TSTP Solution File: GEO297+1 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : GEO297+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 04:05:21 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.23s 1.42s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.23s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 13
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 46 ( 32 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 199 ( 83 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 43 ( 4 avg)
% Number of connectives : 251 ( 98 ~; 89 |; 61 &)
% ( 1 <=>; 2 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 25 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 7 ( 5 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 19 ( 19 usr; 17 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 59 ( 0 sgn 27 !; 10 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof('qu(cond(axiom(188), 0), imp(cond(axiom(188), 0)))',axiom,
! [X1,X2,X3,X4,X5,X6,X7,X8] :
( ( ron(X3,X7)
& ron(X1,X7)
& X1 != X5
& X1 != X3
& X7 = X8
& rline(X8)
& X5 = X6
& rpoint(X6)
& X3 = X4
& rpoint(X4)
& X1 = X2
& rpoint(X2) )
=> ( ( ~ rR(X1,X3,X5)
& ron(X5,X7) )
<=> vangle(X3,X1,X5) = v0 ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in','qu(cond(axiom(188), 0), imp(cond(axiom(188), 0)))') ).
fof('qe(s3(plural(271)))',axiom,
? [X16] :
( vd1201 = X16
& rpoint(X16) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in','qe(s3(plural(271)))') ).
fof('and(neg(neg(conjunct2(conjunct2(conjunct2(plural(comma_conjunct2(268))))))), and(holds(conjunct1(conjunct2(conjunct2(plural(comma_conjunct2(268))))), 1194, 0), and(holds(conjunct1(conjunct2(plural(comma_conjunct2(268)))), 1193, 0), and(holds(conjunct1(plural(comma_conjunct2(268))), 1192, 0), and(qe(s3(plural(comma_conjunct2(268)))), and(qe(s2(plural(comma_conjunct2(268)))), and(qe(s1(plural(comma_conjunct2(268)))), and(pred(comma_conjunct1(268), 9), and(pred(comma_conjunct1(268), 8), and(pred(comma_conjunct1(268), 7), and(qe(s3(plural(268))), and(qe(s2(plural(268))), qe(s1(plural(268)))))))))))))))',axiom,
( ~ ? [X9] :
( ron(vd1187,X9)
& ron(vd1186,X9)
& ron(vd1185,X9)
& rline(X9) )
& vangle(vd1179,vd1178,vd1180) = vangle(vd1186,vd1185,vd1187)
& vf(vd1178,vd1180) = vf(vd1185,vd1187)
& vf(vd1178,vd1179) = vf(vd1185,vd1186)
& ? [X10] :
( vd1187 = X10
& rpoint(X10) )
& ? [X11] :
( vd1186 = X11
& rpoint(X11) )
& ? [X12] :
( vd1185 = X12
& rpoint(X12) )
& vd1179 != vd1180
& vd1178 != vd1180
& vd1178 != vd1179
& ? [X13] :
( vd1180 = X13
& rpoint(X13) )
& ? [X14] :
( vd1179 = X14
& rpoint(X14) )
& ? [X15] :
( vd1178 = X15
& rpoint(X15) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in','and(neg(neg(conjunct2(conjunct2(conjunct2(plural(comma_conjunct2(268))))))), and(holds(conjunct1(conjunct2(conjunct2(plural(comma_conjunct2(268))))), 1194, 0), and(holds(conjunct1(conjunct2(plural(comma_conjunct2(268)))), 1193, 0), and(holds(conjunct1(plural(comma_conjunct2(268))), 1192, 0), and(qe(s3(plural(comma_conjunct2(268)))), and(qe(s2(plural(comma_conjunct2(268)))), and(qe(s1(plural(comma_conjunct2(268)))), and(pred(comma_conjunct1(268), 9), and(pred(comma_conjunct1(268), 8), and(pred(comma_conjunct1(268), 7), and(qe(s3(plural(268))), and(qe(s2(plural(268))), qe(s1(plural(268)))))))))))))))') ).
