TSTP Solution File: GEO294+1 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : GEO294+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 04:05:20 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.25s 1.43s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.25s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 9
% Number of leaves : 12
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 50 ( 34 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 220 ( 107 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 43 ( 4 avg)
% Number of connectives : 271 ( 101 ~; 105 |; 62 &)
% ( 1 <=>; 2 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 25 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 6 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 20 ( 20 usr; 18 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 63 ( 0 sgn 26 !; 11 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof('qu(cond(axiom(188), 0), imp(cond(axiom(188), 0)))',axiom,
! [X1,X2,X3,X4,X5,X6,X7,X8] :
( ( ron(X3,X7)
& ron(X1,X7)
& X1 != X5
& X1 != X3
& X7 = X8
& rline(X8)
& X5 = X6
& rpoint(X6)
& X3 = X4
& rpoint(X4)
& X1 = X2
& rpoint(X2) )
=> ( ( ~ rR(X1,X3,X5)
& ron(X5,X7) )
<=> vangle(X3,X1,X5) = v0 ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in','qu(cond(axiom(188), 0), imp(cond(axiom(188), 0)))') ).
fof('qu(cond(axiom(168), 0), imp(cond(axiom(168), 0)))',axiom,
! [X749,X750,X751] :
( ( X749 != X751
& X749 != X750
& ? [X752] :
( X751 = X752
& rpoint(X752) )
& ? [X753] :
( X750 = X753
& rpoint(X753) )
& ? [X754] :
( X749 = X754
& rpoint(X754) ) )
=> vangle(X749,X750,X751) = vangle(X751,X750,X749) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in','qu(cond(axiom(168), 0), imp(cond(axiom(168), 0)))') ).
fof('and(neg(neg(conjunct2(conjunct2(conjunct2(plural(comma_conjunct2(268))))))), and(holds(conjunct1(conjunct2(conjunct2(plural(comma_conjunct2(268))))), 1194, 0), and(holds(conjunct1(conjunct2(plural(comma_conjunct2(268)))), 1193, 0), and(holds(conjunct1(plural(comma_conjunct2(268))), 1192, 0), and(qe(s3(plural(comma_conjunct2(268)))), and(qe(s2(plural(comma_conjunct2(268)))), and(qe(s1(plural(comma_conjunct2(268)))), and(pred(comma_conjunct1(268), 9), and(pred(comma_conjunct1(268), 8), and(pred(comma_conjunct1(268), 7), and(qe(s3(plural(268))), and(qe(s2(plural(268))), qe(s1(plural(268)))))))))))))))',axiom,
( ~ ? [X9] :
( ron(vd1187,X9)
& ron(vd1186,X9)
& ron(vd1185,X9)
& rline(X9) )
& vangle(vd1179,vd1178,vd1180) = vangle(vd1186,vd1185,vd1187)
& vf(vd1178,vd1180) = vf(vd1185,vd1187)
& vf(vd1178,vd1179) = vf(vd1185,vd1186)
& ? [X10] :
( vd1187 = X10
& rpoint(X10) )
& ? [X11] :
( vd1186 = X11
& rpoint(X11) )
& ? [X12] :
( vd1185 = X12
& rpoint(X12) )
& vd1179 != vd1180
& vd1178 != vd1180
& vd1178 != vd1179
& ? [X13] :
( vd1180 = X13
& rpoint(X13) )
& ? [X14] :
( vd1179 = X14
& rpoint(X14) )
& ? [X15] :
( vd1178 = X15
& rpoint(X15) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in','and(neg(neg(conjunct2(conjunct2(conjunct2(plural(comma_conjunct2(268))))))), and(holds(conjunct1(conjunct2(conjunct2(plural(comma_conjunct2(268))))), 1194, 0), and(holds(conjunct1(conjunct2(plural(comma_conjunct2(268)))), 1193, 0), and(holds(conjunct1(plural(comma_conjunct2(268))), 1192, 0), and(qe(s3(plural(comma_conjunct2(268)))), and(qe(s2(plural(comma_conjunct2(268)))), and(qe(s1(plural(comma_conjunct2(268)))), and(pred(comma_conjunct1(268), 9), and(pred(comma_conjunct1(268), 8), and(pred(comma_conjunct1(268), 7), and(qe(s3(plural(268))), and(qe(s2(plural(268))), qe(s1(plural(268)))))))))))))))') ).
