TSTP Solution File: GEO263+1 by SInE---0.4

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SInE---0.4
% Problem  : GEO263+1 : TPTP v6.4.0. Bugfixed v6.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : Source/sine.py -e eprover -t %d %s

% Computer : n026.star.cs.uiowa.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 2.40GHz
% Memory   : 16091.75MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-327.10.1.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Apr  1 13:39:18 EDT 2016

% Result   : Theorem 183.60s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 183.78s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   28 (   8 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   86 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    7 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   91 (  33   ~;  26   |;  28   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   12 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   6 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   56 (   2 sgn  32   !;  12   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(5,axiom,
    ! [X1,X4] :
      ( ( unequally_directed_lines(X1,X4)
        & unequally_directed_lines(X1,reverse_line(X4)) )
     => ( left_convergent_lines(X1,X4)
        | left_convergent_lines(X1,reverse_line(X4)) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmpJ0u8YJ/sel_theBenchmark.p_4',oag9) ).

fof(14,axiom,
    ! [X1,X4] :
      ( convergent_lines(X1,X4)
    <=> ( unequally_directed_lines(X1,X4)
        & unequally_directed_lines(X1,reverse_line(X4)) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmpJ0u8YJ/sel_theBenchmark.p_4',con_def) ).

fof(24,axiom,
    ! [X1,X4] :
      ~ ( left_convergent_lines(X1,X4)
        | left_convergent_lines(X1,reverse_line(X4)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmpJ0u8YJ/sel_theBenchmark.p_4',oag11) ).

fof(26,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X4,X5,X2,X3,X6] :
      ( ( between_on_line(X1,X2,X3,X6)
        & convergent_lines(X1,X4)
        & convergent_lines(X1,X5)
        & convergent_lines(X4,X5) )
     => between_on_line(X4,intersection_point(X4,parallel_through_point(X5,X2)),intersection_point(X4,parallel_through_point(X5,X3)),intersection_point(X4,parallel_through_point(X5,X6))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmpJ0u8YJ/sel_theBenchmark.p_4',con) ).

fof(27,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X4,X5,X2,X3,X6] :
        ( ( between_on_line(X1,X2,X3,X6)
          & convergent_lines(X1,X4)
          & convergent_lines(X1,X5)
          & convergent_lines(X4,X5) )
       => between_on_line(X4,intersection_point(X4,parallel_through_point(X5,X2)),intersection_point(X4,parallel_through_point(X5,X3)),intersection_point(X4,parallel_through_point(X5,X6))) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[26]) ).

fof(54,plain,
    ! [X1,X4] :
      ( ~ unequally_directed_lines(X1,X4)
      | ~ unequally_directed_lines(X1,reverse_line(X4))
      | left_convergent_lines(X1,X4)
      | left_convergent_lines(X1,reverse_line(X4)) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[5]) ).

fof(55,plain,
    ! [X5,X6] :
      ( ~ unequally_directed_lines(X5,X6)
      | ~ unequally_directed_lines(X5,reverse_line(X6))
      | left_convergent_lines(X5,X6)
      | left_convergent_lines(X5,reverse_line(X6)) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[54]) ).

cnf(56,plain,
    ( left_convergent_lines(X1,reverse_line(X2))
    | left_convergent_lines(X1,X2)
    | ~ unequally_directed_lines(X1,reverse_line(X2))
    | ~ unequally_directed_lines(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[55]) ).

fof(86,plain,
    ! [X1,X4] :
      ( ( ~ convergent_lines(X1,X4)
        | ( unequally_directed_lines(X1,X4)
          & unequally_directed_lines(X1,reverse_line(X4)) ) )
      & ( ~ unequally_directed_lines(X1,X4)
        | ~ unequally_directed_lines(X1,reverse_line(X4))
        | convergent_lines(X1,X4) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[14]) ).

fof(87,plain,
    ! [X5,X6] :
      ( ( ~ convergent_lines(X5,X6)
        | ( unequally_directed_lines(X5,X6)
          & unequally_directed_lines(X5,reverse_line(X6)) ) )
      & ( ~ unequally_directed_lines(X5,X6)
        | ~ unequally_directed_lines(X5,reverse_line(X6))
        | convergent_lines(X5,X6) ) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[86]) ).

fof(88,plain,
    ! [X5,X6] :
      ( ( unequally_directed_lines(X5,X6)
        | ~ convergent_lines(X5,X6) )
      & ( unequally_directed_lines(X5,reverse_line(X6))
        | ~ convergent_lines(X5,X6) )
      & ( ~ unequally_directed_lines(X5,X6)
        | ~ unequally_directed_lines(X5,reverse_line(X6))
        | convergent_lines(X5,X6) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[87]) ).

cnf(90,plain,
    ( unequally_directed_lines(X1,reverse_line(X2))
    | ~ convergent_lines(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[88]) ).

cnf(91,plain,
    ( unequally_directed_lines(X1,X2)
    | ~ convergent_lines(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[88]) ).

fof(127,plain,
    ! [X1,X4] :
      ( ~ left_convergent_lines(X1,X4)
      & ~ left_convergent_lines(X1,reverse_line(X4)) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[24]) ).

fof(128,plain,
    ! [X5,X6] :
      ( ~ left_convergent_lines(X5,X6)
      & ~ left_convergent_lines(X5,reverse_line(X6)) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[127]) ).

cnf(130,plain,
    ~ left_convergent_lines(X1,X2),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[128]) ).

