TSTP Solution File: GEO272+1 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : GEO272+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 04:05:14 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.25s 1.44s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.25s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 11
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 50 ( 20 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 199 ( 62 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 16 ( 3 avg)
% Number of connectives : 266 ( 117 ~; 111 |; 32 &)
% ( 1 <=>; 5 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 18 ( 5 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 6 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 9 ( 9 usr; 8 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 94 ( 0 sgn 32 !; 4 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof('qu(theu(the(212), 1), imp(the(212)))',conjecture,
! [X1] :
( ( ron(vd1055,X1)
& rcenter(vd1057,X1)
& rcircle(X1) )
=> X1 = vd1063 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in','qu(theu(the(212), 1), imp(the(212)))') ).
fof('qu(cond(axiom(184), 0), imp(cond(axiom(184), 0)))',axiom,
! [X7,X8,X9,X10,X11,X12] :
( ( ron(X11,X10)
& X11 = X12
& rpoint(X12)
& rcenter(X9,X10)
& X7 = X8
& rpoint(X8) )
=> ( vf(X9,X7) = vf(X9,X11)
<=> ron(X7,X10) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in','qu(cond(axiom(184), 0), imp(cond(axiom(184), 0)))') ).
fof('and(pred(conjunct2(210), 4), and(holds(conjunct2(210), 1059, 0), and(pred(conjunct2(210), 1), and(pred(conjunct1(210), 2), pred(conjunct1(210), 1)))))',axiom,
( vd1057 = vd1058
& vd1055 != vd1057
& rpoint(vd1058)
& vd1055 = vd1056
& rpoint(vd1056) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in','and(pred(conjunct2(210), 4), and(holds(conjunct2(210), 1059, 0), and(pred(conjunct2(210), 1), and(pred(conjunct1(210), 2), pred(conjunct1(210), 1)))))') ).
fof('qu(cond(axiom(166), 0), imp(cond(axiom(166), 0)))',axiom,
! [X194,X195] :
( ( ? [X196] :
( X195 = X196
& rpoint(X196) )
& ? [X197] :
( X194 = X197
& rpoint(X197) ) )
=> vf(X194,X195) = vf(X195,X194) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in','qu(cond(axiom(166), 0), imp(cond(axiom(166), 0)))') ).
fof('replace(replace(and(pred(comma_conjunct2(the(211)), 0), and(pred(comma_conjunct1(the(211)), 0), pred(the(211), 0)))))',axiom,
( ron(vd1057,vskolem1061)
& rcenter(vd1055,vskolem1061)
& rcircle(vskolem1061) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in','replace(replace(and(pred(comma_conjunct2(the(211)), 0), and(pred(comma_conjunct1(the(211)), 0), pred(the(211), 0)))))') ).
fof('replace(pred(211, 2))',axiom,
vd1060 = vskolem1061,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in','replace(pred(211, 2))') ).
fof('and(pred(comma_conjunct2(the(212)), 0), and(pred(comma_conjunct1(the(212)), 0), pred(the(212), 0)))',axiom,
( ron(vd1055,vd1063)
& rcenter(vd1057,vd1063)
& rcircle(vd1063) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in','and(pred(comma_conjunct2(the(212)), 0), and(pred(comma_conjunct1(the(212)), 0), pred(the(212), 0)))') ).
fof('qu(cond(axiom(182), 0), imp(cond(axiom(182), 0)))',axiom,
! [X13,X14,X15,X16,X17] :
( ( vf(X15,X13) = vf(X15,X14)
& ron(X14,X17)
& ron(X13,X16)
& rcenter(X15,X17)
& rcenter(X15,X16)
& ? [X18] :
( X14 = X18
& rpoint(X18) )
& ? [X19] :
( X13 = X19
& rpoint(X19) ) )
=> X16 = X17 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in','qu(cond(axiom(182), 0), imp(cond(axiom(182), 0)))') ).
fof(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1] :
( ( ron(vd1055,X1)
& rcenter(vd1057,X1)
& rcircle(X1) )
=> X1 = vd1063 ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],['qu(theu(the(212), 1), imp(the(212)))']) ).
