TSTP Solution File: GEO524+1 by SNARK---20120808r022

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem  : GEO524+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run-snark %s %d

% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 06:16:33 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.51s 0.70s
% Output   : Refutation 0.51s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    2
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :    6 (   5 unt;   1 nHn;   4 RR)
%            Number of literals    :    7 (   6 equ;   2 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   4 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    4 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(207,axiom,
    ( X = Y
    | reflect(X,Y,reflect(X,Y,Z)) = Z ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',aSatz10_5) ).

cnf(208,negated_conjecture,
    'SKOLEMAAAV1' != 'SKOLEMAAAV2',
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',aSatz10_7) ).

cnf(209,negated_conjecture,
    reflect('SKOLEMAAAV1','SKOLEMAAAV2','SKOLEMAAAV3') = reflect('SKOLEMAAAV1','SKOLEMAAAV2','SKOLEMAAAV4'),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',aSatz10_7) ).

cnf(210,negated_conjecture,
    'SKOLEMAAAV3' != 'SKOLEMAAAV4',
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',aSatz10_7) ).

cnf(591,plain,
    reflect('SKOLEMAAAV1','SKOLEMAAAV2',reflect('SKOLEMAAAV1','SKOLEMAAAV2',X)) = X,
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[207,208]) ).

cnf(600,plain,
    $false,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[207,209,theory(equality)]),210,591,208,theory(equality)]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.13  % Problem  : GEO524+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.0.0.
% 0.04/0.14  % Command  : run-snark %s %d
% 0.15/0.36  % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.15/0.36  % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 07:37:52 EDT 2022
% 0.15/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.21/0.49  /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/0.50  * 
% 0.21/0.50  * 
% 0.21/0.51  #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.21/0.51  * 
% 0.21/0.51  SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.21/0.51  * 
% 0.21/0.51  ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.21/0.51   (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.21/0.51   (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.21/0.51   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.21/0.51   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.21/0.51   (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.21/0.51   (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.21/0.51   (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.21/0.51   (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.21/0.51   (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.21/0.51   (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.21/0.51   (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.21/0.51   (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.21/0.51  * 
% 0.21/0.51  "."
% 0.21/0.51  * 
% 0.21/0.51  ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-18T07:37:53
% 0.21/0.51  ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n011.cluster.edu at 2022-06-18T07:37:53
% 0.39/0.60  
% 0.39/0.60  ; Recognized commutativity assertion (OR (NOT (|s_col| ?X ?Y ?Z)) (|s_col| ?Y ?X ?Z)).
% 0.39/0.61  ; Recognized relation functionality assertion (OR (NOT (|s_m| ?X ?Y ?Z)) (NOT (|s_m| ?X ?Y ?U)) (= ?Z ?U)).
% 0.51/0.70  ; Declaring s_col to be commutative.
% 0.51/0.70  
% 0.51/0.70  #||
% 0.51/0.70  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.51/0.70  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.51/0.70  ||#
% 0.51/0.70  
% 0.51/0.70  ; Summary of computation:
% 0.51/0.70  ;      1124 formulas have been input or derived (from 127 formulas).
% 0.51/0.70  ;       600 (53%) were retained.  Of these,
% 0.51/0.70  ;           18 ( 3%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 0.51/0.70  ;          582 (97%) are still being kept.
% 0.51/0.70  ; 
% 0.51/0.70  ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 0.51/0.70  ;     0.079  42%   Read assertion file          (1 call)
% 0.51/0.70  ;     0.011   6%   Assert                       (204 calls)
% 0.51/0.70  ;     0.024  13%   Process new row              (1,003 calls)
% 0.51/0.70  ;     0.014   7%   Resolution                   (252 calls)
