TSTP Solution File: GEO257+3 by CSE_E---1.5
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE_E---1.5
% Problem : GEO257+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 30 22:47:32 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 0.21s 0.59s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.21s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 29
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 35 ( 3 unt; 27 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 28 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 7 ( 3 avg)
% Number of connectives : 26 ( 6 ~; 1 |; 15 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 4 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 11 ( 5 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 45 ( 22 >; 23 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 19 ( 18 usr; 1 prp; 0-4 aty)
% Number of functors : 9 ( 9 usr; 5 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 16 ( 2 sgn; 14 !; 0 ?; 0 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(decl_22,type,
unequally_directed_opposite_lines: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(decl_23,type,
reverse_line: $i > $i ).
tff(decl_24,type,
unequally_directed_lines: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(decl_25,type,
right_apart_point: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(decl_26,type,
left_apart_point: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(decl_27,type,
right_convergent_lines: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(decl_28,type,
left_convergent_lines: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(decl_29,type,
equally_directed_lines: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(decl_30,type,
equally_directed_opposite_lines: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(decl_31,type,
apart_point_and_line: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(decl_32,type,
convergent_lines: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(decl_33,type,
divides_points: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(decl_34,type,
before_on_line: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(decl_35,type,
distinct_points: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(decl_36,type,
incident_point_and_line: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(decl_37,type,
line_connecting: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_38,type,
between_on_line: ( $i * $i * $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(decl_39,type,
distinct_lines: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(decl_40,type,
point: $i > $o ).
tff(decl_41,type,
line: $i > $o ).
tff(decl_42,type,
intersection_point: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_43,type,
parallel_through_point: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_44,type,
esk1_0: $i ).
tff(decl_45,type,
esk2_0: $i ).
tff(decl_46,type,
esk3_0: $i ).
tff(decl_47,type,
esk4_0: $i ).
tff(decl_48,type,
esk5_0: $i ).
fof(con,conjecture,
! [X4,X3,X6,X7,X9] :
( ( distinct_points(X3,X7)
& distinct_points(X6,X7)
& incident_point_and_line(X7,X4)
& left_apart_point(X9,X4) )
=> ( ( before_on_line(X4,X3,X6)
& before_on_line(X4,X6,X7) )
=> before_on_line(X4,X3,X7) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',con) ).
fof(ax10_basics,axiom,
! [X3,X4] :
~ ( left_apart_point(X3,X4)
| left_apart_point(X3,reverse_line(X4)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO009+0.ax',ax10_basics) ).
fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X4,X3,X6,X7,X9] :
( ( distinct_points(X3,X7)
& distinct_points(X6,X7)
& incident_point_and_line(X7,X4)
& left_apart_point(X9,X4) )
=> ( ( before_on_line(X4,X3,X6)
& before_on_line(X4,X6,X7) )
=> before_on_line(X4,X3,X7) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[con]) ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
( distinct_points(esk2_0,esk4_0)
& distinct_points(esk3_0,esk4_0)
& incident_point_and_line(esk4_0,esk1_0)
& left_apart_point(esk5_0,esk1_0)
& before_on_line(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0)
& before_on_line(esk1_0,esk3_0,esk4_0)
& ~ before_on_line(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk4_0) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])])]) ).
fof(c_0_4,plain,
! [X53,X54] :
( ~ left_apart_point(X53,X54)
& ~ left_apart_point(X53,reverse_line(X54)) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax10_basics])]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
left_apart_point(esk5_0,esk1_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
~ left_apart_point(X1,X2),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13 % Problem : GEO257+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.15/0.35 % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.35 % DateTime : Tue Aug 29 20:46:56 EDT 2023
% 0.21/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.57 start to proof: theBenchmark
% 0.21/0.59 % Version : CSE_E---1.5
% 0.21/0.59 % Problem : theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/0.59 % Proof found
% 0.21/0.59 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/0.59 % SZS output start Proof
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.59 % Total time : 0.006000 s
% 0.21/0.59 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.21/0.59 % Total time : 0.010000 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------