fof('qe(s3(plural(271)))',axiom,
? [X18] :
( vd1201 = X18
& rpoint(X18) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in','qe(s3(plural(271)))') ).
fof('holds(291, 1230, 0)',axiom,
vd1199 = vd1185,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in','holds(291, 1230, 0)') ).
fof('pred(303, 0)',conjecture,
ron(vd1201,vd1232),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in','pred(303, 0)') ).
fof('holds(302, 1241, 0)',axiom,
vangle(vd1201,vd1185,vd1187) = v0,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in','holds(302, 1241, 0)') ).
fof('pred(s2(plural(293)), 0)',axiom,
ron(vd1187,vd1232),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in','pred(s2(plural(293)), 0)') ).
fof('pred(s1(plural(293)), 0)',axiom,
ron(vd1185,vd1232),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in','pred(s1(plural(293)), 0)') ).
fof('neg(neg(270))',axiom,
~ ron(vd1187,vd1197),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in','neg(neg(270))') ).
fof('pred(s3(plural(274)), 0)',axiom,
ron(vd1185,vd1197),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in','pred(s3(plural(274)), 0)') ).
fof('pred(293, 0)',axiom,
rline(vd1232),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in','pred(293, 0)') ).
fof(c_0_12,plain,
! [X9,X10,X11,X12,X13,X14,X15,X16] :
( ( rR(X9,X11,X13)
| ~ ron(X13,X15)
| vangle(X11,X9,X13) = v0
| ~ ron(X11,X15)
| ~ ron(X9,X15)
| X9 = X13
| X9 = X11
| X15 != X16
| ~ rline(X16)
| X13 != X14
| ~ rpoint(X14)
| X11 != X12
| ~ rpoint(X12)
| X9 != X10
| ~ rpoint(X10) )
& ( ~ rR(X9,X11,X13)
| vangle(X11,X9,X13) != v0
| ~ ron(X11,X15)
| ~ ron(X9,X15)
| X9 = X13
| X9 = X11
| X15 != X16
| ~ rline(X16)
| X13 != X14
| ~ rpoint(X14)
| X11 != X12
| ~ rpoint(X12)
| X9 != X10
| ~ rpoint(X10) )
& ( ron(X13,X15)
| vangle(X11,X9,X13) != v0
| ~ ron(X11,X15)
| ~ ron(X9,X15)
| X9 = X13
| X9 = X11
| X15 != X16
| ~ rline(X16)
| X13 != X14
| ~ rpoint(X14)
| X11 != X12
| ~ rpoint(X12)
| X9 != X10
| ~ rpoint(X10) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],['qu(cond(axiom(188), 0), imp(cond(axiom(188), 0)))'])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_13,plain,
! [X755,X756,X757,X758,X759,X760] :
( X755 = X757
| X755 = X756
| X757 != X758
| ~ rpoint(X758)
| X756 != X759
| ~ rpoint(X759)
| X755 != X760
| ~ rpoint(X760)
| vangle(X755,X756,X757) = vangle(X757,X756,X755) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],['qu(cond(axiom(168), 0), imp(cond(axiom(168), 0)))'])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_14,plain,
! [X16] :
( ( ~ ron(vd1187,X16)
| ~ ron(vd1186,X16)
| ~ ron(vd1185,X16)
| ~ rline(X16) )
& vangle(vd1179,vd1178,vd1180) = vangle(vd1186,vd1185,vd1187)
& vf(vd1178,vd1180) = vf(vd1185,vd1187)
& vf(vd1178,vd1179) = vf(vd1185,vd1186)
& vd1187 = esk6_0
& rpoint(esk6_0)
& vd1186 = esk7_0
& rpoint(esk7_0)
& vd1185 = esk8_0
& rpoint(esk8_0)
& vd1179 != vd1180
& vd1178 != vd1180
& vd1178 != vd1179
& vd1180 = esk9_0
& rpoint(esk9_0)
& vd1179 = esk10_0
& rpoint(esk10_0)
& vd1178 = esk11_0
& rpoint(esk11_0) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],['and(neg(neg(conjunct2(conjunct2(conjunct2(plural(comma_conjunct2(268))))))), and(holds(conjunct1(conjunct2(conjunct2(plural(comma_conjunct2(268))))), 1194, 0), and(holds(conjunct1(conjunct2(plural(comma_conjunct2(268)))), 1193, 0), and(holds(conjunct1(plural(comma_conjunct2(268))), 1192, 0), and(qe(s3(plural(comma_conjunct2(268)))), and(qe(s2(plural(comma_conjunct2(268)))), and(qe(s1(plural(comma_conjunct2(268)))), and(pred(comma_conjunct1(268), 9), and(pred(comma_conjunct1(268), 8), and(pred(comma_conjunct1(268), 7), and(qe(s3(plural(268))), and(qe(s2(plural(268))), qe(s1(plural(268)))))))))))))))'])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( X2 = X4