fof(135,negated_conjecture,
    ? [X1,X4,X5,X2,X3,X6] :
      ( between_on_line(X1,X2,X3,X6)
      & convergent_lines(X1,X4)
      & convergent_lines(X1,X5)
      & convergent_lines(X4,X5)
      & ~ between_on_line(X4,intersection_point(X4,parallel_through_point(X5,X2)),intersection_point(X4,parallel_through_point(X5,X3)),intersection_point(X4,parallel_through_point(X5,X6))) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[27]) ).

fof(136,negated_conjecture,
    ? [X7,X8,X9,X10,X11,X12] :
      ( between_on_line(X7,X10,X11,X12)
      & convergent_lines(X7,X8)
      & convergent_lines(X7,X9)
      & convergent_lines(X8,X9)
      & ~ between_on_line(X8,intersection_point(X8,parallel_through_point(X9,X10)),intersection_point(X8,parallel_through_point(X9,X11)),intersection_point(X8,parallel_through_point(X9,X12))) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[135]) ).

fof(137,negated_conjecture,
    ( between_on_line(esk1_0,esk4_0,esk5_0,esk6_0)
    & convergent_lines(esk1_0,esk2_0)
    & convergent_lines(esk1_0,esk3_0)
    & convergent_lines(esk2_0,esk3_0)
    & ~ between_on_line(esk2_0,intersection_point(esk2_0,parallel_through_point(esk3_0,esk4_0)),intersection_point(esk2_0,parallel_through_point(esk3_0,esk5_0)),intersection_point(esk2_0,parallel_through_point(esk3_0,esk6_0))) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[136]) ).

cnf(141,negated_conjecture,
    convergent_lines(esk1_0,esk2_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[137]) ).

cnf(143,negated_conjecture,
    unequally_directed_lines(esk1_0,esk2_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[91,141,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(146,negated_conjecture,
    unequally_directed_lines(esk1_0,reverse_line(esk2_0)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[90,141,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(175,plain,
    ( left_convergent_lines(X1,reverse_line(X2))
    | ~ unequally_directed_lines(X1,X2)
    | ~ unequally_directed_lines(X1,reverse_line(X2)) ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[56,130,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(176,plain,
    ( ~ unequally_directed_lines(X1,X2)
    | ~ unequally_directed_lines(X1,reverse_line(X2)) ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[175,130,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(195,negated_conjecture,
    ~ unequally_directed_lines(esk1_0,esk2_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[176,146,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(196,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[195,143,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(197,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[196,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(198,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    197,
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : GEO263+1 : TPTP v6.4.0. Bugfixed v6.4.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : Source/sine.py -e eprover -t %d %s
% 0.02/0.22  % Computer : n026.star.cs.uiowa.edu
% 0.02/0.22  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.02/0.22  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 @ 2.40GHz
% 0.02/0.22  % Memory   : 16091.75MB
% 0.02/0.22  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-327.10.1.el7.x86_64
% 0.02/0.22  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.02/0.22  % DateTime : Fri Apr  1 11:33:37 CDT 2016
% 0.02/0.22  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.02/0.27  % SZS status Started for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.02/0.27  --creating new selector for [GEO007+0.ax]
% 29.02/29.39  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 109.29/112.13  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 109.37/112.81  -running prover on /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmpJ0u8YJ/sel_theBenchmark.p_1 with time limit 29
% 109.37/112.81  -running prover with command ['/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/Source/./Source/PROVER/eproof.working', '-s', '-tLPO4', '-xAuto', '-tAuto', '--memory-limit=768', '--tptp3-format', '--cpu-limit=29', '/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmpJ0u8YJ/sel_theBenchmark.p_1']
% 109.37/112.81  -prover status ResourceOut
% 109.37/112.81  -running prover on /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmpJ0u8YJ/sel_theBenchmark.p_2 with time limit 80
% 109.37/112.81  -running prover with command ['/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/Source/./Source/PROVER/eproof.working', '-s', '-tLPO4', '-xAuto', '-tAuto', '--memory-limit=768', '--tptp3-format', '--cpu-limit=80', '/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmpJ0u8YJ/sel_theBenchmark.p_2']
% 109.37/112.81  -prover status ResourceOut
% 109.37/112.81  --creating new selector for [GEO007+0.ax]
% 183.44/187.79  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 183.60/188.52  -running prover on /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmpJ0u8YJ/sel_theBenchmark.p_3 with time limit 74
% 183.60/188.52  -running prover with command ['/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/Source/./Source/PROVER/eproof.working', '-s', '-tLPO4', '-xAuto', '-tAuto', '--memory-limit=768', '--tptp3-format', '--cpu-limit=74', '/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmpJ0u8YJ/sel_theBenchmark.p_3']
% 183.60/188.52  -prover status ResourceOut
% 183.60/188.52  --creating new selector for [GEO007+0.ax]
% 183.60/188.59  -running prover on /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmpJ0u8YJ/sel_theBenchmark.p_4 with time limit 55
% 183.60/188.59  -running prover with command ['/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/Source/./Source/PROVER/eproof.working', '-s', '-tLPO4', '-xAuto', '-tAuto', '--memory-limit=768', '--tptp3-format', '--cpu-limit=55', '/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmpJ0u8YJ/sel_theBenchmark.p_4']
% 183.60/188.59  -prover status Theorem
% 183.60/188.59  Problem theBenchmark.p solved in phase 3.
% 183.60/188.59  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 183.60/188.59  % SZS status Ended for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 183.60/188.59  Solved 1 out of 1.
% 183.60/188.59  # Problem is unsatisfiable (or provable), constructing proof object
% 183.60/188.59  # SZS status Theorem
% 183.60/188.59  # SZS output start CNFRefutation.
% See solution above
% 183.78/188.60  # SZS output end CNFRefutation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------