TSTP Solution File: GEO263+1 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : GEO263+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v6.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 03:45:00 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 7.12s 2.38s
% Output : CNFRefutation 7.12s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 14 ( 7 unt; 2 nHn; 14 RR)
% Number of literals : 25 ( 0 equ; 12 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 2 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 18 ( 4 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_46,plain,
( left_convergent_lines(X1,X2)
| left_convergent_lines(X1,reverse_line(X2))
| ~ unequally_directed_lines(X1,X2)
| ~ unequally_directed_lines(X1,reverse_line(X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-qhkwltgi/input.p',i_0_46) ).
cnf(i_0_34,plain,
~ left_convergent_lines(X1,X2),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-qhkwltgi/input.p',i_0_34) ).
cnf(i_0_23,plain,
( unequally_directed_lines(X1,reverse_line(X2))
| ~ convergent_lines(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-qhkwltgi/input.p',i_0_23) ).
cnf(i_0_18,negated_conjecture,
convergent_lines(esk2_0,esk3_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-qhkwltgi/input.p',i_0_18) ).
cnf(i_0_24,plain,
( unequally_directed_lines(X1,X2)
| ~ convergent_lines(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-qhkwltgi/input.p',i_0_24) ).
cnf(c_0_52,plain,
( left_convergent_lines(X1,X2)
| left_convergent_lines(X1,reverse_line(X2))
| ~ unequally_directed_lines(X1,X2)
| ~ unequally_directed_lines(X1,reverse_line(X2)) ),
i_0_46 ).
cnf(c_0_53,plain,
~ left_convergent_lines(X1,X2),
i_0_34 ).
cnf(c_0_54,plain,
( unequally_directed_lines(X1,reverse_line(X2))
| ~ convergent_lines(X1,X2) ),
i_0_23 ).
cnf(c_0_55,negated_conjecture,
convergent_lines(esk2_0,esk3_0),
i_0_18 ).
cnf(c_0_56,plain,
( unequally_directed_lines(X1,X2)
| ~ convergent_lines(X1,X2) ),
i_0_24 ).
cnf(c_0_57,plain,
( ~ unequally_directed_lines(X1,reverse_line(X2))
| ~ unequally_directed_lines(X1,X2) ),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_52,c_0_53]),c_0_53]) ).
cnf(c_0_58,negated_conjecture,
unequally_directed_lines(esk2_0,reverse_line(esk3_0)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_54,c_0_55]) ).
cnf(c_0_59,negated_conjecture,
unequally_directed_lines(esk2_0,esk3_0),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_56,c_0_55]) ).
cnf(c_0_60,plain,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_57,c_0_58]),c_0_59])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.12 % Problem : GEO263+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v6.4.0.
% 0.12/0.12 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 06:00:09 EDT 2022
% 0.18/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.44 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.19/0.45 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.45 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.19/0.45 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.19/0.45 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 7.12/2.38 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y:
% 7.12/2.38 # Version: 2.1pre011
% 7.12/2.38 # Preprocessing time : 0.015 s
% 7.12/2.38
% 7.12/2.38 # Proof found!
% 7.12/2.38 # SZS status Theorem
% 7.12/2.38 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.12/2.38 # Proof object total steps : 14
% 7.12/2.38 # Proof object clause steps : 9
% 7.12/2.38 # Proof object formula steps : 5
% 7.12/2.38 # Proof object conjectures : 4
% 7.12/2.38 # Proof object clause conjectures : 3
% 7.12/2.38 # Proof object formula conjectures : 1
% 7.12/2.38 # Proof object initial clauses used : 5
% 7.12/2.38 # Proof object initial formulas used : 5
% 7.12/2.38 # Proof object generating inferences : 3
% 7.12/2.38 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 4
% 7.12/2.38 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.12/2.38 # Parsed axioms : 63
% 7.12/2.38 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 7.12/2.38 # Initial clauses : 63
% 7.12/2.38 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 7.12/2.38 # Initial clauses in saturation : 63
% 7.12/2.38 # Processed clauses : 72
% 7.12/2.38 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 7.12/2.38 # ...subsumed : 21
% 7.12/2.38 # ...remaining for further processing : 51
% 7.12/2.38 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 7.12/2.38 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 7.12/2.38 # Backward-subsumed : 4
% 7.12/2.38 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 7.12/2.38 # Generated clauses : 36
% 7.12/2.38 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 22
% 7.12/2.38 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 4
% 7.12/2.38 # Paramodulations : 36
% 7.12/2.38 # Factorizations : 0
% 7.12/2.38 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 7.12/2.38 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 7.12/2.38 # Propositional unsat check successes : 0
% 7.12/2.38 # Current number of processed clauses : 47
% 7.12/2.38 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 8
% 7.12/2.38 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 7.12/2.38 # Negative unit clauses : 12
% 7.12/2.38 # Non-unit-clauses : 27
% 7.12/2.38 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 12
% 7.12/2.38 # ...number of literals in the above : 31
% 7.12/2.38 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 7.12/2.38 # Current number of archived clauses : 4
% 7.12/2.38 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 126
% 7.12/2.38 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 98
% 7.12/2.38 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 11
% 7.12/2.38 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 72
% 7.12/2.38 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 7.12/2.38 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 7.12/2.38 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 7.12/2.38 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 7.12/2.38 # Condensation successes : 0
% 7.12/2.38 # Termbank termtop insertions : 1649
% 7.12/2.38
% 7.12/2.38 # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.12/2.38 # User time : 0.013 s
% 7.12/2.38 # System time : 0.003 s
% 7.12/2.38 # Total time : 0.016 s
% 7.12/2.38 # ...preprocessing : 0.015 s
% 7.12/2.38 # ...main loop : 0.001 s
% 7.12/2.38 # Maximum resident set size: 7136 pages
% 7.12/2.38
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------