TSTP Solution File: GEO474+1 by E-SAT---3.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem  : GEO474+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v7.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 17:35:05 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 1052.81s 130.27s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1052.81s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   13 (   9 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   19 (  18 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   14 (   8   ~;   4   |;   1   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    9 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   12 (  12 usr;   8 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   19 (   0 sgn;  12   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(aRANKu_0,conjecture,
    ! [X1464,X1465] : s(num,i(s(fun(cart(cart(real,X1464),X1465),num),rank),s(cart(cart(real,X1464),X1465),i(s(fun(num,cart(cart(real,X1464),X1465)),mat),s(num,i(s(fun(num,num),numeral),s(num,u_0))))))) = s(num,i(s(fun(num,num),numeral),s(num,u_0))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.S894qem2KS/E---3.1_19174.p',aRANKu_0) ).

fof(aNUMERAL,axiom,
    ! [X84] : s(num,i(s(fun(num,num),numeral),s(num,X84))) = s(num,X84),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.S894qem2KS/E---3.1_19174.p',aNUMERAL) ).

fof(aRANKu_EQu_0,axiom,
    ! [X738,X733,X16] :
      ( s(num,i(s(fun(cart(cart(real,X738),X733),num),rank),s(cart(cart(real,X738),X733),X16))) = s(num,i(s(fun(num,num),numeral),s(num,u_0)))
    <=> s(cart(cart(real,X738),X733),X16) = s(cart(cart(real,X738),X733),i(s(fun(num,cart(cart(real,X738),X733)),mat),s(num,i(s(fun(num,num),numeral),s(num,u_0))))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.S894qem2KS/E---3.1_19174.p',aRANKu_EQu_0) ).

fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1464,X1465] : s(num,i(s(fun(cart(cart(real,X1464),X1465),num),rank),s(cart(cart(real,X1464),X1465),i(s(fun(num,cart(cart(real,X1464),X1465)),mat),s(num,i(s(fun(num,num),numeral),s(num,u_0))))))) = s(num,i(s(fun(num,num),numeral),s(num,u_0))),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[aRANKu_0]) ).

fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    s(num,i(s(fun(cart(cart(real,esk1_0),esk2_0),num),rank),s(cart(cart(real,esk1_0),esk2_0),i(s(fun(num,cart(cart(real,esk1_0),esk2_0)),mat),s(num,i(s(fun(num,num),numeral),s(num,u_0))))))) != s(num,i(s(fun(num,num),numeral),s(num,u_0))),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])])]) ).

fof(c_0_5,plain,
    ! [X1565] : s(num,i(s(fun(num,num),numeral),s(num,X1565))) = s(num,X1565),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[aNUMERAL]) ).

