TSTP Solution File: GEO524+1 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : GEO524+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 04:06:08 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.25s 1.44s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.25s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 11 ( 5 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 20 ( 19 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 16 ( 7 ~; 7 |; 2 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 9 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 4 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 17 ( 0 sgn 14 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(aSatz10_7,conjecture,
! [X12,X15,X13,X16] :
( X12 = X15
| reflect(X12,X15,X13) != reflect(X12,X15,X16)
| X13 = X16 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',aSatz10_7) ).
fof(aSatz10_5,axiom,
! [X12,X15,X13] :
( X12 = X15
| reflect(X12,X15,reflect(X12,X15,X13)) = X13 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',aSatz10_5) ).
fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X12,X15,X13,X16] :
( X12 = X15
| reflect(X12,X15,X13) != reflect(X12,X15,X16)
| X13 = X16 ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[aSatz10_7]) ).
fof(c_0_3,plain,
! [X16,X17,X18] :
( X16 = X17
| reflect(X16,X17,reflect(X16,X17,X18)) = X18 ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[aSatz10_5])])]) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
( esk1_0 != esk2_0
& reflect(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0) = reflect(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk4_0)
& esk3_0 != esk4_0 ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,plain,
( reflect(X1,X2,reflect(X1,X2,X3)) = X3
| X1 = X2 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
reflect(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0) = reflect(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk4_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
esk1_0 != esk2_0,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
reflect(esk1_0,esk2_0,reflect(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk4_0)) = esk3_0,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]),c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
esk3_0 != esk4_0,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_8]),c_0_9]),c_0_7]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : GEO524+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.0.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 07:42:32 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.25/1.44 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.25/1.44 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.25/1.44 # Preprocessing time : 0.021 s
% 0.25/1.44
% 0.25/1.44 # Proof found!
% 0.25/1.44 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.25/1.44 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.25/1.44 # Proof object total steps : 11
% 0.25/1.44 # Proof object clause steps : 6
% 0.25/1.44 # Proof object formula steps : 5
% 0.25/1.44 # Proof object conjectures : 8
% 0.25/1.44 # Proof object clause conjectures : 5
% 0.25/1.44 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.25/1.44 # Proof object initial clauses used : 4
% 0.25/1.44 # Proof object initial formulas used : 2
% 0.25/1.44 # Proof object generating inferences : 2
% 0.25/1.44 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 3
% 0.25/1.44 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.25/1.44 # Parsed axioms : 204
% 0.25/1.44 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 200
% 0.25/1.44 # Initial clauses : 6
% 0.25/1.44 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.25/1.44 # Initial clauses in saturation : 6
% 0.25/1.44 # Processed clauses : 7
% 0.25/1.44 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.25/1.44 # ...subsumed : 1
% 0.25/1.44 # ...remaining for further processing : 6
% 0.25/1.44 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 1
% 0.25/1.44 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.25/1.44 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.25/1.44 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.25/1.44 # Generated clauses : 8
% 0.25/1.44 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 3
% 0.25/1.44 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.25/1.44 # Paramodulations : 6
% 0.25/1.44 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.25/1.44 # Equation resolutions : 2
% 0.25/1.44 # Current number of processed clauses : 6
% 0.25/1.44 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 2
% 0.25/1.44 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.25/1.44 # Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.25/1.44 # Non-unit-clauses : 2
% 0.25/1.44 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 2
% 0.25/1.44 # ...number of literals in the above : 4
% 0.25/1.44 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.25/1.44 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.25/1.44 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 3
% 0.25/1.44 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 0.25/1.44 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 1
% 0.25/1.44 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.25/1.44 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.25/1.44 # BW rewrite match attempts : 2
% 0.25/1.44 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.25/1.44 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.25/1.44 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.25/1.44 # Termbank termtop insertions : 4255
% 0.25/1.44
% 0.25/1.44 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.25/1.44 # User time : 0.018 s
% 0.25/1.44 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.25/1.44 # Total time : 0.021 s
% 0.25/1.44 # Maximum resident set size: 3180 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------