TSTP Solution File: GEO265+3 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : GEO265+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 03:45:01 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 7.33s 2.34s
% Output : CNFRefutation 7.33s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 13 ( 7 unt; 2 nHn; 11 RR)
% Number of literals : 19 ( 0 equ; 8 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 2 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 12 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_67,negated_conjecture,
~ equally_directed_opposite_lines(esk1_0,esk2_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-_gj1y_34/input.p',i_0_67) ).
cnf(i_0_9,plain,
( unequally_directed_opposite_lines(X1,X2)
| equally_directed_opposite_lines(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-_gj1y_34/input.p',i_0_9) ).
cnf(i_0_2,plain,
( unequally_directed_lines(X1,reverse_line(X2))
| ~ unequally_directed_opposite_lines(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-_gj1y_34/input.p',i_0_2) ).
cnf(i_0_8,plain,
( ~ unequally_directed_lines(X1,X2)
| ~ equally_directed_lines(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-_gj1y_34/input.p',i_0_8) ).
cnf(i_0_68,negated_conjecture,
equally_directed_lines(esk1_0,reverse_line(esk2_0)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-_gj1y_34/input.p',i_0_68) ).
cnf(c_0_74,negated_conjecture,
~ equally_directed_opposite_lines(esk1_0,esk2_0),
i_0_67 ).
cnf(c_0_75,plain,
( unequally_directed_opposite_lines(X1,X2)
| equally_directed_opposite_lines(X1,X2) ),
i_0_9 ).
cnf(c_0_76,plain,
( unequally_directed_lines(X1,reverse_line(X2))
| ~ unequally_directed_opposite_lines(X1,X2) ),
i_0_2 ).
cnf(c_0_77,negated_conjecture,
unequally_directed_opposite_lines(esk1_0,esk2_0),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_74,c_0_75]) ).
cnf(c_0_78,plain,
( ~ unequally_directed_lines(X1,X2)
| ~ equally_directed_lines(X1,X2) ),
i_0_8 ).
cnf(c_0_79,negated_conjecture,
equally_directed_lines(esk1_0,reverse_line(esk2_0)),
i_0_68 ).
cnf(c_0_80,plain,
unequally_directed_lines(esk1_0,reverse_line(esk2_0)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_76,c_0_77]) ).
cnf(c_0_81,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_78,c_0_79]),c_0_80])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.11 % Problem : GEO265+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Fri Jun 17 22:15:29 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.44 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.18/0.45 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.45 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.18/0.45 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.18/0.45 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 7.33/2.34 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_S0Y:
% 7.33/2.34 # Version: 2.1pre011
% 7.33/2.34 # Preprocessing time : 0.010 s
% 7.33/2.34
% 7.33/2.34 # Proof found!
% 7.33/2.34 # SZS status Theorem
% 7.33/2.34 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.33/2.34 # Proof object total steps : 13
% 7.33/2.34 # Proof object clause steps : 8
% 7.33/2.34 # Proof object formula steps : 5
% 7.33/2.34 # Proof object conjectures : 6
% 7.33/2.34 # Proof object clause conjectures : 4
% 7.33/2.34 # Proof object formula conjectures : 2
% 7.33/2.34 # Proof object initial clauses used : 5
% 7.33/2.34 # Proof object initial formulas used : 5
% 7.33/2.34 # Proof object generating inferences : 3
% 7.33/2.34 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 2
% 7.33/2.34 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.33/2.34 # Parsed axioms : 68
% 7.33/2.34 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 7.33/2.34 # Initial clauses : 68
% 7.33/2.34 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 7.33/2.34 # Initial clauses in saturation : 68
% 7.33/2.34 # Processed clauses : 76
% 7.33/2.34 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 7.33/2.34 # ...subsumed : 18
% 7.33/2.34 # ...remaining for further processing : 57
% 7.33/2.34 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 7.33/2.34 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 7.33/2.34 # Backward-subsumed : 3
% 7.33/2.34 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 7.33/2.34 # Generated clauses : 50
% 7.33/2.34 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 35
% 7.33/2.34 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 6
% 7.33/2.34 # Paramodulations : 44
% 7.33/2.34 # Factorizations : 6
% 7.33/2.34 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 7.33/2.34 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 7.33/2.34 # Propositional unsat check successes : 0
% 7.33/2.34 # Current number of processed clauses : 54
% 7.33/2.34 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 5
% 7.33/2.34 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 7.33/2.34 # Negative unit clauses : 13
% 7.33/2.34 # Non-unit-clauses : 36
% 7.33/2.34 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 25
% 7.33/2.34 # ...number of literals in the above : 56
% 7.33/2.34 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 7.33/2.34 # Current number of archived clauses : 3
% 7.33/2.34 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 639
% 7.33/2.34 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 429
% 7.33/2.34 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 13
% 7.33/2.34 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 143
% 7.33/2.34 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 7.33/2.34 # BW rewrite match attempts : 2
% 7.33/2.34 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 7.33/2.34 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 7.33/2.34 # Condensation successes : 0
% 7.33/2.34 # Termbank termtop insertions : 1791
% 7.33/2.34
% 7.33/2.34 # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.33/2.34 # User time : 0.009 s
% 7.33/2.34 # System time : 0.003 s
% 7.33/2.34 # Total time : 0.012 s
% 7.33/2.34 # ...preprocessing : 0.010 s
% 7.33/2.34 # ...main loop : 0.002 s
% 7.33/2.34 # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 7.33/2.34
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------