| X2 = X6
| ron(X6,X8)
| ~ rpoint(X1)
| X2 != X1
| ~ rpoint(X3)
| X4 != X3
| ~ rpoint(X5)
| X6 != X5
| ~ rline(X7)
| X8 != X7
| ~ ron(X2,X8)
| ~ ron(X4,X8)
| vangle(X4,X2,X6) != v0 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( vangle(X1,X2,X3) = vangle(X3,X2,X1)
| X1 = X2
| X1 = X3
| ~ rpoint(X4)
| X1 != X4
| ~ rpoint(X5)
| X2 != X5
| ~ rpoint(X6)
| X3 != X6 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
fof(c_0_17,plain,
( vd1201 = esk1_0
& rpoint(esk1_0) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],['qe(s3(plural(271)))'])]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
vd1185 = esk8_0,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
vd1199 = vd1185,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],['holds(291, 1230, 0)']) ).
fof(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
~ ron(vd1201,vd1232),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],['pred(303, 0)']) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
( X1 = X2
| X1 = X3
| ron(X2,X4)
| vangle(X3,X1,X2) != v0
| ~ rpoint(X2)
| ~ rpoint(X3)
| ~ rpoint(X1)
| ~ rline(X4)
| ~ ron(X3,X4)
| ~ ron(X1,X4) ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_15])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
( vangle(X1,X2,X3) = vangle(X3,X2,X1)
| X1 = X3
| X1 = X2
| ~ rpoint(X3)
| ~ rpoint(X2)
| ~ rpoint(X1) ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_16])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
vangle(vd1201,vd1185,vd1187) = v0,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],['holds(302, 1241, 0)']) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
vd1201 = esk1_0,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
vd1199 = esk8_0,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
vd1187 = esk6_0,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).
fof(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
~ ron(vd1201,vd1232),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
( X1 = X2
| X3 = X1
| X3 = X2
| ron(X2,X4)
| vangle(X2,X3,X1) != v0
| ~ rpoint(X2)
| ~ rpoint(X1)
| ~ rpoint(X3)
| ~ rline(X4)
| ~ ron(X1,X4)
| ~ ron(X3,X4) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
vangle(esk1_0,esk8_0,esk6_0) = v0,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]),c_0_19]),c_0_25]),c_0_26]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,plain,
rpoint(esk1_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,plain,
rpoint(esk6_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,plain,
rpoint(esk8_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,plain,
ron(vd1187,vd1232),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],['pred(s2(plural(293)), 0)']) ).
cnf(c_0_34,plain,
ron(vd1185,vd1232),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],['pred(s1(plural(293)), 0)']) ).
cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
~ ron(vd1201,vd1232),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_27]) ).
fof(c_0_36,plain,
~ ron(vd1187,vd1197),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],['neg(neg(270))']) ).
cnf(c_0_37,plain,
ron(vd1185,vd1197),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],['pred(s3(plural(274)), 0)']) ).
cnf(c_0_38,plain,
( esk8_0 = esk1_0
| esk8_0 = esk6_0
| esk6_0 = esk1_0
| ron(esk1_0,X1)
| ~ rline(X1)
| ~ ron(esk6_0,X1)
| ~ ron(esk8_0,X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]),c_0_30]),c_0_31]),c_0_32])]) ).
