TSTP Solution File: GEO262+1 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : GEO262+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v6.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 03:44:59 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 7.88s 2.46s
% Output : CNFRefutation 7.88s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 14 ( 7 unt; 2 nHn; 14 RR)
% Number of literals : 25 ( 0 equ; 12 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 2 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 18 ( 4 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_48,plain,
( left_convergent_lines(X1,X2)
| left_convergent_lines(X1,reverse_line(X2))
| ~ unequally_directed_lines(X1,X2)
| ~ unequally_directed_lines(X1,reverse_line(X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-tfmgbt1s/input.p',i_0_48) ).
cnf(i_0_36,plain,
~ left_convergent_lines(X1,X2),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-tfmgbt1s/input.p',i_0_36) ).
cnf(i_0_25,plain,
( unequally_directed_lines(X1,reverse_line(X2))
| ~ convergent_lines(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-tfmgbt1s/input.p',i_0_25) ).
cnf(i_0_19,negated_conjecture,
convergent_lines(esk2_0,esk3_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-tfmgbt1s/input.p',i_0_19) ).
cnf(i_0_26,plain,
( unequally_directed_lines(X1,X2)
| ~ convergent_lines(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-tfmgbt1s/input.p',i_0_26) ).
cnf(c_0_54,plain,
( left_convergent_lines(X1,X2)
| left_convergent_lines(X1,reverse_line(X2))
| ~ unequally_directed_lines(X1,X2)
| ~ unequally_directed_lines(X1,reverse_line(X2)) ),
i_0_48 ).
cnf(c_0_55,plain,
~ left_convergent_lines(X1,X2),
i_0_36 ).
cnf(c_0_56,plain,
( unequally_directed_lines(X1,reverse_line(X2))
| ~ convergent_lines(X1,X2) ),
i_0_25 ).
cnf(c_0_57,negated_conjecture,
convergent_lines(esk2_0,esk3_0),
i_0_19 ).
cnf(c_0_58,plain,
( unequally_directed_lines(X1,X2)
| ~ convergent_lines(X1,X2) ),
i_0_26 ).
cnf(c_0_59,plain,
( ~ unequally_directed_lines(X1,reverse_line(X2))
| ~ unequally_directed_lines(X1,X2) ),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_54,c_0_55]),c_0_55]) ).
cnf(c_0_60,negated_conjecture,
unequally_directed_lines(esk2_0,reverse_line(esk3_0)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_56,c_0_57]) ).
cnf(c_0_61,negated_conjecture,
unequally_directed_lines(esk2_0,esk3_0),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_58,c_0_57]) ).
cnf(c_0_62,plain,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_59,c_0_60]),c_0_61])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12 % Problem : GEO262+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v6.4.0.
% 0.06/0.13 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 12:40:50 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.46 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.20/0.47 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.47 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.20/0.47 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.20/0.47 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 7.88/2.46 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_S0Y:
% 7.88/2.46 # Version: 2.1pre011
% 7.88/2.46 # Preprocessing time : 0.015 s
% 7.88/2.46
% 7.88/2.46 # Proof found!
% 7.88/2.46 # SZS status Theorem
% 7.88/2.46 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.88/2.46 # Proof object total steps : 14
% 7.88/2.46 # Proof object clause steps : 9
% 7.88/2.46 # Proof object formula steps : 5
% 7.88/2.46 # Proof object conjectures : 4
% 7.88/2.46 # Proof object clause conjectures : 3
% 7.88/2.46 # Proof object formula conjectures : 1
% 7.88/2.46 # Proof object initial clauses used : 5
% 7.88/2.46 # Proof object initial formulas used : 5
% 7.88/2.46 # Proof object generating inferences : 3
% 7.88/2.46 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 4
% 7.88/2.46 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.88/2.46 # Parsed axioms : 65
% 7.88/2.46 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 7.88/2.46 # Initial clauses : 65
% 7.88/2.46 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 7.88/2.46 # Initial clauses in saturation : 65
% 7.88/2.46 # Processed clauses : 72
% 7.88/2.46 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 7.88/2.46 # ...subsumed : 21
% 7.88/2.46 # ...remaining for further processing : 51
% 7.88/2.46 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 7.88/2.46 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 7.88/2.46 # Backward-subsumed : 4
% 7.88/2.46 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 7.88/2.46 # Generated clauses : 34
% 7.88/2.46 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 22
% 7.88/2.46 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 6
% 7.88/2.46 # Paramodulations : 34
% 7.88/2.46 # Factorizations : 0
% 7.88/2.46 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 7.88/2.46 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 7.88/2.46 # Propositional unsat check successes : 0
% 7.88/2.46 # Current number of processed clauses : 47
% 7.88/2.46 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 8
% 7.88/2.46 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 7.88/2.46 # Negative unit clauses : 14
% 7.88/2.46 # Non-unit-clauses : 25
% 7.88/2.46 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 14
% 7.88/2.46 # ...number of literals in the above : 35
% 7.88/2.46 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 7.88/2.46 # Current number of archived clauses : 4
% 7.88/2.46 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 104
% 7.88/2.46 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 78
% 7.88/2.46 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 14
% 7.88/2.46 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 96
% 7.88/2.46 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 7.88/2.46 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 7.88/2.46 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 7.88/2.46 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 7.88/2.46 # Condensation successes : 0
% 7.88/2.46 # Termbank termtop insertions : 1626
% 7.88/2.46
% 7.88/2.46 # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.88/2.46 # User time : 0.012 s
% 7.88/2.46 # System time : 0.004 s
% 7.88/2.46 # Total time : 0.016 s
% 7.88/2.46 # ...preprocessing : 0.015 s
% 7.88/2.46 # ...main loop : 0.001 s
% 7.88/2.46 # Maximum resident set size: 7128 pages
% 7.88/2.46
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------