TSTP Solution File: GEO261+3 by SPASS---3.9

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : GEO261+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 06:24:02 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.20s 0.48s
% Output   : Refutation 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   23 (  11 unt;   5 nHn;  23 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   38 (   0 equ;  17 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   5 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   5 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    0 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(1,axiom,
    convergent_lines(skc9,skc5),
    file('GEO261+3.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(3,axiom,
    equally_directed_lines(u,u),
    file('GEO261+3.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(7,axiom,
    ~ left_convergent_lines(u,v),
    file('GEO261+3.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(18,axiom,
    ( ~ convergent_lines(u,v)
    | unequally_directed_lines(u,v) ),
    file('GEO261+3.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(19,axiom,
    ( ~ convergent_lines(u,v)
    | unequally_directed_opposite_lines(u,v) ),
    file('GEO261+3.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(21,axiom,
    ( unequally_directed_lines(u,v)
    | unequally_directed_lines(u,reverse_line(v)) ),
    file('GEO261+3.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(22,axiom,
    ( ~ unequally_directed_opposite_lines(u,v)
    | unequally_directed_lines(u,reverse_line(v)) ),
    file('GEO261+3.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(28,axiom,
    ( ~ unequally_directed_lines(u,v)
    | ~ equally_directed_lines(u,v) ),
    file('GEO261+3.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(38,axiom,
    ( ~ unequally_directed_lines(u,v)
    | unequally_directed_lines(v,w)
    | unequally_directed_lines(u,w) ),
    file('GEO261+3.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(64,axiom,
    ( ~ unequally_directed_lines(u,v)
    | ~ unequally_directed_lines(u,reverse_line(v))
    | left_convergent_lines(u,v)
    | left_convergent_lines(u,reverse_line(v)) ),
    file('GEO261+3.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(73,plain,
    ( ~ unequally_directed_lines(u,v)
    | ~ unequally_directed_lines(u,reverse_line(v)) ),
    inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[64,7]),
    [iquote('0:MRR:64.2,64.3,7.0,7.0')] ).

cnf(77,plain,
    unequally_directed_lines(skc9,skc5),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[1,18]),
    [iquote('0:Res:1.0,18.0')] ).

cnf(78,plain,
    unequally_directed_opposite_lines(skc9,skc5),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[1,19]),
    [iquote('0:Res:1.0,19.0')] ).

cnf(98,plain,
    ~ unequally_directed_lines(u,u),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[3,28]),
    [iquote('0:Res:3.0,28.1')] ).

cnf(104,plain,
    unequally_directed_lines(reverse_line(u),u),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[21,98]),
    [iquote('0:Res:21.1,98.0')] ).

cnf(170,plain,
    ( unequally_directed_lines(skc5,u)
    | unequally_directed_lines(skc9,u) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[77,38]),
    [iquote('0:Res:77.0,38.0')] ).

cnf(175,plain,
    ( unequally_directed_lines(u,v)
    | unequally_directed_lines(reverse_line(u),v) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[104,38]),
    [iquote('0:Res:104.0,38.0')] ).

cnf(179,plain,
    ( ~ unequally_directed_lines(skc5,u)
    | unequally_directed_lines(skc9,reverse_line(u)) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[170,73]),
    [iquote('0:Res:170.0,73.1')] ).

cnf(199,plain,
    unequally_directed_lines(u,reverse_line(u)),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[175,98]),
    [iquote('0:Res:175.1,98.0')] ).

cnf(212,plain,
    ( ~ unequally_directed_lines(skc5,u)
    | ~ unequally_directed_lines(skc9,u) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[179,73]),
    [iquote('0:Res:179.1,73.1')] ).

cnf(232,plain,
    ~ unequally_directed_lines(skc9,reverse_line(skc5)),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[199,212]),
    [iquote('0:Res:199.0,212.0')] ).

cnf(239,plain,
    ~ unequally_directed_opposite_lines(skc9,skc5),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[22,232]),
    [iquote('0:Res:22.1,232.0')] ).

cnf(241,plain,
    $false,
    inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[239,78]),
    [iquote('0:MRR:239.0,78.0')] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.13  % Problem  : GEO261+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.03/0.14  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 18:25:14 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.48  
% 0.20/0.48  SPASS V 3.9 
% 0.20/0.48  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.20/0.48  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.20/0.48  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 0.20/0.48  SPASS derived 161 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 2 splits and kept 170 clauses.
% 0.20/0.48  SPASS allocated 97800 KBytes.
% 0.20/0.48  SPASS spent	0:00:00.10 on the problem.
% 0.20/0.48  		0:00:00.04 for the input.
% 0.20/0.48  		0:00:00.03 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.20/0.48  		0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.20/0.48  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.20/0.48  		0:00:00.01 for the reduction.
% 0.20/0.48  
% 0.20/0.48  
% 0.20/0.48  Here is a proof with depth 6, length 23 :
% 0.20/0.48  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.48  Formulae used in the proof : con ax5_basics ax11_basics a7_defns ax8_basics a1_defns a4_defns ax6_basics ax9_basics
% 0.20/0.48  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------