TSTP Solution File: GEO274+1 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : GEO274+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 04:05:15 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.25s 1.42s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.25s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 9
% Number of leaves : 13
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 58 ( 35 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 173 ( 83 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 14 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 198 ( 83 ~; 79 |; 30 &)
% ( 1 <=>; 5 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 23 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 10 ( 10 usr; 9 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 67 ( 0 sgn 26 !; 9 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof('qu(theu(the(227), 1), imp(the(227)))',conjecture,
! [X1] :
( ( ron(vd1089,X1)
& ron(vd1080,X1)
& rline(X1) )
=> X1 = vd1092 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in','qu(theu(the(227), 1), imp(the(227)))') ).
fof('qe(s1(plural(224)))',axiom,
? [X2] :
( vd1080 = X2
& rpoint(X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in','qe(s1(plural(224)))') ).
fof('qu(cond(axiom(73), 0), imp(cond(axiom(73), 0)))',axiom,
! [X369,X370,X371,X372] :
( ( ron(X370,X372)
& ron(X370,X371)
& ron(X369,X372)
& ron(X369,X371)
& ? [X373] :
( X372 = X373
& rline(X373) )
& ? [X374] :
( X371 = X374
& rline(X374) )
& X369 != X370
& ? [X375] :
( X370 = X375
& rpoint(X375) )
& ? [X376] :
( X369 = X376
& rpoint(X376) ) )
=> X371 = X372 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in','qu(cond(axiom(73), 0), imp(cond(axiom(73), 0)))') ).
fof('holds(226, 1090, 0)',axiom,
vf(vd1089,vd1085) = vf(vd1089,vd1080),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in','holds(226, 1090, 0)') ).
fof('holds(226, 1090, 1)',axiom,
vf(vd1089,vd1080) = vf(vd1085,vd1080),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in','holds(226, 1090, 1)') ).
fof('qu(cond(axiom(166), 0), imp(cond(axiom(166), 0)))',axiom,
! [X3,X4] :
( ( ? [X5] :
( X4 = X5
& rpoint(X5) )
& ? [X6] :
( X3 = X6
& rpoint(X6) ) )
=> vf(X3,X4) = vf(X4,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in','qu(cond(axiom(166), 0), imp(cond(axiom(166), 0)))') ).
fof('and(pred(s2(plural(the(227))), 0), and(pred(s1(plural(the(227))), 0), pred(the(227), 0)))',axiom,
( ron(vd1089,vd1092)
& ron(vd1080,vd1092)
& rline(vd1092) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in','and(pred(s2(plural(the(227))), 0), and(pred(s1(plural(the(227))), 0), pred(the(227), 0)))') ).
fof('qu(cond(axiom(162), 0), imp(cond(axiom(162), 0)))',axiom,
! [X7,X8] :
( ( ? [X9] :
( X8 = X9
& rpoint(X9) )
& ? [X10] :
( X7 = X10
& rpoint(X10) ) )
=> ( vf(X7,X8) = v0
<=> X7 = X8 ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in','qu(cond(axiom(162), 0), imp(cond(axiom(162), 0)))') ).
fof('pred(axiom(137), 2)',axiom,
v0 = vd684,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in','pred(axiom(137), 2)') ).
fof('pred(225, 1)',axiom,
rpoint(vd1086),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in','pred(225, 1)') ).
fof('pred(225, 4)',axiom,
vd1085 = vd1086,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in','pred(225, 4)') ).
fof('pred(226, 0)',axiom,
rpoint(vd1089),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in','pred(226, 0)') ).
fof('holds(conjunct1(225), 1087, 0)',axiom,
vd1085 != vd1080,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in','holds(conjunct1(225), 1087, 0)') ).
fof(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1] :
( ( ron(vd1089,X1)
& ron(vd1080,X1)
& rline(X1) )
=> X1 = vd1092 ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],['qu(theu(the(227), 1), imp(the(227)))']) ).
fof(c_0_14,plain,
( vd1080 = esk2_0
& rpoint(esk2_0) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],['qe(s1(plural(224)))'])]) ).
