% 18.47/18.67
% 18.47/18.67 % SZS output end Refutation
% 18.47/18.67 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 18.47/18.67
% 18.47/18.67
% 18.47/18.67 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 18.47/18.67
% 18.47/18.67
% 18.47/18.67 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 18.47/18.67
% 18.47/18.67 ============ end of search ============
% 18.47/18.67
% 18.47/18.67 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 18.47/18.67
% 18.47/18.67 Process 26347 finished Fri Jun 17 16:52:25 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------