TSTP Solution File: GEO275+1 by E---3.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.1
% Problem  : GEO275+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 17:32:29 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 0.21s 0.64s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.21s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   22 (   9 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   80 (  23 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   10 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   98 (  40   ~;  36   |;  19   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   18 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   36 (   0 sgn;  14   !;   3   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof('qu(cond(axiom(182), 0), imp(cond(axiom(182), 0)))',axiom,
    ! [X608,X609,X610,X611,X612] :
      ( ( vf(X610,X608) = vf(X610,X609)
        & ron(X609,X612)
        & ron(X608,X611)
        & rcenter(X610,X612)
        & rcenter(X610,X611)
        & ? [X613] :
            ( X609 = X613
            & rpoint(X613) )
        & ? [X614] :
            ( X608 = X614
            & rpoint(X614) ) )
     => X611 = X612 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.dPcMuTRhhB/E---3.1_7483.p','qu(cond(axiom(182), 0), imp(cond(axiom(182), 0)))') ).

fof('qu(theu(the(228), 1), imp(the(228)))',conjecture,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ( ron(vd1081,X1)
        & rcenter(vd1080,X1)
        & rcircle(X1) )
     => X1 = vd1095 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.dPcMuTRhhB/E---3.1_7483.p','qu(theu(the(228), 1), imp(the(228)))') ).

fof('qe(s2(plural(224)))',axiom,
    ? [X2] :
      ( vd1081 = X2
      & rpoint(X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.dPcMuTRhhB/E---3.1_7483.p','qe(s2(plural(224)))') ).

fof('and(pred(comma_conjunct2(the(228)), 0), and(pred(comma_conjunct1(the(228)), 0), pred(the(228), 0)))',axiom,
    ( ron(vd1081,vd1095)
    & rcenter(vd1080,vd1095)
    & rcircle(vd1095) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.dPcMuTRhhB/E---3.1_7483.p','and(pred(comma_conjunct2(the(228)), 0), and(pred(comma_conjunct1(the(228)), 0), pred(the(228), 0)))') ).

fof(c_0_4,plain,
    ! [X803,X804,X805,X806,X807,X808,X809] :
      ( vf(X805,X803) != vf(X805,X804)
      | ~ ron(X804,X807)
      | ~ ron(X803,X806)
      | ~ rcenter(X805,X807)
      | ~ rcenter(X805,X806)
      | X804 != X808
      | ~ rpoint(X808)
      | X803 != X809
      | ~ rpoint(X809)
      | X806 = X807 ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],['qu(cond(axiom(182), 0), imp(cond(axiom(182), 0)))'])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_5,plain,
    ( X5 = X4
    | vf(X1,X2) != vf(X1,X3)
    | ~ ron(X3,X4)
    | ~ ron(X2,X5)
    | ~ rcenter(X1,X4)
    | ~ rcenter(X1,X5)
    | X3 != X6
    | ~ rpoint(X6)
    | X2 != X7
    | ~ rpoint(X7) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1] :
        ( ( ron(vd1081,X1)
          & rcenter(vd1080,X1)
          & rcircle(X1) )
       => X1 = vd1095 ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],['qu(theu(the(228), 1), imp(the(228)))']) ).

cnf(c_0_7,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | vf(X3,X4) != vf(X3,X5)
    | ~ rpoint(X4)
    | ~ rpoint(X5)
    | ~ rcenter(X3,X2)
    | ~ rcenter(X3,X1)
    | ~ ron(X5,X1)
    | ~ ron(X4,X2) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])]) ).

fof(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ( ron(vd1081,esk1_0)
    & rcenter(vd1080,esk1_0)
    & rcircle(esk1_0)
    & esk1_0 != vd1095 ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | ~ rpoint(X3)
    | ~ rcenter(X4,X2)
    | ~ rcenter(X4,X1)
    | ~ ron(X3,X1)
    | ~ ron(X3,X2) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    rcenter(vd1080,esk1_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

