TSTP Solution File: GEO277+1 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : GEO277+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 04:05:15 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.23s 1.42s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.23s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 12
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 54 ( 32 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 169 ( 80 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 14 ( 3 avg)
% Number of connectives : 197 ( 82 ~; 79 |; 30 &)
% ( 1 <=>; 5 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 23 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 9 ( 9 usr; 8 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 67 ( 0 sgn 26 !; 9 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof('qu(cond(axiom(166), 0), imp(cond(axiom(166), 0)))',axiom,
! [X13,X14] :
( ( ? [X15] :
( X14 = X15
& rpoint(X15) )
& ? [X16] :
( X13 = X16
& rpoint(X16) ) )
=> vf(X13,X14) = vf(X14,X13) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p','qu(cond(axiom(166), 0), imp(cond(axiom(166), 0)))') ).
fof('qe(s1(plural(224)))',axiom,
? [X8] :
( vd1080 = X8
& rpoint(X8) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p','qe(s1(plural(224)))') ).
fof('qu(cond(axiom(73), 0), imp(cond(axiom(73), 0)))',axiom,
! [X102,X103,X104,X105] :
( ( ron(X103,X105)
& ron(X103,X104)
& ron(X102,X105)
& ron(X102,X104)
& ? [X106] :
( X105 = X106
& rline(X106) )
& ? [X107] :
( X104 = X107
& rline(X107) )
& X102 != X103
& ? [X108] :
( X103 = X108
& rpoint(X108) )
& ? [X109] :
( X102 = X109
& rpoint(X109) ) )
=> X104 = X105 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p','qu(cond(axiom(73), 0), imp(cond(axiom(73), 0)))') ).
fof('qu(theu(the(230), 1), imp(the(230)))',conjecture,
! [X1] :
( ( ron(vd1085,X1)
& ron(vd1089,X1)
& rline(X1) )
=> X1 = vd1099 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p','qu(theu(the(230), 1), imp(the(230)))') ).
fof('pred(225, 1)',axiom,
rpoint(vd1086),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p','pred(225, 1)') ).
fof('pred(225, 4)',axiom,
vd1085 = vd1086,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p','pred(225, 4)') ).
fof('holds(226, 1090, 1)',axiom,
vf(vd1089,vd1080) = vf(vd1085,vd1080),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p','holds(226, 1090, 1)') ).
fof('pred(226, 0)',axiom,
rpoint(vd1089),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p','pred(226, 0)') ).
fof('qu(cond(axiom(162), 0), imp(cond(axiom(162), 0)))',axiom,
! [X92,X93] :
( ( ? [X94] :
( X93 = X94
& rpoint(X94) )
& ? [X95] :
( X92 = X95
& rpoint(X95) ) )
=> ( vf(X92,X93) = v0
<=> X92 = X93 ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p','qu(cond(axiom(162), 0), imp(cond(axiom(162), 0)))') ).
fof('holds(226, 1090, 0)',axiom,
vf(vd1089,vd1085) = vf(vd1089,vd1080),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p','holds(226, 1090, 0)') ).
fof('and(pred(s2(plural(the(230))), 0), and(pred(s1(plural(the(230))), 0), pred(the(230), 0)))',axiom,
( ron(vd1085,vd1099)
& ron(vd1089,vd1099)
& rline(vd1099) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p','and(pred(s2(plural(the(230))), 0), and(pred(s1(plural(the(230))), 0), pred(the(230), 0)))') ).
fof('holds(conjunct1(225), 1087, 0)',axiom,
vd1085 != vd1080,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p','holds(conjunct1(225), 1087, 0)') ).
fof(c_0_12,plain,
! [X17,X18,X19,X20] :
( X18 != X19
| ~ rpoint(X19)
| X17 != X20
| ~ rpoint(X20)
| vf(X17,X18) = vf(X18,X17) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],['qu(cond(axiom(166), 0), imp(cond(axiom(166), 0)))'])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_13,plain,
( vd1080 = esk4_0
& rpoint(esk4_0) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],['qe(s1(plural(224)))'])]) ).
