TSTP Solution File: GEO270+1 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : GEO270+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 04:05:14 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.26s 1.46s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.26s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 10
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 35 ( 9 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 156 ( 104 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 8 ( 4 avg)
% Number of connectives : 213 ( 92 ~; 88 |; 23 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 10 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 15 ( 6 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 4 con; 0-6 aty)
% Number of variables : 96 ( 2 sgn 43 !; 4 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof('qe(208)',conjecture,
? [X1] :
( vf(vd1049,X1) = vf(X1,vd1047)
& vf(vd1047,vd1049) = vf(vd1049,X1)
& rpoint(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in','qe(208)') ).
fof('ass(cond(proof(209), 0), 1)',axiom,
! [X2,X3,X4,X5] :
( ( X4 = X5
& X2 != X4
& rpoint(X5)
& X2 = X3
& rpoint(X3) )
=> ! [X6] :
( X6 = vskolem1061(X2,X3,X4,X5)
=> ! [X7] :
( X7 = vskolem1063(X6,X2,X3,X4,X5)
=> vf(X2,X4) = vf(X4,vskolem1064(X7,X6,X2,X3,X4,X5)) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in','ass(cond(proof(209), 0), 1)') ).
fof('and(pred(conjunct2(207), 4), and(holds(conjunct2(207), 1051, 0), and(pred(conjunct2(207), 1), and(pred(conjunct1(207), 2), pred(conjunct1(207), 1)))))',axiom,
( vd1049 = vd1050
& vd1047 != vd1049
& rpoint(vd1050)
& vd1047 = vd1048
& rpoint(vd1048) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in','and(pred(conjunct2(207), 4), and(holds(conjunct2(207), 1051, 0), and(pred(conjunct2(207), 1), and(pred(conjunct1(207), 2), pred(conjunct1(207), 1)))))') ).
fof('qu(cond(axiom(166), 0), imp(cond(axiom(166), 0)))',axiom,
! [X15,X16] :
( ( ? [X17] :
( X16 = X17
& rpoint(X17) )
& ? [X18] :
( X15 = X18
& rpoint(X18) ) )
=> vf(X15,X16) = vf(X16,X15) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in','qu(cond(axiom(166), 0), imp(cond(axiom(166), 0)))') ).
fof('ass(cond(proof(209), 0), 3)',axiom,
! [X2,X3,X4,X5] :
( ( X4 = X5
& X2 != X4
& rpoint(X5)
& X2 = X3
& rpoint(X3) )
=> ! [X6] :
( X6 = vskolem1061(X2,X3,X4,X5)
=> ! [X7] :
( X7 = vskolem1063(X6,X2,X3,X4,X5)
=> vf(X2,X4) = vf(X2,vskolem1064(X7,X6,X2,X3,X4,X5)) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in','ass(cond(proof(209), 0), 3)') ).
fof('ass(cond(proof(209), 0), 6)',axiom,
! [X2,X3,X4,X5] :
( ( X4 = X5
& X2 != X4
& rpoint(X5)
& X2 = X3
& rpoint(X3) )
=> ! [X6] :
( X6 = vskolem1061(X2,X3,X4,X5)
=> ! [X7] :
( X7 = vskolem1063(X6,X2,X3,X4,X5)
=> rpoint(vskolem1064(X7,X6,X2,X3,X4,X5)) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in','ass(cond(proof(209), 0), 6)') ).
fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X1] :
( vf(vd1049,X1) = vf(X1,vd1047)
& vf(vd1047,vd1049) = vf(vd1049,X1)
& rpoint(X1) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],['qe(208)']) ).
fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
! [X2] :
( vf(vd1049,X2) != vf(X2,vd1047)
| vf(vd1047,vd1049) != vf(vd1049,X2)
| ~ rpoint(X2) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])]) ).
fof(c_0_8,plain,
! [X8,X9,X10,X11,X12,X13] :
( X10 != X11
| X8 = X10
| ~ rpoint(X11)
| X8 != X9
| ~ rpoint(X9)
| X12 != vskolem1061(X8,X9,X10,X11)
| X13 != vskolem1063(X12,X8,X9,X10,X11)
| vf(X8,X10) = vf(X10,vskolem1064(X13,X12,X8,X9,X10,X11)) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],['ass(cond(proof(209), 0), 1)'])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
( ~ rpoint(X1)
| vf(vd1047,vd1049) != vf(vd1049,X1)
| vf(vd1049,X1) != vf(X1,vd1047) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
vd1047 = vd1048,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],['and(pred(conjunct2(207), 4), and(holds(conjunct2(207), 1051, 0), and(pred(conjunct2(207), 1), and(pred(conjunct1(207), 2), pred(conjunct1(207), 1)))))']) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( vf(X1,X2) = vf(X2,vskolem1064(X3,X4,X1,X5,X2,X6))
| X1 = X2
| X3 != vskolem1063(X4,X1,X5,X2,X6)
| X4 != vskolem1061(X1,X5,X2,X6)
| ~ rpoint(X5)
| X1 != X5
| ~ rpoint(X6)
| X2 != X6 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
rpoint(vd1050),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],['and(pred(conjunct2(207), 4), and(holds(conjunct2(207), 1051, 0), and(pred(conjunct2(207), 1), and(pred(conjunct1(207), 2), pred(conjunct1(207), 1)))))']) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
vd1049 = vd1050,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],['and(pred(conjunct2(207), 4), and(holds(conjunct2(207), 1051, 0), and(pred(conjunct2(207), 1), and(pred(conjunct1(207), 2), pred(conjunct1(207), 1)))))']) ).
