TSTP Solution File: GEO544+1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : GEO544+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 06:20:49 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 22.62s 22.81s
% Output : Refutation 22.62s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : GEO544+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.5.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 06:35:38 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.37 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.12/0.37 The process was started by sandbox on n010.cluster.edu,
% 0.12/0.37 Sat Jun 18 06:35:38 2022
% 0.12/0.37 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 22069.
% 0.12/0.37
% 0.12/0.37 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.12/0.37 set(auto).
% 0.12/0.37 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.12/0.37 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.12/0.37 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.12/0.37 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.12/0.37 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.12/0.37 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.12/0.37 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.12/0.37 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.12/0.37 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.12/0.37 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.12/0.37 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.12/0.37 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.12/0.37 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.12/0.37 clear(print_given).
% 0.12/0.37
% 0.12/0.37 formula_list(usable).
% 0.12/0.37
% 0.12/0.37 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=5.
% 0.12/0.37
% 0.12/0.37 This ia a non-Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 0.12/0.37 Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.12/0.37 unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.12/0.37 clauses in usable.
% 0.12/0.37
% 0.12/0.37 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.12/0.37 dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.12/0.37 dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.12/0.37 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.12/0.37 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.12/0.37 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.12/0.37 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.12/0.37 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.12/0.37 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.12/0.37 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.12/0.37 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.12/0.37 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.12/0.37 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.12/0.37 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.12/0.37 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.12/0.37
% 0.12/0.37 ------------> process usable:
% 0.12/0.37 Following clause subsumed by 72 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -eqangle(A,B,C,D,C,D,A,B)|perp(A,B,C,D)|para(A,B,C,D).
% 0.12/0.37
% 0.12/0.37 ------------> process sos:
% 0.12/0.37 Following clause subsumed by 168 during input processing: 0 [copy,168,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.12/0.37 168 back subsumes 146.
% 0.12/0.37 168 back subsumes 145.
% 0.12/0.37 168 back subsumes 144.
% 0.12/0.37 168 back subsumes 143.
% 0.12/0.37
% 0.12/0.37 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.19/0.44
% 0.19/0.44
% 0.19/0.44 Failed to model usable list: disabling FINDER
% 0.19/0.44
% 0.19/0.44
% 0.19/0.44
% 0.19/0.44 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.19/0.44
% 0.19/0.44 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.19/0.44 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.19/0.44 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.19/0.44 number of clauses in intial UL: 154
% 0.19/0.44 number of clauses initially in problem: 164
% 0.19/0.44 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 93
% 0.19/0.44 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 83
% 0.19/0.44 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.19/0.44 absolute distinct symbol count: 43
% 0.19/0.44 distinct predicate count: 12
% 0.19/0.44 distinct function count: 20
% 0.19/0.44 distinct constant count: 11
% 0.19/0.44
% 0.19/0.44 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.19/0.44
% 0.19/0.44
% 0.19/0.44
% 0.19/0.44 =========== start of search ===========
% 4.78/4.96
% 4.78/4.96
% 4.78/4.96 Changing weight limit from 60 to 57.
% 4.78/4.96
% 4.78/4.96 Resetting weight limit to 57 after 220 givens.
% 4.78/4.96
% 5.24/5.46
% 5.24/5.46
% 5.24/5.46 Changing weight limit from 57 to 56.
% 5.24/5.46
% 5.24/5.46 Resetting weight limit to 56 after 225 givens.
% 5.24/5.46
% 6.82/7.00
% 6.82/7.00
% 6.82/7.00 Changing weight limit from 56 to 55.
% 6.82/7.00
% 6.82/7.00 Resetting weight limit to 55 after 240 givens.
% 6.82/7.00
% 7.95/8.17
% 7.95/8.17
% 7.95/8.17 Changing weight limit from 55 to 52.
% 7.95/8.17
% 7.95/8.17 Resetting weight limit to 52 after 250 givens.
% 7.95/8.17
% 8.98/9.18
% 8.98/9.18
% 8.98/9.18 Changing weight limit from 52 to 51.
% 8.98/9.18
% 8.98/9.18 Resetting weight limit to 51 after 255 givens.
% 8.98/9.18
% 11.00/11.23
% 11.00/11.23
% 11.00/11.23 Changing weight limit from 51 to 50.
% 11.00/11.23
% 11.00/11.23 Resetting weight limit to 50 after 275 givens.
