TSTP Solution File: GEO304+1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : GEO304+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 06:19:55 EDT 2022
% Result : Timeout 300.05s 300.27s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.11 % Problem : GEO304+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.06/0.12 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.11/0.33 % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.11/0.33 % DateTime : Fri Jun 17 18:57:47 EDT 2022
% 0.11/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 164.28/164.53 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 164.28/164.53 The process was started by sandbox on n024.cluster.edu,
% 164.28/164.53 Fri Jun 17 18:57:47 2022
% 164.28/164.53 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 5856.
% 164.28/164.53
% 164.28/164.53 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 164.28/164.53 set(auto).
% 164.28/164.53 dependent: set(auto1).
% 164.28/164.53 dependent: set(process_input).
% 164.28/164.53 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 164.28/164.53 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 164.28/164.53 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 164.28/164.53 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 164.28/164.53 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 164.28/164.53 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 164.28/164.53 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 164.28/164.53 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 164.28/164.53 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 164.28/164.53 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 164.28/164.53 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 164.28/164.53 clear(print_given).
% 164.28/164.53
% 164.28/164.53 formula_list(usable).
% 164.28/164.53
% 164.28/164.53 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=42.
% 164.28/164.53
% 164.28/164.53 This ia a non-Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 164.28/164.53 Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 164.28/164.53 unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 164.28/164.53 clauses in usable.
% 164.28/164.53
% 164.28/164.53 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 164.28/164.53 dependent: set(para_from).
% 164.28/164.53 dependent: set(para_into).
% 164.28/164.53 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 164.28/164.53 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 164.28/164.53 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 164.28/164.53 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 164.28/164.53 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 164.28/164.53 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 164.28/164.53 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 164.28/164.53 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 164.28/164.53 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 164.28/164.53 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 164.28/164.53 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 164.28/164.53 dependent: set(factor).
% 164.28/164.53
% 164.28/164.53 ------------> process usable:
% 164.28/164.53 Following clause subsumed by 16 during input processing: 0 [flip.18] {-} vf(A,B)!=vf(A,C)|B=C|A=C|A=B|C!=D| -rpoint(D)|B!=E| -rpoint(E)|A!=F| -rpoint(F)|G!=H|I!=J| -rR(C,A,I)| -rpoint(J)| -rR(B,A,G)| -rpoint(H)|rless(vf(A,G),vf(A,I))|vf(vskolem1329(G,H,I,J,A,B,C),C)=vf(I,B).
% 164.28/164.53 Following clause subsumed by 26 during input processing: 0 [] {-} vf(A,B)!=vf(A,C)|B=C|A=C|A=B|C!=D| -rpoint(D)|B!=E| -rpoint(E)|A!=F| -rpoint(F)|G!=H|I!=J| -rR(C,A,I)| -rpoint(J)| -rR(B,A,G)| -rpoint(H)|rless(vf(A,G),vf(A,I))|I!=A.
% 164.28/164.53 Following clause subsumed by 25 during input processing: 0 [] {-} vf(A,B)!=vf(A,C)|B=C|A=C|A=B|C!=D| -rpoint(D)|B!=E| -rpoint(E)|A!=F| -rpoint(F)|G!=H|I!=J| -rR(C,A,I)| -rpoint(J)| -rR(B,A,G)| -rpoint(H)|rless(vf(A,G),vf(A,I))|vskolem1329(G,H,I,J,A,B,C)!=A.
% 164.28/164.53 Following clause subsumed by 30 during input processing: 0 [] {-} vf(A,B)!=vf(A,C)|B=C|A=C|A=B|C!=D| -rpoint(D)|B!=E| -rpoint(E)|A!=F| -rpoint(F)|G!=H|I!=J| -rR(C,A,I)| -rpoint(J)| -rR(B,A,G)| -rpoint(H)|rless(vf(A,G),vf(A,I))|ron(vskolem1329(G,H,I,J,A,B,C),vskolem1295(A,B,C)).
% 164.28/164.53 Following clause subsumed by 59 during input processing: 0 [] {-} vf(A,B)!=vf(A,C)|B=C|A=C|A=B|C!=D| -rpoint(D)|B!=E| -rpoint(E)|A!=F| -rpoint(F)|G!=H|I!=J| -rR(C,A,I)| -rpoint(J)| -rR(B,A,G)| -rpoint(H)| -rless(vf(A,G),vf(A,I))|G!=A.
% 164.28/164.53 Following clause subsumed by 58 during input processing: 0 [] {-} vf(A,B)!=vf(A,C)|B=C|A=C|A=B|C!=D| -rpoint(D)|B!=E| -rpoint(E)|A!=F| -rpoint(F)|G!=H|I!=J| -rR(C,A,I)| -rpoint(J)| -rR(B,A,G)| -rpoint(H)| -rless(vf(A,G),vf(A,I))|vskolem1306(G,H,I,J,A,B,C)!=A.
% 164.28/164.53 Following clause subsumed by 64 during input processing: 0 [] {-} vf(A,B)!=vf(A,C)|B=C|A=C|A=B|C!=D| -rpoint(D)|B!=E| -rpoint(E)|A!=F| -rpoint(F)|G!=H|I!=J| -rR(C,A,I)| -rpoint(J)| -rR(B,A,G)| -rpoint(H)| -rless(vf(A,G),vf(A,I))|ron(vskolem1306(G,H,I,J,A,B,C),vskolem1297(A,B,C)).
% 164.28/164.53 Following clause subsumed by 178 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -rR(A,B,C)| -ron(C,D)| -ron(B,D)|D!=E| -rcircle(E)|F!=G| -rline(G)|A!=H| -rpoint(H)|C!=I| -rpoint(I)|B!=J| -rpoint(J)|rinside(A,D).
% 164.28/164.53 Following clause subsumed by 179 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -rR(A,B,C)| -ron(C,D)| -rinside(B,D)|D!=E| -rcircle(E)|F!=G| -rline(G)|A!=H| -rpoint(H)|C!=I| -rpoint(I)|B!=J| -rpoint(J)|rinside(A,D).
% 164.28/164.53 74 back subsumes 66.
% 164.28/164.53 74 back subsumes 31.
% 164.28/164.53 75 back subsumes 62.
% 164.28/164.53 75 back subsumes 32.
% 164.28/164.53 76 back subsumes 65.
% 164.28/164.53 76 back subsumes 33.
% 164.28/164.53 78 back subsumes 63.
% 164.28/164.53 78 back subsumes 29.
% 164.28/164.53 79 back subsumes 67.
% 164.28/164.53 79 back subsumes 34.
% 164.28/164.53 100 back subsumes 57.
% 164.28/164.53 100 back subsumes 24.
% 164.28/164.53 582 back subsumes 550.
% 164.28/164.53 582 back subsumes 545.
% 164.28/164.53 582 back subsumes 447.
% 300.05/300.27 Wow, sos-wrapper got a signal XCPU
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------