% 0.51/0.70  ;     0.002   1%   Paramodulation               (126 calls)
% 0.51/0.70  ;     0.000   0%   Factoring                    (9 calls)
% 0.51/0.70  ;     0.007   4%   Condensing                   (320 calls)
% 0.51/0.70  ;     0.002   1%   Forward subsumption          (320 calls)
% 0.51/0.70  ;     0.002   1%   Backward subsumption         (288 calls)
% 0.51/0.70  ;     0.009   5%   Clause clause subsumption    (669 calls)
% 0.51/0.70  ;     0.011   6%   Forward simplification       (1,003 calls)
% 0.51/0.70  ;     0.005   3%   Backward simplification      (598 calls)
% 0.51/0.70  ;     0.002   1%   Ordering                     (238 calls)
% 0.51/0.70  ;     0.001   1%   Sortal reasoning             (32 calls)
% 0.51/0.70  ;     0.001   1%   Purity testing               (1 call)
% 0.51/0.70  ;     0.020  11%   Other
% 0.51/0.70  ;     0.190        Total
% 0.51/0.70  ;     0.191        Real time
% 0.51/0.70  ; 
% 0.51/0.70  ; Term-hash-array has 876 terms in all.
% 0.51/0.70  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 273 entries (273 at peak, 288 added, 15 deleted).
% 0.51/0.70  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 431 nodes (431 at peak, 475 added, 44 deleted).
% 0.51/0.70  ;  Retrieved 958 possibly forward subsuming rows in 320 calls.
% 0.51/0.70  ;  Retrieved 667 possibly backward subsumed rows in 288 calls.
% 0.51/0.70  ; Path-index has 871 entries (871 at peak, 898 added, 27 deleted).
% 0.51/0.70  ; Path-index has 2,370 nodes (2,370 at peak, 2,412 added, 42 deleted).
% 0.51/0.70  ; Trie-index has 871 entries (871 at peak, 898 added, 27 deleted).
% 0.51/0.70  ; Trie-index has 2,513 nodes (2,513 at peak, 2,579 added, 66 deleted).
% 0.51/0.70  ; Retrieved 2,227 generalization terms in 1,860 calls.
% 0.51/0.70  ; Retrieved 899 instance terms in 309 calls.
% 0.51/0.71  ; Retrieved 23,233 unifiable terms in 924 calls.
% 0.51/0.71  ; 
% 0.51/0.71  ; The agenda of rows to process has 6 entries:
% 0.51/0.71  ;     1 with value 18              2 with value 22               1 with value 26
% 0.51/0.71  ;     1 with value 20              1 with value 24
% 0.51/0.71  ; The agenda of input rows to give has 142 entries:
% 0.51/0.71  ;    15 with value 16              4 with value 26               2 with value 37
% 0.51/0.71  ;     9 with value 17              6 with value 27               1 with value 39
% 0.51/0.71  ;    20 with value 18              6 with value 28               3 with value 41
% 0.51/0.71  ;     8 with value 19              3 with value 29               1 with value 42
% 0.51/0.71  ;     8 with value 20              5 with value 30               3 with value 44
% 0.51/0.71  ;    10 with value 21              1 with value 31               3 with value 48
% 0.51/0.71  ;     7 with value 22              2 with value 32               1 with value 50
% 0.51/0.71  ;     5 with value 23              2 with value 34               1 with value 53
% 0.51/0.71  ;     7 with value 24              1 with value 35               1 with value 56
% 0.51/0.71  ;     3 with value 25              3 with value 36               1 with value 60
% 0.51/0.71  ; The agenda of rows to give has 313 entries:
% 0.51/0.71  ;    50 with value (4 6)          34 with value (4 13)           4 with value (4 20)
% 0.51/0.71  ;    25 with value (4 7)           7 with value (4 14)           5 with value (4 22)
% 0.51/0.71  ;    14 with value (4 8)          14 with value (4 15)           2 with value (4 23)
% 0.51/0.71  ;    34 with value (4 9)           4 with value (4 16)           3 with value (4 24)
% 0.51/0.71  ;    32 with value (4 10)          9 with value (4 17)           1 with value (4 25)
% 0.51/0.71  ;    54 with value (4 11)          4 with value (4 18)           2 with value (4 29)
% 0.51/0.71  ;    12 with value (4 12)          3 with value (4 19)
% 0.51/0.71  Evaluation took:
% 0.51/0.71    0.2 seconds of real time
% 0.51/0.71    0.188221 seconds of user run time
% 0.51/0.71    0.012105 seconds of system run time
% 0.51/0.71    [Run times include 0.009 seconds GC run time.]
% 0.51/0.71    0 calls to %EVAL
% 0.51/0.71    0 page faults and
% 0.51/0.71    12,411,616 bytes consed.
% 0.51/0.71  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.51/0.71  ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-18T07:37:53
% 0.51/0.71  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.51/0.71  * 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------