TSTP Solution File: GEO258+1 by SuperZenon---0.0.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SuperZenon---0.0.1
% Problem  : GEO258+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v6.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_super_zenon -p0 -itptp -om -max-time %d %s

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 06:31:39 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.12s 0.40s
% Output   : Proof 0.12s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.12  % Problem  : GEO258+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v6.4.0.
% 0.10/0.12  % Command  : run_super_zenon -p0 -itptp -om -max-time %d %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 06:59:54 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.40  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.12/0.40  (* PROOF-FOUND *)
% 0.12/0.40  (* BEGIN-PROOF *)
% 0.12/0.40  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.12/0.40  1. (before_on_line T_0 T_1 T_2) (-. (before_on_line T_0 T_1 T_2))   ### Axiom
% 0.12/0.40  2. (before_on_line T_0 T_2 T_3) (-. (before_on_line T_0 T_2 T_3))   ### Axiom
% 0.12/0.40  3. (before_on_line T_0 T_1 T_2) (-. (before_on_line T_0 T_1 T_2))   ### Axiom
% 0.12/0.40  4. (before_on_line T_0 T_2 T_3) (-. (before_on_line T_0 T_2 T_3))   ### Axiom
% 0.12/0.40  5. (-. (between_on_line T_0 T_3 T_2 T_1)) (before_on_line T_0 T_2 T_3) (before_on_line T_0 T_1 T_2)   ### Extension/test/not_bet_def 1 2 3 4
% 0.12/0.40  6. (before_on_line T_0 T_3 T_2) (-. (before_on_line T_0 T_3 T_2))   ### Axiom
% 0.12/0.40  7. (before_on_line T_0 T_3 T_2) (-. (before_on_line T_0 T_3 T_2))   ### Axiom
% 0.12/0.40  8. (before_on_line T_0 T_2 T_1) (-. (before_on_line T_0 T_2 T_1))   ### Axiom
% 0.12/0.40  9. (before_on_line T_0 T_2 T_1) (-. (before_on_line T_0 T_2 T_1))   ### Axiom
% 0.12/0.40  10. (-. (between_on_line T_0 T_3 T_2 T_1)) (before_on_line T_0 T_2 T_1) (before_on_line T_0 T_3 T_2)   ### Extension/test/not_bet_def 6 7 8 9
% 0.12/0.40  11. (between_on_line T_0 T_1 T_2 T_3) (-. (between_on_line T_0 T_3 T_2 T_1))   ### Extension/test/bet_def 5 10
% 0.12/0.40  12. (-. ((between_on_line T_0 T_1 T_2 T_3) => (between_on_line T_0 T_3 T_2 T_1)))   ### NotImply 11
% 0.12/0.40  13. (-. (All C, ((between_on_line T_0 T_1 T_2 C) => (between_on_line T_0 C T_2 T_1))))   ### NotAllEx 12
% 0.12/0.40  14. (-. (All B, (All C, ((between_on_line T_0 T_1 B C) => (between_on_line T_0 C B T_1)))))   ### NotAllEx 13
% 0.12/0.40  15. (-. (All A, (All B, (All C, ((between_on_line T_0 A B C) => (between_on_line T_0 C B A))))))   ### NotAllEx 14
% 0.12/0.40  16. (-. (All L, (All A, (All B, (All C, ((between_on_line L A B C) => (between_on_line L C B A)))))))   ### NotAllEx 15
% 0.12/0.40  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.12/0.40  (* END-PROOF *)
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------