TSTP Solution File: GEO524+1 by E---3.2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.2.0
% Problem : GEO524+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v7.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 06:08:49 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.37s 0.54s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.37s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 11 ( 5 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 20 ( 19 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 16 ( 7 ~; 7 |; 2 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 9 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 4 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 17 ( 0 sgn 14 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(aSatz10_7,conjecture,
! [X12,X15,X13,X16] :
( X12 = X15
| reflect(X12,X15,X13) != reflect(X12,X15,X16)
| X13 = X16 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.zHyJBUiUEB/E---3.1_17698.p',aSatz10_7) ).
fof(aSatz10_5,axiom,
! [X12,X15,X13] :
( X12 = X15
| reflect(X12,X15,reflect(X12,X15,X13)) = X13 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.zHyJBUiUEB/E---3.1_17698.p',aSatz10_5) ).
fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X12,X15,X13,X16] :
( X12 = X15
| reflect(X12,X15,X13) != reflect(X12,X15,X16)
| X13 = X16 ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[aSatz10_7])]) ).
fof(c_0_3,plain,
! [X62,X63,X64] :
( X62 = X63
| reflect(X62,X63,reflect(X62,X63,X64)) = X64 ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[aSatz10_5]) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
( esk1_0 != esk2_0
& reflect(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0) = reflect(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk4_0)
& esk3_0 != esk4_0 ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,plain,
( X1 = X2
| reflect(X1,X2,reflect(X1,X2,X3)) = X3 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
reflect(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0) = reflect(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk4_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
esk1_0 != esk2_0,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
reflect(esk1_0,esk2_0,reflect(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk4_0)) = esk3_0,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]),c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
esk3_0 != esk4_0,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_8]),c_0_9]),c_0_7]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13 % Problem : GEO524+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v7.0.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Fri Jun 21 08:48:39 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.51 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.21/0.51 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.zHyJBUiUEB/E---3.1_17698.p
% 0.37/0.54 # Version: 3.2.0
% 0.37/0.54 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.37/0.54 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.37/0.54 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.37/0.54 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.37/0.54 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.37/0.54 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.37/0.54 # new_bool_3 with pid 17777 completed with status 0
% 0.37/0.54 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.37/0.54 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.37/0.54 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.37/0.54 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.37/0.54 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.37/0.54 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.37/0.54 # Search class: FGHSM-FFMF32-SFFFFFNN
% 0.37/0.54 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.37/0.54 # Starting G-E--_300_C01_F1_SE_CS_SP_S0Y with 163s (1) cores
% 0.37/0.54 # G-E--_300_C01_F1_SE_CS_SP_S0Y with pid 17780 completed with status 0
% 0.37/0.54 # Result found by G-E--_300_C01_F1_SE_CS_SP_S0Y
% 0.37/0.54 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.37/0.54 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.37/0.54 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.37/0.54 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.37/0.54 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.37/0.54 # Search class: FGHSM-FFMF32-SFFFFFNN
% 0.37/0.54 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.37/0.54 # Starting G-E--_300_C01_F1_SE_CS_SP_S0Y with 163s (1) cores
% 0.37/0.54 # Preprocessing time : 0.004 s
% 0.37/0.54
% 0.37/0.54 # Proof found!
% 0.37/0.54 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.37/0.54 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.37/0.54 # Parsed axioms : 204
% 0.37/0.54 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 126
% 0.37/0.54 # Initial clauses : 87
% 0.37/0.54 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.37/0.54 # Initial clauses in saturation : 87
% 0.37/0.54 # Processed clauses : 16
% 0.37/0.54 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.37/0.54 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.37/0.54 # ...remaining for further processing : 16
% 0.37/0.54 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.37/0.54 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.37/0.54 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.37/0.54 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.37/0.54 # Generated clauses : 3
% 0.37/0.54 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 1
% 0.37/0.54 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.37/0.54 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.37/0.54 # Paramodulations : 3
% 0.37/0.54 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.37/0.54 # NegExts : 0
% 0.37/0.54 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.37/0.54 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.37/0.54 # Total rewrite steps : 0
% 0.37/0.54 # ...of those cached : 0
% 0.37/0.54 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.37/0.54 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.37/0.54 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.37/0.54 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.37/0.54 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.37/0.54 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.37/0.54 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.37/0.54 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.37/0.54 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.37/0.54 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.37/0.54 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.37/0.54 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.37/0.54 # Current number of processed clauses : 16
% 0.37/0.54 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 10
% 0.37/0.54 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.37/0.54 # Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.37/0.54 # Non-unit-clauses : 4
% 0.37/0.54 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 72
% 0.37/0.54 # ...number of literals in the above : 263
% 0.37/0.54 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.37/0.54 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.37/0.54 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 2
% 0.37/0.54 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% 0.37/0.54 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.37/0.54 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.37/0.54 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.37/0.54 # BW rewrite match attempts : 7
% 0.37/0.54 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.37/0.54 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.37/0.54 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.37/0.54 # Termbank termtop insertions : 10118
% 0.37/0.54 # Search garbage collected termcells : 2447
% 0.37/0.54
% 0.37/0.54 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.37/0.54 # User time : 0.008 s
% 0.37/0.54 # System time : 0.004 s
% 0.37/0.54 # Total time : 0.012 s
% 0.37/0.54 # Maximum resident set size: 2440 pages
% 0.37/0.54
% 0.37/0.54 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.37/0.54 # User time : 0.014 s
% 0.37/0.54 # System time : 0.008 s
% 0.37/0.54 # Total time : 0.022 s
% 0.37/0.54 # Maximum resident set size: 2068 pages
% 0.37/0.54 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.43/0.54 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------