TSTP Solution File: GEO343+1 by Enigma---0.5.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : GEO343+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 03:45:24 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 7.47s 2.84s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 7.47s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :   13
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   31 (  27 unt;   4 nHn;  31 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   72 (  24 equ;  41 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :   14 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   6 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   22 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_122,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | X3 = X4
    | X4 != X5
    | X2 != X6
    | X1 != X7
    | X3 != X8
    | ~ rline(X6)
    | ~ rline(X7)
    | ~ rpoint(X5)
    | ~ rpoint(X8)
    | ~ ron(X4,X2)
    | ~ ron(X4,X1)
    | ~ ron(X3,X2)
    | ~ ron(X3,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-gr_dy1n0/lgb.p',i_0_122) ).

cnf(i_0_13,plain,
    rpoint(esk2_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-gr_dy1n0/lgb.p',i_0_13) ).

cnf(i_0_14,plain,
    vd1401 = esk2_0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-gr_dy1n0/lgb.p',i_0_14) ).

cnf(i_0_6,plain,
    ron(vd1401,vd1416),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-gr_dy1n0/lgb.p',i_0_6) ).

cnf(i_0_5,plain,
    rline(vd1416),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-gr_dy1n0/lgb.p',i_0_5) ).

cnf(i_0_9,plain,
    rpoint(esk4_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-gr_dy1n0/lgb.p',i_0_9) ).

cnf(i_0_10,plain,
    vd1399 = esk4_0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-gr_dy1n0/lgb.p',i_0_10) ).

cnf(i_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ron(vd1399,esk1_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-gr_dy1n0/lgb.p',i_0_4) ).

cnf(i_0_2,negated_conjecture,
    rline(esk1_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-gr_dy1n0/lgb.p',i_0_2) ).

cnf(i_0_3,negated_conjecture,
    ron(vd1401,esk1_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-gr_dy1n0/lgb.p',i_0_3) ).

cnf(i_0_7,plain,
    ron(vd1399,vd1416),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-gr_dy1n0/lgb.p',i_0_7) ).

cnf(i_0_16,plain,
    vd1399 != vd1401,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-gr_dy1n0/lgb.p',i_0_16) ).

cnf(i_0_1,negated_conjecture,
    esk1_0 != vd1416,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-gr_dy1n0/lgb.p',i_0_1) ).

cnf(c_0_136,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | X3 = X4
    | X4 != X5
    | X2 != X6
    | X1 != X7
    | X3 != X8
    | ~ rline(X6)
    | ~ rline(X7)
    | ~ rpoint(X5)
    | ~ rpoint(X8)
    | ~ ron(X4,X2)
    | ~ ron(X4,X1)
    | ~ ron(X3,X2)
    | ~ ron(X3,X1) ),
    i_0_122 ).

cnf(c_0_137,plain,
    rpoint(esk2_0),
    i_0_13 ).

cnf(c_0_138,plain,
    vd1401 = esk2_0,
    i_0_14 ).

cnf(c_0_139,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | X3 = X4
    | ~ rpoint(X1)
    | ~ rpoint(X2)
    | ~ rline(X3)
    | ~ rline(X4)
    | ~ ron(X2,X4)
    | ~ ron(X2,X3)
    | ~ ron(X1,X4)
    | ~ ron(X1,X3) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_136])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_140,plain,
    ron(vd1401,vd1416),
    i_0_6 ).

cnf(c_0_141,plain,
    rpoint(vd1401),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_137,c_0_138]) ).

cnf(c_0_142,plain,
    rline(vd1416),
    i_0_5 ).

cnf(c_0_143,plain,
    rpoint(esk4_0),
    i_0_9 ).

cnf(c_0_144,plain,
    vd1399 = esk4_0,
    i_0_10 ).

cnf(c_0_145,plain,
    ( X1 = vd1401
    | X2 = vd1416
    | ~ rpoint(X1)
    | ~ rline(X2)
    | ~ ron(vd1401,X2)
    | ~ ron(X1,vd1416)
    | ~ ron(X1,X2) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_139,c_0_140]),c_0_141]),c_0_142])]) ).

cnf(c_0_146,negated_conjecture,
    ron(vd1399,esk1_0),
    i_0_4 ).

cnf(c_0_147,plain,
    rpoint(vd1399),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_143,c_0_144]) ).

cnf(c_0_148,negated_conjecture,
    rline(esk1_0),
    i_0_2 ).

cnf(c_0_149,negated_conjecture,
    ron(vd1401,esk1_0),
    i_0_3 ).

cnf(c_0_150,plain,
    ron(vd1399,vd1416),
    i_0_7 ).

cnf(c_0_151,plain,
    vd1399 != vd1401,
    i_0_16 ).

cnf(c_0_152,negated_conjecture,
    esk1_0 != vd1416,
    i_0_1 ).

cnf(c_0_153,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_145,c_0_146]),c_0_147]),c_0_148]),c_0_149]),c_0_150])]),c_0_151]),c_0_152]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.13  % Problem  : GEO343+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.08/0.13  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.15/0.35  % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.35  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.15/0.35  % DateTime : Fri Jun 17 16:31:36 EDT 2022
% 0.15/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.21/0.46  # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 7.47/2.84  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 7.47/2.84  # No SInE strategy applied
% 7.47/2.84  # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 7.47/2.84  # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S2mI
% 7.47/2.84  # and selection function SelectCQArNTNpEqFirst.
% 7.47/2.84  #
% 7.47/2.84  # Preprocessing time       : 0.013 s
% 7.47/2.84  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 7.47/2.84  
% 7.47/2.84  # Proof found!
% 7.47/2.84  # SZS status Theorem
% 7.47/2.84  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.47/2.84  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.47/2.84  
% 7.47/2.84  # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.47/2.84  # User time                : 0.050 s
% 7.47/2.84  # System time              : 0.010 s
% 7.47/2.84  # Total time               : 0.060 s
% 7.47/2.84  # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 7.47/2.84  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------