fof(c_0_14,plain,
! [X110,X111,X112,X113,X114,X115,X116,X117] :
( ~ ron(X111,X113)
| ~ ron(X111,X112)
| ~ ron(X110,X113)
| ~ ron(X110,X112)
| X113 != X114
| ~ rline(X114)
| X112 != X115
| ~ rline(X115)
| X110 = X111
| X111 != X116
| ~ rpoint(X116)
| X110 != X117
| ~ rpoint(X117)
| X112 = X113 ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],['qu(cond(axiom(73), 0), imp(cond(axiom(73), 0)))'])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1] :
( ( ron(vd1085,X1)
& ron(vd1089,X1)
& rline(X1) )
=> X1 = vd1099 ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],['qu(theu(the(230), 1), imp(the(230)))']) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( vf(X1,X2) = vf(X2,X1)
| ~ rpoint(X3)
| X1 != X3
| ~ rpoint(X4)
| X2 != X4 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
rpoint(vd1086),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],['pred(225, 1)']) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
vd1085 = vd1086,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],['pred(225, 4)']) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
rpoint(esk4_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
vd1080 = esk4_0,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
( X1 = X2
| X4 = X6
| ~ rpoint(X3)
| X4 != X3
| ~ rpoint(X5)
| X6 != X5
| ~ rline(X7)
| X1 != X7
| ~ rline(X8)
| X2 != X8
| ~ ron(X4,X1)
| ~ ron(X4,X2)
| ~ ron(X6,X1)
| ~ ron(X6,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).
fof(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
( ron(vd1085,esk1_0)
& ron(vd1089,esk1_0)
& rline(esk1_0)
& esk1_0 != vd1099 ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_15])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
vf(vd1089,vd1080) = vf(vd1085,vd1080),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],['holds(226, 1090, 1)']) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
( vf(X1,X2) = vf(X2,X1)
| ~ rpoint(X2)
| ~ rpoint(X1) ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_16])]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
rpoint(vd1085),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
rpoint(vd1080),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
( X1 = X2
| X3 = X4
| ~ rpoint(X2)
| ~ rpoint(X1)
| ~ rline(X4)
| ~ rline(X3)
| ~ ron(X2,X4)
| ~ ron(X2,X3)
| ~ ron(X1,X4)
| ~ ron(X1,X3) ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_21])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
ron(vd1089,esk1_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_22]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
rpoint(vd1089),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],['pred(226, 0)']) ).
cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
rline(esk1_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_22]) ).
fof(c_0_31,plain,
! [X96,X97,X98,X99] :
( ( vf(X96,X97) != v0
| X96 = X97
| X97 != X98
| ~ rpoint(X98)
| X96 != X99
| ~ rpoint(X99) )
& ( X96 != X97
| vf(X96,X97) = v0
| X97 != X98
| ~ rpoint(X98)
| X96 != X99
| ~ rpoint(X99) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],['qu(cond(axiom(162), 0), imp(cond(axiom(162), 0)))'])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,plain,
vf(vd1089,vd1085) = vf(vd1089,vd1080),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],['holds(226, 1090, 0)']) ).
cnf(c_0_33,plain,
vf(vd1089,vd1080) = vf(vd1080,vd1085),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]),c_0_25]),c_0_26])]) ).
cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
( X1 = esk1_0
| X2 = vd1089
| ~ rpoint(X2)
| ~ rline(X1)
| ~ ron(vd1089,X1)
| ~ ron(X2,esk1_0)
| ~ ron(X2,X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]),c_0_29]),c_0_30])]) ).
cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
ron(vd1085,esk1_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_22]) ).
cnf(c_0_36,plain,
( X2 = X4
| ~ rpoint(X1)
| X2 != X1
| ~ rpoint(X3)
| X4 != X3
| vf(X2,X4) != v0 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_31]) ).
cnf(c_0_37,plain,
vf(vd1089,vd1085) = vf(vd1080,vd1085),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33]) ).
cnf(c_0_38,plain,
vf(vd1080,vd1085) = vf(vd1080,vd1089),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_33]),c_0_26]),c_0_29])]) ).
cnf(c_0_39,negated_conjecture,
( vd1085 = vd1089
| X1 = esk1_0
| ~ rline(X1)
| ~ ron(vd1089,X1)
| ~ ron(vd1085,X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_35]),c_0_25])]) ).
cnf(c_0_40,plain,
rline(vd1099),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],['and(pred(s2(plural(the(230))), 0), and(pred(s1(plural(the(230))), 0), pred(the(230), 0)))']) ).
cnf(c_0_41,plain,
ron(vd1089,vd1099),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],['and(pred(s2(plural(the(230))), 0), and(pred(s1(plural(the(230))), 0), pred(the(230), 0)))']) ).
cnf(c_0_42,plain,
ron(vd1085,vd1099),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],['and(pred(s2(plural(the(230))), 0), and(pred(s1(plural(the(230))), 0), pred(the(230), 0)))']) ).
