TSTP Solution File: GEO299+1 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : GEO299+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 03:45:11 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 7.55s 2.54s
% Output : CNFRefutation 7.55s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 12
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 36 ( 29 unt; 0 nHn; 36 RR)
% Number of literals : 65 ( 34 equ; 33 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 8 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 9 ( 9 usr; 7 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 26 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_86,plain,
( vf(X1,X2) = vf(X2,X1)
| X2 != X3
| X1 != X4
| ~ rpoint(X3)
| ~ rpoint(X4) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-y5jho2n_/lgb.p',i_0_86) ).
cnf(i_0_40,plain,
rpoint(esk3_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-y5jho2n_/lgb.p',i_0_40) ).
cnf(i_0_41,plain,
vd1187 = esk3_0,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-y5jho2n_/lgb.p',i_0_41) ).
cnf(i_0_123,plain,
vf(vd1185,vd1187) = vf(vd1199,vd1201),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-y5jho2n_/lgb.p',i_0_123) ).
cnf(i_0_99,plain,
vd1185 = vd1199,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-y5jho2n_/lgb.p',i_0_99) ).
cnf(i_0_21,plain,
rpoint(esk1_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-y5jho2n_/lgb.p',i_0_21) ).
cnf(i_0_22,plain,
vd1201 = esk1_0,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-y5jho2n_/lgb.p',i_0_22) ).
cnf(i_0_36,plain,
rpoint(esk5_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-y5jho2n_/lgb.p',i_0_36) ).
cnf(i_0_37,plain,
esk5_0 = vd1185,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-y5jho2n_/lgb.p',i_0_37) ).
cnf(i_0_1,negated_conjecture,
vplus(vf(vd1185,vd1201),vf(vd1201,vd1187)) != vf(vd1185,vd1187),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-y5jho2n_/lgb.p',i_0_1) ).
cnf(i_0_7,plain,
( vplus(vf(X1,X2),vf(X2,X3)) = vf(X1,X3)
| X3 != X4
| X1 != X5
| X2 != X6
| ~ rpoint(X5)
| ~ rpoint(X6)
| ~ rpoint(X4)
| ~ rR(X2,X1,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-y5jho2n_/lgb.p',i_0_7) ).
cnf(i_0_2,plain,
rR(vd1201,vd1185,vd1187),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-y5jho2n_/lgb.p',i_0_2) ).
cnf(c_0_136,plain,
( vf(X1,X2) = vf(X2,X1)
| X2 != X3
| X1 != X4
| ~ rpoint(X3)
| ~ rpoint(X4) ),
i_0_86 ).
cnf(c_0_137,plain,
rpoint(esk3_0),
i_0_40 ).
cnf(c_0_138,plain,
vd1187 = esk3_0,
i_0_41 ).
cnf(c_0_139,plain,
vf(vd1185,vd1187) = vf(vd1199,vd1201),
i_0_123 ).
cnf(c_0_140,plain,
vd1185 = vd1199,
i_0_99 ).
cnf(c_0_141,plain,
( vf(X1,X2) = vf(X2,X1)
| ~ rpoint(X1)
| ~ rpoint(X2) ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_136])]) ).
cnf(c_0_142,plain,
rpoint(vd1187),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_137,c_0_138]) ).
cnf(c_0_143,plain,
rpoint(esk1_0),
i_0_21 ).
cnf(c_0_144,plain,
vd1201 = esk1_0,
i_0_22 ).
cnf(c_0_145,plain,
rpoint(esk5_0),
i_0_36 ).
cnf(c_0_146,plain,
esk5_0 = vd1185,
i_0_37 ).
cnf(c_0_147,negated_conjecture,
vplus(vf(vd1185,vd1201),vf(vd1201,vd1187)) != vf(vd1185,vd1187),
i_0_1 ).
cnf(c_0_148,plain,
vf(vd1185,vd1201) = vf(vd1185,vd1187),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_139,c_0_140]) ).
cnf(c_0_149,plain,
( vf(X1,vd1187) = vf(vd1187,X1)
| ~ rpoint(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_141,c_0_142]) ).
cnf(c_0_150,plain,
rpoint(vd1201),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_143,c_0_144]) ).
cnf(c_0_151,plain,
rpoint(vd1185),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_145,c_0_146]) ).
cnf(c_0_152,plain,
( vplus(vf(X1,X2),vf(X2,X3)) = vf(X1,X3)
| X3 != X4
| X1 != X5
| X2 != X6
| ~ rpoint(X5)
| ~ rpoint(X6)
| ~ rpoint(X4)
| ~ rR(X2,X1,X3) ),
i_0_7 ).
cnf(c_0_153,negated_conjecture,
vplus(vf(vd1185,vd1187),vf(vd1201,vd1187)) != vf(vd1185,vd1187),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_147,c_0_148]) ).
cnf(c_0_154,plain,
vf(vd1201,vd1187) = vf(vd1187,vd1201),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_149,c_0_150]) ).
cnf(c_0_155,plain,
vf(vd1185,vd1187) = vf(vd1187,vd1185),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_149,c_0_151]) ).
cnf(c_0_156,plain,
( vplus(vf(X1,X2),vf(X2,X3)) = vf(X1,X3)
| ~ rR(X2,X1,X3)
| ~ rpoint(X2)
| ~ rpoint(X1)
| ~ rpoint(X3) ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_152])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_157,plain,
rR(vd1201,vd1185,vd1187),
i_0_2 ).
cnf(c_0_158,negated_conjecture,
vplus(vf(vd1187,vd1185),vf(vd1187,vd1201)) != vf(vd1187,vd1185),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_153,c_0_154]),c_0_155]),c_0_155]) ).
cnf(c_0_159,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_156,c_0_157]),c_0_148]),c_0_155]),c_0_154]),c_0_155]),c_0_150]),c_0_151]),c_0_142])]),c_0_158]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : GEO299+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.07/0.12 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 14:35:59 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.45 # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 7.55/2.54 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 7.55/2.54 # No SInE strategy applied
% 7.55/2.54 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 7.55/2.54 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S2mI
% 7.55/2.54 # and selection function SelectCQArNTNpEqFirst.
% 7.55/2.54 #
% 7.55/2.54 # Preprocessing time : 0.020 s
% 7.55/2.54 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 7.55/2.54
% 7.55/2.54 # Proof found!
% 7.55/2.54 # SZS status Theorem
% 7.55/2.54 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.55/2.54 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.55/2.54
% 7.55/2.54 # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.55/2.54 # User time : 0.026 s
% 7.55/2.54 # System time : 0.003 s
% 7.55/2.54 # Total time : 0.029 s
% 7.55/2.54 # Maximum resident set size: 7128 pages
% 7.55/2.54
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------