TSTP Solution File: GEO499+1 by SInE---0.4
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SInE---0.4
% Problem : GEO499+1 : TPTP v7.0.0. Released v7.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : Source/sine.py -e eprover -t %d %s
% Computer : n023.star.cs.uiowa.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 2.40GHz
% Memory : 32218.75MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-327.36.3.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Jan 20 10:18:34 EST 2017
% Result : Theorem 4.56s
% Output : CNFRefutation 4.56s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 10
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 21 ( 9 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 33 ( 1 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 27 ( 15 ~; 9 |; 3 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 8 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 50 ( 0 sgn 28 !; 8 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(47,axiom,
! [X12,X16] : equal(s(X12,s(X12,X16)),X16),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp1QN67b/sel_theBenchmark.p_1',aSatz7_7) ).
fof(96,conjecture,
! [X16,X17,X18,X12] :
( s_t(X16,X17,X18)
| ~ s_t(s(X12,X16),s(X12,X17),s(X12,X18)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp1QN67b/sel_theBenchmark.p_1',aSatz7_15b) ).
fof(97,axiom,
! [X16,X17,X18,X12] :
( ~ s_t(X16,X17,X18)
| s_t(s(X12,X16),s(X12,X17),s(X12,X18)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp1QN67b/sel_theBenchmark.p_1',aSatz7_15a) ).
fof(116,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X16,X17,X18,X12] :
( s_t(X16,X17,X18)
| ~ s_t(s(X12,X16),s(X12,X17),s(X12,X18)) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[96]) ).
fof(188,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X16,X17,X18,X12] :
( s_t(X16,X17,X18)
| ~ s_t(s(X12,X16),s(X12,X17),s(X12,X18)) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[116,theory(equality)]) ).
fof(189,plain,
! [X16,X17,X18,X12] :
( ~ s_t(X16,X17,X18)
| s_t(s(X12,X16),s(X12,X17),s(X12,X18)) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[97,theory(equality)]) ).
fof(319,plain,
! [X17,X18] : equal(s(X17,s(X17,X18)),X18),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[47]) ).
cnf(320,plain,
s(X1,s(X1,X2)) = X2,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[319]) ).
fof(439,negated_conjecture,
? [X16,X17,X18,X12] :
( ~ s_t(X16,X17,X18)
& s_t(s(X12,X16),s(X12,X17),s(X12,X18)) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[188]) ).
fof(440,negated_conjecture,
? [X19,X20,X21,X22] :
( ~ s_t(X19,X20,X21)
& s_t(s(X22,X19),s(X22,X20),s(X22,X21)) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[439]) ).
fof(441,negated_conjecture,
( ~ s_t(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0)
& s_t(s(esk4_0,esk1_0),s(esk4_0,esk2_0),s(esk4_0,esk3_0)) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[440]) ).
cnf(442,negated_conjecture,
s_t(s(esk4_0,esk1_0),s(esk4_0,esk2_0),s(esk4_0,esk3_0)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[441]) ).
cnf(443,negated_conjecture,
~ s_t(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[441]) ).
fof(444,plain,
! [X19,X20,X21,X22] :
( ~ s_t(X19,X20,X21)
| s_t(s(X22,X19),s(X22,X20),s(X22,X21)) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[189]) ).
cnf(445,plain,
( s_t(s(X1,X2),s(X1,X3),s(X1,X4))
| ~ s_t(X2,X3,X4) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[444]) ).
cnf(576,plain,
( s_t(X2,s(X1,X3),s(X1,X4))
| ~ s_t(s(X1,X2),X3,X4) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[445,320,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(2588,plain,
( s_t(X1,X3,s(X2,X4))
| ~ s_t(s(X2,X1),s(X2,X3),X4) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[576,320,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(170953,negated_conjecture,
s_t(esk1_0,esk2_0,s(esk4_0,s(esk4_0,esk3_0))),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[2588,442,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(171246,negated_conjecture,
s_t(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[170953,320,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(171247,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[171246,443,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(171248,negated_conjecture,
$false,
171247,
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : GEO499+1 : TPTP v7.0.0. Released v7.0.0.
% 0.00/0.03 % Command : Source/sine.py -e eprover -t %d %s
% 0.02/0.24 % Computer : n023.star.cs.uiowa.edu
% 0.02/0.24 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.02/0.24 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 @ 2.40GHz
% 0.02/0.24 % Memory : 32218.75MB
% 0.02/0.24 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-327.36.3.el7.x86_64
% 0.02/0.24 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.02/0.24 % DateTime : Fri Jan 20 05:32:48 CST 2017
% 0.02/0.24 % CPUTime :
% 0.02/0.30 % SZS status Started for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.02/0.30 --creating new selector for [GEO011+0.ax]
% 4.56/4.80 -running prover on /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp1QN67b/sel_theBenchmark.p_1 with time limit 29
% 4.56/4.80 -running prover with command ['/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/Source/./Source/PROVER/eproof.working', '-s', '-tLPO4', '-xAuto', '-tAuto', '--memory-limit=768', '--tptp3-format', '--cpu-limit=29', '/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp1QN67b/sel_theBenchmark.p_1']
% 4.56/4.80 -prover status Theorem
% 4.56/4.80 Problem theBenchmark.p solved in phase 0.
% 4.56/4.80 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 4.56/4.80 % SZS status Ended for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 4.56/4.80 Solved 1 out of 1.
% 4.56/4.80 # Problem is unsatisfiable (or provable), constructing proof object
% 4.56/4.80 # SZS status Theorem
% 4.56/4.80 # SZS output start CNFRefutation.
% See solution above
% 4.56/4.80 # SZS output end CNFRefutation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------