fof(c_0_9,plain,
! [X13,X14,X15,X16,X17,X18] :
( ( vf(X15,X13) != vf(X15,X17)
| ron(X13,X16)
| ~ ron(X17,X16)
| X17 != X18
| ~ rpoint(X18)
| ~ rcenter(X15,X16)
| X13 != X14
| ~ rpoint(X14) )
& ( ~ ron(X13,X16)
| vf(X15,X13) = vf(X15,X17)
| ~ ron(X17,X16)
| X17 != X18
| ~ rpoint(X18)
| ~ rcenter(X15,X16)
| X13 != X14
| ~ rpoint(X14) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],['qu(cond(axiom(184), 0), imp(cond(axiom(184), 0)))'])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
( ron(vd1055,esk1_0)
& rcenter(vd1057,esk1_0)
& rcircle(esk1_0)
& esk1_0 != vd1063 ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( ron(X2,X4)
| ~ rpoint(X1)
| X2 != X1
| ~ rcenter(X3,X4)
| ~ rpoint(X5)
| X6 != X5
| ~ ron(X6,X4)
| vf(X3,X2) != vf(X3,X6) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
rcenter(vd1057,esk1_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
vd1057 = vd1058,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],['and(pred(conjunct2(210), 4), and(holds(conjunct2(210), 1059, 0), and(pred(conjunct2(210), 1), and(pred(conjunct1(210), 2), pred(conjunct1(210), 1)))))']) ).
fof(c_0_14,plain,
! [X198,X199,X200,X201] :
( X199 != X200
| ~ rpoint(X200)
| X198 != X201
| ~ rpoint(X201)
| vf(X198,X199) = vf(X199,X198) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],['qu(cond(axiom(166), 0), imp(cond(axiom(166), 0)))'])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( ron(X1,X2)
| vf(X3,X1) != vf(X3,X4)
| ~ rpoint(X4)
| ~ rpoint(X1)
| ~ rcenter(X3,X2)
| ~ ron(X4,X2) ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_11])]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
rcenter(vd1058,esk1_0),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( vf(X1,X2) = vf(X2,X1)
| ~ rpoint(X3)
| X1 != X3
| ~ rpoint(X4)
| X2 != X4 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
( vf(X3,X2) = vf(X3,X6)
| ~ rpoint(X1)
| X2 != X1
| ~ rcenter(X3,X4)
| ~ rpoint(X5)
| X6 != X5
| ~ ron(X6,X4)
| ~ ron(X2,X4) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
rcenter(vd1055,vskolem1061),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],['replace(replace(and(pred(comma_conjunct2(the(211)), 0), and(pred(comma_conjunct1(the(211)), 0), pred(the(211), 0)))))']) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
vd1055 = vd1056,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],['and(pred(conjunct2(210), 4), and(holds(conjunct2(210), 1059, 0), and(pred(conjunct2(210), 1), and(pred(conjunct1(210), 2), pred(conjunct1(210), 1)))))']) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
vd1060 = vskolem1061,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],['replace(pred(211, 2))']) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
rcenter(vd1057,vd1063),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],['and(pred(comma_conjunct2(the(212)), 0), and(pred(comma_conjunct1(the(212)), 0), pred(the(212), 0)))']) ).
