TSTP Solution File: GEO260+1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : GEO260+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v8.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 06:19:44 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.19s 0.61s
% Output : Refutation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.11 % Problem : GEO260+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v8.1.0.
% 0.11/0.12 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 05:56:17 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.35 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.12/0.35 The process was started by sandbox on n024.cluster.edu,
% 0.12/0.35 Sat Jun 18 05:56:17 2022
% 0.12/0.35 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 6430.
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.12/0.35 set(auto).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.12/0.35 clear(print_given).
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 formula_list(usable).
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=10.
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 This is a non-Horn set without equality. The strategy
% 0.12/0.35 will be ordered hyper_res, ur_res, unit deletion, and
% 0.12/0.35 factoring, with satellites in sos and nuclei in usable.
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 ------------> process usable:
% 0.12/0.35 Following clause subsumed by 31 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -unequally_directed_lines(A,B)| -unequally_directed_lines(A,reverse_line(B))|unequally_directed_lines(A,C)|unequally_directed_lines(B,C).
% 0.12/0.35 Following clause subsumed by 31 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -unequally_directed_lines(A,B)| -unequally_directed_lines(A,reverse_line(B))|unequally_directed_lines(A,reverse_line(C))|unequally_directed_lines(B,reverse_line(C)).
% 0.12/0.35 Following clause subsumed by 36 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -left_apart_point(A,reverse_line(B)).
% 0.12/0.35 Following clause subsumed by 37 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -left_convergent_lines(A,reverse_line(B)).
% 0.12/0.35 Following clause subsumed by 36 during input processing: 0 [unit_del,36,37] {-} -distinct_points(A,B)| -left_apart_point(A,C).
% 0.12/0.35 Following clause subsumed by 36 during input processing: 0 [unit_del,36] {-} -left_apart_point(A,B)|distinct_points(A,C).
% 0.12/0.35 Following clause subsumed by 36 during input processing: 0 [unit_del,36] {-} -left_apart_point(A,B)| -unequally_directed_lines(B,C)|distinct_lines(B,C).
% 0.12/0.35 Following clause subsumed by 37 during input processing: 0 [unit_del,37] {-} -left_convergent_lines(A,B)|unequally_directed_lines(B,C).
% 0.12/0.35 36 back subsumes 17.
% 0.12/0.35 36 back subsumes 16.
% 0.12/0.35 36 back subsumes 15.
% 0.12/0.35 36 back subsumes 14.
% 0.12/0.35 36 back subsumes 12.
% 0.12/0.35 36 back subsumes 11.
% 0.12/0.35 36 back subsumes 3.
% 0.12/0.35 36 back subsumes 2.
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 ------------> process sos:
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.19/0.40
% 0.19/0.40 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.19/0.40
% 0.19/0.40 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.19/0.40
% 0.19/0.40
% 0.19/0.40 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.19/0.40
% 0.19/0.40 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.19/0.40 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.19/0.40 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.19/0.40 number of clauses in intial UL: 49
% 0.19/0.40 number of clauses initially in problem: 55
% 0.19/0.40 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 89
% 0.19/0.40 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 80
% 0.19/0.40 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.19/0.40 absolute distinct symbol count: 20
% 0.19/0.40 distinct predicate count: 12
% 0.19/0.40 distinct function count: 4
% 0.19/0.40 distinct constant count: 4
% 0.19/0.40
% 0.19/0.40 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.19/0.40
% 0.19/0.40
% 0.19/0.40
% 0.19/0.40 =========== start of search ===========
% 0.19/0.61
% 0.19/0.61 -------- PROOF --------
% 0.19/0.61 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.19/0.61 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.19/0.61
% 0.19/0.61 Model 2 [ 1 2 2717 ] (0.00 seconds, 5066 Inserts)
% 0.19/0.61
% 0.19/0.61 Model 3 [ 1 2 5672 ] (0.00 seconds, 6082 Inserts)
% 0.19/0.61
% 0.19/0.61 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.19/0.61
% 0.19/0.61 Model 4 [ 1 1 3511 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.19/0.61
% 0.19/0.61 ----> UNIT CONFLICT at 0.24 sec ----> 235 [binary,234.1,48.1] {-} $F.
% 0.19/0.61
% 0.19/0.61 Length of proof is 11. Level of proof is 9.
% 0.19/0.61
% 0.19/0.61 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 0.19/0.61 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.19/0.61 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.19/0.61
% 0.19/0.61 30 [] {+} -unequally_directed_lines(A,A).