fof(c_0_11,plain,
    ( vd1081 = esk16_0
    & rpoint(esk16_0) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],['qe(s2(plural(224)))'])]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    ( X1 = esk1_0
    | ~ rpoint(X2)
    | ~ rcenter(vd1080,X1)
    | ~ ron(X2,esk1_0)
    | ~ ron(X2,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    rcenter(vd1080,vd1095),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],['and(pred(comma_conjunct2(the(228)), 0), and(pred(comma_conjunct1(the(228)), 0), pred(the(228), 0)))']) ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    esk1_0 != vd1095,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    rpoint(esk16_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    vd1081 = esk16_0,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ rpoint(X1)
    | ~ ron(X1,esk1_0)
    | ~ ron(X1,vd1095) ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]),c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    ron(vd1081,esk1_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    rpoint(vd1081),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ron(vd1081,vd1095),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],['and(pred(comma_conjunct2(the(228)), 0), and(pred(comma_conjunct1(the(228)), 0), pred(the(228), 0)))']) ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]),c_0_19]),c_0_20])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.16  % Problem    : GEO275+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.07/0.17  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.16/0.37  % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.37  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.37  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.37  % CPULimit   : 2400
% 0.16/0.37  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.16/0.37  % DateTime   : Tue Oct  3 06:44:44 EDT 2023
% 0.16/0.37  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.21/0.51  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.21/0.51  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.dPcMuTRhhB/E---3.1_7483.p
% 0.21/0.64  # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.21/0.64  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.64  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.64  # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.64  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.64  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.64  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.64  # new_bool_1 with pid 7565 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.64  # Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.21/0.64  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.64  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.64  # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.64  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.64  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.64  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.21/0.64  # Search class: FGHSF-FSLM33-SFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.64  # Scheduled 10 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.21/0.64  # Starting G-E--_107_C41_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S2U with 55s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.64  # G-E--_107_C41_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S2U with pid 7568 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.64  # Result found by G-E--_107_C41_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S2U
% 0.21/0.64  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.64  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.64  # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.64  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.64  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.64  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.21/0.64  # Search class: FGHSF-FSLM33-SFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.64  # Scheduled 10 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.21/0.64  # Starting G-E--_107_C41_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S2U with 55s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.64  # Preprocessing time       : 0.007 s
% 0.21/0.64  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.21/0.64  
% 0.21/0.64  # Proof found!
% 0.21/0.64  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.21/0.64  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.64  # Parsed axioms                        : 120
% 0.21/0.64  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 32
% 0.21/0.64  # Initial clauses                      : 196
% 0.21/0.64  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.21/0.64  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 196
% 0.21/0.64  # Processed clauses                    : 631
% 0.21/0.64  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.21/0.64  # ...subsumed                          : 29
% 0.21/0.64  # ...remaining for further processing  : 602
% 0.21/0.64  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 539
% 0.21/0.64  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.21/0.64  # Backward-subsumed                    : 1
% 0.21/0.64  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.21/0.64  # Generated clauses                    : 904
% 0.21/0.64  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 878
% 0.21/0.64  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.21/0.64  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 13
% 0.21/0.64  # Paramodulations                      : 719
% 0.21/0.64  # Factorizations                       : 6
% 0.21/0.64  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.21/0.64  # Equation resolutions                 : 544
% 0.21/0.64  # Total rewrite steps                  : 161
% 0.21/0.64  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.21/0.64  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.21/0.64  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.21/0.64  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.21/0.64  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.21/0.64  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.21/0.64  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.21/0.64  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.21/0.64  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.21/0.64  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.21/0.64  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.21/0.64  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.21/0.64  # Current number of processed clauses  : 233
% 0.21/0.64  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 15
% 0.21/0.64  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.21/0.64  #    Negative unit clauses             : 6
% 0.21/0.64  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 212
% 0.21/0.64  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 617
% 0.21/0.64  # ...number of literals in the above   : 6165
% 0.21/0.64  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.21/0.64  # Current number of archived clauses   : 195
% 0.21/0.64  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 48532
% 0.21/0.64  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2815
% 0.21/0.64  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 43
% 0.21/0.64  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 20
% 0.21/0.64  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.21/0.64  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
% 0.21/0.64  # BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.21/0.64  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.21/0.64  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.21/0.64  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 50504
% 0.21/0.64  
% 0.21/0.64  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.64  # User time                : 0.100 s
% 0.21/0.64  # System time              : 0.004 s
% 0.21/0.64  # Total time               : 0.104 s
% 0.21/0.64  # Maximum resident set size: 3628 pages
% 0.21/0.64  
% 0.21/0.64  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.64  # User time                : 0.106 s
% 0.21/0.64  # System time              : 0.006 s
% 0.21/0.64  # Total time               : 0.111 s
% 0.21/0.64  # Maximum resident set size: 2516 pages
% 0.21/0.64  % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.21/0.64  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------