TSTP Solution File: GEO554+1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : GEO554+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 06:20:52 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 43.01s 43.18s
% Output : Refutation 43.01s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12 % Problem : GEO554+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.5.0.
% 0.11/0.13 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 02:32:37 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.37 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.12/0.37 The process was started by sandbox on n027.cluster.edu,
% 0.12/0.37 Sat Jun 18 02:32:37 2022
% 0.12/0.37 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 21692.
% 0.12/0.37
% 0.12/0.37 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.12/0.37 set(auto).
% 0.12/0.37 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.12/0.37 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.12/0.37 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.12/0.37 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.12/0.37 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.12/0.37 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.12/0.37 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.12/0.37 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.12/0.37 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.12/0.37 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.12/0.37 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.12/0.37 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.12/0.37 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.12/0.37 clear(print_given).
% 0.12/0.37
% 0.12/0.37 formula_list(usable).
% 0.12/0.37
% 0.12/0.37 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=5.
% 0.12/0.37
% 0.12/0.37 This ia a non-Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 0.12/0.37 Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.12/0.37 unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.12/0.37 clauses in usable.
% 0.12/0.37
% 0.12/0.37 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.12/0.37 dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.12/0.37 dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.12/0.37 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.12/0.37 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.12/0.37 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.12/0.37 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.12/0.37 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.12/0.37 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.12/0.37 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.12/0.37 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.12/0.37 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.12/0.37 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.12/0.37 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.12/0.37 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.12/0.37
% 0.12/0.37 ------------> process usable:
% 0.12/0.37 Following clause subsumed by 72 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -eqangle(A,B,C,D,C,D,A,B)|perp(A,B,C,D)|para(A,B,C,D).
% 0.12/0.37
% 0.12/0.37 ------------> process sos:
% 0.12/0.37 Following clause subsumed by 169 during input processing: 0 [copy,169,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.12/0.37 169 back subsumes 146.
% 0.12/0.37 169 back subsumes 145.
% 0.12/0.37 169 back subsumes 144.
% 0.12/0.37 169 back subsumes 143.
% 0.12/0.37
% 0.12/0.37 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.20/0.44
% 0.20/0.44
% 0.20/0.44 Failed to model usable list: disabling FINDER
% 0.20/0.44
% 0.20/0.44
% 0.20/0.44
% 0.20/0.44 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.20/0.44
% 0.20/0.44 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.20/0.44 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.20/0.44 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.20/0.44 number of clauses in intial UL: 154
% 0.20/0.44 number of clauses initially in problem: 165
% 0.20/0.44 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 93
% 0.20/0.44 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 72
% 0.20/0.44 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.20/0.44 absolute distinct symbol count: 48
% 0.20/0.44 distinct predicate count: 12
% 0.20/0.44 distinct function count: 20
% 0.20/0.44 distinct constant count: 16
% 0.20/0.44
% 0.20/0.44 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.20/0.44
% 0.20/0.44
% 0.20/0.44
% 0.20/0.44 =========== start of search ===========
% 6.63/6.85
% 6.63/6.85
% 6.63/6.85 Changing weight limit from 60 to 57.
% 6.63/6.85
% 6.63/6.85 Resetting weight limit to 57 after 265 givens.
% 6.63/6.85
% 7.23/7.44
% 7.23/7.44
% 7.23/7.44 Changing weight limit from 57 to 56.
% 7.23/7.44
% 7.23/7.44 Resetting weight limit to 56 after 270 givens.
% 7.23/7.44
% 10.00/10.26
% 10.00/10.26
% 10.00/10.26 Changing weight limit from 56 to 55.
% 10.00/10.26
% 10.00/10.26 Resetting weight limit to 55 after 280 givens.
% 10.00/10.26
% 11.84/12.07
% 11.84/12.07
% 11.84/12.07 Changing weight limit from 55 to 51.
% 11.84/12.07
% 11.84/12.07 Resetting weight limit to 51 after 285 givens.
% 11.84/12.07
% 14.04/14.27
% 14.04/14.27
% 14.04/14.27 Changing weight limit from 51 to 50.
% 14.04/14.27
% 14.04/14.27 Resetting weight limit to 50 after 295 givens.