% 11.00/11.23
% 12.64/12.84
% 12.64/12.84
% 12.64/12.84 Changing weight limit from 50 to 49.
% 12.64/12.84
% 12.64/12.84 Modelling stopped after 300 given clauses and 0.00 seconds
% 12.64/12.84
% 12.64/12.84
% 12.64/12.84 Resetting weight limit to 49 after 305 givens.
% 12.64/12.84
% 12.89/13.08
% 12.89/13.08
% 12.89/13.08 Changing weight limit from 49 to 47.
% 12.89/13.08
% 12.89/13.08 Resetting weight limit to 47 after 310 givens.
% 12.89/13.08
% 13.11/13.30
% 13.11/13.30
% 13.11/13.30 Changing weight limit from 47 to 46.
% 13.11/13.30
% 13.11/13.30 Resetting weight limit to 46 after 315 givens.
% 13.11/13.30
% 13.85/14.06
% 13.85/14.06
% 13.85/14.06 Changing weight limit from 46 to 45.
% 13.85/14.06
% 13.85/14.06 Resetting weight limit to 45 after 330 givens.
% 13.85/14.06
% 14.09/14.30
% 14.09/14.30
% 14.09/14.30 Changing weight limit from 45 to 37.
% 14.09/14.30
% 14.09/14.30 Resetting weight limit to 37 after 335 givens.
% 14.09/14.30
% 14.60/14.79
% 14.60/14.79
% 14.60/14.79 Changing weight limit from 37 to 36.
% 14.60/14.79
% 14.60/14.79 Resetting weight limit to 36 after 345 givens.
% 14.60/14.79
% 14.83/15.05
% 14.83/15.05
% 14.83/15.05 Changing weight limit from 36 to 35.
% 14.83/15.05
% 14.83/15.05 Resetting weight limit to 35 after 350 givens.
% 14.83/15.05
% 15.42/15.60
% 15.42/15.60
% 15.42/15.60 Changing weight limit from 35 to 31.
% 15.42/15.60
% 15.42/15.60 Resetting weight limit to 31 after 360 givens.
% 15.42/15.60
% 15.58/15.78
% 15.58/15.78
% 15.58/15.78 Changing weight limit from 31 to 30.
% 15.58/15.78
% 15.58/15.78 Resetting weight limit to 30 after 365 givens.
% 15.58/15.78
% 18.88/19.07
% 18.88/19.07
% 18.88/19.07 Changing weight limit from 30 to 29.
% 18.88/19.07
% 18.88/19.07 Resetting weight limit to 29 after 530 givens.
% 18.88/19.07
% 20.15/20.38
% 20.15/20.38
% 20.15/20.38 Changing weight limit from 29 to 23.
% 20.15/20.38
% 20.15/20.38 Resetting weight limit to 23 after 930 givens.
% 20.15/20.38
% 20.24/20.47
% 20.24/20.47
% 20.24/20.47 Changing weight limit from 23 to 22.
% 20.24/20.47
% 20.24/20.47 Resetting weight limit to 22 after 1000 givens.
% 20.24/20.47
% 20.32/20.54
% 20.32/20.54
% 20.32/20.54 Changing weight limit from 22 to 21.
% 20.32/20.54
% 20.32/20.54 Resetting weight limit to 21 after 1030 givens.
% 20.32/20.54
% 20.39/20.60
% 20.39/20.60
% 20.39/20.60 Changing weight limit from 21 to 18.
% 20.39/20.60
% 20.39/20.60 Resetting weight limit to 18 after 1055 givens.
% 20.39/20.60
% 20.42/20.62
% 20.42/20.62
% 20.42/20.62 Changing weight limit from 18 to 17.
% 20.42/20.62
% 20.42/20.62 Resetting weight limit to 17 after 1105 givens.
% 20.42/20.62
% 20.55/20.79
% 20.55/20.79
% 20.55/20.79 Changing weight limit from 17 to 16.
% 20.55/20.79
% 20.55/20.79 Resetting weight limit to 16 after 1255 givens.
% 20.55/20.79
% 20.77/21.02
% 20.77/21.02
% 20.77/21.02 Changing weight limit from 16 to 13.
% 20.77/21.02
% 20.77/21.02 Resetting weight limit to 13 after 1270 givens.
