TSTP Solution File: GEO257+3 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : GEO257+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 03:44:57 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 7.33s 2.46s
% Output : CNFRefutation 7.33s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 2
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 5 ( 5 unt; 0 nHn; 5 RR)
% Number of literals : 5 ( 0 equ; 2 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 2 ( 2 usr; 2 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 4 ( 4 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_70,negated_conjecture,
left_apart_point(esk5_0,esk1_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-rzr7qdak/input.p',i_0_70) ).
cnf(i_0_30,plain,
~ left_apart_point(X1,X2),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-rzr7qdak/input.p',i_0_30) ).
cnf(c_0_73,negated_conjecture,
left_apart_point(esk5_0,esk1_0),
i_0_70 ).
cnf(c_0_74,plain,
~ left_apart_point(X1,X2),
i_0_30 ).
cnf(c_0_75,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_73,c_0_74]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.14 % Problem : GEO257+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.08/0.14 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.14/0.36 % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.14/0.36 % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 00:51:51 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.22/0.48 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.22/0.49 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/0.49 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.22/0.49 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.22/0.49 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 7.33/2.46 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y:
% 7.33/2.46 # Version: 2.1pre011
% 7.33/2.46 # Preprocessing time : 0.020 s
% 7.33/2.46
% 7.33/2.46 # Proof found!
% 7.33/2.46 # SZS status Theorem
% 7.33/2.46 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.33/2.46 # Proof object total steps : 5
% 7.33/2.46 # Proof object clause steps : 3
% 7.33/2.46 # Proof object formula steps : 2
% 7.33/2.46 # Proof object conjectures : 3
% 7.33/2.46 # Proof object clause conjectures : 2
% 7.33/2.46 # Proof object formula conjectures : 1
% 7.33/2.46 # Proof object initial clauses used : 2
% 7.33/2.46 # Proof object initial formulas used : 2
% 7.33/2.46 # Proof object generating inferences : 0
% 7.33/2.46 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 1
% 7.33/2.46 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.33/2.46 # Parsed axioms : 73
% 7.33/2.46 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 7.33/2.46 # Initial clauses : 73
% 7.33/2.46 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 7.33/2.46 # Initial clauses in saturation : 73
% 7.33/2.46 # Processed clauses : 3
% 7.33/2.46 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 7.33/2.46 # ...subsumed : 0
% 7.33/2.46 # ...remaining for further processing : 2
% 7.33/2.46 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 7.33/2.46 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 7.33/2.46 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 7.33/2.46 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 7.33/2.46 # Generated clauses : 0
% 7.33/2.46 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 0
% 7.33/2.46 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 7.33/2.46 # Paramodulations : 0
% 7.33/2.46 # Factorizations : 0
% 7.33/2.46 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 7.33/2.46 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 7.33/2.46 # Propositional unsat check successes : 0
% 7.33/2.46 # Current number of processed clauses : 2
% 7.33/2.46 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 0
% 7.33/2.46 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 7.33/2.46 # Negative unit clauses : 2
% 7.33/2.46 # Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 7.33/2.46 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 70
% 7.33/2.46 # ...number of literals in the above : 178
% 7.33/2.46 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 7.33/2.46 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 7.33/2.46 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 7.33/2.46 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 7.33/2.46 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 7.33/2.46 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 7.33/2.46 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 7.33/2.46 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 7.33/2.46 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 7.33/2.46 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 7.33/2.46 # Condensation successes : 0
% 7.33/2.46 # Termbank termtop insertions : 1067
% 7.33/2.46
% 7.33/2.46 # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.33/2.46 # User time : 0.016 s
% 7.33/2.46 # System time : 0.004 s
% 7.33/2.46 # Total time : 0.020 s
% 7.33/2.46 # ...preprocessing : 0.020 s
% 7.33/2.46 # ...main loop : 0.000 s
% 7.33/2.46 # Maximum resident set size: 7128 pages
% 7.33/2.46
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------