TSTP Solution File: GEO268+3 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : GEO268+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 03:45:02 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 7.14s 2.30s
% Output : CNFRefutation 7.14s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 10
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 31 ( 10 unt; 12 nHn; 22 RR)
% Number of literals : 60 ( 0 equ; 26 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 2 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 40 ( 4 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_2,plain,
( unequally_directed_lines(X1,reverse_line(X2))
| ~ unequally_directed_opposite_lines(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-xs853le_/lgb.p',i_0_2) ).
cnf(i_0_67,negated_conjecture,
( unequally_directed_lines(esk1_0,esk2_0)
| unequally_directed_opposite_lines(esk1_0,reverse_line(esk2_0)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-xs853le_/lgb.p',i_0_67) ).
cnf(i_0_65,plain,
( left_convergent_lines(X1,X2)
| left_convergent_lines(X1,reverse_line(X2))
| ~ unequally_directed_lines(X1,X2)
| ~ unequally_directed_lines(X1,reverse_line(X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-xs853le_/lgb.p',i_0_65) ).
cnf(i_0_33,plain,
~ left_convergent_lines(X1,X2),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-xs853le_/lgb.p',i_0_33) ).
cnf(i_0_55,plain,
( unequally_directed_lines(X1,X2)
| unequally_directed_lines(X3,X2)
| ~ unequally_directed_lines(X3,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-xs853le_/lgb.p',i_0_55) ).
cnf(i_0_8,plain,
( ~ unequally_directed_lines(X1,X2)
| ~ equally_directed_lines(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-xs853le_/lgb.p',i_0_8) ).
cnf(i_0_52,plain,
equally_directed_lines(X1,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-xs853le_/lgb.p',i_0_52) ).
cnf(i_0_63,plain,
( unequally_directed_lines(X1,X2)
| unequally_directed_lines(X1,reverse_line(X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-xs853le_/lgb.p',i_0_63) ).
cnf(i_0_68,negated_conjecture,
( ~ unequally_directed_lines(esk1_0,esk2_0)
| ~ unequally_directed_opposite_lines(esk1_0,reverse_line(esk2_0)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-xs853le_/lgb.p',i_0_68) ).
cnf(i_0_1,plain,
( unequally_directed_opposite_lines(X1,X2)
| ~ unequally_directed_lines(X1,reverse_line(X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-xs853le_/lgb.p',i_0_1) ).
cnf(c_0_79,plain,
( unequally_directed_lines(X1,reverse_line(X2))
| ~ unequally_directed_opposite_lines(X1,X2) ),
i_0_2 ).
cnf(c_0_80,negated_conjecture,
( unequally_directed_lines(esk1_0,esk2_0)
| unequally_directed_opposite_lines(esk1_0,reverse_line(esk2_0)) ),
i_0_67 ).
cnf(c_0_81,plain,
( left_convergent_lines(X1,X2)
| left_convergent_lines(X1,reverse_line(X2))
| ~ unequally_directed_lines(X1,X2)
| ~ unequally_directed_lines(X1,reverse_line(X2)) ),
i_0_65 ).
cnf(c_0_82,plain,
~ left_convergent_lines(X1,X2),
i_0_33 ).
cnf(c_0_83,plain,
( unequally_directed_lines(X1,X2)
| unequally_directed_lines(X3,X2)
| ~ unequally_directed_lines(X3,X1) ),
i_0_55 ).
cnf(c_0_84,negated_conjecture,
( unequally_directed_lines(esk1_0,reverse_line(reverse_line(esk2_0)))
| unequally_directed_lines(esk1_0,esk2_0) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_79,c_0_80]) ).
cnf(c_0_85,plain,
( ~ unequally_directed_lines(X1,X2)
| ~ equally_directed_lines(X1,X2) ),
i_0_8 ).
cnf(c_0_86,plain,
equally_directed_lines(X1,X1),
i_0_52 ).
cnf(c_0_87,plain,
( ~ unequally_directed_lines(X1,reverse_line(X2))
| ~ unequally_directed_lines(X1,X2) ),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_81,c_0_82]),c_0_82]) ).
cnf(c_0_88,plain,
( unequally_directed_lines(reverse_line(reverse_line(esk2_0)),X1)
| unequally_directed_lines(esk1_0,esk2_0)
| unequally_directed_lines(esk1_0,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_83,c_0_84]) ).
cnf(c_0_89,plain,
~ unequally_directed_lines(X1,X1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_85,c_0_86]) ).
cnf(c_0_90,plain,
( unequally_directed_lines(X1,X2)
| unequally_directed_lines(X1,reverse_line(X2)) ),
i_0_63 ).
cnf(c_0_91,plain,
( unequally_directed_lines(esk1_0,esk2_0)
| unequally_directed_lines(esk1_0,X1)
| ~ unequally_directed_lines(reverse_line(reverse_line(esk2_0)),reverse_line(X1)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_87,c_0_88]) ).
cnf(c_0_92,plain,
unequally_directed_lines(reverse_line(X1),X1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_89,c_0_90]) ).
cnf(c_0_93,negated_conjecture,
( ~ unequally_directed_lines(esk1_0,esk2_0)
| ~ unequally_directed_opposite_lines(esk1_0,reverse_line(esk2_0)) ),
i_0_68 ).
cnf(c_0_94,plain,
unequally_directed_lines(esk1_0,esk2_0),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_91,c_0_92]) ).
cnf(c_0_95,plain,
( unequally_directed_opposite_lines(X1,X2)
| ~ unequally_directed_lines(X1,reverse_line(X2)) ),
i_0_1 ).
cnf(c_0_96,negated_conjecture,
~ unequally_directed_opposite_lines(esk1_0,reverse_line(esk2_0)),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_93,c_0_94])]) ).
cnf(c_0_97,plain,
( unequally_directed_opposite_lines(X1,X2)
| unequally_directed_lines(X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_95,c_0_90]) ).
cnf(c_0_98,plain,
~ unequally_directed_lines(esk1_0,reverse_line(esk2_0)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_87,c_0_94]) ).
cnf(c_0_99,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_96,c_0_97]),c_0_98]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : GEO268+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.14/0.13 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.14/0.34 % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.14/0.34 % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 12:18:59 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.45 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.20/0.46 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.46 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.20/0.46 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.20/0.46 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 7.14/2.30 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 7.14/2.30 # No SInE strategy applied
% 7.14/2.30 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 7.14/2.30 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___008_C45_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_S4c
% 7.14/2.30 # and selection function SelectCQPrecWNTNp.
% 7.14/2.30 #
% 7.14/2.30 # Preprocessing time : 0.012 s
% 7.14/2.30
% 7.14/2.30 # Proof found!
% 7.14/2.30 # SZS status Theorem
% 7.14/2.30 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.14/2.30 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.14/2.30
% 7.14/2.30 # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.14/2.30 # User time : 0.016 s
% 7.14/2.30 # System time : 0.004 s
% 7.14/2.30 # Total time : 0.020 s
% 7.14/2.30 # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 7.14/2.30
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------