fof('qu(cond(axiom(99), 0), imp(cond(axiom(99), 0)))',axiom,
! [X95,X96,X97,X98] :
( ( rS(X95,X96,X97)
& X97 = X98
& rline(X98)
& ? [X99] :
( X96 = X99
& rpoint(X99) )
& ? [X100] :
( X95 = X100
& rpoint(X100) ) )
=> ~ ron(X95,X97) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in','qu(cond(axiom(99), 0), imp(cond(axiom(99), 0)))') ).
fof('holds(310, 1246, 0)',axiom,
vangle(vd1187,vd1185,vd1201) = v0,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in','holds(310, 1246, 0)') ).
fof('neg(neg(296))',axiom,
~ ron(vd1201,vd1232),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in','neg(neg(296))') ).
fof('neg(neg(270))',axiom,
~ ron(vd1187,vd1197),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in','neg(neg(270))') ).
fof('pred(293, 0)',axiom,
rline(vd1232),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in','pred(293, 0)') ).
fof('pred(311, 0)',axiom,
ron(vd1187,vd1232),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in','pred(311, 0)') ).
fof('pred(s1(plural(293)), 0)',axiom,
ron(vd1185,vd1232),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in','pred(s1(plural(293)), 0)') ).
fof('holds(comma_conjunct2(comma_conjunct2(plural(271))), 1214, 0)',axiom,
rS(vd1201,vd1187,vd1197),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in','holds(comma_conjunct2(comma_conjunct2(plural(271))), 1214, 0)') ).
fof('pred(269, 0)',axiom,
rline(vd1197),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in','pred(269, 0)') ).
fof('pred(s3(plural(274)), 0)',axiom,
ron(vd1185,vd1197),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in','pred(s3(plural(274)), 0)') ).
fof(c_0_13,plain,
! [X9,X10,X11,X12,X13,X14,X15,X16] :
( ( rR(X9,X11,X13)
| ~ ron(X13,X15)
| vangle(X11,X9,X13) = v0
| ~ ron(X11,X15)
| ~ ron(X9,X15)
| X9 = X13
| X9 = X11
| X15 != X16
| ~ rline(X16)
| X13 != X14
| ~ rpoint(X14)
| X11 != X12
| ~ rpoint(X12)
| X9 != X10
| ~ rpoint(X10) )
& ( ~ rR(X9,X11,X13)
| vangle(X11,X9,X13) != v0
| ~ ron(X11,X15)
| ~ ron(X9,X15)
| X9 = X13
| X9 = X11
| X15 != X16
| ~ rline(X16)
| X13 != X14
| ~ rpoint(X14)
| X11 != X12
| ~ rpoint(X12)
| X9 != X10
| ~ rpoint(X10) )
& ( ron(X13,X15)
| vangle(X11,X9,X13) != v0
| ~ ron(X11,X15)
| ~ ron(X9,X15)
| X9 = X13
| X9 = X11
| X15 != X16
| ~ rline(X16)
| X13 != X14
| ~ rpoint(X14)
| X11 != X12
| ~ rpoint(X12)
| X9 != X10
| ~ rpoint(X10) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],['qu(cond(axiom(188), 0), imp(cond(axiom(188), 0)))'])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_14,plain,
( vd1201 = esk7_0
& rpoint(esk7_0) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],['qe(s3(plural(271)))'])]) ).
