TSTP Solution File: GEO354+1 by E---3.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.1
% Problem  : GEO354+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v6.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 17:32:40 EDT 2023

% Result   : Satisfiable 0.17s 0.45s
% Output   : Saturation 0.17s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named c_0_39)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    ~ unequally_directed_lines(X1,X2),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    ( ~ line(X1)
    | ~ line(X2) ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]),c_0_25]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_43,plain,
    ( ~ point(X1)
    | ~ line(X2) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_45,plain,
    ~ left_apart_point(X1,X2),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_31]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_55,plain,
    ( before_on_line(X1,X2,X3)
    | before_on_line(X1,X2,X4)
    | ~ between_on_line(X1,X3,X2,X4) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_39]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_56,plain,
    ( before_on_line(X1,X2,X3)
    | before_on_line(X1,X3,X2)
    | ~ between_on_line(X1,X3,X2,X4) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_39]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_57,plain,
    ( before_on_line(X1,X2,X3)
    | before_on_line(X1,X3,X2)
    | ~ between_on_line(X1,X4,X3,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_39]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_58,plain,
    ( before_on_line(X1,X2,X3)
    | before_on_line(X1,X4,X3)
    | ~ between_on_line(X1,X4,X3,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_39]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_59,plain,
    ( distinct_lines(X1,X3)
    | distinct_lines(X2,X3)
    | ~ distinct_lines(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_40]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_60,plain,
    ( distinct_points(X1,X3)
    | distinct_points(X2,X3)
    | ~ distinct_points(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_41]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_61,plain,
    ( between_on_line(X1,X2,X3,X4)
    | ~ before_on_line(X1,X2,X3)
    | ~ before_on_line(X1,X3,X4) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_39]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_62,plain,
    ( between_on_line(X1,X4,X3,X2)
    | ~ before_on_line(X1,X2,X3)
    | ~ before_on_line(X1,X3,X4) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_39]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_63,plain,
    ( ~ point(X1)
    | ~ point(X2)
    | ~ distinct_points(X2,X1) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_42,c_0_43]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_64,plain,
    ( distinct_points(X1,X2)
    | ~ before_on_line(X3,X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_30]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_65,plain,
    ( before_on_line(X1,X2,X3)
    | ~ distinct_points(X2,X3) ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_44,c_0_45]),c_0_45]),c_0_45]),c_0_45]),c_0_25]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_66,plain,
    ( ~ distinct_lines(X1,X2)
    | ~ distinct_points(X3,X4) ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_46,c_0_45]),c_0_45]),c_0_45]),c_0_45]),c_0_45]),c_0_45]),c_0_45]),c_0_45]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_67,plain,
    ( line(reverse_line(X1))
    | ~ line(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_47]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_68,plain,
    ~ divides_points(X1,X2,X3),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_48,c_0_45]),c_0_45]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_69,plain,
    ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,X2),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_49,c_0_45]),c_0_45]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_70,plain,
    ~ convergent_lines(X1,X2),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_50,c_0_22]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_71,plain,
    ~ distinct_lines(X1,reverse_line(X1)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_51]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_72,plain,
    ~ left_convergent_lines(X1,X2),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_52]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_73,plain,
    ~ distinct_lines(X1,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_53]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_74,plain,
    ~ distinct_points(X1,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_54]),
    [final] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.09/0.11  % Problem    : GEO354+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v6.4.0.
% 0.09/0.12  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.12/0.32  % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.32  % CPULimit   : 2400
% 0.12/0.32  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.12/0.32  % DateTime   : Tue Oct  3 07:02:35 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.32  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.17/0.44  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.17/0.44  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.u7Nty1GJZG/E---3.1_1197.p
% 0.17/0.45  # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.17/0.45  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/0.45  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/0.45  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.17/0.45  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.45  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.45  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.45  # G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with pid 1275 completed with status 1
% 0.17/0.45  # Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S
% 0.17/0.45  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/0.45  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/0.45  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.17/0.45  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.17/0.45  # Search class: FGHNF-FFMF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.17/0.45  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.17/0.45  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S2mI with 811s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.45  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 151s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.45  # Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.45  # Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.45  # Starting sh5l with 136s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.45  # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S2mI with pid 1291 completed with status 1
% 0.17/0.45  # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S2mI
% 0.17/0.45  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/0.45  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/0.45  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.17/0.45  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.17/0.45  # Search class: FGHNF-FFMF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.17/0.45  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.17/0.45  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S2mI with 811s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.45  # Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.17/0.45  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.17/0.45  
% 0.17/0.45  # No proof found!
% 0.17/0.45  # SZS status Satisfiable
% 0.17/0.45  # SZS output start Saturation
% See solution above
% 0.17/0.45  # Parsed axioms                        : 37
% 0.17/0.45  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.17/0.45  # Initial clauses                      : 71
% 0.17/0.45  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 4
% 0.17/0.45  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 67
% 0.17/0.45  # Processed clauses                    : 93
% 0.17/0.45  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.17/0.45  # ...subsumed                          : 37
% 0.17/0.45  # ...remaining for further processing  : 56
% 0.17/0.45  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.17/0.45  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.17/0.45  # Backward-subsumed                    : 8
% 0.17/0.45  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.17/0.45  # Generated clauses                    : 2
% 0.17/0.45  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 2
% 0.17/0.45  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.17/0.45  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 2
% 0.17/0.45  # Paramodulations                      : 2
% 0.17/0.45  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.17/0.45  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.17/0.45  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.17/0.45  # Total rewrite steps                  : 0
% 0.17/0.45  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.17/0.45  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.17/0.45  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.17/0.45  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.17/0.45  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.17/0.45  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.17/0.45  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.17/0.45  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.17/0.45  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.17/0.45  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.17/0.45  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.17/0.45  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.17/0.45  # Current number of processed clauses  : 24
% 0.17/0.45  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 0
% 0.17/0.45  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.17/0.45  #    Negative unit clauses             : 9
% 0.17/0.45  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 15
% 0.17/0.45  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.17/0.45  # ...number of literals in the above   : 0
% 0.17/0.45  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.17/0.45  # Current number of archived clauses   : 32
% 0.17/0.45  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 88
% 0.17/0.45  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 80
% 0.17/0.45  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 5
% 0.17/0.45  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 92
% 0.17/0.45  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.17/0.45  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
% 0.17/0.45  # BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.17/0.45  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.17/0.45  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.17/0.45  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 3986
% 0.17/0.45  
% 0.17/0.45  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.17/0.45  # User time                : 0.006 s
% 0.17/0.45  # System time              : 0.004 s
% 0.17/0.45  # Total time               : 0.010 s
% 0.17/0.45  # Maximum resident set size: 1916 pages
% 0.17/0.45  
% 0.17/0.45  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.17/0.45  # User time                : 0.024 s
% 0.17/0.45  # System time              : 0.008 s
% 0.17/0.45  # Total time               : 0.032 s
% 0.17/0.45  # Maximum resident set size: 1732 pages
% 0.17/0.45  % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.17/0.46  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------