TSTP Solution File: GEO567+1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : GEO567+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 06:20:56 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 25.09s 25.30s
% Output : Refutation 25.09s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : GEO567+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.5.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.14/0.34 % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.14/0.34 % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 02:33:47 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.14/0.37 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.14/0.37 The process was started by sandbox2 on n018.cluster.edu,
% 0.14/0.37 Sat Jun 18 02:33:47 2022
% 0.14/0.37 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 3877.
% 0.14/0.37
% 0.14/0.37 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.14/0.37 set(auto).
% 0.14/0.37 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.14/0.37 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.14/0.37 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.14/0.37 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.14/0.37 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.14/0.37 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.14/0.37 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.14/0.37 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.14/0.37 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.14/0.37 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.14/0.37 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.14/0.37 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.14/0.37 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.14/0.37 clear(print_given).
% 0.14/0.37
% 0.14/0.37 formula_list(usable).
% 0.14/0.37
% 0.14/0.37 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=5.
% 0.14/0.37
% 0.14/0.37 This ia a non-Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 0.14/0.37 Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.14/0.37 unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.14/0.37 clauses in usable.
% 0.14/0.37
% 0.14/0.37 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.14/0.37 dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.14/0.37 dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.14/0.37 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.14/0.37 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.14/0.37 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.14/0.37 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.14/0.37 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.14/0.37 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.14/0.37 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.14/0.37 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.14/0.37 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.14/0.37 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.14/0.37 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.14/0.37 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.14/0.37
% 0.14/0.37 ------------> process usable:
% 0.14/0.37 Following clause subsumed by 72 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -eqangle(A,B,C,D,C,D,A,B)|perp(A,B,C,D)|para(A,B,C,D).
% 0.14/0.37
% 0.14/0.37 ------------> process sos:
% 0.14/0.37 Following clause subsumed by 165 during input processing: 0 [copy,165,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.14/0.37 165 back subsumes 146.
% 0.14/0.37 165 back subsumes 145.
% 0.14/0.37 165 back subsumes 144.
% 0.14/0.37 165 back subsumes 143.
% 0.14/0.37
% 0.14/0.37 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.20/0.44
% 0.20/0.44
% 0.20/0.44 Failed to model usable list: disabling FINDER
% 0.20/0.44
% 0.20/0.44
% 0.20/0.44
% 0.20/0.44 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.20/0.44
% 0.20/0.44 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.20/0.44 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.20/0.44 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.20/0.44 number of clauses in intial UL: 154
% 0.20/0.44 number of clauses initially in problem: 161
% 0.20/0.44 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 95
% 0.20/0.44 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 94
% 0.20/0.44 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.20/0.44 absolute distinct symbol count: 38
% 0.20/0.44 distinct predicate count: 12
% 0.20/0.44 distinct function count: 20
% 0.20/0.44 distinct constant count: 6
% 0.20/0.44
% 0.20/0.44 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.20/0.44
% 0.20/0.44
% 0.20/0.44
% 0.20/0.44 =========== start of search ===========
% 7.76/7.94
% 7.76/7.94
% 7.76/7.94 Changing weight limit from 60 to 57.
% 7.76/7.94
% 7.76/7.94 Resetting weight limit to 57 after 255 givens.
% 7.76/7.94
% 8.40/8.61
% 8.40/8.61
% 8.40/8.61 Changing weight limit from 57 to 56.
% 8.40/8.61
% 8.40/8.61 Resetting weight limit to 56 after 260 givens.
% 8.40/8.61
% 11.85/12.06
% 11.85/12.06
% 11.85/12.06 Changing weight limit from 56 to 55.
% 11.85/12.06
% 11.85/12.06 Resetting weight limit to 55 after 280 givens.
% 11.85/12.06
% 13.42/13.66
% 13.42/13.66
% 13.42/13.66 Changing weight limit from 55 to 54.
% 13.42/13.66
% 13.42/13.66 Resetting weight limit to 54 after 285 givens.
% 13.42/13.66
% 14.60/14.78
% 14.60/14.78
% 14.60/14.78 Changing weight limit from 54 to 52.
% 14.60/14.78
% 14.60/14.78 Resetting weight limit to 52 after 290 givens.
% 14.60/14.78
% 16.03/16.24
% 16.03/16.24
% 16.03/16.24 Changing weight limit from 52 to 51.
% 16.03/16.24
% 16.03/16.24 Resetting weight limit to 51 after 295 givens.