fof(c_0_23,plain,
! [X20,X21,X22,X23,X24,X25,X26] :
( vf(X22,X20) != vf(X22,X21)
| ~ ron(X21,X24)
| ~ ron(X20,X23)
| ~ rcenter(X22,X24)
| ~ rcenter(X22,X23)
| X21 != X25
| ~ rpoint(X25)
| X20 != X26
| ~ rpoint(X26)
| X23 = X24 ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],['qu(cond(axiom(182), 0), imp(cond(axiom(182), 0)))'])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
( ron(X1,esk1_0)
| vf(vd1058,X1) != vf(vd1058,X2)
| ~ rpoint(X2)
| ~ rpoint(X1)
| ~ ron(X2,esk1_0) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
( vf(X1,X2) = vf(X2,X1)
| ~ rpoint(X2)
| ~ rpoint(X1) ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_17])]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
rpoint(vd1058),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],['and(pred(conjunct2(210), 4), and(holds(conjunct2(210), 1059, 0), and(pred(conjunct2(210), 1), and(pred(conjunct1(210), 2), pred(conjunct1(210), 1)))))']) ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
( vf(X1,X2) = vf(X1,X3)
| ~ rpoint(X3)
| ~ rpoint(X2)
| ~ rcenter(X1,X4)
| ~ ron(X3,X4)
| ~ ron(X2,X4) ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_18])]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
rcenter(vd1056,vd1060),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]),c_0_21]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
ron(vd1055,esk1_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,plain,
ron(vd1057,vskolem1061),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],['replace(replace(and(pred(comma_conjunct2(the(211)), 0), and(pred(comma_conjunct1(the(211)), 0), pred(the(211), 0)))))']) ).
cnf(c_0_31,plain,
rcenter(vd1058,vd1063),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,plain,
( X1 = X2
| ~ rpoint(X3)
| X4 != X3
| ~ rpoint(X5)
| X6 != X5
| ~ rcenter(X7,X1)
| ~ rcenter(X7,X2)
| ~ ron(X4,X1)
| ~ ron(X6,X2)
| vf(X7,X4) != vf(X7,X6) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_23]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
( ron(X1,esk1_0)
| vf(vd1058,X1) != vf(X2,vd1058)
| ~ rpoint(X2)
| ~ rpoint(X1)
| ~ ron(X2,esk1_0) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]),c_0_26])]) ).
cnf(c_0_34,plain,
( vf(vd1056,X1) = vf(vd1056,X2)
| ~ rpoint(X2)
| ~ rpoint(X1)
| ~ ron(X2,vd1060)
| ~ ron(X1,vd1060) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]) ).
cnf(c_0_35,plain,
rpoint(vd1056),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],['and(pred(conjunct2(210), 4), and(holds(conjunct2(210), 1059, 0), and(pred(conjunct2(210), 1), and(pred(conjunct1(210), 2), pred(conjunct1(210), 1)))))']) ).
cnf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
ron(vd1056,esk1_0),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_37,plain,
ron(vd1058,vd1060),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_13]),c_0_21]) ).
cnf(c_0_38,plain,
( vf(vd1058,X1) = vf(vd1058,X2)
| ~ rpoint(X2)
| ~ rpoint(X1)
| ~ ron(X2,vd1063)
| ~ ron(X1,vd1063) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_31]) ).
cnf(c_0_39,plain,
ron(vd1055,vd1063),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],['and(pred(comma_conjunct2(the(212)), 0), and(pred(comma_conjunct1(the(212)), 0), pred(the(212), 0)))']) ).
cnf(c_0_40,plain,
( X1 = X2
| vf(X3,X4) != vf(X3,X5)
| ~ rpoint(X5)
| ~ rpoint(X4)
| ~ rcenter(X3,X2)
| ~ rcenter(X3,X1)
| ~ ron(X5,X2)
| ~ ron(X4,X1) ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_32])]) ).
cnf(c_0_41,negated_conjecture,
( ron(X1,esk1_0)
| vf(vd1058,X1) != vf(vd1056,X2)
| ~ rpoint(X1)
| ~ rpoint(X2)
| ~ ron(X2,vd1060) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_34]),c_0_35]),c_0_36]),c_0_26]),c_0_37])]) ).
cnf(c_0_42,plain,
( vf(X1,vd1058) = vf(vd1058,X2)
| ~ rpoint(X1)
| ~ rpoint(X2)
| ~ ron(X1,vd1063)
| ~ ron(X2,vd1063) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_38]),c_0_26])]) ).
