TSTP Solution File: GEO257+3 by E---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1
% Problem : GEO257+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 17:32:25 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 0.22s 0.54s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.22s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 8 ( 3 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 28 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 7 ( 3 avg)
% Number of connectives : 26 ( 6 ~; 1 |; 15 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 4 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 11 ( 5 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 5 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 16 ( 2 sgn; 14 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(con,conjecture,
! [X4,X3,X6,X7,X9] :
( ( distinct_points(X3,X7)
& distinct_points(X6,X7)
& incident_point_and_line(X7,X4)
& left_apart_point(X9,X4) )
=> ( ( before_on_line(X4,X3,X6)
& before_on_line(X4,X6,X7) )
=> before_on_line(X4,X3,X7) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.zVBHlCMh5L/E---3.1_27565.p',con) ).
fof(ax10_basics,axiom,
! [X3,X4] :
~ ( left_apart_point(X3,X4)
| left_apart_point(X3,reverse_line(X4)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.zVBHlCMh5L/E---3.1_27565.p',ax10_basics) ).
fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X4,X3,X6,X7,X9] :
( ( distinct_points(X3,X7)
& distinct_points(X6,X7)
& incident_point_and_line(X7,X4)
& left_apart_point(X9,X4) )
=> ( ( before_on_line(X4,X3,X6)
& before_on_line(X4,X6,X7) )
=> before_on_line(X4,X3,X7) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[con]) ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
( distinct_points(esk2_0,esk4_0)
& distinct_points(esk3_0,esk4_0)
& incident_point_and_line(esk4_0,esk1_0)
& left_apart_point(esk5_0,esk1_0)
& before_on_line(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0)
& before_on_line(esk1_0,esk3_0,esk4_0)
& ~ before_on_line(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk4_0) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])])]) ).
fof(c_0_4,plain,
! [X18,X19] :
( ~ left_apart_point(X18,X19)
& ~ left_apart_point(X18,reverse_line(X19)) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax10_basics])]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
left_apart_point(esk5_0,esk1_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
~ left_apart_point(X1,X2),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.09/0.14 % Problem : GEO257+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.09/0.16 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.15/0.37 % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.37 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.37 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.37 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.15/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.37 % DateTime : Tue Oct 3 06:24:44 EDT 2023
% 0.15/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.22/0.52 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.22/0.52 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.zVBHlCMh5L/E---3.1_27565.p
% 0.22/0.54 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.22/0.54 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/0.54 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.54 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.54 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.54 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.54 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.54 # new_bool_1 with pid 27646 completed with status 0
% 0.22/0.54 # Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.22/0.54 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/0.54 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.54 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.54 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.54 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.54 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.22/0.54 # Search class: FGHNF-FFMM21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.22/0.54 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.22/0.54 # Starting G-E--_107_C18_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S4S with 131s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.54 # G-E--_107_C18_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S4S with pid 27648 completed with status 0
% 0.22/0.54 # Result found by G-E--_107_C18_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S4S
% 0.22/0.54 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/0.54 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.54 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.54 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.54 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.54 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.22/0.54 # Search class: FGHNF-FFMM21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.22/0.54 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.22/0.54 # Starting G-E--_107_C18_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S4S with 131s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.54 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.22/0.54 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.22/0.54
% 0.22/0.54 # Proof found!
% 0.22/0.54 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.22/0.54 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.22/0.54 # Parsed axioms : 37
% 0.22/0.54 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 18
% 0.22/0.54 # Initial clauses : 38
% 0.22/0.54 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.22/0.54 # Initial clauses in saturation : 38
% 0.22/0.54 # Processed clauses : 8
% 0.22/0.54 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.22/0.54 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.22/0.54 # ...remaining for further processing : 8
% 0.22/0.54 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.22/0.54 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.22/0.54 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.22/0.54 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.22/0.54 # Generated clauses : 1
% 0.22/0.54 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.22/0.54 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.22/0.54 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.22/0.54 # Paramodulations : 0
% 0.22/0.54 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.22/0.54 # NegExts : 0
% 0.22/0.54 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.22/0.54 # Total rewrite steps : 0
% 0.22/0.54 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.22/0.54 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.22/0.54 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.22/0.54 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.22/0.54 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.22/0.54 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.22/0.54 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.54 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.54 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.54 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.54 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.54 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.54 # Current number of processed clauses : 7
% 0.22/0.54 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 6
% 0.22/0.54 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.22/0.54 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.22/0.54 # Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.22/0.54 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 30
% 0.22/0.54 # ...number of literals in the above : 74
% 0.22/0.54 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.22/0.54 # Current number of archived clauses : 1
% 0.22/0.54 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.22/0.54 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.22/0.54 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.22/0.54 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.22/0.54 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.22/0.54 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.22/0.54 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.22/0.54 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.22/0.54 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.22/0.54 # Termbank termtop insertions : 1879
% 0.22/0.54
% 0.22/0.54 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/0.54 # User time : 0.003 s
% 0.22/0.54 # System time : 0.002 s
% 0.22/0.54 # Total time : 0.005 s
% 0.22/0.54 # Maximum resident set size: 1864 pages
% 0.22/0.54
% 0.22/0.54 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/0.54 # User time : 0.005 s
% 0.22/0.54 # System time : 0.004 s
% 0.22/0.54 # Total time : 0.009 s
% 0.22/0.54 # Maximum resident set size: 1724 pages
% 0.22/0.54 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.22/0.54 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------