% 20.77/21.02
% 20.90/21.08
% 20.90/21.08
% 20.90/21.08 Changing weight limit from 13 to 10.
% 20.90/21.08
% 20.90/21.08 Resetting weight limit to 10 after 1275 givens.
% 20.90/21.08
% 22.40/22.67
% 22.40/22.67
% 22.40/22.67 Changing weight limit from 10 to 9.
% 22.40/22.67
% 22.40/22.67 Resetting weight limit to 9 after 1700 givens.
% 22.40/22.67
% 22.62/22.81
% 22.62/22.81 -- HEY sandbox, WE HAVE A PROOF!! --
% 22.62/22.81
% 22.62/22.81 ----> UNIT CONFLICT at 22.37 sec ----> 56168 [binary,56167.1,113.1] {-} $F.
% 22.62/22.81
% 22.62/22.81 Length of proof is 39. Level of proof is 9.
% 22.62/22.81
% 22.62/22.81 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 22.62/22.81 % SZS status Theorem
% 22.62/22.81 % SZS output start Refutation
% 22.62/22.81
% 22.62/22.81 1 [] {+} -coll(A,B,C)|coll(A,C,B).
% 22.62/22.81 2 [] {+} -coll(A,B,C)|coll(B,A,C).
% 22.62/22.81 3 [] {+} -coll(A,B,C)| -coll(A,B,D)|coll(C,D,A).
% 22.62/22.81 6 [] {+} -para(A,B,C,D)| -para(C,D,E,F)|para(A,B,E,F).
% 22.62/22.81 8 [] {+} -perp(A,B,C,D)|perp(C,D,A,B).
% 22.62/22.81 9 [] {+} -perp(A,B,C,D)| -perp(C,D,E,F)|para(A,B,E,F).
% 22.62/22.81 10 [] {+} -para(A,B,C,D)| -perp(C,D,E,F)|perp(A,B,E,F).
% 22.62/22.81 11 [] {+} -midp(A,B,C)|midp(A,C,B).
% 22.62/22.81 23 [] {+} -cong(A,B,C,D)|cong(A,B,D,C).
% 22.62/22.81 24 [] {+} -cong(A,B,C,D)|cong(C,D,A,B).
% 22.62/22.81 25 [] {+} -cong(A,B,C,D)| -cong(C,D,E,F)|cong(A,B,E,F).
% 22.62/22.81 45 [] {+} -midp(A,B,C)| -midp(D,B,E)|para(A,D,C,E).
% 22.62/22.81 57 [] {+} -cong(A,B,C,B)| -cong(A,D,C,D)|perp(A,C,B,D).
% 22.62/22.81 65 [] {+} -midp(A,B,C)| -para(B,D,C,E)| -para(B,E,C,D)|midp(A,D,E).
% 22.62/22.81 68 [] {+} -cong(A,B,A,C)| -coll(A,B,C)|midp(A,B,C).
% 22.62/22.81 69 [] {+} -midp(A,B,C)|cong(A,B,A,C).
% 22.62/22.81 70 [] {+} -midp(A,B,C)|coll(A,B,C).
% 22.62/22.81 99 [] {+} -circle(A,B,C,D)|perp($f12(B,C,D,A),B,B,A).
% 22.62/22.81 113 [] {+} -perp($c5,$c3,$c10,$c9).
% 22.62/22.81 114 [factor,3.1.2] {+} -coll(A,B,C)|coll(C,C,A).
% 22.62/22.81 124 [factor,45.1.2] {+} -midp(A,B,C)|para(A,A,C,C).
% 22.62/22.81 129 [factor,65.2.3] {+} -midp(A,B,C)| -para(B,D,C,D)|midp(A,D,D).
% 22.62/22.81 159 [] {-} circle($c8,$c11,$c10,$c9).
% 22.62/22.81 161 [] {-} midp($c6,$c9,$c10).
% 22.62/22.81 162 [] {-} midp($c5,$c11,$c7).
% 22.62/22.81 163 [] {-} midp($c4,$c5,$c6).
% 22.62/22.81 164 [] {-} coll($c8,$c4,$c3).
% 22.62/22.81 165 [] {-} cong($c8,$c4,$c8,$c3).
% 22.62/22.81 169 [hyper,159,99] {-} perp($f12($c11,$c10,$c9,$c8),$c11,$c11,$c8).
% 22.62/22.81 193 [hyper,161,69] {-} cong($c6,$c9,$c6,$c10).
