TSTP Solution File: GEO264+3 by PyRes---1.3
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : PyRes---1.3
% Problem : GEO264+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s
% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 05:59:54 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.40s 0.58s
% Output : Refutation 0.40s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.11 % Problem : GEO264+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 14:43:19 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.40/0.58 # Version: 1.3
% 0.40/0.58 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.40/0.58 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% 0.40/0.58 fof(ax10_basics,axiom,(![A]:(![L]:(~(left_apart_point(A,L)|left_apart_point(A,reverse_line(L)))))),input).
% 0.40/0.58 fof(c67,axiom,(![A]:(![L]:(~left_apart_point(A,L)&~left_apart_point(A,reverse_line(L))))),inference(fof_nnf,status(thm),[ax10_basics])).
% 0.40/0.58 fof(c68,axiom,((![A]:(![L]:~left_apart_point(A,L)))&(![A]:(![L]:~left_apart_point(A,reverse_line(L))))),inference(shift_quantors,status(thm),[c67])).
% 0.40/0.58 fof(c70,axiom,(![X44]:(![X45]:(![X46]:(![X47]:(~left_apart_point(X44,X45)&~left_apart_point(X46,reverse_line(X47))))))),inference(shift_quantors,status(thm),[fof(c69,axiom,((![X44]:(![X45]:~left_apart_point(X44,X45)))&(![X46]:(![X47]:~left_apart_point(X46,reverse_line(X47))))),inference(variable_rename,status(thm),[c68])).])).
% 0.40/0.58 cnf(c71,axiom,~left_apart_point(X118,X117),inference(split_conjunct,status(thm),[c70])).
% 0.40/0.58 fof(con,conjecture,(![A]:(![B]:(![C]:(![D]:(left_apart_point(C,line_connecting(A,B))=>((right_apart_point(D,line_connecting(B,C))&right_apart_point(D,line_connecting(C,A)))=>left_apart_point(D,line_connecting(A,B)))))))),input).
% 0.40/0.58 fof(c0,negated_conjecture,(~(![A]:(![B]:(![C]:(![D]:(left_apart_point(C,line_connecting(A,B))=>((right_apart_point(D,line_connecting(B,C))&right_apart_point(D,line_connecting(C,A)))=>left_apart_point(D,line_connecting(A,B))))))))),inference(assume_negation,status(cth),[con])).
% 0.40/0.58 fof(c1,negated_conjecture,(?[A]:(?[B]:(?[C]:(?[D]:(left_apart_point(C,line_connecting(A,B))&((right_apart_point(D,line_connecting(B,C))&right_apart_point(D,line_connecting(C,A)))&~left_apart_point(D,line_connecting(A,B)))))))),inference(fof_nnf,status(thm),[c0])).
% 0.40/0.58 fof(c2,negated_conjecture,(?[A]:(?[B]:(?[C]:(left_apart_point(C,line_connecting(A,B))&(?[D]:((right_apart_point(D,line_connecting(B,C))&right_apart_point(D,line_connecting(C,A)))&~left_apart_point(D,line_connecting(A,B)))))))),inference(shift_quantors,status(thm),[c1])).
% 0.40/0.58 fof(c3,negated_conjecture,(?[X2]:(?[X3]:(?[X4]:(left_apart_point(X4,line_connecting(X2,X3))&(?[X5]:((right_apart_point(X5,line_connecting(X3,X4))&right_apart_point(X5,line_connecting(X4,X2)))&~left_apart_point(X5,line_connecting(X2,X3)))))))),inference(variable_rename,status(thm),[c2])).
% 0.40/0.58 fof(c4,negated_conjecture,(left_apart_point(skolem0003,line_connecting(skolem0001,skolem0002))&((right_apart_point(skolem0004,line_connecting(skolem0002,skolem0003))&right_apart_point(skolem0004,line_connecting(skolem0003,skolem0001)))&~left_apart_point(skolem0004,line_connecting(skolem0001,skolem0002)))),inference(skolemize,status(esa),[c3])).
% 0.40/0.58 cnf(c5,negated_conjecture,left_apart_point(skolem0003,line_connecting(skolem0001,skolem0002)),inference(split_conjunct,status(thm),[c4])).
% 0.40/0.58 cnf(c190,plain,$false,inference(resolution,status(thm),[c5, c71])).
% 0.40/0.58 # SZS output end CNFRefutation
% 0.40/0.58
% 0.40/0.58 # Initial clauses : 70
% 0.40/0.58 # Processed clauses : 6
% 0.40/0.58 # Factors computed : 0
% 0.40/0.58 # Resolvents computed: 1
% 0.40/0.58 # Tautologies deleted: 0
% 0.40/0.58 # Forward subsumed : 0
% 0.40/0.58 # Backward subsumed : 0
% 0.40/0.58 # -------- CPU Time ---------
% 0.40/0.58 # User time : 0.219 s
% 0.40/0.58 # System time : 0.020 s
% 0.40/0.58 # Total time : 0.239 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------