cnf(c_0_39,plain,
rline(vd1232),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],['pred(293, 0)']) ).
cnf(c_0_40,plain,
ron(esk6_0,vd1232),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_26]) ).
cnf(c_0_41,plain,
ron(esk8_0,vd1232),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_19]),c_0_25]) ).
cnf(c_0_42,negated_conjecture,
~ ron(esk1_0,vd1232),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_24]) ).
cnf(c_0_43,plain,
~ ron(vd1187,vd1197),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_36]) ).
cnf(c_0_44,plain,
ron(esk8_0,vd1197),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_19]),c_0_25]) ).
cnf(c_0_45,plain,
( esk6_0 = esk1_0
| esk8_0 = esk6_0
| esk8_0 = esk1_0 ),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_38,c_0_39]),c_0_40]),c_0_41])]),c_0_42]) ).
cnf(c_0_46,plain,
~ ron(esk6_0,vd1197),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_43,c_0_26]) ).
cnf(c_0_47,plain,
( esk8_0 = esk1_0
| esk6_0 = esk1_0 ),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_44,c_0_45]),c_0_46]) ).
cnf(c_0_48,plain,
esk6_0 = esk1_0,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_41,c_0_47]),c_0_42]) ).
cnf(c_0_49,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_40,c_0_48]),c_0_42]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : GEO294+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 19:13:09 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.25/1.43 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.25/1.43 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.25/1.43 # Preprocessing time : 0.051 s
% 0.25/1.43
% 0.25/1.43 # Proof found!
% 0.25/1.43 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.25/1.43 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.25/1.43 # Proof object total steps : 50
% 0.25/1.43 # Proof object clause steps : 31
% 0.25/1.43 # Proof object formula steps : 19
% 0.25/1.43 # Proof object conjectures : 5
% 0.25/1.43 # Proof object clause conjectures : 2
% 0.25/1.43 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.25/1.43 # Proof object initial clauses used : 16
% 0.25/1.43 # Proof object initial formulas used : 12
% 0.25/1.43 # Proof object generating inferences : 5
% 0.25/1.43 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 31
% 0.25/1.43 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.25/1.43 # Parsed axioms : 154
% 0.25/1.43 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 56
% 0.25/1.43 # Initial clauses : 197
% 0.25/1.43 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 2
% 0.25/1.43 # Initial clauses in saturation : 195
% 0.25/1.43 # Processed clauses : 5340
% 0.25/1.43 # ...of these trivial : 30
% 0.25/1.43 # ...subsumed : 3679
% 0.25/1.43 # ...remaining for further processing : 1631
% 0.25/1.43 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 797
% 0.25/1.43 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # Backward-subsumed : 79
% 0.25/1.43 # Backward-rewritten : 216
% 0.25/1.43 # Generated clauses : 18344
% 0.25/1.43 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 16135
% 0.25/1.43 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 1216
% 0.25/1.43 # Paramodulations : 18205
% 0.25/1.43 # Factorizations : 1
% 0.25/1.43 # Equation resolutions : 802
% 0.25/1.43 # Current number of processed clauses : 1203
% 0.25/1.43 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 47
% 0.25/1.43 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.25/1.43 # Negative unit clauses : 19
% 0.25/1.43 # Non-unit-clauses : 1137
% 0.25/1.43 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 8331
% 0.25/1.43 # ...number of literals in the above : 55449
% 0.25/1.43 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # Current number of archived clauses : 295
% 0.25/1.43 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1094423
% 0.25/1.43 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 464582
% 0.25/1.43 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 4191
% 0.25/1.43 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3847
% 0.25/1.43 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # BW rewrite match attempts : 13
% 0.25/1.43 # BW rewrite match successes : 11
% 0.25/1.43 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # Termbank termtop insertions : 456843
% 0.25/1.43
% 0.25/1.43 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.25/1.43 # User time : 0.569 s
% 0.25/1.43 # System time : 0.010 s
% 0.25/1.43 # Total time : 0.579 s
% 0.25/1.43 # Maximum resident set size: 15900 pages
% 0.25/23.43 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.25/23.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.49 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.49 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.49 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.49 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.50 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.50 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.50 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.50 eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------