% 16.03/16.24
% 18.45/18.62
% 18.45/18.62
% 18.45/18.62 Changing weight limit from 51 to 50.
% 18.45/18.62
% 18.45/18.62 Modelling stopped after 300 given clauses and 0.00 seconds
% 18.45/18.62
% 18.45/18.62
% 18.45/18.62 Resetting weight limit to 50 after 305 givens.
% 18.45/18.62
% 20.47/20.70
% 20.47/20.70
% 20.47/20.70 Changing weight limit from 50 to 49.
% 20.47/20.70
% 20.47/20.70 Resetting weight limit to 49 after 315 givens.
% 20.47/20.70
% 21.56/21.77
% 21.56/21.77
% 21.56/21.77 Changing weight limit from 49 to 45.
% 21.56/21.77
% 21.56/21.77 Resetting weight limit to 45 after 320 givens.
% 21.56/21.77
% 21.97/22.20
% 21.97/22.20
% 21.97/22.20 Changing weight limit from 45 to 31.
% 21.97/22.20
% 21.97/22.20 Resetting weight limit to 31 after 325 givens.
% 21.97/22.20
% 22.40/22.57
% 22.40/22.57
% 22.40/22.57 Changing weight limit from 31 to 30.
% 22.40/22.57
% 22.40/22.57 Resetting weight limit to 30 after 360 givens.
% 22.40/22.57
% 24.29/24.48
% 24.29/24.48
% 24.29/24.48 Changing weight limit from 30 to 29.
% 24.29/24.48
% 24.29/24.48 Resetting weight limit to 29 after 475 givens.
% 24.29/24.48
% 24.86/25.04
% 24.86/25.04
% 24.86/25.04 Changing weight limit from 29 to 11.
% 24.86/25.04
% 24.86/25.04 Resetting weight limit to 11 after 500 givens.
% 24.86/25.04
% 24.98/25.17
% 24.98/25.17
% 24.98/25.17 Changing weight limit from 11 to 10.
% 24.98/25.17
% 24.98/25.17 Resetting weight limit to 10 after 515 givens.
% 24.98/25.17
% 25.09/25.30
% 25.09/25.30 -- HEY sandbox2, WE HAVE A PROOF!! --
% 25.09/25.30
% 25.09/25.30 ----> UNIT CONFLICT at 24.90 sec ----> 15285 [binary,15284.1,113.1] {-} $F.
% 25.09/25.30
% 25.09/25.30 Length of proof is 37. Level of proof is 11.
% 25.09/25.30
% 25.09/25.30 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 25.09/25.30 % SZS status Theorem
% 25.09/25.30 % SZS output start Refutation
% 25.09/25.30
% 25.09/25.30 1 [] {+} -coll(A,B,C)|coll(A,C,B).
% 25.09/25.30 2 [] {+} -coll(A,B,C)|coll(B,A,C).
% 25.09/25.30 3 [] {+} -coll(A,B,C)| -coll(A,B,D)|coll(C,D,A).
% 25.09/25.30 8 [] {+} -perp(A,B,C,D)|perp(C,D,A,B).
% 25.09/25.30 9 [] {+} -perp(A,B,C,D)| -perp(C,D,E,F)|para(A,B,E,F).
% 25.09/25.30 14 [] {+} -cyclic(A,B,C,D)|cyclic(A,B,D,C).
% 25.09/25.30 15 [] {+} -cyclic(A,B,C,D)|cyclic(A,C,B,D).
% 25.09/25.30 17 [] {+} -cyclic(A,B,C,D)| -cyclic(A,B,C,E)|cyclic(B,C,D,E).
% 25.09/25.30 40 [] {+} -para(A,B,C,D)|eqangle(A,B,E,F,C,D,E,F).
% 25.09/25.30 43 [] {+} -eqangle(A,B,A,C,D,B,D,C)| -coll(A,D,C)|cyclic(B,C,A,D).
% 25.09/25.30 113 [] {+} -cyclic($c5,$c2,$c1,$c4).
% 25.09/25.30 114 [factor,3.1.2] {+} -coll(A,B,C)|coll(C,C,A).
% 25.09/25.30 159 [] {-} perp($c3,$c6,$c5,$c4).
% 25.09/25.30 160 [] {-} coll($c3,$c5,$c4).
% 25.09/25.30 162 [] {-} coll($c2,$c6,$c5).
% 25.09/25.30 164 [] {-} coll($c1,$c6,$c4).
% 25.09/25.30 166 [hyper,159,8] {-} perp($c5,$c4,$c3,$c6).