fof(c_0_14,plain,
! [X19,X20,X21,X22] :
( X20 != X21
| ~ rpoint(X21)
| X19 != X22
| ~ rpoint(X22)
| vf(X19,X20) = vf(X20,X19) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],['qu(cond(axiom(166), 0), imp(cond(axiom(166), 0)))'])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
( vf(vd1048,vd1049) != vf(vd1049,X1)
| vf(vd1049,X1) != vf(X1,vd1048)
| ~ rpoint(X1) ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( vf(X1,vskolem1064(X2,X3,X4,X4,X1,X1)) = vf(X4,X1)
| X4 = X1
| X2 != vskolem1063(X3,X4,X4,X1,X1)
| X3 != vskolem1061(X4,X4,X1,X1)
| ~ rpoint(X1)
| ~ rpoint(X4) ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_11])]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
rpoint(vd1049),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
( vf(X1,X2) = vf(X2,X1)
| ~ rpoint(X3)
| X1 != X3
| ~ rpoint(X4)
| X2 != X4 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).
fof(c_0_19,plain,
! [X8,X9,X10,X11,X12,X13] :
( X10 != X11
| X8 = X10
| ~ rpoint(X11)
| X8 != X9
| ~ rpoint(X9)
| X12 != vskolem1061(X8,X9,X10,X11)
| X13 != vskolem1063(X12,X8,X9,X10,X11)
| vf(X8,X10) = vf(X8,vskolem1064(X13,X12,X8,X9,X10,X11)) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],['ass(cond(proof(209), 0), 3)'])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
( X1 = vd1049
| vf(vskolem1064(X2,X3,X1,X1,vd1049,vd1049),vd1048) != vf(X1,vd1049)
| vf(vd1048,vd1049) != vf(X1,vd1049)
| X2 != vskolem1063(X3,X1,X1,vd1049,vd1049)
| X3 != vskolem1061(X1,X1,vd1049,vd1049)
| ~ rpoint(vskolem1064(X2,X3,X1,X1,vd1049,vd1049))
| ~ rpoint(X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]),c_0_17])]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
( vf(X1,X2) = vf(X2,X1)
| ~ rpoint(X2)
| ~ rpoint(X1) ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_18])]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
rpoint(vd1048),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],['and(pred(conjunct2(207), 4), and(holds(conjunct2(207), 1051, 0), and(pred(conjunct2(207), 1), and(pred(conjunct1(207), 2), pred(conjunct1(207), 1)))))']) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
( vf(X1,X2) = vf(X1,vskolem1064(X3,X4,X1,X5,X2,X6))
| X1 = X2
| X3 != vskolem1063(X4,X1,X5,X2,X6)
| X4 != vskolem1061(X1,X5,X2,X6)
| ~ rpoint(X5)
| X1 != X5
| ~ rpoint(X6)
| X2 != X6 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
vd1047 != vd1049,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],['and(pred(conjunct2(207), 4), and(holds(conjunct2(207), 1051, 0), and(pred(conjunct2(207), 1), and(pred(conjunct1(207), 2), pred(conjunct1(207), 1)))))']) ).
fof(c_0_25,plain,
! [X8,X9,X10,X11,X12,X13] :
( X10 != X11
| X8 = X10
| ~ rpoint(X11)
| X8 != X9
| ~ rpoint(X9)
| X12 != vskolem1061(X8,X9,X10,X11)
| X13 != vskolem1063(X12,X8,X9,X10,X11)
| rpoint(vskolem1064(X13,X12,X8,X9,X10,X11)) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],['ass(cond(proof(209), 0), 6)'])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
( X1 = vd1049
| vf(vd1048,vskolem1064(X2,X3,X1,X1,vd1049,vd1049)) != vf(X1,vd1049)
| vf(vd1048,vd1049) != vf(X1,vd1049)
| X2 != vskolem1063(X3,X1,X1,vd1049,vd1049)
| X3 != vskolem1061(X1,X1,vd1049,vd1049)
| ~ rpoint(vskolem1064(X2,X3,X1,X1,vd1049,vd1049))
| ~ rpoint(X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]),c_0_22])]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
( vf(X1,vskolem1064(X2,X3,X1,X1,X4,X4)) = vf(X1,X4)
| X1 = X4
| X2 != vskolem1063(X3,X1,X1,X4,X4)
| X3 != vskolem1061(X1,X1,X4,X4)
| ~ rpoint(X4)
| ~ rpoint(X1) ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_23])]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
vd1048 != vd1049,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
( rpoint(vskolem1064(X1,X2,X3,X4,X5,X6))
| X3 = X5
| X1 != vskolem1063(X2,X3,X4,X5,X6)
| X2 != vskolem1061(X3,X4,X5,X6)
| ~ rpoint(X4)
| X3 != X4
| ~ rpoint(X6)
| X5 != X6 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_25]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
( X1 != vskolem1063(X2,vd1048,vd1048,vd1049,vd1049)
| X2 != vskolem1061(vd1048,vd1048,vd1049,vd1049)
| ~ rpoint(vskolem1064(X1,X2,vd1048,vd1048,vd1049,vd1049)) ),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]),c_0_22]),c_0_17])]),c_0_28]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,plain,
( X1 = X2
| rpoint(vskolem1064(X3,X4,X1,X1,X2,X2))
| X3 != vskolem1063(X4,X1,X1,X2,X2)
| X4 != vskolem1061(X1,X1,X2,X2)
| ~ rpoint(X2)
| ~ rpoint(X1) ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_29])]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
( X1 != vskolem1063(X2,vd1048,vd1048,vd1049,vd1049)
| X2 != vskolem1061(vd1048,vd1048,vd1049,vd1049) ),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31]),c_0_17]),c_0_22])]),c_0_28]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
X1 != vskolem1061(vd1048,vd1048,vd1049,vd1049),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_32]) ).
cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_33]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.13 % Problem : GEO270+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.08/0.14 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 03:18:22 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.26/1.46 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_29fa5c60d0ee03ec4f64b055553dc135fbe4ee3a for 23 seconds:
% 0.26/1.46 # Preprocessing time : 0.061 s
% 0.26/1.46
% 0.26/1.46 # Proof found!
% 0.26/1.46 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.26/1.46 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.26/1.46 # Proof object total steps : 35
% 0.26/1.46 # Proof object clause steps : 23
% 0.26/1.46 # Proof object formula steps : 12
% 0.26/1.46 # Proof object conjectures : 11
% 0.26/1.46 # Proof object clause conjectures : 8
% 0.26/1.46 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.26/1.46 # Proof object initial clauses used : 10
% 0.26/1.46 # Proof object initial formulas used : 6
% 0.26/1.46 # Proof object generating inferences : 6
% 0.26/1.46 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 24
% 0.26/1.46 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.26/1.46 # Parsed axioms : 116
% 0.26/1.46 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.26/1.46 # Initial clauses : 270
% 0.26/1.46 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 2
% 0.26/1.46 # Initial clauses in saturation : 268
% 0.26/1.46 # Processed clauses : 723
% 0.26/1.46 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.26/1.46 # ...subsumed : 202
% 0.26/1.46 # ...remaining for further processing : 521
% 0.26/1.46 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 1120
% 0.26/1.46 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.26/1.46 # Backward-subsumed : 2
% 0.26/1.46 # Backward-rewritten : 4
% 0.26/1.46 # Generated clauses : 1042
% 0.26/1.46 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 987
% 0.26/1.46 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 121
% 0.26/1.46 # Paramodulations : 773
% 0.26/1.46 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.26/1.46 # Equation resolutions : 1138
% 0.26/1.46 # Current number of processed clauses : 266
% 0.26/1.46 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 10
% 0.26/1.46 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.26/1.46 # Negative unit clauses : 10
% 0.26/1.46 # Non-unit-clauses : 246
% 0.26/1.46 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 502
% 0.26/1.46 # ...number of literals in the above : 5373
% 0.26/1.46 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.26/1.46 # Current number of archived clauses : 6
% 0.26/1.46 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 63031
% 0.26/1.46 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 5609
% 0.26/1.46 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 319
% 0.26/1.46 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 175
% 0.26/1.46 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.26/1.46 # BW rewrite match attempts : 3
% 0.26/1.46 # BW rewrite match successes : 3
% 0.26/1.46 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.26/1.46 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.26/1.46 # Termbank termtop insertions : 73186
% 0.26/1.46
% 0.26/1.46 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.26/1.46 # User time : 0.148 s
% 0.26/1.46 # System time : 0.006 s
% 0.26/1.46 # Total time : 0.154 s
% 0.26/1.46 # Maximum resident set size: 6252 pages
% 0.26/23.44 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.26/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.26/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.26/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.26/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.26/23.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.26/23.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.26/23.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.26/23.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.26/23.49 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.26/23.49 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.26/23.49 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.26/23.49 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.26/23.50 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.26/23.50 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.26/23.51 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.26/23.51 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.26/23.51 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.26/23.51 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.26/23.52 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.26/23.52 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.26/23.52 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.26/23.52 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.26/23.52 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.26/23.54 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.26/23.54 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.26/23.55 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.26/23.55 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.26/23.55 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.26/23.55 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.26/23.56 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.26/23.56 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.26/23.56 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.26/23.56 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.26/23.57 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.26/23.57 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.26/23.57 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.26/23.57 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.26/23.58 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.26/23.58 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.26/23.58 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.26/23.58 eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------