TSTP Solution File: GEO299+1 by SInE---0.4

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SInE---0.4
% Problem  : GEO299+1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : Source/sine.py -e eprover -t %d %s

% Computer : art05.cs.miami.edu
% Model    : i686 i686
% CPU      : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory   : 2018MB
% OS       : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat Dec 25 09:23:35 EST 2010

% Result   : Theorem 0.61s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.61s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   15
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   45 (  23 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  227 ( 103 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   22 (   5 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  276 (  94   ~;  79   |; 102   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   20 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   18 (  18 usr;  15 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   67 (   0 sgn  25   !;  24   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(6,axiom,
    ( ~ ? [X38] :
          ( ron(vd1187,X38)
          & ron(vd1186,X38)
          & ron(vd1185,X38)
          & rline(X38) )
    & vangle(vd1179,vd1178,vd1180) = vangle(vd1186,vd1185,vd1187)
    & vf(vd1178,vd1180) = vf(vd1185,vd1187)
    & vf(vd1178,vd1179) = vf(vd1185,vd1186)
    & ? [X39] :
        ( vd1187 = X39
        & rpoint(X39) )
    & ? [X40] :
        ( vd1186 = X40
        & rpoint(X40) )
    & ? [X41] :
        ( vd1185 = X41
        & rpoint(X41) )
    & vd1179 != vd1180
    & vd1178 != vd1180
    & vd1178 != vd1179
    & ? [X42] :
        ( vd1180 = X42
        & rpoint(X42) )
    & ? [X43] :
        ( vd1179 = X43
        & rpoint(X43) )
    & ? [X44] :
        ( vd1178 = X44
        & rpoint(X44) ) ),
    file('/tmp/tmpuceqfR/sel_GEO299+1.p_1','and(neg(neg(conjunct2(conjunct2(conjunct2(plural(comma_conjunct2(268))))))), and(holds(conjunct1(conjunct2(conjunct2(plural(comma_conjunct2(268))))), 1194, 0), and(holds(conjunct1(conjunct2(plural(comma_conjunct2(268)))), 1193, 0), and(holds(conjunct1(plural(comma_conjunct2(268))), 1192, 0), and(qe(s3(plural(comma_conjunct2(268)))), and(qe(s2(plural(comma_conjunct2(268)))), and(qe(s1(plural(comma_conjunct2(268)))), and(pred(comma_conjunct1(268), 9), and(pred(comma_conjunct1(268), 8), and(pred(comma_conjunct1(268), 7), and(qe(s3(plural(268))), and(qe(s2(plural(268))), qe(s1(plural(268)))))))))))))))') ).

fof(9,axiom,
    vf(vd1199,vd1201) = vf(vd1185,vd1187),
    file('/tmp/tmpuceqfR/sel_GEO299+1.p_1','holds(314, 1247, 0)') ).

fof(30,conjecture,
    vf(vd1185,vd1187) = vplus(vf(vd1185,vd1201),vf(vd1201,vd1187)),
    file('/tmp/tmpuceqfR/sel_GEO299+1.p_1','holds(324, 1255, 0)') ).

fof(34,axiom,
    rR(vd1201,vd1185,vd1187),
    file('/tmp/tmpuceqfR/sel_GEO299+1.p_1','holds(323, 1254, 0)') ).

fof(65,axiom,
    ! [X375,X376,X377] :
      ( ( rR(X376,X375,X377)
        & ? [X378] :
            ( X377 = X378
            & rpoint(X378) )
        & ? [X379] :
            ( X376 = X379
            & rpoint(X379) )
        & ? [X380] :
            ( X375 = X380
            & rpoint(X380) ) )
     => vplus(vf(X375,X376),vf(X376,X377)) = vf(X375,X377) ),
    file('/tmp/tmpuceqfR/sel_GEO299+1.p_1','qu(cond(axiom(180), 0), imp(cond(axiom(180), 0)))') ).

fof(88,axiom,
    vd1199 = vd1185,
    file('/tmp/tmpuceqfR/sel_GEO299+1.p_1','holds(291, 1230, 0)') ).

fof(128,axiom,
    ? [X631] :
      ( vd1201 = X631
      & rpoint(X631) ),
    file('/tmp/tmpuceqfR/sel_GEO299+1.p_1','qe(s3(plural(271)))') ).

fof(149,negated_conjecture,
    vf(vd1185,vd1187) != vplus(vf(vd1185,vd1201),vf(vd1201,vd1187)),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[30]) ).

fof(158,negated_conjecture,
    vf(vd1185,vd1187) != vplus(vf(vd1185,vd1201),vf(vd1201,vd1187)),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[149,theory(equality)]) ).