fof(c_0_15,plain,
! [X377,X378,X379,X380,X381,X382,X383,X384] :
( ~ ron(X378,X380)
| ~ ron(X378,X379)
| ~ ron(X377,X380)
| ~ ron(X377,X379)
| X380 != X381
| ~ rline(X381)
| X379 != X382
| ~ rline(X382)
| X377 = X378
| X378 != X383
| ~ rpoint(X383)
| X377 != X384
| ~ rpoint(X384)
| X379 = X380 ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],['qu(cond(axiom(73), 0), imp(cond(axiom(73), 0)))'])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
( ron(vd1089,esk1_0)
& ron(vd1080,esk1_0)
& rline(esk1_0)
& esk1_0 != vd1092 ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_13])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
vf(vd1089,vd1085) = vf(vd1089,vd1080),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],['holds(226, 1090, 0)']) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
vd1080 = esk2_0,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
( X1 = X2
| X4 = X6
| ~ rpoint(X3)
| X4 != X3
| ~ rpoint(X5)
| X6 != X5
| ~ rline(X7)
| X1 != X7
| ~ rline(X8)
| X2 != X8
| ~ ron(X4,X1)
| ~ ron(X4,X2)
| ~ ron(X6,X1)
| ~ ron(X6,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
ron(vd1080,esk1_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
vf(vd1089,vd1080) = vf(vd1085,vd1080),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],['holds(226, 1090, 1)']) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
vf(vd1089,esk2_0) = vf(vd1089,vd1085),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).
fof(c_0_23,plain,
! [X7,X8,X9,X10] :
( X8 != X9
| ~ rpoint(X9)
| X7 != X10
| ~ rpoint(X10)
| vf(X7,X8) = vf(X8,X7) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],['qu(cond(axiom(166), 0), imp(cond(axiom(166), 0)))'])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
( X1 = X2
| X3 = X4
| ~ rpoint(X2)
| ~ rpoint(X1)
| ~ rline(X4)
| ~ rline(X3)
| ~ ron(X2,X4)
| ~ ron(X2,X3)
| ~ ron(X1,X4)
| ~ ron(X1,X3) ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_19])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
ron(esk2_0,esk1_0),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
rpoint(esk2_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
rline(esk1_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
ron(vd1080,vd1092),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],['and(pred(s2(plural(the(227))), 0), and(pred(s1(plural(the(227))), 0), pred(the(227), 0)))']) ).
fof(c_0_29,plain,
! [X11,X12,X13,X14] :
( ( vf(X11,X12) != v0
| X11 = X12
| X12 != X13
| ~ rpoint(X13)
| X11 != X14
| ~ rpoint(X14) )
& ( X11 != X12
| vf(X11,X12) = v0
| X12 != X13
| ~ rpoint(X13)
| X11 != X14
| ~ rpoint(X14) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],['qu(cond(axiom(162), 0), imp(cond(axiom(162), 0)))'])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,plain,
vf(vd1089,vd1085) = vf(vd1085,esk2_0),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_18]),c_0_22]),c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,plain,
( vf(X1,X2) = vf(X2,X1)
| ~ rpoint(X3)
| X1 != X3
| ~ rpoint(X4)
| X2 != X4 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_23]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
( X1 = esk1_0
| X2 = esk2_0
| ~ rpoint(X2)
| ~ rline(X1)
| ~ ron(esk2_0,X1)
| ~ ron(X2,esk1_0)
| ~ ron(X2,X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]),c_0_26]),c_0_27])]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,plain,
ron(esk2_0,vd1092),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_34,plain,
rline(vd1092),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],['and(pred(s2(plural(the(227))), 0), and(pred(s1(plural(the(227))), 0), pred(the(227), 0)))']) ).
cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
esk1_0 != vd1092,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_36,plain,
( X2 = X4
| ~ rpoint(X1)
| X2 != X1
| ~ rpoint(X3)
| X4 != X3
| vf(X2,X4) != v0 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_29]) ).
cnf(c_0_37,plain,
v0 = vd684,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],['pred(axiom(137), 2)']) ).
cnf(c_0_38,plain,
rpoint(vd1086),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],['pred(225, 1)']) ).
cnf(c_0_39,plain,
vd1085 = vd1086,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],['pred(225, 4)']) ).
cnf(c_0_40,plain,
vf(vd1089,esk2_0) = vf(vd1085,esk2_0),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_30]) ).
cnf(c_0_41,plain,
( vf(X1,X2) = vf(X2,X1)
| ~ rpoint(X2)
| ~ rpoint(X1) ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_31])]) ).
cnf(c_0_42,plain,
rpoint(vd1089),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],['pred(226, 0)']) ).
cnf(c_0_43,negated_conjecture,
( X1 = esk2_0
| ~ rpoint(X1)
| ~ ron(X1,esk1_0)
| ~ ron(X1,vd1092) ),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33]),c_0_34])]),c_0_35]) ).
cnf(c_0_44,negated_conjecture,
ron(vd1089,esk1_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_45,plain,
ron(vd1089,vd1092),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],['and(pred(s2(plural(the(227))), 0), and(pred(s1(plural(the(227))), 0), pred(the(227), 0)))']) ).
cnf(c_0_46,plain,
( X1 = X2
| vf(X1,X2) != vd684
| ~ rpoint(X2)
| ~ rpoint(X1) ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_37])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_47,plain,
rpoint(vd1085),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_38,c_0_39]) ).