fof(c_0_6,plain,
    ! [X1693,X1694,X1695] :
      ( ( s(num,i(s(fun(cart(cart(real,X1693),X1694),num),rank),s(cart(cart(real,X1693),X1694),X1695))) != s(num,i(s(fun(num,num),numeral),s(num,u_0)))
        | s(cart(cart(real,X1693),X1694),X1695) = s(cart(cart(real,X1693),X1694),i(s(fun(num,cart(cart(real,X1693),X1694)),mat),s(num,i(s(fun(num,num),numeral),s(num,u_0))))) )
      & ( s(cart(cart(real,X1693),X1694),X1695) != s(cart(cart(real,X1693),X1694),i(s(fun(num,cart(cart(real,X1693),X1694)),mat),s(num,i(s(fun(num,num),numeral),s(num,u_0)))))
        | s(num,i(s(fun(cart(cart(real,X1693),X1694),num),rank),s(cart(cart(real,X1693),X1694),X1695))) = s(num,i(s(fun(num,num),numeral),s(num,u_0))) ) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[aRANKu_EQu_0])]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    s(num,i(s(fun(cart(cart(real,esk1_0),esk2_0),num),rank),s(cart(cart(real,esk1_0),esk2_0),i(s(fun(num,cart(cart(real,esk1_0),esk2_0)),mat),s(num,i(s(fun(num,num),numeral),s(num,u_0))))))) != s(num,i(s(fun(num,num),numeral),s(num,u_0))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    s(num,i(s(fun(num,num),numeral),s(num,X1))) = s(num,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    ( s(num,i(s(fun(cart(cart(real,X1),X2),num),rank),s(cart(cart(real,X1),X2),X3))) = s(num,i(s(fun(num,num),numeral),s(num,u_0)))
    | s(cart(cart(real,X1),X2),X3) != s(cart(cart(real,X1),X2),i(s(fun(num,cart(cart(real,X1),X2)),mat),s(num,i(s(fun(num,num),numeral),s(num,u_0))))) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    s(num,i(s(fun(cart(cart(real,esk1_0),esk2_0),num),rank),s(cart(cart(real,esk1_0),esk2_0),i(s(fun(num,cart(cart(real,esk1_0),esk2_0)),mat),s(num,u_0))))) != s(num,u_0),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]),c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( s(num,i(s(fun(cart(cart(real,X1),X2),num),rank),s(cart(cart(real,X1),X2),X3))) = s(num,u_0)
    | s(cart(cart(real,X1),X2),X3) != s(cart(cart(real,X1),X2),i(s(fun(num,cart(cart(real,X1),X2)),mat),s(num,u_0))) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_8]),c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.09/0.11  % Problem    : GEO474+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v7.0.0.
% 0.09/0.12  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit   : 2400
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime   : Tue Oct  3 07:22:07 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 1.24/1.39  Running first-order model finding
% 1.24/1.39  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.S894qem2KS/E---3.1_19174.p
% 1052.81/130.27  # Version: 3.1pre001
% 1052.81/130.27  # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 1052.81/130.27  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1052.81/130.27  # Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 900s (3) cores
% 1052.81/130.27  # Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 1052.81/130.27  # Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 1052.81/130.27  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 1052.81/130.27  # new_bool_3 with pid 19252 completed with status 0
% 1052.81/130.27  # Result found by new_bool_3
% 1052.81/130.27  # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 1052.81/130.27  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1052.81/130.27  # Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 900s (3) cores
% 1052.81/130.27  # Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 1052.81/130.27  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 1052.81/130.27  # Search class: FGHSM-SMLM33-DFFFFFNN
% 1052.81/130.27  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 2 cores with 600 seconds (600 total)
% 1052.81/130.27  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 325s (1) cores
% 1052.81/130.27  # Starting new_bool_3 with 61s (1) cores
% 1052.81/130.27  # new_bool_3 with pid 19256 completed with status 7
% 1052.81/130.27  # Starting SAT001_CA_MinMin_p005000_rr with 55s (1) cores
% 1052.81/130.27  # SAT001_CA_MinMin_p005000_rr with pid 19314 completed with status 7
% 1052.81/130.27  # Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_S5PRR_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 55s (1) cores
% 1052.81/130.27  # G-E--_208_B07_F1_S5PRR_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with pid 19319 completed with status 0
% 1052.81/130.27  # Result found by G-E--_208_B07_F1_S5PRR_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y
% 1052.81/130.27  # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 1052.81/130.27  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1052.81/130.27  # Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 900s (3) cores
% 1052.81/130.27  # Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 1052.81/130.27  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 1052.81/130.27  # Search class: FGHSM-SMLM33-DFFFFFNN
% 1052.81/130.27  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 2 cores with 600 seconds (600 total)
% 1052.81/130.27  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 325s (1) cores
% 1052.81/130.27  # Starting new_bool_3 with 61s (1) cores
% 1052.81/130.27  # new_bool_3 with pid 19256 completed with status 7
% 1052.81/130.27  # Starting SAT001_CA_MinMin_p005000_rr with 55s (1) cores
% 1052.81/130.27  # SAT001_CA_MinMin_p005000_rr with pid 19314 completed with status 7
% 1052.81/130.27  # Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_S5PRR_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 55s (1) cores
% 1052.81/130.27  # Preprocessing time       : 0.317 s
% 1052.81/130.27  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 1052.81/130.27  
% 1052.81/130.27  # Proof found!
% 1052.81/130.27  # SZS status Theorem
% 1052.81/130.27  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1052.81/130.27  # Parsed axioms                        : 3503
% 1052.81/130.27  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 2116
% 1052.81/130.27  # Initial clauses                      : 3565
% 1052.81/130.27  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 174
% 1052.81/130.27  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 3391
% 1052.81/130.27  # Processed clauses                    : 9015
% 1052.81/130.27  # ...of these trivial                  : 135
% 1052.81/130.27  # ...subsumed                          : 5102
% 1052.81/130.27  # ...remaining for further processing  : 3778
% 1052.81/130.27  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 1052.81/130.27  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 1052.81/130.27  # Backward-subsumed                    : 31
% 1052.81/130.27  # Backward-rewritten                   : 132
% 1052.81/130.27  # Generated clauses                    : 192657
% 1052.81/130.27  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 137820
% 1052.81/130.27  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 1052.81/130.27  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 200
% 1052.81/130.27  # Paramodulations                      : 192631
% 1052.81/130.27  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 1052.81/130.27  # NegExts                              : 0
% 1052.81/130.27  # Equation resolutions                 : 26
% 1052.81/130.27  # Total rewrite steps                  : 104382
% 1052.81/130.27  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 1052.81/130.27  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 1052.81/130.27  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 1052.81/130.27  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 1052.81/130.27  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 1052.81/130.27  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 1052.81/130.27  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 1052.81/130.27  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 1052.81/130.27  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 1052.81/130.27  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 1052.81/130.27  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 1052.81/130.27  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 1052.81/130.27  # Current number of processed clauses  : 783
% 1052.81/130.27  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 330
% 1052.81/130.27  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 100
% 1052.81/130.27  #    Negative unit clauses             : 64
% 1052.81/130.27  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 289
% 1052.81/130.27  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 134734
% 1052.81/130.27  # ...number of literals in the above   : 263374
% 1052.81/130.27  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 1052.81/130.27  # Current number of archived clauses   : 2995
% 1052.81/130.27  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 3269831
% 1052.81/130.27  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 290159
% 1052.81/130.27  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 2833
% 1052.81/130.27  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2824
% 1052.81/130.27  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 489
% 1052.81/130.27  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 191612
% 1052.81/130.27  # BW rewrite match successes           : 2570
% 1052.81/130.27  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 1052.81/130.27  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 1052.81/130.27  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 23368237
% 1052.81/130.27  
% 1052.81/130.27  # -------------------------------------------------
% 1052.81/130.27  # User time                : 126.272 s
% 1052.81/130.27  # System time              : 1.349 s
% 1052.81/130.27  # Total time               : 127.622 s
% 1052.81/130.27  # Maximum resident set size: 28676 pages
% 1052.81/130.27  
% 1052.81/130.27  # -------------------------------------------------
% 1052.81/130.27  # User time                : 252.160 s
% 1052.81/130.27  # System time              : 3.105 s
% 1052.81/130.27  # Total time               : 255.265 s
% 1052.81/130.27  # Maximum resident set size: 12540 pages
% 1052.81/130.27  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------