fof(218,plain,
    ( ! [X38] :
        ( ~ ron(vd1187,X38)
        | ~ ron(vd1186,X38)
        | ~ ron(vd1185,X38)
        | ~ rline(X38) )
    & vangle(vd1179,vd1178,vd1180) = vangle(vd1186,vd1185,vd1187)
    & vf(vd1178,vd1180) = vf(vd1185,vd1187)
    & vf(vd1178,vd1179) = vf(vd1185,vd1186)
    & ? [X39] :
        ( vd1187 = X39
        & rpoint(X39) )
    & ? [X40] :
        ( vd1186 = X40
        & rpoint(X40) )
    & ? [X41] :
        ( vd1185 = X41
        & rpoint(X41) )
    & vd1179 != vd1180
    & vd1178 != vd1180
    & vd1178 != vd1179
    & ? [X42] :
        ( vd1180 = X42
        & rpoint(X42) )
    & ? [X43] :
        ( vd1179 = X43
        & rpoint(X43) )
    & ? [X44] :
        ( vd1178 = X44
        & rpoint(X44) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[6]) ).

fof(219,plain,
    ( ! [X45] :
        ( ~ ron(vd1187,X45)
        | ~ ron(vd1186,X45)
        | ~ ron(vd1185,X45)
        | ~ rline(X45) )
    & vangle(vd1179,vd1178,vd1180) = vangle(vd1186,vd1185,vd1187)
    & vf(vd1178,vd1180) = vf(vd1185,vd1187)
    & vf(vd1178,vd1179) = vf(vd1185,vd1186)
    & ? [X46] :
        ( vd1187 = X46
        & rpoint(X46) )
    & ? [X47] :
        ( vd1186 = X47
        & rpoint(X47) )
    & ? [X48] :
        ( vd1185 = X48
        & rpoint(X48) )
    & vd1179 != vd1180
    & vd1178 != vd1180
    & vd1178 != vd1179
    & ? [X49] :
        ( vd1180 = X49
        & rpoint(X49) )
    & ? [X50] :
        ( vd1179 = X50
        & rpoint(X50) )
    & ? [X51] :
        ( vd1178 = X51
        & rpoint(X51) ) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[218]) ).

fof(220,plain,
    ( ! [X45] :
        ( ~ ron(vd1187,X45)
        | ~ ron(vd1186,X45)
        | ~ ron(vd1185,X45)
        | ~ rline(X45) )
    & vangle(vd1179,vd1178,vd1180) = vangle(vd1186,vd1185,vd1187)
    & vf(vd1178,vd1180) = vf(vd1185,vd1187)
    & vf(vd1178,vd1179) = vf(vd1185,vd1186)
    & vd1187 = esk4_0
    & rpoint(esk4_0)
    & vd1186 = esk5_0
    & rpoint(esk5_0)
    & vd1185 = esk6_0
    & rpoint(esk6_0)
    & vd1179 != vd1180
    & vd1178 != vd1180
    & vd1178 != vd1179
    & vd1180 = esk7_0
    & rpoint(esk7_0)
    & vd1179 = esk8_0
    & rpoint(esk8_0)
    & vd1178 = esk9_0
    & rpoint(esk9_0) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[219]) ).

fof(221,plain,
    ! [X45] :
      ( ( ~ ron(vd1187,X45)
        | ~ ron(vd1186,X45)
        | ~ ron(vd1185,X45)
        | ~ rline(X45) )
      & vangle(vd1179,vd1178,vd1180) = vangle(vd1186,vd1185,vd1187)
      & vf(vd1178,vd1180) = vf(vd1185,vd1187)
      & vf(vd1178,vd1179) = vf(vd1185,vd1186)
      & vd1187 = esk4_0
      & rpoint(esk4_0)
      & vd1186 = esk5_0
      & rpoint(esk5_0)
      & vd1185 = esk6_0
      & rpoint(esk6_0)
      & vd1179 != vd1180
      & vd1178 != vd1180
      & vd1178 != vd1179
      & vd1180 = esk7_0
      & rpoint(esk7_0)
      & vd1179 = esk8_0
      & rpoint(esk8_0)
      & vd1178 = esk9_0
      & rpoint(esk9_0) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[220]) ).

cnf(231,plain,
    rpoint(esk6_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[221]) ).

cnf(232,plain,
    vd1185 = esk6_0,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[221]) ).

cnf(235,plain,
    rpoint(esk4_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[221]) ).

cnf(236,plain,
    vd1187 = esk4_0,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[221]) ).

cnf(243,plain,
    vf(vd1199,vd1201) = vf(vd1185,vd1187),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[9]) ).

cnf(322,negated_conjecture,
    vf(vd1185,vd1187) != vplus(vf(vd1185,vd1201),vf(vd1201,vd1187)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[158]) ).

cnf(332,plain,
    rR(vd1201,vd1185,vd1187),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[34]) ).

fof(510,plain,
    ! [X375,X376,X377] :
      ( ~ rR(X376,X375,X377)
      | ! [X378] :
          ( X377 != X378
          | ~ rpoint(X378) )
      | ! [X379] :
          ( X376 != X379
          | ~ rpoint(X379) )
      | ! [X380] :
          ( X375 != X380
          | ~ rpoint(X380) )
      | vplus(vf(X375,X376),vf(X376,X377)) = vf(X375,X377) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[65]) ).