cnf(c_0_48,plain,
vd1085 != vd1080,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],['holds(conjunct1(225), 1087, 0)']) ).
cnf(c_0_49,plain,
( vf(X2,X4) = v0
| ~ rpoint(X1)
| X2 != X1
| ~ rpoint(X3)
| X4 != X3
| X2 != X4 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_29]) ).
cnf(c_0_50,plain,
vf(esk2_0,vd1089) = vf(vd1085,esk2_0),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_40,c_0_41]),c_0_42]),c_0_26])]) ).
cnf(c_0_51,negated_conjecture,
vd1089 = esk2_0,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_43,c_0_44]),c_0_42]),c_0_45])]) ).
cnf(c_0_52,plain,
( vd1089 = vd1085
| vf(vd1085,esk2_0) != vd684 ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_46,c_0_30]),c_0_47]),c_0_42])]) ).
cnf(c_0_53,plain,
esk2_0 != vd1085,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_48,c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_54,plain,
( vf(X1,X1) = vd684
| ~ rpoint(X1) ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_49,c_0_37])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_55,plain,
vf(esk2_0,esk2_0) = vf(vd1085,esk2_0),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_50,c_0_51]) ).
cnf(c_0_56,plain,
vf(vd1085,esk2_0) != vd684,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_52,c_0_51]),c_0_53]) ).
cnf(c_0_57,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_54,c_0_55]),c_0_26])]),c_0_56]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.12 % Problem : GEO274+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.10/0.12 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.13/0.33 % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.33 % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 13:22:32 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.25/1.42 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_29fa5c60d0ee03ec4f64b055553dc135fbe4ee3a for 23 seconds:
% 0.25/1.42 # Preprocessing time : 0.057 s
% 0.25/1.42
% 0.25/1.42 # Proof found!
% 0.25/1.42 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.25/1.42 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.25/1.42 # Proof object total steps : 58
% 0.25/1.42 # Proof object clause steps : 39
% 0.25/1.42 # Proof object formula steps : 19
% 0.25/1.42 # Proof object conjectures : 11
% 0.25/1.42 # Proof object clause conjectures : 8
% 0.25/1.42 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.25/1.42 # Proof object initial clauses used : 20
% 0.25/1.42 # Proof object initial formulas used : 13
% 0.25/1.42 # Proof object generating inferences : 6
% 0.25/1.42 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 43
% 0.25/1.42 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.25/1.42 # Parsed axioms : 117
% 0.25/1.42 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.25/1.42 # Initial clauses : 270
% 0.25/1.42 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 2
% 0.25/1.42 # Initial clauses in saturation : 268
% 0.25/1.42 # Processed clauses : 470
% 0.25/1.42 # ...of these trivial : 4
% 0.25/1.42 # ...subsumed : 24
% 0.25/1.42 # ...remaining for further processing : 442
% 0.25/1.42 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 1094
% 0.25/1.42 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.25/1.42 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.25/1.42 # Backward-rewritten : 50
% 0.25/1.42 # Generated clauses : 890
% 0.25/1.42 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 822
% 0.25/1.42 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 33
% 0.25/1.42 # Paramodulations : 643
% 0.25/1.42 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.25/1.42 # Equation resolutions : 1103
% 0.25/1.42 # Current number of processed clauses : 156
% 0.25/1.42 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 20
% 0.25/1.42 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.25/1.42 # Negative unit clauses : 9
% 0.25/1.42 # Non-unit-clauses : 127
% 0.25/1.42 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 356
% 0.25/1.42 # ...number of literals in the above : 3603
% 0.25/1.42 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.25/1.42 # Current number of archived clauses : 50
% 0.25/1.42 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 38013
% 0.25/1.42 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2879
% 0.25/1.42 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 57
% 0.25/1.42 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 324
% 0.25/1.42 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.25/1.42 # BW rewrite match attempts : 6
% 0.25/1.42 # BW rewrite match successes : 6
% 0.25/1.42 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.25/1.42 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.25/1.42 # Termbank termtop insertions : 70119
% 0.25/1.42
% 0.25/1.42 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.25/1.42 # User time : 0.119 s
% 0.25/1.42 # System time : 0.004 s
% 0.25/1.42 # Total time : 0.123 s
% 0.25/1.42 # Maximum resident set size: 5944 pages
% 0.25/23.41 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.25/23.42 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.25/23.43 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.25/23.43 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.25/23.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.25/23.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.25/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.25/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.25/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.25/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.25/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.25/23.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.25/23.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.49 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.49 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.49 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.25/23.49 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.49 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.49 eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------