TSTP Solution File: GEO258+1 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : GEO258+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v6.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 04:05:09 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.23s 1.41s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.23s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 22 ( 5 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 64 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 18 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 66 ( 24 ~; 31 |; 8 &)
% ( 1 <=>; 2 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 17 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-4 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 4 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 44 ( 6 sgn 20 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(con,conjecture,
! [X2,X1,X4,X5] :
( between_on_line(X2,X1,X4,X5)
=> between_on_line(X2,X5,X4,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',con) ).
fof(bet_def,axiom,
! [X2,X1,X4,X5] :
( between_on_line(X2,X1,X4,X5)
<=> ( ( before_on_line(X2,X1,X4)
& before_on_line(X2,X4,X5) )
| ( before_on_line(X2,X5,X4)
& before_on_line(X2,X4,X1) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO007+0.ax',bet_def) ).
fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X2,X1,X4,X5] :
( between_on_line(X2,X1,X4,X5)
=> between_on_line(X2,X5,X4,X1) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[con]) ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
( between_on_line(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0,esk4_0)
& ~ between_on_line(esk1_0,esk4_0,esk3_0,esk2_0) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])])]) ).
fof(c_0_4,plain,
! [X6,X7,X8,X9,X6,X7,X8,X9] :
( ( before_on_line(X6,X9,X8)
| before_on_line(X6,X7,X8)
| ~ between_on_line(X6,X7,X8,X9) )
& ( before_on_line(X6,X8,X7)
| before_on_line(X6,X7,X8)
| ~ between_on_line(X6,X7,X8,X9) )
& ( before_on_line(X6,X9,X8)
| before_on_line(X6,X8,X9)
| ~ between_on_line(X6,X7,X8,X9) )
& ( before_on_line(X6,X8,X7)
| before_on_line(X6,X8,X9)
| ~ between_on_line(X6,X7,X8,X9) )
& ( ~ before_on_line(X6,X7,X8)
| ~ before_on_line(X6,X8,X9)
| between_on_line(X6,X7,X8,X9) )
& ( ~ before_on_line(X6,X9,X8)
| ~ before_on_line(X6,X8,X7)
| between_on_line(X6,X7,X8,X9) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[bet_def])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
~ between_on_line(esk1_0,esk4_0,esk3_0,esk2_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
( between_on_line(X1,X2,X3,X4)
| ~ before_on_line(X1,X3,X4)
| ~ before_on_line(X1,X2,X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
( before_on_line(X1,X2,X3)
| before_on_line(X1,X4,X3)
| ~ between_on_line(X1,X2,X3,X4) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
between_on_line(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0,esk4_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
( ~ before_on_line(esk1_0,esk3_0,esk2_0)
| ~ before_on_line(esk1_0,esk4_0,esk3_0) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
( before_on_line(esk1_0,esk4_0,esk3_0)
| before_on_line(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( before_on_line(X1,X3,X4)
| before_on_line(X1,X4,X3)
| ~ between_on_line(X1,X2,X3,X4) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( before_on_line(X1,X3,X4)
| before_on_line(X1,X3,X2)
| ~ between_on_line(X1,X2,X3,X4) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( between_on_line(X1,X2,X3,X4)
| ~ before_on_line(X1,X3,X2)
| ~ before_on_line(X1,X4,X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( before_on_line(X1,X2,X3)
| before_on_line(X1,X3,X2)
| ~ between_on_line(X1,X2,X3,X4) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
( before_on_line(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0)
| ~ before_on_line(esk1_0,esk3_0,esk2_0) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
( before_on_line(esk1_0,esk4_0,esk3_0)
| before_on_line(esk1_0,esk3_0,esk4_0) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
( before_on_line(esk1_0,esk3_0,esk4_0)
| before_on_line(esk1_0,esk3_0,esk2_0) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
( ~ before_on_line(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0)
| ~ before_on_line(esk1_0,esk3_0,esk4_0) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
before_on_line(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_8]),c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
before_on_line(esk1_0,esk3_0,esk4_0),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_16]),c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19])]),c_0_20])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.12 % Problem : GEO258+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v6.4.0.
% 0.04/0.13 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 06:57:17 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.23/1.41 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.23/1.41 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.23/1.41 # Preprocessing time : 0.017 s
% 0.23/1.41
% 0.23/1.41 # Proof found!
% 0.23/1.41 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.23/1.41 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.23/1.41 # Proof object total steps : 22
% 0.23/1.41 # Proof object clause steps : 17
% 0.23/1.41 # Proof object formula steps : 5
% 0.23/1.41 # Proof object conjectures : 14
% 0.23/1.41 # Proof object clause conjectures : 11
% 0.23/1.41 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.23/1.41 # Proof object initial clauses used : 8
% 0.23/1.41 # Proof object initial formulas used : 2
% 0.23/1.41 # Proof object generating inferences : 8
% 0.23/1.41 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 6
% 0.23/1.41 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.23/1.41 # Parsed axioms : 32
% 0.23/1.41 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 14
% 0.23/1.41 # Initial clauses : 38
% 0.23/1.41 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Initial clauses in saturation : 38
% 0.23/1.41 # Processed clauses : 51
% 0.23/1.41 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # ...subsumed : 15
% 0.23/1.41 # ...remaining for further processing : 35
% 0.23/1.41 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Backward-subsumed : 4
% 0.23/1.41 # Backward-rewritten : 5
% 0.23/1.41 # Generated clauses : 30
% 0.23/1.41 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 23
% 0.23/1.41 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 4
% 0.23/1.41 # Paramodulations : 30
% 0.23/1.41 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Current number of processed clauses : 26
% 0.23/1.41 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 5
% 0.23/1.41 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Negative unit clauses : 8
% 0.23/1.41 # Non-unit-clauses : 13
% 0.23/1.41 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 4
% 0.23/1.41 # ...number of literals in the above : 8
% 0.23/1.42 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Current number of archived clauses : 9
% 0.23/1.42 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 38
% 0.23/1.42 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 38
% 0.23/1.42 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 8
% 0.23/1.42 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 16
% 0.23/1.42 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # BW rewrite match attempts : 4
% 0.23/1.42 # BW rewrite match successes : 3
% 0.23/1.42 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Termbank termtop insertions : 2485
% 0.23/1.42
% 0.23/1.42 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.23/1.42 # User time : 0.018 s
% 0.23/1.42 # System time : 0.001 s
% 0.23/1.42 # Total time : 0.019 s
% 0.23/1.42 # Maximum resident set size: 3020 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------