TSTP Solution File: GEO354+1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : GEO354+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v6.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 06:20:06 EDT 2022
% Result : Unknown 0.21s 0.39s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : GEO354+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v6.4.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 16:57:08 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.36 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.13/0.36 The process was started by sandbox2 on n027.cluster.edu,
% 0.13/0.36 Sat Jun 18 16:57:08 2022
% 0.13/0.36 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 26442.
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.13/0.36 set(auto).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.13/0.36 clear(print_given).
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 formula_list(usable).
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=10.
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 This is a non-Horn set without equality. The strategy
% 0.13/0.36 will be ordered hyper_res, ur_res, unit deletion, and
% 0.13/0.36 factoring, with satellites in sos and nuclei in usable.
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 ------------> process usable:
% 0.13/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 31 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -unequally_directed_lines(A,B)| -unequally_directed_lines(A,reverse_line(B))|unequally_directed_lines(A,C)|unequally_directed_lines(B,C).
% 0.13/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 31 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -unequally_directed_lines(A,B)| -unequally_directed_lines(A,reverse_line(B))|unequally_directed_lines(A,reverse_line(C))|unequally_directed_lines(B,reverse_line(C)).
% 0.13/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 36 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -left_apart_point(A,reverse_line(B)).
% 0.13/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 37 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -left_convergent_lines(A,reverse_line(B)).
% 0.13/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 36 during input processing: 0 [unit_del,36,37] {-} -distinct_points(A,B)| -left_apart_point(A,C).
% 0.13/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 36 during input processing: 0 [unit_del,36] {-} -left_apart_point(A,B)|distinct_points(A,C).
% 0.13/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 36 during input processing: 0 [unit_del,36] {-} -left_apart_point(A,B)| -unequally_directed_lines(B,C)|distinct_lines(B,C).
% 0.13/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 37 during input processing: 0 [unit_del,37] {-} -left_convergent_lines(A,B)|unequally_directed_lines(B,C).
% 0.13/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 30 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -unequally_directed_lines(A,A).
% 0.13/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 52 during input processing: 0 [] {-} unequally_directed_lines(A,B)|unequally_directed_lines(A,C)| -unequally_directed_lines(B,C)| -unequally_directed_lines(B,reverse_line(C)).
% 0.13/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 52 during input processing: 0 [] {-} unequally_directed_lines(A,B)|unequally_directed_lines(A,reverse_line(C))| -unequally_directed_lines(B,C)| -unequally_directed_lines(B,reverse_line(C)).
% 0.13/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 34 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -line(A)| -line(B)|unequally_directed_lines(A,B)|unequally_directed_lines(A,reverse_line(B)).
% 0.13/0.36 36 back subsumes 17.
% 0.13/0.36 36 back subsumes 16.
% 0.13/0.36 36 back subsumes 15.
% 0.13/0.36 36 back subsumes 14.
% 0.13/0.36 36 back subsumes 12.
% 0.13/0.36 36 back subsumes 11.
% 0.13/0.36 36 back subsumes 3.
% 0.13/0.36 36 back subsumes 2.
% 0.13/0.36 55 back subsumes 54.
% 0.13/0.36 55 back subsumes 53.
% 0.13/0.36 55 back subsumes 48.
% 0.13/0.36 55 back subsumes 45.
% 0.13/0.36 55 back subsumes 44.
% 0.13/0.36 55 back subsumes 39.
% 0.13/0.36 55 back subsumes 35.
% 0.13/0.36 55 back subsumes 33.
% 0.13/0.36 55 back subsumes 32.
% 0.13/0.36 55 back subsumes 6.
% 0.13/0.36 57 back subsumes 55.
% 0.13/0.36 57 back subsumes 52.
% 0.13/0.36 57 back subsumes 49.
% 0.13/0.36 57 back subsumes 31.
% 0.13/0.36 57 back subsumes 30.
% 0.13/0.36 57 back subsumes 18.
% 0.13/0.36 64 back subsumes 41.
% 0.13/0.36 64 back subsumes 40.
% 0.13/0.36 64 back subsumes 34.
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 ------------> process sos:
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.21/0.39
% 0.21/0.39 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.21/0.39
% 0.21/0.39 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.21/0.39
% 0.21/0.39
% 0.21/0.39 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.21/0.39
% 0.21/0.39 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.21/0.39 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.21/0.39 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.21/0.39 number of clauses in intial UL: 35
% 0.21/0.39 number of clauses initially in problem: 35
% 0.21/0.39 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 100
% 0.21/0.39 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 100
% 0.21/0.39 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.21/0.39 absolute distinct symbol count: 15
% 0.21/0.39 distinct predicate count: 12
% 0.21/0.39 distinct function count: 3
% 0.21/0.39 distinct constant count: 0
% 0.21/0.39
% 0.21/0.39 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.21/0.39
% 0.21/0.39
% 0.21/0.39
% 0.21/0.39 =========== start of search ===========
% 0.21/0.39
% 0.21/0.39 Search stopped because sos empty.
% 0.21/0.39
% 0.21/0.39
% 0.21/0.39 Search stopped because sos empty.
% 0.21/0.39
% 0.21/0.39 ============ end of search ============
% 0.21/0.39
% 0.21/0.39 Process 26442 finished Sat Jun 18 16:57:08 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------