fof(c_0_15,plain,
! [X16] :
( ( ~ ron(vd1187,X16)
| ~ ron(vd1186,X16)
| ~ ron(vd1185,X16)
| ~ rline(X16) )
& vangle(vd1179,vd1178,vd1180) = vangle(vd1186,vd1185,vd1187)
& vf(vd1178,vd1180) = vf(vd1185,vd1187)
& vf(vd1178,vd1179) = vf(vd1185,vd1186)
& vd1187 = esk1_0
& rpoint(esk1_0)
& vd1186 = esk2_0
& rpoint(esk2_0)
& vd1185 = esk3_0
& rpoint(esk3_0)
& vd1179 != vd1180
& vd1178 != vd1180
& vd1178 != vd1179
& vd1180 = esk4_0
& rpoint(esk4_0)
& vd1179 = esk5_0
& rpoint(esk5_0)
& vd1178 = esk6_0
& rpoint(esk6_0) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],['and(neg(neg(conjunct2(conjunct2(conjunct2(plural(comma_conjunct2(268))))))), and(holds(conjunct1(conjunct2(conjunct2(plural(comma_conjunct2(268))))), 1194, 0), and(holds(conjunct1(conjunct2(plural(comma_conjunct2(268)))), 1193, 0), and(holds(conjunct1(plural(comma_conjunct2(268))), 1192, 0), and(qe(s3(plural(comma_conjunct2(268)))), and(qe(s2(plural(comma_conjunct2(268)))), and(qe(s1(plural(comma_conjunct2(268)))), and(pred(comma_conjunct1(268), 9), and(pred(comma_conjunct1(268), 8), and(pred(comma_conjunct1(268), 7), and(qe(s3(plural(268))), and(qe(s2(plural(268))), qe(s1(plural(268)))))))))))))))'])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( X2 = X4
| X2 = X6
| ron(X6,X8)
| ~ rpoint(X1)
| X2 != X1
| ~ rpoint(X3)
| X4 != X3
| ~ rpoint(X5)
| X6 != X5
| ~ rline(X7)
| X8 != X7
| ~ ron(X2,X8)
| ~ ron(X4,X8)
| vangle(X4,X2,X6) != v0 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
rpoint(esk7_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
vd1201 = esk7_0,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
rpoint(esk1_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
vd1187 = esk1_0,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
rpoint(esk3_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
vd1185 = esk3_0,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).
fof(c_0_23,plain,
! [X101,X102,X103,X104,X105,X106] :
( ~ rS(X101,X102,X103)
| X103 != X104
| ~ rline(X104)
| X102 != X105
| ~ rpoint(X105)
| X101 != X106
| ~ rpoint(X106)
| ~ ron(X101,X103) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],['qu(cond(axiom(99), 0), imp(cond(axiom(99), 0)))'])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
( X1 = X2
| X1 = X3
| ron(X2,X4)
| vangle(X3,X1,X2) != v0
| ~ rpoint(X2)
| ~ rpoint(X3)
| ~ rpoint(X1)
| ~ rline(X4)
| ~ ron(X3,X4)
| ~ ron(X1,X4) ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_16])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
vangle(vd1187,vd1185,vd1201) = v0,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],['holds(310, 1246, 0)']) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
rpoint(vd1201),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
rpoint(vd1187),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
rpoint(vd1185),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).
fof(c_0_29,plain,
~ ron(vd1201,vd1232),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],['neg(neg(296))']) ).
cnf(c_0_30,plain,
( ~ ron(X1,X2)
| ~ rpoint(X3)
| X1 != X3
| ~ rpoint(X4)
| X5 != X4
| ~ rline(X6)
| X2 != X6
| ~ rS(X1,X5,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_23]) ).
fof(c_0_31,plain,
~ ron(vd1187,vd1197),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],['neg(neg(270))']) ).
cnf(c_0_32,plain,
( vd1187 = vd1185
| vd1201 = vd1185
| ron(vd1201,X1)
| ~ rline(X1)
| ~ ron(vd1187,X1)
| ~ ron(vd1185,X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]),c_0_26]),c_0_27]),c_0_28])]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,plain,
rline(vd1232),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],['pred(293, 0)']) ).
cnf(c_0_34,plain,
ron(vd1187,vd1232),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],['pred(311, 0)']) ).
cnf(c_0_35,plain,
ron(vd1185,vd1232),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],['pred(s1(plural(293)), 0)']) ).
cnf(c_0_36,plain,
~ ron(vd1201,vd1232),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_29]) ).
cnf(c_0_37,plain,
( ~ rS(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ rpoint(X2)
| ~ rpoint(X1)
| ~ rline(X3)
| ~ ron(X1,X3) ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_30])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_38,plain,
rS(vd1201,vd1187,vd1197),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],['holds(comma_conjunct2(comma_conjunct2(plural(271))), 1214, 0)']) ).
cnf(c_0_39,plain,
rline(vd1197),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],['pred(269, 0)']) ).
cnf(c_0_40,plain,
~ ron(vd1187,vd1197),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_31]) ).
cnf(c_0_41,plain,
( vd1201 = vd1185
| vd1187 = vd1185 ),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33]),c_0_34]),c_0_35])]),c_0_36]) ).