cnf(c_0_43,plain,
ron(vd1056,vd1063),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_39,c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_44,negated_conjecture,
( X1 = esk1_0
| vf(vd1058,X2) != vf(vd1058,X3)
| ~ rpoint(X3)
| ~ rpoint(X2)
| ~ rcenter(vd1058,X1)
| ~ ron(X3,esk1_0)
| ~ ron(X2,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_40,c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_45,negated_conjecture,
esk1_0 != vd1063,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_46,negated_conjecture,
( ron(X1,esk1_0)
| vf(vd1058,X1) != vf(vd1058,X2)
| ~ rpoint(X1)
| ~ rpoint(X2)
| ~ ron(X2,vd1063) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_41,c_0_42]),c_0_26]),c_0_37]),c_0_35]),c_0_43])]) ).
cnf(c_0_47,negated_conjecture,
( vf(vd1058,X1) != vf(vd1058,X2)
| ~ rpoint(X2)
| ~ rpoint(X1)
| ~ ron(X1,vd1063) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_44,c_0_31]),c_0_45]),c_0_46]) ).
cnf(c_0_48,negated_conjecture,
( ~ rpoint(X1)
| ~ ron(X1,vd1063) ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_47]) ).
cnf(c_0_49,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_48,c_0_43]),c_0_35])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.12 % Problem : GEO272+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.12/0.13 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 18:25:52 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.25/1.44 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_29fa5c60d0ee03ec4f64b055553dc135fbe4ee3a for 23 seconds:
% 0.25/1.44 # Preprocessing time : 0.058 s
% 0.25/1.44
% 0.25/1.44 # Proof found!
% 0.25/1.44 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.25/1.44 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.25/1.44 # Proof object total steps : 50
% 0.25/1.44 # Proof object clause steps : 37
% 0.25/1.44 # Proof object formula steps : 13
% 0.25/1.44 # Proof object conjectures : 16
% 0.25/1.44 # Proof object clause conjectures : 13
% 0.25/1.44 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.25/1.44 # Proof object initial clauses used : 16
% 0.25/1.44 # Proof object initial formulas used : 8
% 0.25/1.44 # Proof object generating inferences : 11
% 0.25/1.44 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 34
% 0.25/1.44 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.25/1.44 # Parsed axioms : 108
% 0.25/1.44 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.25/1.44 # Initial clauses : 265
% 0.25/1.44 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 2
% 0.25/1.44 # Initial clauses in saturation : 263
% 0.25/1.44 # Processed clauses : 945
% 0.25/1.44 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.25/1.44 # ...subsumed : 343
% 0.25/1.44 # ...remaining for further processing : 602
% 0.25/1.44 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 1088
% 0.25/1.44 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.25/1.44 # Backward-subsumed : 27
% 0.25/1.44 # Backward-rewritten : 13
% 0.25/1.44 # Generated clauses : 2210
% 0.25/1.44 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 2004
% 0.25/1.44 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 459
% 0.25/1.44 # Paramodulations : 1942
% 0.25/1.44 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.25/1.44 # Equation resolutions : 1110
% 0.25/1.44 # Current number of processed clauses : 323
% 0.25/1.44 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 23
% 0.25/1.44 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.25/1.44 # Negative unit clauses : 13
% 0.25/1.44 # Non-unit-clauses : 287
% 0.25/1.44 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 966
% 0.25/1.44 # ...number of literals in the above : 10374
% 0.25/1.44 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.25/1.44 # Current number of archived clauses : 40
% 0.25/1.44 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 168149
% 0.25/1.44 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 20006
% 0.25/1.44 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 789
% 0.25/1.44 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 413
% 0.25/1.44 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.25/1.44 # BW rewrite match attempts : 8
% 0.25/1.44 # BW rewrite match successes : 8
% 0.25/1.44 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.25/1.44 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.25/1.44 # Termbank termtop insertions : 126356
% 0.25/1.44
% 0.25/1.44 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.25/1.44 # User time : 0.172 s
% 0.25/1.44 # System time : 0.009 s
% 0.25/1.44 # Total time : 0.181 s
% 0.25/1.44 # Maximum resident set size: 7472 pages
% 0.25/23.43 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.25/23.44 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.25/23.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.25/23.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.25/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.25/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.25/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.25/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.25/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.25/23.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.25/23.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.49 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.25/23.49 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.49 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.49 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.49 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.25/23.49 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.49 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.49 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.50 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.50 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.50 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.25/23.50 eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------