TSTP Solution File: GEO555+1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : GEO555+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 06:20:52 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 42.71s 42.92s
% Output : Refutation 42.71s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.13 % Problem : GEO555+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.5.0.
% 0.04/0.14 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 15:36:48 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.39 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.20/0.39 The process was started by sandbox on n020.cluster.edu,
% 0.20/0.39 Sat Jun 18 15:36:48 2022
% 0.20/0.39 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 22468.
% 0.20/0.39
% 0.20/0.39 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.20/0.39 set(auto).
% 0.20/0.39 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.20/0.39 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.20/0.39 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.20/0.39 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.20/0.39 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.20/0.39 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.20/0.39 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.20/0.39 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.20/0.39 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.20/0.39 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.20/0.39 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.20/0.39 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.20/0.39 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.20/0.39 clear(print_given).
% 0.20/0.39
% 0.20/0.39 formula_list(usable).
% 0.20/0.39
% 0.20/0.39 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=5.
% 0.20/0.39
% 0.20/0.39 This ia a non-Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 0.20/0.39 Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.20/0.39 unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.20/0.39 clauses in usable.
% 0.20/0.39
% 0.20/0.39 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.20/0.39 dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.20/0.39 dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.20/0.39 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.20/0.39 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.20/0.39 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.20/0.39 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.20/0.39 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.20/0.39 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.20/0.39 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.20/0.39 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.20/0.39 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.20/0.39 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.20/0.39 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.20/0.39 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.20/0.39
% 0.20/0.39 ------------> process usable:
% 0.20/0.39 Following clause subsumed by 72 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -eqangle(A,B,C,D,C,D,A,B)|perp(A,B,C,D)|para(A,B,C,D).
% 0.20/0.39
% 0.20/0.39 ------------> process sos:
% 0.20/0.39 Following clause subsumed by 173 during input processing: 0 [copy,173,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.20/0.39 173 back subsumes 146.
% 0.20/0.39 173 back subsumes 145.
% 0.20/0.39 173 back subsumes 144.
% 0.20/0.39 173 back subsumes 143.
% 0.20/0.39
% 0.20/0.39 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.20/0.46
% 0.20/0.46
% 0.20/0.46 Failed to model usable list: disabling FINDER
% 0.20/0.46
% 0.20/0.46
% 0.20/0.46
% 0.20/0.46 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.20/0.46
% 0.20/0.46 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.20/0.46 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.20/0.46 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.20/0.46 number of clauses in intial UL: 154
% 0.20/0.46 number of clauses initially in problem: 169
% 0.20/0.46 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 91
% 0.20/0.46 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 85
% 0.20/0.46 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.20/0.46 absolute distinct symbol count: 42
% 0.20/0.46 distinct predicate count: 12
% 0.20/0.46 distinct function count: 20
% 0.20/0.46 distinct constant count: 10
% 0.20/0.46
% 0.20/0.46 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.20/0.46
% 0.20/0.46
% 0.20/0.46
% 0.20/0.46 =========== start of search ===========
% 6.30/6.53
% 6.30/6.53
% 6.30/6.53 Changing weight limit from 60 to 57.
% 6.30/6.53
% 6.30/6.53 Resetting weight limit to 57 after 245 givens.
% 6.30/6.53
% 7.37/7.63
% 7.37/7.63
% 7.37/7.63 Changing weight limit from 57 to 56.
% 7.37/7.63
% 7.37/7.63 Resetting weight limit to 56 after 250 givens.
% 7.37/7.63
% 10.19/10.41
% 10.19/10.41
% 10.19/10.41 Changing weight limit from 56 to 55.
% 10.19/10.41
% 10.19/10.41 Resetting weight limit to 55 after 265 givens.
% 10.19/10.41
% 12.66/12.88
% 12.66/12.88
% 12.66/12.88 Changing weight limit from 55 to 54.
% 12.66/12.88
% 12.66/12.88 Resetting weight limit to 54 after 290 givens.
% 12.66/12.88
% 13.65/13.84
% 13.65/13.84
% 13.65/13.84 Changing weight limit from 54 to 52.
% 13.65/13.84
% 13.65/13.84 Modelling stopped after 300 given clauses and 0.00 seconds
% 13.65/13.84
% 13.65/13.84
% 13.65/13.84 Resetting weight limit to 52 after 305 givens.
% 13.65/13.84
% 15.10/15.29
% 15.10/15.29
% 15.10/15.29 Changing weight limit from 52 to 51.
% 15.10/15.29
% 15.10/15.29 Resetting weight limit to 51 after 315 givens.
% 15.10/15.29
% 18.91/19.12
% 18.91/19.12
% 18.91/19.12 Changing weight limit from 51 to 50.
% 18.91/19.12
% 18.91/19.12 Resetting weight limit to 50 after 370 givens.
% 18.91/19.12
% 22.11/22.36
% 22.11/22.36
% 22.11/22.36 Changing weight limit from 50 to 49.