cnf(c_0_42,plain,
ron(vd1185,vd1197),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],['pred(s3(plural(274)), 0)']) ).
cnf(c_0_43,plain,
~ ron(vd1201,vd1197),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_38]),c_0_27]),c_0_26]),c_0_39])]) ).
cnf(c_0_44,plain,
vd1201 = vd1185,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_40,c_0_41]),c_0_42])]) ).
cnf(c_0_45,plain,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_43,c_0_44]),c_0_42])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : GEO297+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 08:21:32 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.23/1.42 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.23/1.42 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.23/1.42 # Preprocessing time : 0.022 s
% 0.23/1.42
% 0.23/1.42 # Failure: Out of unprocessed clauses!
% 0.23/1.42 # OLD status GaveUp
% 0.23/1.42 # Parsed axioms : 156
% 0.23/1.42 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 155
% 0.23/1.42 # Initial clauses : 1
% 0.23/1.42 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 1
% 0.23/1.42 # Initial clauses in saturation : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Processed clauses : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # ...remaining for further processing : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Generated clauses : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Paramodulations : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Current number of processed clauses : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.23/1.42 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Termbank termtop insertions : 4414
% 0.23/1.42
% 0.23/1.42 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.23/1.42 # User time : 0.020 s
% 0.23/1.42 # System time : 0.002 s
% 0.23/1.42 # Total time : 0.022 s
% 0.23/1.42 # Maximum resident set size: 3528 pages
% 0.23/1.42 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_f171197f65f27d1ba69648a20c844832c84a5dd7 for 23 seconds:
% 0.23/1.42 # Preprocessing time : 0.065 s
% 0.23/1.42
% 0.23/1.42 # Proof found!
% 0.23/1.42 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.23/1.42 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.23/1.42 # Proof object total steps : 46
% 0.23/1.42 # Proof object clause steps : 27
% 0.23/1.42 # Proof object formula steps : 19
% 0.23/1.42 # Proof object conjectures : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Proof object clause conjectures : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Proof object formula conjectures : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Proof object initial clauses used : 17
% 0.23/1.42 # Proof object initial formulas used : 13
% 0.23/1.42 # Proof object generating inferences : 4
% 0.23/1.42 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 27
% 0.23/1.42 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.23/1.42 # Parsed axioms : 156
% 0.23/1.42 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Initial clauses : 323
% 0.23/1.42 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 3
% 0.23/1.42 # Initial clauses in saturation : 320
% 0.23/1.42 # Processed clauses : 1063
% 0.23/1.42 # ...of these trivial : 25
% 0.23/1.42 # ...subsumed : 291
% 0.23/1.42 # ...remaining for further processing : 747
% 0.23/1.42 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 1112
% 0.23/1.42 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Backward-subsumed : 8
% 0.23/1.42 # Backward-rewritten : 120
% 0.23/1.42 # Generated clauses : 2250
% 0.23/1.42 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 2216
% 0.23/1.42 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 137
% 0.23/1.42 # Paramodulations : 1996
% 0.23/1.42 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Equation resolutions : 1126
% 0.23/1.42 # Current number of processed clauses : 379
% 0.23/1.42 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 39
% 0.23/1.42 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Negative unit clauses : 13
% 0.23/1.42 # Non-unit-clauses : 327
% 0.23/1.42 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1187
% 0.23/1.42 # ...number of literals in the above : 11227
% 0.23/1.42 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Current number of archived clauses : 128
% 0.23/1.42 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 79277
% 0.23/1.42 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 13106
% 0.23/1.42 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 391
% 0.23/1.42 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 382
% 0.23/1.42 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # BW rewrite match attempts : 5
% 0.23/1.42 # BW rewrite match successes : 4
% 0.23/1.42 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Termbank termtop insertions : 104177
% 0.23/1.42
% 0.23/1.42 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.23/1.42 # User time : 0.167 s
% 0.23/1.42 # System time : 0.008 s
% 0.23/1.42 # Total time : 0.175 s
% 0.23/1.42 # Maximum resident set size: 7908 pages
% 0.23/23.50 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.23/23.52 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.52 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.52 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.52 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.53 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.53 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.53 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.53 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.54 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.54 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.55 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.55 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.55 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.55 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.56 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.56 eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------