% 25.09/25.30 184 [hyper,160,114] {-} coll($c4,$c4,$c3).
% 25.09/25.30 185 [hyper,160,2] {-} coll($c5,$c3,$c4).
% 25.09/25.30 186 [hyper,160,1] {-} coll($c3,$c4,$c5).
% 25.09/25.30 199 [hyper,162,114] {-} coll($c5,$c5,$c2).
% 25.09/25.30 214 [hyper,164,114] {-} coll($c4,$c4,$c1).
% 25.09/25.30 247 [hyper,184,114] {-} coll($c3,$c3,$c4).
% 25.09/25.30 262 [hyper,185,1] {-} coll($c5,$c4,$c3).
% 25.09/25.30 275 [hyper,186,114] {-} coll($c5,$c5,$c3).
% 25.09/25.30 351 [hyper,214,3,184] {-} coll($c1,$c3,$c4).
% 25.09/25.30 379 [hyper,166,9,159] {-} para($c3,$c6,$c3,$c6).
% 25.09/25.30 473 [hyper,262,114] {-} coll($c3,$c3,$c5).
% 25.09/25.30 487 [hyper,275,3,199] {-} coll($c2,$c3,$c5).
% 25.09/25.30 824 [hyper,351,1] {-} coll($c1,$c4,$c3).
% 25.09/25.30 1389 [hyper,487,1] {-} coll($c2,$c5,$c3).
% 25.09/25.30 1892 [hyper,824,114] {-} coll($c3,$c3,$c1).
% 25.09/25.30 2552 [hyper,1389,114] {-} coll($c3,$c3,$c2).
% 25.09/25.30 6026 [hyper,379,40] {-} eqangle($c3,$c6,A,B,$c3,$c6,A,B).
% 25.09/25.30 8556 [hyper,6026,43,2552] {-} cyclic($c6,$c2,$c3,$c3).
% 25.09/25.30 8557 [hyper,6026,43,1892] {-} cyclic($c6,$c1,$c3,$c3).
% 25.09/25.30 8559 [hyper,6026,43,473] {-} cyclic($c6,$c5,$c3,$c3).
% 25.09/25.30 8560 [hyper,6026,43,247] {-} cyclic($c6,$c4,$c3,$c3).
% 25.09/25.30 8582 [hyper,8556,15] {-} cyclic($c6,$c3,$c2,$c3).
% 25.09/25.30 8601 [hyper,8557,15] {-} cyclic($c6,$c3,$c1,$c3).
% 25.09/25.30 8638 [hyper,8559,15] {-} cyclic($c6,$c3,$c5,$c3).
% 25.09/25.30 8657 [hyper,8560,15] {-} cyclic($c6,$c3,$c4,$c3).
% 25.09/25.30 8729 [hyper,8582,14] {-} cyclic($c6,$c3,$c3,$c2).
% 25.09/25.30 8782 [hyper,8601,14] {-} cyclic($c6,$c3,$c3,$c1).
% 25.09/25.30 8870 [hyper,8638,14] {-} cyclic($c6,$c3,$c3,$c5).
% 25.09/25.30 8924 [hyper,8657,14] {-} cyclic($c6,$c3,$c3,$c4).
% 25.09/25.30 9093 [hyper,8870,17,8782] {-} cyclic($c3,$c3,$c5,$c1).
% 25.09/25.30 9094 [hyper,8870,17,8729] {-} cyclic($c3,$c3,$c5,$c2).
% 25.09/25.30 9137 [hyper,8924,17,8870] {-} cyclic($c3,$c3,$c5,$c4).
% 25.09/25.30 11047 [hyper,9094,17,9093] {-} cyclic($c3,$c5,$c2,$c1).
% 25.09/25.30 11135 [hyper,9137,17,9094] {-} cyclic($c3,$c5,$c2,$c4).
% 25.09/25.30 15284 [hyper,11135,17,11047] {-} cyclic($c5,$c2,$c1,$c4).
% 25.09/25.30 15285 [binary,15284.1,113.1] {-} $F.
% 25.09/25.30
% 25.09/25.30 % SZS output end Refutation
% 25.09/25.30 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 25.09/25.30
% 25.09/25.30
% 25.09/25.30 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 25.09/25.30
% 25.09/25.30
% 25.09/25.30 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 25.09/25.30
% 25.09/25.30 ============ end of search ============
% 25.09/25.30
% 25.09/25.30 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 25.09/25.30
% 25.09/25.30 Process 3877 finished Sat Jun 18 02:34:12 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------