TSTP Solution File: GEO265+3 by E-SAT---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem : GEO265+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 17:34:43 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 0.18s 0.47s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.18s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 19 ( 5 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 39 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 37 ( 17 ~; 9 |; 4 &)
% ( 5 <=>; 2 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 6 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 2 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 26 ( 0 sgn; 20 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(con,conjecture,
! [X4,X5] :
( equally_directed_lines(X4,reverse_line(X5))
=> equally_directed_opposite_lines(X4,X5) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.t48rwpUzHZ/E---3.1_12197.p',con) ).
fof(a5_defns,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( equally_directed_opposite_lines(X1,X2)
<=> ~ unequally_directed_opposite_lines(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.t48rwpUzHZ/E---3.1_12197.p',a5_defns) ).
fof(a4_defns,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( equally_directed_lines(X1,X2)
<=> ~ unequally_directed_lines(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.t48rwpUzHZ/E---3.1_12197.p',a4_defns) ).
fof(a1_defns,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( unequally_directed_opposite_lines(X1,X2)
<=> unequally_directed_lines(X1,reverse_line(X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.t48rwpUzHZ/E---3.1_12197.p',a1_defns) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X4,X5] :
( equally_directed_lines(X4,reverse_line(X5))
=> equally_directed_opposite_lines(X4,X5) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[con]) ).
fof(c_0_5,plain,
! [X1,X2] :
( equally_directed_opposite_lines(X1,X2)
<=> ~ unequally_directed_opposite_lines(X1,X2) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[a5_defns]) ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
! [X1,X2] :
( equally_directed_lines(X1,X2)
<=> ~ unequally_directed_lines(X1,X2) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[a4_defns]) ).
fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
( equally_directed_lines(esk1_0,reverse_line(esk2_0))
& ~ equally_directed_opposite_lines(esk1_0,esk2_0) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])])]) ).
fof(c_0_8,plain,
! [X11,X12] :
( ( ~ equally_directed_opposite_lines(X11,X12)
| ~ unequally_directed_opposite_lines(X11,X12) )
& ( unequally_directed_opposite_lines(X11,X12)
| equally_directed_opposite_lines(X11,X12) ) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])]) ).
fof(c_0_9,plain,
! [X13,X14] :
( ( ~ equally_directed_lines(X13,X14)
| ~ unequally_directed_lines(X13,X14) )
& ( unequally_directed_lines(X13,X14)
| equally_directed_lines(X13,X14) ) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])]) ).
fof(c_0_10,plain,
! [X23,X24] :
( ( ~ unequally_directed_opposite_lines(X23,X24)
| unequally_directed_lines(X23,reverse_line(X24)) )
& ( ~ unequally_directed_lines(X23,reverse_line(X24))
| unequally_directed_opposite_lines(X23,X24) ) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[a1_defns])]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
~ equally_directed_opposite_lines(esk1_0,esk2_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( unequally_directed_opposite_lines(X1,X2)
| equally_directed_opposite_lines(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( ~ equally_directed_lines(X1,X2)
| ~ unequally_directed_lines(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
equally_directed_lines(esk1_0,reverse_line(esk2_0)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( unequally_directed_lines(X1,reverse_line(X2))
| ~ unequally_directed_opposite_lines(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
unequally_directed_opposite_lines(esk1_0,esk2_0),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
~ unequally_directed_lines(esk1_0,reverse_line(esk2_0)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]),c_0_17]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12 % Problem : GEO265+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.11/0.13 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Tue Oct 3 06:12:10 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.46 Running first-order model finding
% 0.18/0.46 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.t48rwpUzHZ/E---3.1_12197.p
% 0.18/0.47 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.18/0.47 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.18/0.47 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.18/0.47 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.18/0.47 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.47 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.47 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.47 # new_bool_3 with pid 12275 completed with status 0
% 0.18/0.47 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.18/0.47 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.18/0.47 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.18/0.47 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.18/0.47 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.47 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.18/0.47 # Search class: FGHNF-FFMF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.18/0.47 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.18/0.47 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S2mI with 181s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.47 # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S2mI with pid 12278 completed with status 0
% 0.18/0.47 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S2mI
% 0.18/0.47 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.18/0.47 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.18/0.47 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.18/0.47 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.47 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.18/0.47 # Search class: FGHNF-FFMF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.18/0.47 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.18/0.47 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S2mI with 181s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.47 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.18/0.47 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.18/0.47
% 0.18/0.47 # Proof found!
% 0.18/0.47 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.18/0.47 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.18/0.47 # Parsed axioms : 37
% 0.18/0.47 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 17
% 0.18/0.47 # Initial clauses : 32
% 0.18/0.47 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.18/0.47 # Initial clauses in saturation : 32
% 0.18/0.47 # Processed clauses : 48
% 0.18/0.47 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.18/0.47 # ...subsumed : 10
% 0.18/0.47 # ...remaining for further processing : 38
% 0.18/0.47 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.18/0.47 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.18/0.47 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.18/0.47 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.18/0.47 # Generated clauses : 5
% 0.18/0.47 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 3
% 0.18/0.47 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.18/0.47 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.18/0.47 # Paramodulations : 5
% 0.18/0.47 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.18/0.47 # NegExts : 0
% 0.18/0.47 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.18/0.47 # Total rewrite steps : 0
% 0.18/0.47 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.18/0.47 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.18/0.47 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.18/0.47 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.18/0.47 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.18/0.47 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.18/0.47 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.47 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.47 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.47 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.47 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.47 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.47 # Current number of processed clauses : 16
% 0.18/0.47 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 3
% 0.18/0.47 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.18/0.47 # Negative unit clauses : 7
% 0.18/0.47 # Non-unit-clauses : 6
% 0.18/0.47 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 9
% 0.18/0.47 # ...number of literals in the above : 20
% 0.18/0.47 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.18/0.47 # Current number of archived clauses : 22
% 0.18/0.47 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 51
% 0.18/0.47 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 51
% 0.18/0.47 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 4
% 0.18/0.47 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3
% 0.18/0.47 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.18/0.47 # BW rewrite match attempts : 2
% 0.18/0.47 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.18/0.47 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.18/0.47 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.18/0.47 # Termbank termtop insertions : 1860
% 0.18/0.47
% 0.18/0.47 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.18/0.47 # User time : 0.003 s
% 0.18/0.47 # System time : 0.001 s
% 0.18/0.47 # Total time : 0.004 s
% 0.18/0.47 # Maximum resident set size: 1860 pages
% 0.18/0.47
% 0.18/0.47 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.18/0.47 # User time : 0.004 s
% 0.18/0.47 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.18/0.47 # Total time : 0.007 s
% 0.18/0.47 # Maximum resident set size: 1720 pages
% 0.18/0.47 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------