TSTP Solution File: GEO499+1 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : GEO499+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 03:46:00 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 9.95s 2.74s
% Output : CNFRefutation 9.95s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 11 ( 7 unt; 0 nHn; 7 RR)
% Number of literals : 15 ( 2 equ; 6 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 20 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_106,plain,
( s_t(s(X1,X2),s(X1,X3),s(X1,X4))
| ~ s_t(X2,X3,X4) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-7ukx_9ix/input.p',i_0_106) ).
cnf(i_0_115,plain,
s(X1,s(X1,X2)) = X2,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-7ukx_9ix/input.p',i_0_115) ).
cnf(i_0_107,negated_conjecture,
s_t(s(esk4_0,esk1_0),s(esk4_0,esk2_0),s(esk4_0,esk3_0)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-7ukx_9ix/input.p',i_0_107) ).
cnf(i_0_108,negated_conjecture,
~ s_t(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-7ukx_9ix/input.p',i_0_108) ).
cnf(c_0_120,plain,
( s_t(s(X1,X2),s(X1,X3),s(X1,X4))
| ~ s_t(X2,X3,X4) ),
i_0_106 ).
cnf(c_0_121,plain,
s(X1,s(X1,X2)) = X2,
i_0_115 ).
cnf(c_0_122,plain,
( s_t(X1,s(X2,X3),s(X2,X4))
| ~ s_t(s(X2,X1),X3,X4) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_120,c_0_121]) ).
cnf(c_0_123,plain,
( s_t(X1,s(X2,X3),X4)
| ~ s_t(s(X2,X1),X3,s(X2,X4)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_122,c_0_121]) ).
cnf(c_0_124,negated_conjecture,
s_t(s(esk4_0,esk1_0),s(esk4_0,esk2_0),s(esk4_0,esk3_0)),
i_0_107 ).
cnf(c_0_125,negated_conjecture,
~ s_t(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0),
i_0_108 ).
cnf(c_0_126,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_123,c_0_124]),c_0_121]),c_0_125]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12 % Problem : GEO499+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.0.0.
% 0.06/0.13 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 10:05:24 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.45 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.19/0.46 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.46 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.19/0.46 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.19/0.46 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 9.95/2.74 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y:
% 9.95/2.74 # Version: 2.1pre011
% 9.95/2.74 # Preprocessing time : 0.019 s
% 9.95/2.74
% 9.95/2.74 # Proof found!
% 9.95/2.74 # SZS status Theorem
% 9.95/2.74 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 9.95/2.74 # Proof object total steps : 11
% 9.95/2.74 # Proof object clause steps : 7
% 9.95/2.74 # Proof object formula steps : 4
% 9.95/2.74 # Proof object conjectures : 5
% 9.95/2.74 # Proof object clause conjectures : 3
% 9.95/2.74 # Proof object formula conjectures : 2
% 9.95/2.74 # Proof object initial clauses used : 4
% 9.95/2.74 # Proof object initial formulas used : 4
% 9.95/2.74 # Proof object generating inferences : 3
% 9.95/2.74 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 2
% 9.95/2.74 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 9.95/2.74 # Parsed axioms : 155
% 9.95/2.74 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 9.95/2.74 # Initial clauses : 155
% 9.95/2.74 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 9.95/2.74 # Initial clauses in saturation : 155
% 9.95/2.74 # Processed clauses : 494
% 9.95/2.74 # ...of these trivial : 6
% 9.95/2.74 # ...subsumed : 146
% 9.95/2.74 # ...remaining for further processing : 342
% 9.95/2.74 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 11
% 9.95/2.74 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 9.95/2.74 # Backward-subsumed : 18
% 9.95/2.74 # Backward-rewritten : 1
% 9.95/2.74 # Generated clauses : 3289
% 9.95/2.74 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 2968
% 9.95/2.74 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 47
% 9.95/2.74 # Paramodulations : 3270
% 9.95/2.74 # Factorizations : 4
% 9.95/2.74 # Equation resolutions : 15
% 9.95/2.74 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 9.95/2.74 # Propositional unsat check successes : 0
% 9.95/2.74 # Current number of processed clauses : 316
% 9.95/2.74 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 23
% 9.95/2.74 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 9.95/2.74 # Negative unit clauses : 10
% 9.95/2.74 # Non-unit-clauses : 283
% 9.95/2.74 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 2326
% 9.95/2.74 # ...number of literals in the above : 9218
% 9.95/2.74 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 9.95/2.74 # Current number of archived clauses : 19
% 9.95/2.74 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 25201
% 9.95/2.74 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 15494
% 9.95/2.74 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 209
% 9.95/2.74 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 211
% 9.95/2.74 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 9.95/2.74 # BW rewrite match attempts : 191
% 9.95/2.74 # BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 9.95/2.74 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 9.95/2.74 # Condensation successes : 0
% 9.95/2.74 # Termbank termtop insertions : 49390
% 9.95/2.74
% 9.95/2.74 # -------------------------------------------------
% 9.95/2.74 # User time : 0.065 s
% 9.95/2.74 # System time : 0.006 s
% 9.95/2.74 # Total time : 0.071 s
% 9.95/2.74 # ...preprocessing : 0.019 s
% 9.95/2.74 # ...main loop : 0.052 s
% 9.95/2.74 # Maximum resident set size: 7132 pages
% 9.95/2.74
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------