% 22.11/22.36
% 22.11/22.36 Resetting weight limit to 49 after 425 givens.
% 22.11/22.36
% 23.39/23.59
% 23.39/23.59
% 23.39/23.59 Changing weight limit from 49 to 47.
% 23.39/23.59
% 23.39/23.59 Resetting weight limit to 47 after 450 givens.
% 23.39/23.59
% 23.66/23.87
% 23.66/23.87
% 23.66/23.87 Changing weight limit from 47 to 46.
% 23.66/23.87
% 23.66/23.87 Resetting weight limit to 46 after 455 givens.
% 23.66/23.87
% 24.29/24.51
% 24.29/24.51
% 24.29/24.51 Changing weight limit from 46 to 45.
% 24.29/24.51
% 24.29/24.51 Resetting weight limit to 45 after 465 givens.
% 24.29/24.51
% 24.89/25.09
% 24.89/25.09
% 24.89/25.09 Changing weight limit from 45 to 44.
% 24.89/25.09
% 24.89/25.09 Resetting weight limit to 44 after 475 givens.
% 24.89/25.09
% 25.13/25.33
% 25.13/25.33
% 25.13/25.33 Changing weight limit from 44 to 31.
% 25.13/25.33
% 25.13/25.33 Resetting weight limit to 31 after 480 givens.
% 25.13/25.33
% 25.51/25.72
% 25.51/25.72
% 25.51/25.72 Changing weight limit from 31 to 30.
% 25.51/25.72
% 25.51/25.72 Resetting weight limit to 30 after 490 givens.
% 25.51/25.72
% 37.74/37.95
% 37.74/37.95
% 37.74/37.95 Changing weight limit from 30 to 29.
% 37.74/37.95
% 37.74/37.95 Resetting weight limit to 29 after 1015 givens.
% 37.74/37.95
% 40.37/40.56
% 40.37/40.56
% 40.37/40.56 Changing weight limit from 29 to 10.
% 40.37/40.56
% 40.37/40.56 Resetting weight limit to 10 after 1305 givens.
% 40.37/40.56
% 42.36/42.60
% 42.36/42.60
% 42.36/42.60 Changing weight limit from 10 to 9.
% 42.36/42.60
% 42.36/42.60 Resetting weight limit to 9 after 1890 givens.
% 42.36/42.60
% 42.71/42.92
% 42.71/42.92 -- HEY sandbox, WE HAVE A PROOF!! --
% 42.71/42.92
% 42.71/42.92 ----> UNIT CONFLICT at 42.44 sec ----> 62677 [binary,62676.1,113.1] {-} $F.
% 42.71/42.92
% 42.71/42.92 Length of proof is 41. Level of proof is 11.
% 42.71/42.92
% 42.71/42.92 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 42.71/42.92 % SZS status Theorem
% 42.71/42.92 % SZS output start Refutation
% 42.71/42.92
% 42.71/42.92 1 [] {+} -coll(A,B,C)|coll(A,C,B).
% 42.71/42.92 3 [] {+} -coll(A,B,C)| -coll(A,B,D)|coll(C,D,A).
% 42.71/42.92 8 [] {+} -perp(A,B,C,D)|perp(C,D,A,B).
% 42.71/42.92 9 [] {+} -perp(A,B,C,D)| -perp(C,D,E,F)|para(A,B,E,F).
% 42.71/42.92 14 [] {+} -cyclic(A,B,C,D)|cyclic(A,B,D,C).
% 42.71/42.92 15 [] {+} -cyclic(A,B,C,D)|cyclic(A,C,B,D).
% 42.71/42.92 17 [] {+} -cyclic(A,B,C,D)| -cyclic(A,B,C,E)|cyclic(B,C,D,E).
% 42.71/42.92 40 [] {+} -para(A,B,C,D)|eqangle(A,B,E,F,C,D,E,F).
% 42.71/42.92 43 [] {+} -eqangle(A,B,A,C,D,B,D,C)| -coll(A,D,C)|cyclic(B,C,A,D).
% 42.71/42.92 113 [] {+} -cyclic($c3,$c2,$c1,$c4).
% 42.71/42.92 114 [factor,3.1.2] {+} -coll(A,B,C)|coll(C,C,A).
% 42.71/42.92 159 [] {-} perp($c7,$c10,$c9,$c8).
% 42.71/42.92 160 [] {-} coll($c7,$c9,$c8).
% 42.71/42.92 166 [] {-} coll($c4,$c9,$c8).
% 42.71/42.92 168 [] {-} coll($c3,$c10,$c8).
% 42.71/42.92 170 [] {-} coll($c2,$c10,$c9).
% 42.71/42.92 172 [] {-} coll($c1,$c10,$c9).
% 42.71/42.92 174 [hyper,159,8] {-} perp($c9,$c8,$c7,$c10).
