TSTP Solution File: GEO257+3 by SRASS---0.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SRASS---0.1
% Problem : GEO257+3 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp
% Command : SRASS -q2 -a 0 10 10 10 -i3 -n60 %s
% Computer : art03.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Dec 29 05:24:28 EST 2010
% Result : Theorem 0.92s
% Output : Solution 0.92s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ERROR: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Reading problem from /tmp/SystemOnTPTP1372/GEO257+3.tptp
% Adding relevance values
% Extracting the conjecture
% Sorting axioms by relevance
% Looking for THM ...
% found
% SZS status THM for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP1372/GEO257+3.tptp
% SZS output start Solution for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP1372/GEO257+3.tptp
% TreeLimitedRun: ----------------------------------------------------------
% TreeLimitedRun: /home/graph/tptp/Systems/EP---1.2/eproof --print-statistics -xAuto -tAuto --cpu-limit=60 --proof-time-unlimited --memory-limit=Auto --tstp-in --tstp-out /tmp/SRASS.s.p
% TreeLimitedRun: CPU time limit is 60s
% TreeLimitedRun: WC time limit is 120s
% TreeLimitedRun: PID is 1468
% TreeLimitedRun: ----------------------------------------------------------
% PrfWatch: 0.00 CPU 0.02 WC
% # Preprocessing time : 0.017 s
% # Problem is unsatisfiable (or provable), constructing proof object
% # SZS status Theorem
% # SZS output start CNFRefutation.
% fof(5, axiom,![X1]:![X4]:~((left_apart_point(X1,X4)|left_apart_point(X1,reverse_line(X4)))),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', ax10_basics)).
% fof(37, conjecture,![X4]:![X1]:![X2]:![X3]:![X9]:((((distinct_points(X1,X3)&distinct_points(X2,X3))&incident_point_and_line(X3,X4))&left_apart_point(X9,X4))=>((before_on_line(X4,X1,X2)&before_on_line(X4,X2,X3))=>before_on_line(X4,X1,X3))),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', con)).
% fof(38, negated_conjecture,~(![X4]:![X1]:![X2]:![X3]:![X9]:((((distinct_points(X1,X3)&distinct_points(X2,X3))&incident_point_and_line(X3,X4))&left_apart_point(X9,X4))=>((before_on_line(X4,X1,X2)&before_on_line(X4,X2,X3))=>before_on_line(X4,X1,X3)))),inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[37])).
% fof(63, plain,![X1]:![X4]:(~(left_apart_point(X1,X4))&~(left_apart_point(X1,reverse_line(X4)))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[5])).
% fof(64, plain,![X5]:![X6]:(~(left_apart_point(X5,X6))&~(left_apart_point(X5,reverse_line(X6)))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[63])).
% cnf(66,plain,(~left_apart_point(X1,X2)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[64])).
% fof(186, negated_conjecture,?[X4]:?[X1]:?[X2]:?[X3]:?[X9]:((((distinct_points(X1,X3)&distinct_points(X2,X3))&incident_point_and_line(X3,X4))&left_apart_point(X9,X4))&((before_on_line(X4,X1,X2)&before_on_line(X4,X2,X3))&~(before_on_line(X4,X1,X3)))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[38])).
% fof(187, negated_conjecture,?[X10]:?[X11]:?[X12]:?[X13]:?[X14]:((((distinct_points(X11,X13)&distinct_points(X12,X13))&incident_point_and_line(X13,X10))&left_apart_point(X14,X10))&((before_on_line(X10,X11,X12)&before_on_line(X10,X12,X13))&~(before_on_line(X10,X11,X13)))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[186])).
% fof(188, negated_conjecture,((((distinct_points(esk2_0,esk4_0)&distinct_points(esk3_0,esk4_0))&incident_point_and_line(esk4_0,esk1_0))&left_apart_point(esk5_0,esk1_0))&((before_on_line(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0)&before_on_line(esk1_0,esk3_0,esk4_0))&~(before_on_line(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk4_0)))),inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[187])).
% cnf(192,negated_conjecture,(left_apart_point(esk5_0,esk1_0)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[188])).
% cnf(196,negated_conjecture,($false),inference(sr,[status(thm)],[192,66,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(197,negated_conjecture,($false),196,['proof']).
% # SZS output end CNFRefutation
% # Processed clauses : 10
% # ...of these trivial : 0
% # ...subsumed : 0
% # ...remaining for further processing: 10
% # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% # Backward-subsumed : 0
% # Backward-rewritten : 0
% # Generated clauses : 1
% # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 0
% # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% # Paramodulations : 0
% # Factorizations : 0
% # Equation resolutions : 0
% # Current number of processed clauses: 9
% # Positive orientable unit clauses: 6
% # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% # Negative unit clauses : 2
% # Non-unit-clauses : 1
% # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 63
% # ...number of literals in the above : 170
% # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% # Indexed BW rewrite attempts : 0
% # Indexed BW rewrite successes : 0
% # Backwards rewriting index: 16 leaves, 1.00+/-0.000 terms/leaf
% # Paramod-from index: 7 leaves, 1.00+/-0.000 terms/leaf
% # Paramod-into index: 14 leaves, 1.00+/-0.000 terms/leaf
% # -------------------------------------------------
% # User time : 0.015 s
% # System time : 0.003 s
% # Total time : 0.018 s
% # Maximum resident set size: 0 pages
% PrfWatch: 0.11 CPU 0.18 WC
% FINAL PrfWatch: 0.11 CPU 0.18 WC
% SZS output end Solution for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP1372/GEO257+3.tptp
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------