% 0.19/0.61 31 [] {+} -unequally_directed_lines(A,B)|unequally_directed_lines(A,C)|unequally_directed_lines(B,C).
% 0.19/0.61 34 [] {+} -line(A)| -line(B)|unequally_directed_lines(A,B)|unequally_directed_lines(A,reverse_line(B)).
% 0.19/0.61 35 [] {+} -unequally_directed_lines(A,B)| -unequally_directed_lines(A,reverse_line(B))|left_convergent_lines(A,B)|left_convergent_lines(A,reverse_line(B)).
% 0.19/0.61 37 [] {+} -left_convergent_lines(A,B).
% 0.19/0.61 48 [] {+} -unequally_directed_lines(line_connecting(A,B),reverse_line(line_connecting(B,A))).
% 0.19/0.61 58 [factor,34.1.2,unit_del,30] {+} -line(A)|unequally_directed_lines(A,reverse_line(A)).
% 0.19/0.61 59 [] {-} line($c4).
% 0.19/0.61 65 [hyper,59,58] {-} unequally_directed_lines($c4,reverse_line($c4)).
% 0.19/0.61 80 [hyper,65,31] {-} unequally_directed_lines($c4,A)|unequally_directed_lines(reverse_line($c4),A).
% 0.19/0.61 106 [hyper,80,35,80,unit_del,37,37] {-} unequally_directed_lines($c4,reverse_line(A))|unequally_directed_lines($c4,A).
% 0.19/0.61 131 [hyper,106,31] {-} unequally_directed_lines($c4,A)|unequally_directed_lines($c4,B)|unequally_directed_lines(reverse_line(A),B).
% 0.19/0.61 136 [hyper,106,31] {-} unequally_directed_lines($c4,reverse_line(A))|unequally_directed_lines($c4,B)|unequally_directed_lines(A,B).
% 0.19/0.61 137 [factor,131.1.2] {-} unequally_directed_lines($c4,A)|unequally_directed_lines(reverse_line(A),A).
% 0.19/0.61 138 [factor,136.1.2] {-} unequally_directed_lines($c4,reverse_line(A))|unequally_directed_lines(A,reverse_line(A)).
% 0.19/0.61 198 [hyper,138,35,137,unit_del,37,37] {-} unequally_directed_lines(A,reverse_line(A))|unequally_directed_lines(reverse_line(A),A).
% 0.19/0.61 232 [hyper,198,31] {-} unequally_directed_lines(A,reverse_line(A))|unequally_directed_lines(reverse_line(A),B)|unequally_directed_lines(A,B).
% 0.19/0.61 234 [factor,232.1.3,unit_del,30] {-} unequally_directed_lines(A,reverse_line(A)).
% 0.19/0.61 235 [binary,234.1,48.1] {-} $F.
% 0.19/0.61
% 0.19/0.61 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.19/0.61 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 0.19/0.61
% 0.19/0.61
% 0.19/0.61 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.19/0.61
% 0.19/0.61
% 0.19/0.61 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.19/0.61
% 0.19/0.61 ============ end of search ============
% 0.19/0.61
% 0.19/0.61 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 0.19/0.61
% 0.19/0.61 true clauses given 12 (31.6%)
% 0.19/0.61 false clauses given 26
% 0.19/0.61
% 0.19/0.61 FALSE TRUE
% 0.19/0.61 6 0 2
% 0.19/0.61 8 4 10
% 0.19/0.61 9 12 9
% 0.19/0.61 10 16 0
% 0.19/0.61 11 6 9
% 0.19/0.61 12 4 12
% 0.19/0.61 13 1 0
% 0.19/0.61 14 2 6
% 0.19/0.61 15 1 0
% 0.19/0.61 16 2 0
% 0.19/0.61 17 2 0
% 0.19/0.61 19 3 0
% 0.19/0.61 21 3 0
% 0.19/0.61 23 3 0
% 0.19/0.61 25 2 0
% 0.19/0.61 27 1 0
% 0.19/0.61 tot: 62 48 (43.6% true)
% 0.19/0.61
% 0.19/0.61
% 0.19/0.61 Model 4 [ 1 -16 3511 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.19/0.61
% 0.19/0.61 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 0.19/0.61
% 0.19/0.61 Process 6430 finished Sat Jun 18 05:56:18 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------