TSTP Solution File: GEO499+1 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : GEO499+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 04:06:03 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.24s 1.43s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.24s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 13 ( 6 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 20 ( 3 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 16 ( 9 ~; 6 |; 1 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 8 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 30 ( 0 sgn 20 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(aSatz7_15a,axiom,
! [X13,X16,X27,X12] :
( ~ s_t(X13,X16,X27)
| s_t(s(X12,X13),s(X12,X16),s(X12,X27)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',aSatz7_15a) ).
fof(aSatz7_7,axiom,
! [X12,X13] : s(X12,s(X12,X13)) = X13,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',aSatz7_7) ).
fof(aSatz7_15b,conjecture,
! [X13,X16,X27,X12] :
( s_t(X13,X16,X27)
| ~ s_t(s(X12,X13),s(X12,X16),s(X12,X27)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',aSatz7_15b) ).
fof(c_0_3,plain,
! [X28,X29,X30,X31] :
( ~ s_t(X28,X29,X30)
| s_t(s(X31,X28),s(X31,X29),s(X31,X30)) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[aSatz7_15a])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_4,plain,
! [X14,X15] : s(X14,s(X14,X15)) = X15,
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[aSatz7_7]) ).
fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X13,X16,X27,X12] :
( s_t(X13,X16,X27)
| ~ s_t(s(X12,X13),s(X12,X16),s(X12,X27)) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[aSatz7_15b]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
( s_t(s(X1,X2),s(X1,X3),s(X1,X4))
| ~ s_t(X2,X3,X4) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
s(X1,s(X1,X2)) = X2,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
fof(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
( ~ s_t(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0)
& s_t(s(esk4_0,esk1_0),s(esk4_0,esk2_0),s(esk4_0,esk3_0)) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( s_t(s(X1,X2),s(X1,X3),X4)
| ~ s_t(X2,X3,s(X1,X4)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
s_t(s(esk4_0,esk1_0),s(esk4_0,esk2_0),s(esk4_0,esk3_0)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
~ s_t(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),c_0_7]),c_0_7]),c_0_11]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12 % Problem : GEO499+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.0.0.
% 0.06/0.13 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 10:22:28 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.24/1.43 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.24/1.43 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.24/1.43 # Preprocessing time : 0.020 s
% 0.24/1.43
% 0.24/1.43 # Proof found!
% 0.24/1.43 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.24/1.43 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.24/1.43 # Proof object total steps : 13
% 0.24/1.43 # Proof object clause steps : 6
% 0.24/1.43 # Proof object formula steps : 7
% 0.24/1.43 # Proof object conjectures : 6
% 0.24/1.43 # Proof object clause conjectures : 3
% 0.24/1.43 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.24/1.43 # Proof object initial clauses used : 4
% 0.24/1.43 # Proof object initial formulas used : 3
% 0.24/1.43 # Proof object generating inferences : 2
% 0.24/1.43 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 3
% 0.24/1.43 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.24/1.43 # Parsed axioms : 116
% 0.24/1.43 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 69
% 0.24/1.43 # Initial clauses : 50
% 0.24/1.43 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.24/1.43 # Initial clauses in saturation : 50
% 0.24/1.43 # Processed clauses : 106
% 0.24/1.43 # ...of these trivial : 3
% 0.24/1.43 # ...subsumed : 15
% 0.24/1.43 # ...remaining for further processing : 88
% 0.24/1.43 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 6
% 0.24/1.43 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.24/1.43 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.24/1.43 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.24/1.43 # Generated clauses : 418
% 0.24/1.43 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 332
% 0.24/1.43 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 2
% 0.24/1.43 # Paramodulations : 409
% 0.24/1.43 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.24/1.43 # Equation resolutions : 9
% 0.24/1.43 # Current number of processed clauses : 86
% 0.24/1.43 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 15
% 0.24/1.43 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.24/1.43 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.24/1.43 # Non-unit-clauses : 70
% 0.24/1.43 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 276
% 0.24/1.43 # ...number of literals in the above : 907
% 0.24/1.43 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.24/1.43 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.24/1.43 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1817
% 0.24/1.43 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1435
% 0.24/1.43 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 17
% 0.24/1.43 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 33
% 0.24/1.43 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.24/1.43 # BW rewrite match attempts : 74
% 0.24/1.43 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.24/1.43 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.24/1.43 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.24/1.43 # Termbank termtop insertions : 10331
% 0.24/1.43
% 0.24/1.43 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.24/1.43 # User time : 0.027 s
% 0.24/1.43 # System time : 0.004 s
% 0.24/1.43 # Total time : 0.031 s
% 0.24/1.43 # Maximum resident set size: 3556 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------