% 14.04/14.27
% 15.91/16.12
% 15.91/16.12
% 15.91/16.12 Changing weight limit from 50 to 49.
% 15.91/16.12
% 15.91/16.12 Modelling stopped after 300 given clauses and 0.00 seconds
% 15.91/16.12
% 15.91/16.12
% 15.91/16.12 Resetting weight limit to 49 after 310 givens.
% 15.91/16.12
% 16.43/16.62
% 16.43/16.62
% 16.43/16.62 Changing weight limit from 49 to 46.
% 16.43/16.62
% 16.43/16.62 Resetting weight limit to 46 after 315 givens.
% 16.43/16.62
% 16.84/17.05
% 16.84/17.05
% 16.84/17.05 Changing weight limit from 46 to 45.
% 16.84/17.05
% 16.84/17.05 Resetting weight limit to 45 after 320 givens.
% 16.84/17.05
% 17.51/17.71
% 17.51/17.71
% 17.51/17.71 Changing weight limit from 45 to 34.
% 17.51/17.71
% 17.51/17.71 Resetting weight limit to 34 after 330 givens.
% 17.51/17.71
% 18.09/18.32
% 18.09/18.32
% 18.09/18.32 Changing weight limit from 34 to 33.
% 18.09/18.32
% 18.09/18.32 Resetting weight limit to 33 after 350 givens.
% 18.09/18.32
% 18.50/18.71
% 18.50/18.71
% 18.50/18.71 Changing weight limit from 33 to 31.
% 18.50/18.71
% 18.50/18.71 Resetting weight limit to 31 after 390 givens.
% 18.50/18.71
% 18.71/18.94
% 18.71/18.94
% 18.71/18.94 Changing weight limit from 31 to 30.
% 18.71/18.94
% 18.71/18.94 Resetting weight limit to 30 after 415 givens.
% 18.71/18.94
% 20.02/20.26
% 20.02/20.26
% 20.02/20.26 Changing weight limit from 30 to 29.
% 20.02/20.26
% 20.02/20.26 Resetting weight limit to 29 after 810 givens.
% 20.02/20.26
% 20.71/20.89
% 20.71/20.89
% 20.71/20.89 Changing weight limit from 29 to 26.
% 20.71/20.89
% 20.71/20.89 Resetting weight limit to 26 after 1140 givens.
% 20.71/20.89
% 20.77/20.98
% 20.77/20.98
% 20.77/20.98 Changing weight limit from 26 to 22.
% 20.77/20.98
% 20.77/20.98 Resetting weight limit to 22 after 1220 givens.
% 20.77/20.98
% 20.77/20.98
% 20.77/20.98
% 20.77/20.98 Changing weight limit from 22 to 21.
% 20.77/20.98
% 20.77/20.98 Resetting weight limit to 21 after 1225 givens.
% 20.77/20.98
% 20.91/21.08
% 20.91/21.08
% 20.91/21.08 Changing weight limit from 21 to 20.
% 20.91/21.08
% 20.91/21.08 Resetting weight limit to 20 after 1270 givens.
% 20.91/21.08
% 20.91/21.10
% 20.91/21.10
% 20.91/21.10 Changing weight limit from 20 to 18.
% 20.91/21.10
% 20.91/21.10 Resetting weight limit to 18 after 1285 givens.
% 20.91/21.10
% 21.52/21.72
% 21.52/21.72
% 21.52/21.72 Changing weight limit from 18 to 16.
% 21.52/21.72
% 21.52/21.72 Resetting weight limit to 16 after 1320 givens.
% 21.52/21.72
% 21.63/21.82
% 21.63/21.82
% 21.63/21.82 Changing weight limit from 16 to 14.
% 21.63/21.82
% 21.63/21.82 Resetting weight limit to 14 after 1325 givens.
% 21.63/21.82
% 22.35/22.55
% 22.35/22.55
% 22.35/22.55 Changing weight limit from 14 to 13.
% 22.35/22.55
% 22.35/22.55 Resetting weight limit to 13 after 1515 givens.
% 22.35/22.55
% 22.53/22.71
% 22.53/22.71
% 22.53/22.71 Changing weight limit from 13 to 12.