cnf(c_0_43,negated_conjecture,
esk1_0 != vd1099,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_22]) ).
cnf(c_0_44,plain,
( X1 = X2
| vf(X1,X2) != v0
| ~ rpoint(X2)
| ~ rpoint(X1) ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_36])]) ).
cnf(c_0_45,plain,
vd1085 != vd1080,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],['holds(conjunct1(225), 1087, 0)']) ).
cnf(c_0_46,plain,
( vf(X2,X4) = v0
| ~ rpoint(X1)
| X2 != X1
| ~ rpoint(X3)
| X4 != X3
| X2 != X4 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_31]) ).
cnf(c_0_47,plain,
vf(vd1089,vd1085) = vf(vd1080,vd1089),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_38]) ).
cnf(c_0_48,negated_conjecture,
vd1085 = vd1089,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_39,c_0_40]),c_0_41]),c_0_42])]),c_0_43]) ).
cnf(c_0_49,plain,
vf(vd1089,vd1080) != v0,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_44,c_0_23]),c_0_26]),c_0_25])]),c_0_45]) ).
cnf(c_0_50,plain,
( vf(X1,X1) = v0
| ~ rpoint(X1) ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_46])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_51,plain,
vf(vd1089,vd1089) = vf(vd1080,vd1089),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_47,c_0_48]) ).
cnf(c_0_52,plain,
vf(vd1080,vd1089) != v0,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_49,c_0_24]),c_0_29]),c_0_26])]) ).
cnf(c_0_53,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_50,c_0_51]),c_0_29])]),c_0_52]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.11 % Problem : GEO277+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.11/0.12 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 17:05:34 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.23/1.42 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_63dc1b1eb7d762c2f3686774d32795976f981b97 for 23 seconds:
% 0.23/1.42 # Preprocessing time : 0.061 s
% 0.23/1.42
% 0.23/1.42 # Proof found!
% 0.23/1.42 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.23/1.42 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.23/1.42 # Proof object total steps : 54
% 0.23/1.42 # Proof object clause steps : 36
% 0.23/1.42 # Proof object formula steps : 18
% 0.23/1.42 # Proof object conjectures : 10
% 0.23/1.42 # Proof object clause conjectures : 7
% 0.23/1.42 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.23/1.42 # Proof object initial clauses used : 19
% 0.23/1.42 # Proof object initial formulas used : 12
% 0.23/1.42 # Proof object generating inferences : 8
% 0.23/1.42 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 41
% 0.23/1.42 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.23/1.42 # Parsed axioms : 127
% 0.23/1.42 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Initial clauses : 284
% 0.23/1.42 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 2
% 0.23/1.42 # Initial clauses in saturation : 282
% 0.23/1.42 # Processed clauses : 570
% 0.23/1.42 # ...of these trivial : 3
% 0.23/1.42 # ...subsumed : 32
% 0.23/1.42 # ...remaining for further processing : 535
% 0.23/1.42 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 1094
% 0.23/1.42 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Backward-subsumed : 1
% 0.23/1.42 # Backward-rewritten : 27
% 0.23/1.42 # Generated clauses : 1127
% 0.23/1.42 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 1117
% 0.23/1.42 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 17
% 0.23/1.42 # Paramodulations : 880
% 0.23/1.42 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Equation resolutions : 1106
% 0.23/1.42 # Current number of processed clauses : 272
% 0.23/1.42 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 33
% 0.23/1.42 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Negative unit clauses : 13
% 0.23/1.42 # Non-unit-clauses : 226
% 0.23/1.42 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 690
% 0.23/1.42 # ...number of literals in the above : 6863
% 0.23/1.42 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Current number of archived clauses : 28
% 0.23/1.42 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 42368
% 0.23/1.42 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3266
% 0.23/1.42 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 40
% 0.23/1.42 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 834
% 0.23/1.42 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # BW rewrite match attempts : 5
% 0.23/1.42 # BW rewrite match successes : 5
% 0.23/1.42 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Termbank termtop insertions : 74116
% 0.23/1.42
% 0.23/1.42 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.23/1.42 # User time : 0.131 s
% 0.23/1.42 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.23/1.42 # Total time : 0.134 s
% 0.23/1.42 # Maximum resident set size: 6480 pages
% 0.23/23.41 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.23/23.41 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.23/23.41 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.23/23.43 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.43 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.43 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.43 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.49 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.49 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.49 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.49 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.49 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.49 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.49 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.49 eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------