% 22.62/22.81 194 [hyper,161,11] {-} midp($c6,$c10,$c9).
% 22.62/22.81 221 [hyper,162,70] {-} coll($c5,$c11,$c7).
% 22.62/22.81 222 [hyper,162,69] {-} cong($c5,$c11,$c5,$c7).
% 22.62/22.81 223 [hyper,162,11] {-} midp($c5,$c7,$c11).
% 22.62/22.81 241 [hyper,163,124] {-} para($c4,$c4,$c6,$c6).
% 22.62/22.81 290 [hyper,164,114] {-} coll($c3,$c3,$c8).
% 22.62/22.81 352 [hyper,165,68,164] {-} midp($c8,$c4,$c3).
% 22.62/22.81 355 [hyper,165,23] {-} cong($c8,$c4,$c3,$c8).
% 22.62/22.81 402 [hyper,194,69] {-} cong($c6,$c10,$c6,$c9).
% 22.62/22.81 420 [hyper,221,1] {-} coll($c5,$c7,$c11).
% 22.62/22.81 471 [hyper,223,69] {-} cong($c5,$c7,$c5,$c11).
% 22.62/22.81 506 [hyper,169,8] {-} perp($c11,$c8,$f12($c11,$c10,$c9,$c8),$c11).
% 22.62/22.81 601 [hyper,290,114] {-} coll($c8,$c8,$c3).
% 22.62/22.81 1125 [hyper,352,11] {-} midp($c8,$c3,$c4).
% 22.62/22.81 1267 [hyper,420,114] {-} coll($c11,$c11,$c5).
% 22.62/22.81 1405 [hyper,601,1] {-} coll($c8,$c3,$c8).
% 22.62/22.81 2160 [hyper,1125,124] {-} para($c8,$c8,$c4,$c4).
% 22.62/22.81 2359 [hyper,1267,1] {-} coll($c11,$c5,$c11).
% 22.62/22.81 2556 [hyper,1405,2] {-} coll($c3,$c8,$c8).
% 22.62/22.81 3946 [hyper,2359,2] {-} coll($c5,$c11,$c11).
% 22.62/22.81 11999 [hyper,355,24] {-} cong($c3,$c8,$c8,$c4).
% 22.62/22.81 14884 [hyper,402,25,193] {-} cong($c6,$c9,$c6,$c9).
% 22.62/22.81 14885 [hyper,402,25,193] {-} cong($c6,$c10,$c6,$c10).
% 22.62/22.81 18168 [hyper,471,25,222] {-} cong($c5,$c11,$c5,$c11).
% 22.62/22.81 18545 [hyper,506,9,169] {-} para($c11,$c8,$c11,$c8).
% 22.62/22.81 20765 [hyper,2160,6,241] {-} para($c8,$c8,$c6,$c6).
% 22.62/22.81 23458 [hyper,11999,25,355] {-} cong($c3,$c8,$c3,$c8).
% 22.62/22.81 24810 [hyper,14885,57,14884] {-} perp($c6,$c6,$c10,$c9).
% 22.62/22.81 27202 [hyper,18168,68,3946] {-} midp($c5,$c11,$c11).
% 22.62/22.81 27763 [hyper,18545,129,27202] {-} midp($c5,$c8,$c8).
% 22.62/22.81 37247 [hyper,23458,68,2556] {-} midp($c3,$c8,$c8).
% 22.62/22.81 37319 [hyper,37247,45,27763] {-} para($c5,$c3,$c8,$c8).
% 22.62/22.81 39337 [hyper,24810,10,20765] {-} perp($c8,$c8,$c10,$c9).
% 22.62/22.81 56167 [hyper,39337,10,37319] {-} perp($c5,$c3,$c10,$c9).
% 22.62/22.81 56168 [binary,56167.1,113.1] {-} $F.
% 22.62/22.81
% 22.62/22.81 % SZS output end Refutation
% 22.62/22.81 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 22.62/22.81
% 22.62/22.81
% 22.62/22.81 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 22.62/22.81
% 22.62/22.81
% 22.62/22.81 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 22.62/22.81
% 22.62/22.81 ============ end of search ============
% 22.62/22.81
% 22.62/22.81 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 22.62/22.81
% 22.62/22.81 Process 22069 finished Sat Jun 18 06:36:00 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------