% 22.53/22.71
% 22.53/22.71 Resetting weight limit to 12 after 1565 givens.
% 22.53/22.71
% 22.55/22.77
% 22.55/22.77
% 22.55/22.77 Changing weight limit from 12 to 11.
% 22.55/22.77
% 22.55/22.77 Resetting weight limit to 11 after 1580 givens.
% 22.55/22.77
% 22.81/22.98
% 22.81/22.98
% 22.81/22.98 Changing weight limit from 11 to 10.
% 22.81/22.98
% 22.81/22.98 Resetting weight limit to 10 after 1590 givens.
% 22.81/22.98
% 25.64/25.82
% 25.64/25.82
% 25.64/25.82 Changing weight limit from 10 to 9.
% 25.64/25.82
% 25.64/25.82 Resetting weight limit to 9 after 3175 givens.
% 25.64/25.82
% 36.85/37.08
% 36.85/37.08
% 36.85/37.08 Changing weight limit from 9 to 8.
% 36.85/37.08
% 36.85/37.08 Resetting weight limit to 8 after 6120 givens.
% 36.85/37.08
% 43.01/43.18
% 43.01/43.18 -- HEY sandbox, WE HAVE A PROOF!! --
% 43.01/43.18
% 43.01/43.18 ----> UNIT CONFLICT at 42.01 sec ----> 115338 [binary,115337.1,113.1] {-} $F.
% 43.01/43.18
% 43.01/43.18 Length of proof is 9. Level of proof is 8.
% 43.01/43.18
% 43.01/43.18 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 43.01/43.18 % SZS status Theorem
% 43.01/43.18 % SZS output start Refutation
% 43.01/43.18
% 43.01/43.18 3 [] {+} -coll(A,B,C)| -coll(A,B,D)|coll(C,D,A).
% 43.01/43.18 8 [] {+} -perp(A,B,C,D)|perp(C,D,A,B).
% 43.01/43.18 9 [] {+} -perp(A,B,C,D)| -perp(C,D,E,F)|para(A,B,E,F).
% 43.01/43.18 19 [] {+} -eqangle(A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H)|eqangle(C,D,A,B,G,H,E,F).
% 43.01/43.18 39 [] {+} -eqangle(A,B,C,D,E,F,C,D)|para(A,B,E,F).
% 43.01/43.18 40 [] {+} -para(A,B,C,D)|eqangle(A,B,E,F,C,D,E,F).
% 43.01/43.18 67 [] {+} -para(A,B,A,C)|coll(A,B,C).
% 43.01/43.18 113 [] {+} -coll($c13,$c11,$c10).
% 43.01/43.18 114 [factor,3.1.2] {+} -coll(A,B,C)|coll(C,C,A).
% 43.01/43.18 159 [] {-} perp($c14,$c16,$c14,$c15).
% 43.01/43.18 174 [hyper,159,8] {-} perp($c14,$c15,$c14,$c16).
% 43.01/43.18 1072 [hyper,174,9,159] {-} para($c14,$c16,$c14,$c16).
% 43.01/43.18 3296 [hyper,1072,40] {-} eqangle($c14,$c16,A,B,$c14,$c16,A,B).
% 43.01/43.18 14052 [hyper,3296,19] {-} eqangle(A,B,$c14,$c16,A,B,$c14,$c16).
% 43.01/43.18 88865 [hyper,14052,39] {-} para(A,B,A,B).
% 43.01/43.18 115115 [hyper,88865,67] {-} coll(A,B,B).
% 43.01/43.18 115222 [hyper,115115,114] {-} coll(A,A,B).
% 43.01/43.18 115337 [hyper,115222,3,115222] {-} coll(A,B,C).
% 43.01/43.18 115338 [binary,115337.1,113.1] {-} $F.
% 43.01/43.18
% 43.01/43.18 % SZS output end Refutation
% 43.01/43.18 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 43.01/43.18
% 43.01/43.18
% 43.01/43.18 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 43.01/43.18
% 43.01/43.18
% 43.01/43.18 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 43.01/43.18
% 43.01/43.18 ============ end of search ============
% 43.01/43.18
% 43.01/43.18 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 43.01/43.18
% 43.01/43.18 Process 21692 finished Sat Jun 18 02:33:20 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------