% 42.71/42.92 192 [hyper,160,114] {-} coll($c8,$c8,$c7).
% 42.71/42.92 194 [hyper,160,1] {-} coll($c7,$c8,$c9).
% 42.71/42.92 255 [hyper,166,114] {-} coll($c8,$c8,$c4).
% 42.71/42.92 270 [hyper,168,114] {-} coll($c8,$c8,$c3).
% 42.71/42.92 285 [hyper,170,114] {-} coll($c9,$c9,$c2).
% 42.71/42.92 300 [hyper,172,114] {-} coll($c9,$c9,$c1).
% 42.71/42.92 361 [hyper,194,114] {-} coll($c9,$c9,$c7).
% 42.71/42.92 501 [hyper,255,3,192] {-} coll($c4,$c7,$c8).
% 42.71/42.92 566 [hyper,270,3,192] {-} coll($c3,$c7,$c8).
% 42.71/42.92 700 [hyper,174,9,159] {-} para($c7,$c10,$c7,$c10).
% 42.71/42.92 810 [hyper,361,3,300] {-} coll($c1,$c7,$c9).
% 42.71/42.92 811 [hyper,361,3,285] {-} coll($c2,$c7,$c9).
% 42.71/42.92 1571 [hyper,501,1] {-} coll($c4,$c8,$c7).
% 42.71/42.92 1964 [hyper,566,1] {-} coll($c3,$c8,$c7).
% 42.71/42.92 2788 [hyper,810,1] {-} coll($c1,$c9,$c7).
% 42.71/42.92 2801 [hyper,811,1] {-} coll($c2,$c9,$c7).
% 42.71/42.92 3895 [hyper,1571,114] {-} coll($c7,$c7,$c4).
% 42.71/42.92 4473 [hyper,1964,114] {-} coll($c7,$c7,$c3).
% 42.71/42.92 5962 [hyper,2788,114] {-} coll($c7,$c7,$c1).
% 42.71/42.92 5985 [hyper,2801,114] {-} coll($c7,$c7,$c2).
% 42.71/42.92 15510 [hyper,700,40] {-} eqangle($c7,$c10,A,B,$c7,$c10,A,B).
% 42.71/42.92 32180 [hyper,15510,43,5985] {-} cyclic($c10,$c2,$c7,$c7).
% 42.71/42.92 32181 [hyper,15510,43,5962] {-} cyclic($c10,$c1,$c7,$c7).
% 42.71/42.92 32182 [hyper,15510,43,4473] {-} cyclic($c10,$c3,$c7,$c7).
% 42.71/42.92 32183 [hyper,15510,43,3895] {-} cyclic($c10,$c4,$c7,$c7).
% 42.71/42.92 32199 [hyper,32180,15] {-} cyclic($c10,$c7,$c2,$c7).
% 42.71/42.92 32202 [hyper,32181,15] {-} cyclic($c10,$c7,$c1,$c7).
% 42.71/42.92 32208 [hyper,32182,15] {-} cyclic($c10,$c7,$c3,$c7).
% 42.71/42.92 32211 [hyper,32183,15] {-} cyclic($c10,$c7,$c4,$c7).
% 42.71/42.92 32246 [hyper,32199,14] {-} cyclic($c10,$c7,$c7,$c2).
% 42.71/42.92 32251 [hyper,32202,14] {-} cyclic($c10,$c7,$c7,$c1).
% 42.71/42.92 32260 [hyper,32208,14] {-} cyclic($c10,$c7,$c7,$c3).
% 42.71/42.92 32269 [hyper,32211,14] {-} cyclic($c10,$c7,$c7,$c4).
% 42.71/42.92 32374 [hyper,32260,17,32251] {-} cyclic($c7,$c7,$c3,$c1).
% 42.71/42.92 32375 [hyper,32260,17,32246] {-} cyclic($c7,$c7,$c3,$c2).
% 42.71/42.92 32390 [hyper,32269,17,32260] {-} cyclic($c7,$c7,$c3,$c4).
% 42.71/42.92 35866 [hyper,32375,17,32374] {-} cyclic($c7,$c3,$c2,$c1).
% 42.71/42.92 35919 [hyper,32390,17,32375] {-} cyclic($c7,$c3,$c2,$c4).
% 42.71/42.92 62676 [hyper,35919,17,35866] {-} cyclic($c3,$c2,$c1,$c4).
% 42.71/42.92 62677 [binary,62676.1,113.1] {-} $F.
% 42.71/42.92
% 42.71/42.92 % SZS output end Refutation
% 42.71/42.92 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 42.71/42.92
% 42.71/42.92
% 42.71/42.92 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 42.71/42.92
% 42.71/42.92
% 42.71/42.92 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 42.71/42.92
% 42.71/42.92 ============ end of search ============
% 42.71/42.92
% 42.71/42.92 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 42.71/42.92
% 42.71/42.92 Process 22468 finished Sat Jun 18 15:37:31 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------