fof(511,plain,
    ! [X381,X382,X383] :
      ( ~ rR(X382,X381,X383)
      | ! [X384] :
          ( X383 != X384
          | ~ rpoint(X384) )
      | ! [X385] :
          ( X382 != X385
          | ~ rpoint(X385) )
      | ! [X386] :
          ( X381 != X386
          | ~ rpoint(X386) )
      | vplus(vf(X381,X382),vf(X382,X383)) = vf(X381,X383) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[510]) ).

fof(512,plain,
    ! [X381,X382,X383,X384,X385,X386] :
      ( X381 != X386
      | ~ rpoint(X386)
      | X382 != X385
      | ~ rpoint(X385)
      | X383 != X384
      | ~ rpoint(X384)
      | ~ rR(X382,X381,X383)
      | vplus(vf(X381,X382),vf(X382,X383)) = vf(X381,X383) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[511]) ).

cnf(513,plain,
    ( vplus(vf(X1,X2),vf(X2,X3)) = vf(X1,X3)
    | ~ rR(X2,X1,X3)
    | ~ rpoint(X4)
    | X3 != X4
    | ~ rpoint(X5)
    | X2 != X5
    | ~ rpoint(X6)
    | X1 != X6 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[512]) ).

cnf(603,plain,
    vd1199 = vd1185,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[88]) ).

fof(770,plain,
    ? [X632] :
      ( vd1201 = X632
      & rpoint(X632) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[128]) ).

fof(771,plain,
    ( vd1201 = esk50_0
    & rpoint(esk50_0) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[770]) ).

cnf(772,plain,
    rpoint(esk50_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[771]) ).

cnf(773,plain,
    vd1201 = esk50_0,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[771]) ).

cnf(876,plain,
    vf(vd1185,vd1201) = vf(vd1185,vd1187),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[243,603,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(878,plain,
    rpoint(vd1187),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[235,236,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(880,plain,
    rpoint(vd1185),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[231,232,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(890,plain,
    rpoint(vd1201),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[772,773,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(907,negated_conjecture,
    vplus(vf(vd1185,vd1201),vf(vd1201,vd1187)) != vf(vd1185,vd1201),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[322,876,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(1133,plain,
    ( vplus(vf(X1,X2),vf(X2,X3)) = vf(X1,X3)
    | X2 != X4
    | X1 != X5
    | ~ rR(X2,X1,X3)
    | ~ rpoint(X5)
    | ~ rpoint(X4)
    | ~ rpoint(X3) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[513,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(1134,plain,
    ( vplus(vf(X1,X2),vf(X2,X3)) = vf(X1,X3)
    | X1 != X4
    | ~ rR(X2,X1,X3)
    | ~ rpoint(X4)
    | ~ rpoint(X2)
    | ~ rpoint(X3) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[1133,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(1135,plain,
    ( vplus(vf(X1,X2),vf(X2,X3)) = vf(X1,X3)
    | ~ rR(X2,X1,X3)
    | ~ rpoint(X1)
    | ~ rpoint(X2)
    | ~ rpoint(X3) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[1134,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(3726,negated_conjecture,
    ( vf(vd1185,vd1187) != vf(vd1185,vd1201)
    | ~ rR(vd1201,vd1185,vd1187)
    | ~ rpoint(vd1185)
    | ~ rpoint(vd1201)
    | ~ rpoint(vd1187) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[907,1135,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(3780,negated_conjecture,
    ( $false
    | ~ rR(vd1201,vd1185,vd1187)
    | ~ rpoint(vd1185)
    | ~ rpoint(vd1201)
    | ~ rpoint(vd1187) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[3726,876,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(3781,negated_conjecture,
    ( $false
    | $false
    | ~ rpoint(vd1185)
    | ~ rpoint(vd1201)
    | ~ rpoint(vd1187) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[3780,332,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(3782,negated_conjecture,
    ( $false
    | $false
    | $false
    | ~ rpoint(vd1201)
    | ~ rpoint(vd1187) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[3781,880,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(3783,negated_conjecture,
    ( $false
    | $false
    | $false
    | $false
    | ~ rpoint(vd1187) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[3782,890,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(3784,negated_conjecture,
    ( $false
    | $false
    | $false
    | $false
    | $false ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[3783,878,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(3785,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[3784,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(3786,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    3785,
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% % SZS status Started for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/GEO/GEO299+1.p
% --creating new selector for []
% -running prover on /tmp/tmpuceqfR/sel_GEO299+1.p_1 with time limit 29
% -prover status Theorem
% Problem GEO299+1.p solved in phase 0.
% % SZS status Theorem for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/GEO/GEO299+1.p
% % SZS status Ended for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/GEO/GEO299+1.p
% Solved 1 out of 1.
% # Problem is unsatisfiable (or provable), constructing proof object
% # SZS status Theorem
% # SZS output start CNFRefutation.
% See solution above
% # SZS output end CNFRefutation
% 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------